Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de estudo
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 24(4): 496-506, 1983 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6832919

RESUMO

In unequal alternating monocular exposure (unequal AME), each eye receives normal patterned visual input but on alternate days and for unequal periods. It has been shown previously that this imbalance in stimulation produces a deficit in the nasal visual field of the less experienced eye (LEE). The effect of subsequent binocular exposure on these visual deficits has now been examined. No evidence of recovery was found. Instead, visual fields remained the same or became smaller. In cats reared with little or no imbalance (8 hr/day vs 7 hr/day or 1 hr/day vs 1 hr), subsequent binocular exposure had no effect on visual fields. In cats reared with a moderate or large imbalance (8 hr/day vs 4 hr/day or 8 hr/day vs 1 hr/day), subsequent binocular exposure led to a suppression of the LEE: when tested binocularly, these cats rarely responded to targets presented in the monocular field of the LEE. The deficits became progressively more severe throughout the period of binocular exposure, until eventually they could be observed even when the LEE was tested monocularly. Most of these cats were clearly esotropic but not all esotropic cats showed suppression. The degree of suppression was correlated with the degree of the imbalance imposed during unequal AME. Our results suggest that when the eyes are misaligned, binocular exposure does not permit recovery of visual function in a disadvantaged eye, but may exacerbate the existing imbalance.


Assuntos
Fenômenos Fisiológicos Oculares , Estimulação Luminosa/métodos , Campos Visuais , Fatores Etários , Animais , Gatos , Fatores de Tempo , Testes de Campo Visual
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA