Mistle: bringing spectral library predictions to metaproteomics with an efficient search index.

MOTIVATION: Deep learning has moved to the forefront of tandem mass spectrometry-driven proteomics and authentic prediction for peptide fragmentation is more feasible than ever. Still, at this point spectral prediction is mainly used to validate database search results or for confined search spaces. Fully predicted spectral libraries have not yet been efficiently adapted to large search space problems that often occur in metaproteomics or proteogenomics. RESULTS: In this study, we showcase a workflow that uses Prosit for spectral library predictions on two common metaproteomes and implement an indexing and search algorithm, Mistle, to efficiently identify experimental mass spectra within the library. Hence, the workflow emulates a classic protein sequence database search with protein digestion but builds a searchable index from spectral predictions as an in-between step. We compare Mistle to popular search engines, both on a spectral and database search level, and provide evidence that this approach is more accurate than a database search using MSFragger. Mistle outperforms other spectral library search engines in terms of run time and proves to be extremely memory efficient with a 4- to 22-fold decrease in RAM usage. This makes Mistle universally applicable to large search spaces, e.g. covering comprehensive sequence databases of diverse microbiomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Mistle is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/BAMeScience/Mistle.

Machine learning methods for compound annotation in non-targeted mass spectrometry-A brief overview of fingerprinting, in silico fragmentation and de novo methods.

Non-targeted screenings (NTS) are essential tools in different fields, such as forensics, health and environmental sciences. NTSs often employ mass spectrometry (MS) methods due to their high throughput and sensitivity in comparison to, for example, nuclear magnetic resonance-based methods. As the identification of mass spectral signals, called annotation, is labour intensive, it has been used for developing supporting tools based on machine learning (ML). However, both the diversity of mass spectral signals and the sheer quantity of different ML tools developed for compound annotation present a challenge for researchers in maintaining a comprehensive overview of the field. In this work, we illustrate which ML-based methods are available for compound annotation in non-targeted MS experiments and provide a nuanced comparison of the ML models used in MS data analysis, unravelling their unique features and performance metrics. Through this overview we support researchers to judiciously apply these tools in their daily research. This review also offers a detailed exploration of methods and datasets to show gaps in current methods, and promising target areas, offering a starting point for developers intending to improve existing methodologies.