Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 2024 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39137430

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication lacking medical treatment. Lymfactin® is an adenovirus type 5-based gene therapy and prolymphangiogenic growth factor vector that induces vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) expression. Our aim was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of Lymfactin® with vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT). METHODS: This Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Lymfactin® in combination with VLNT. The primary endpoints were edema volume, quality of life (LyQoLI), and lymphoscintigraphy. All adverse events were recorded. A mixed model of repeated measures analysis of covariance was performed. This study was a continuation of a previous Phase I Lymfactin® study. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with BCRL were recruited between June 2018 and December 2019 and randomized to receive either Lymfactin® (n = 20) or placebo (n = 19). The primary endpoints showed a positive effect of VLNT in both groups compared to the baseline, but without statistical differences between groups at 12 months. Additionally, greater improvements were observed in the tissue dielectric constant ratios measuring skin interstitial fluid levels in the Lymfactin® group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.020). No differences in adverse events were detected between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study was one of the few studies to objectively show a positive effect of VLNT in a prospective clinical multicenter setting. It was also the first-ever randomized prospective clinical study showing a quantitatively positive effect of a medical therapy on the edema of lymphedema although failing to show differences between groups in primary outcome measures.

2.
Ann Surg ; 255(3): 468-73, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22233832

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative lymphedema after breast cancer surgery is a challenging problem. Recently, a novel microvascular lymph node transfer technique provided a fresh hope for patients with lymphedema. We aimed to combine this new method with the standard breast reconstruction. METHODS: During 2008-2010, we performed free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction in 87 patients. For all patients with lymphedema symptoms (n = 9), we used a modified lower abdominal reconstruction flap containing lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels surrounding the superficial circumflex vessel pedicle. Operation time, donor site morbidity, and postoperative recovery between the 2 groups (lymphedema breast reconstruction and breast reconstruction) were compared. The effect on the postoperative lymphatic vessel function was examined. RESULTS: The average operation time was 426 minutes in the lymphedema breast reconstruction group and 391 minutes in the breast reconstruction group. The postoperative abdominal seroma formation was increased in patients with lymphedema. Postoperative lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated at least some improvement in lymphatic vessel function in 5 of 6 patients with lymphedema. The upper limb perimeter decreased in 7 of 9 patients. Physiotherapy and compression was no longer needed in 3 of 9 patients. Importantly, we found that human lymph nodes express high levels of endogenous lymphatic vessel growth factors. Transfer of the lymph nodes and the resulting endogenous growth factor expression may thereby induce the regrowth of lymphatic network in the axilla. No edema problems were detected in the lymph node donor area. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous breast and lymphatic reconstruction is an ideal option for patients who suffer from lymphedema after mastectomy and axillary dissection.


Assuntos
Linfonodos/transplante , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/cirurgia , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Microvasos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos
3.
Microsurgery ; 27(5): 369-71, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17557288

RESUMO

Progressive hemifacial atrophy (PHA) is characterized by slow and progressive atrophy usually of one side of the face. PHA affects primarily the subcutaneous fat and muscle tissues, but may involve the bone. The cause is unknown. The treatment is symptomatic and directed at augmentation of the deficient soft-tissue volume. The reconstructive procedures may combine fat grafts, dermis fat grafts, pedicle flaps, bone grafts, microvascular free flaps, and alloplastic implants. We report a patient with of PHA whose condition was treated with a free latissimus dorsi (LD) perforator flap. The LD perforator flap was suitable for the large defect of the patient. It could easily be tailored and thinned to follow the facial contour. Minor revisions were needed for esthetic reasons. There was neither significant downward gravitation nor wasting of the flap. 23 months later, the natural appearance of the face was maintained.


Assuntos
Hemiatrofia Facial/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA