Gastrectomy with or without omentectomy for cT3-4 gastric cancer: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Omentectomy is performed widely for locally advanced gastric cancer to prevent disease recurrence. However, its clinical benefit is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared the outcome of gastrectomy with preservation of the omentum (GPO) and gastrectomy with resection of the omentum (GRO) among patients with cT3-T4 gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between 2006 and 2012 in one of five participating institutions. A consensus conference identified 28 variables potentially associated with outcome after gastrectomy for the estimation of propensity scores, and propensity score matching (PSM) was undertaken to control for possible confounders. Postoperative surgical outcomes, overall survival and disease recurrence were compared between GPO and GRO. RESULTS: A total of 1758 patients were identified, of whom 526 remained after PSM, 263 in each group. Median follow-up was 4·9 (i.q.r. 3·1-5·9) years in the GRO group and 5·0 (2·5-6·8) years in the GPO group. The incidence of postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or more was significantly higher in the GRO group (17·5 versus 10·3 per cent; P = 0·016). Five-year overall survival rates were 77·1 per cent in the GRO group and 79·4 per cent in the GPO group (P = 0·749). There were no significant differences in recurrence rate or pattern of recurrence between the groups. CONCLUSION: Overall survival and disease recurrence were comparable in patients with cT3-4 gastric cancer who underwent GPO or GRO.

ANTECEDENTES: La omentectomía se realiza ampliamente en el cáncer gástrico localmente avanzado para prevenir la recidiva de la enfermedad. Sin embargo, se desconoce su beneficio clínico. MÉTODOS: Este estudio retrospectivo comparó el resultado de la gastrectomía con preservación del omento (gastrectomy with preservation of the omentum, GPO) con la gastrectomía con resección del omento (gastrectomy with resection of the omentum, GRO) para el cáncer gástrico con estadio clínico T3/T4. Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a gastrectomía por cáncer gástrico clínico T3/T4 (2006-2012) y se recogieron datos relevantes de 5 hospitales participantes. A través de una conferencia de consenso se identificaron 28 variables potencialmente asociadas con el resultado tras la gastrectomía, mediante las cuales se estimaron las puntuaciones de propensión, utilizándose el emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión (propensity score matching, PSM) para el control de posibles factores de confusión. Los resultados quirúrgicos postoperatorios, la supervivencia global y la recidiva de la enfermedad se compararon entre las gastrectomías con GPO y GRO. RESULTADOS: En total, se identificaron 1.758 pacientes, seleccionándose 526 (263 GRO y 263 GPO) tras el PSM. La mediana (rango intercuartílico) de seguimiento fue de 4,9 años (3,1-5,9) en el grupo GRO y de 5,0 años (2,5-6,8) en el grupo GPO. La incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias de Clavien-Dindo grado III o más alto fue significativamente más elevada en el grupo GRO que en el grupo GPO (17,1% versus 9,1%; P = 0,010). La supervivencia global a los 5 años fue del 77,1% para el grupo GRO y del 79,4% para el grupo GPO (P = 0,749). No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la tasa de recidiva o patrón de recidiva entre ambos grupos. CONCLUSIÓN: La supervivencia global y la recidiva de la enfermedad son comparables en pacientes con cáncer gástrico estadio clínico T3-4 sometidos a GPO o GRO.

Role of Prealbumin as a Powerful and Simple Index for Predicting Postoperative Complications After Gastric Cancer Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative factors, including nutritional status, may have strong correlations with postoperative morbidities. The current study evaluated preoperative prealbumin concentrations as a predictor of postoperative complications after gastric surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study of 1798 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma was performed. Information was collected on basic patient characteristics, preoperative laboratory findings, and 30 day postoperative complications. The patients were divided into three groups based on prealbumin concentrations (≥22 mg/dL, <22 to ≥15 mg/dL, and <15 mg/dL) for analysis. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 21.7 %, and the infection rate was 16 %. Subgroup analysis based on prealbumin concentrations showed that complication rates were markedly elevated with decreasing concentrations of prealbumin. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model showed that both overall and infectious complications were strongly associated with male gender, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and decreased prealbumin levels (p < 0.05). Even in patients with a CRP level higher than 0.1 mg/dL, male gender and low prealbumin concentrations (<15 mg/dL) were significantly correlated with overall and infectious morbidities (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative prealbumin concentrations are useful predictors of short-term postoperative outcomes after gastrectomy.

Use of endoscopy to determine the resection margin during laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: It can be difficult to determine the transection line during totally laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer owing to lack of tactile feedback. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the role of intraoperative endoscopy in determining the resection margin in totally laparoscopic gastrectomy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy between March 2012 and July 2015 were eligible. Preoperative placement of marking clips and intraoperative endoscopy were performed to determine the resection margin. Frozen-section analyses were also performed to confirm the absence of cancer cells at the surgical margin. Success was defined as the proportion of specimens with all clips present and by the proportion of resections with a negative surgical margin following initial transection. RESULTS: Total laparoscopic gastrectomy with intraoperative endoscopy was performed in 522 patients; a total of 662 surgical margins were analysed. The overall success rate was 99·8 per cent (661 of 662 margins). The success rate of achieving a negative surgical margin during the initial transection was 98·9 per cent (550 of 556 margins). CONCLUSION: Preoperative placement of marking clips and intraoperative endoscopy is helpful in the determination of a safe surgical margin in patients with gastric cancer who undergo laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with pT1 N+ or T2-3 N0 gastric cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The outcome for pT1 N+ or pT2-3 N0 gastric cancer is favourable, but some patients suffer from recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors in patients with pT1 N+ or pT2-3 N0 gastric cancer. METHODS: This was a multicentre, retrospective cohort study. All patients with pT1 N+ or pT2-3 N0 gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy at five high-volume, specialized cancer centres in Japan between 2000 and 2008 were included. Demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological data were collected. Independent prognostic factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Some 1442 patients were included. The 5-year overall survival rate for patients with pT1 N+ or pT2-3 N0 gastric cancer was 92·0 per cent. Multivariable analysis for overall survival identified age (hazard ratio (HR) 2·67, 95 per cent c.i. 2·09 to 3·43), sex (HR 0·57, 0·39 to 0·83) and clinical tumour depth (cT) (HR 1·45, 1·06 to 1·98) as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Survival of patients with pT1 N+ or pT2-3 N0 gastric cancer is good. Age 65 years or above, male sex and cT2-4 category are associated with worse overall survival.

Randomized clinical trial comparing standard diet with perioperative oral immunonutrition in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is associated with excessive weight loss and decreased calorie intake. Nutritional support using eicosapentaenoic acid modulates immune function and limits catabolism in patients with advanced cancer, but its impact in the perioperative period is unclear. METHODS: This was a randomized phase III clinical trial of addition of eicosapentaenoic acid-rich nutrition to a standard diet in patients having total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Patients were randomized to either a standard diet or standard diet with oral supplementation of an eicosapentaenoic acid (ProSure®), comprising 600 kcal with 2·2 g eicosapentaenoic acid, for 7 days before and 21 days after surgery. The primary endpoint was percentage bodyweight loss at 1 and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Of 127 eligible patients, 126 were randomized; 124 patients (61 standard diet, 63 supplemented diet) were analysed for safety and 123 (60 standard diet, 63 supplemented diet) for efficacy. Across both groups, all but three patients underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Background factors were well balanced between the groups. Median compliance with the supplement in the immunonutrition group was 100 per cent before and 54 per cent after surgery. The surgical morbidity rate was 13 per cent in patients who received a standard diet and 14 per cent among those with a supplemented diet. Median bodyweight loss at 1 month after gastrectomy was 8·7 per cent without dietary supplementation and 8·5 per cent with eicosapentaenoic acid enrichment (P = 0·818, adjusted P = 1·000). Similarly, there was no difference between groups in percentage bodyweight loss at 3 months (P = 0·529, adjusted P = 1·000). CONCLUSION: Immunonutrition based on an eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched oral diet did not reduce bodyweight loss after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with a standard diet. Registration number: UMIN000006380 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/).

Development and external validation of a nomogram for overall survival after curative resection in serosa-negative, locally advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Few nomograms can predict overall survival (OS) after curative resection of advanced gastric cancer (AGC), and these nomograms were developed using data from only a few large centers over a long time period. The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate an elaborative nomogram that predicts 5-year OS after curative resection for serosa-negative, locally AGC using a large amount of data from multiple centers in Japan over a short time period (2001-2003). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 39 859 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer between 2001 and 2003 at multiple centers in Japan, we retrospectively analyzed 5196 patients with serosa-negative AGC who underwent Resection A according to the 13th Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. The data of 3085 patients who underwent surgery from 2001 to 2002 were used as a training set for the construction of a nomogram and Web software. The data of 2111 patients who underwent surgery in 2003 were used as an external validation set. RESULTS: Age at operation, gender, tumor size and location, macroscopic type, histological type, depth of invasion, number of positive and examined lymph nodes, and lymphovascular invasion, but not the extent of lymphadenectomy, were associated with OS. Discrimination of the developed nomogram was superior to that of the TNM classification (concordance indices of 0.68 versus 0.61; P < 0.001). Moreover, calibration was accurate. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and externally validated an elaborative nomogram that predicts the 5-year OS of postoperative serosa-negative AGC. This nomogram would be helpful in the assessment of individual risks and in the consideration of additional therapy in clinical practice, and we have created freely available Web software to more easily and quickly predict OS and to draw a survival curve for these purposes.

Lymphadenectomy around the left renal vein in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: The extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate lymph node involvement around the left renal vein. METHODS: Lymph node involvement and prognosis in patients with Siewert type II cancers treated by R0-1 surgical resection were investigated, with regard to lymphadenectomy around the left renal vein. Based on the incidence of involvement at each node, the node stations were divided into three tiers (first tier, more than 20 per cent involvement; second tier, 10-20 per cent involvement; third tier, less than 10 per cent involvement). RESULTS: Of 150 patients with type II oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma, 94 had left renal vein lymphadenectomy. The first lymph node tier included nodes along the lesser curvature, right cardia, left cardia and left gastric artery, with involvement of 28·0-46·0 per cent and a 5-year survival rate of 42-53 per cent in patients with positive nodes. The nodes around the lower mediastinum, left renal vein, splenic artery and coeliac axis constituted the second tier, with involvement of 12·7-18 per cent and a 5-year survival rate of 11-35 per cent. With regard to the left renal vein, the incidence of involvement was 17 per cent and the 5-year rate survival rate was 19 per cent. Multivariable analysis showed that left renal vein lymphadenectomy was an independent prognostic factor in patients with pathological tumour category pathological T3-4 disease (hazard ratio 0·51, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·26 to 0·99; P = 0·048). CONCLUSION: Left renal vein nodal involvement is similar to that seen along the splenic artery, in the lower mediastinum and coeliac axis, with similar impact on patient survival.

Proximal margin length with transhiatal gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: A gross proximal oesophageal margin greater than 5 cm is considered to be necessary for curative surgery of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. This study investigated whether a shorter proximal margin might suffice in the context of total gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III tumours. METHODS: The gross proximal margin was measured on stretched specimens just after resection. Relationships between gross proximal margin lengths and clinicopathological features were investigated in patients with Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction treated by R0-1 surgical resection. For survival analyses, only patients who had undergone R0 resection for pathological (p) T2-4N0-3M0 tumour via a transhiatal approach were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients, 120 had a total gastrectomy. Two patients (1·4 per cent) had histologically positive proximal margins and another two (1·4 per cent) developed anastomotic recurrence. Of 100 patients with pT2-4N0-3M0 tumours who underwent gastrectomy via a transhiatal approach, those with gross proximal margins larger than 20 mm appeared to have better survival than those with shorter margins (P = 0·027). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that a gross proximal margin of 20 mm or less was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio (HR) 3·56, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·39 to 9·14; P = 0·008), as was pathological node status (HR 1·76, 1·08 to 2·86; P = 0·024). CONCLUSION: Gross proximal margin lengths of more than 20 mm in resected specimens seem satisfactory for patients with type II and III adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction treated by transhiatal gastrectomy.

Prognostic importance of the inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) has been shown to be a prognostic factor for a variety of tumours. This study investigates the significance of the modified GPS (mGPS) for the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: The mGPS (0=C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤ 10 mg l(-1), 1=CRP>10 mg l(-1) and 2=CRP>10 mg l(-1) and albumin<35 g l(-1)) was calculated on the basis of preoperative data for 1710 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery between January 2000 and December 2007. Patients were given an mGPS of 0, 1 or 2. The prognostic significance was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Increased mGPS was associated with male patient, old age, low body mass index, increased white cell count and neutrophils, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen and CA19-9 and advanced tumour stage. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test revealed that a higher mGPS predicted a higher risk of postoperative mortality in both relative early-stage (stage I; P<0.001) and advanced-stage cancer (stage II, III and IV; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the mGPS to be a risk factor for postoperative mortality (odds ratio 1.845; 95% confidence interval 1.184-2.875; P=0.007). CONCLUSION: The preoperative mGPS is a simple and useful prognostic factor for postoperative survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in patients with previous endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Some patients undergoing endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer need further surgical treatment to achieve cure. However, the influence of endoscopic resection on subsequent laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 711 patients who underwent LAG were analysed retrospectively; 111 patients had undergone endoscopic resection previously and the remaining 600 had no history of endoscopic resection. Patient characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Risk factors associated with postoperative complications were analysed. RESULTS: Duration of operation and blood loss were comparable between the two groups. Patients who had undergone endoscopic resection had fewer dissected lymph nodes and a lower rate of preservation of the coeliac branch of the vagus nerve, especially those who had LAG within 2 months after endoscopic resection. Early postoperative outcomes, including complications, gastrointestinal recovery and length of postoperative hospital stay, were not significantly different between the two groups. Previous endoscopic resection was not a risk factor for postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: LAG can be performed safely even after endoscopic resection. Endoscopic resection might increase the difficulty of subsequent LAG, including lymph node dissection and preservation of the coeliac branch of the vagus nerve; however, it has little influence on early postoperative outcome.

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique versus laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique (LPG-DFT) and laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LSTG) may replace laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for proximal early gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes after LPG-DFT and LSTG. METHODS: Patients who underwent LPG-DFT or LSTG at the Cancer Institute Hospital in Tokyo between January 2006 and April 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Operative procedures were selected based on the distance from the cardia to the proximal boundary of the tumour, tumour location and predicted remnant stomach volume. Patient characteristics, surgical data, markers of postoperative nutritional status, such as blood chemistry and bodyweight loss, and endoscopic findings were compared between procedures. The main study outcome was nutritional status. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients (LPG-DFT 51, LSTG 110) were included. Types of postoperative complication occurring more than 30 days after surgery differed between the two procedures. Remnant stomach ulcers, including anastomotic ulcers, were observed only after LPG-DFT, whereas complications involving the small intestine, such as internal hernia or small bowel obstruction, occurred more frequently after LSTG. Values for total protein, albumin, prealbumin and bodyweight loss were comparable between the two procedures at 36 months after surgery. Haemoglobin concentrations were higher after LPG-DFT than after LSTG at 24 months (13·4 versus 12·8 g/dl respectively; P = 0·045) and 36 months (13·5 versus 12·8 g/dl; P = 0·007) after surgery. The rate of Los Angeles grade B or more severe reflux oesophagitis was comparable. CONCLUSION: LPG-DFT and LSTG for proximal early gastric cancer have similar outcomes, but different types of complication.

ANTECEDENTES: La gastrectomía proximal laparoscópica con técnica de doble derivación (double flap technique, LPG-DFT) y la gastrectomía subtotal laparoscópica (laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy, LsTG) pueden sustituir a la gastrectomía total laparoscópica (laparoscopic total gastrectomy, LTG) para el cáncer gástrico precoz (early gastric cancer, EGC) proximal. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los resultados a corto y a largo plazo tras LPG-DFT y LsTG. MÉTODOS: En este estudio retrospectivo se incluyeron pacientes que fueron sometidos a LPG-DFT o LsTG en el Hospital del Instituto del Cáncer de Tokio entre enero 2006 y abril 2015. Las técnicas quirúrgicas se seleccionaron en base a la distancia entre el cardias y el borde proximal del tumor, localización del tumor, y el volumen previsto del remanente gástrico. Las características de los pacientes, datos quirúrgicos, marcadores del estado nutricional postoperatorio, tales como la bioquímica sanguínea y la pérdida de peso corporal (body weight loss, BWL), y los hallazgos endoscópicos se compararon entre las técnicas. El resultado principal del estudio fue el estado nutricional. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 161 pacientes (LPG-DFT 51, LsTG 110). Los tipos de complicaciones postoperatorias que aparecieron a más de 30 días después de la cirugía variaron entre ambas técnicas. Las úlceras en el remanente gástrico, incluyendo úlceras anastomóticas, solo se observaron tras una LPG-DFT, mientras las complicaciones relacionadas con el intestino delgado, como la hernia interna o la obstrucción de intestino delgado, sucedió con más frecuencia tras una LsTG. Los valores de proteínas totales, albúmina, prealbúmina, y BWL fueron comparables entre ambas técnicas a los 36 meses después de la cirugía. Las concentraciones de hemoglobina fueron más altas tras una LPG-DFT que tras una LsTG a los 24 (13,4 versus 12,8 mg/dL, P = 0,045) y 36 meses (13,5 versus 12,8 mg/mL, P = 0,007) después de la cirugía. Las incidencias de esofagitis por reflujo grado B Los Angeles o más grave fueron comparables. CONCLUSIÓN: La LPG-DFT y la LsTG para el EGC proximal presentan resultados bastante similares, pero difieren en el tipo de complicaciones.

Perirenal fat thickness as a predictor of postoperative complications after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is used widely in surgery for gastric cancer. Excess visceral fat can limit the ability to dissect the suprapancreatic region, potentially increasing the risk of local complications, particularly pancreatic fistula. This study evaluated perirenal fat thickness as a surrogate for visceral fat to see whether this was related to complications after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. METHODS: Perirenal fat thickness was measured dorsal to the left kidney as an indicator of visceral fat in patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without complications. The relationship between perirenal fat thickness and postoperative complications was evaluated. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value for predicting morbidity using adipose tissue thickness was 10·7 mm; a distance equal to or greater than this was considered a positive perirenal fat thickness sign (PTS). A positive PTS showed a significant correlation with visceral fat area. Multivariable analysis found that a positive PTS was an independent risk factor for complications (hazard ratio 4·42, 95 per cent c.i. 2·31 to 8·86; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Perirenal fat thickness as an indicator of visceral fat was an independent predictor of postoperative complications after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

ANTECEDENTES: La gastrectomía distal laparoscópica se utiliza ampliamente en la cirugía del cáncer gástrico. El exceso de grasa visceral puede limitar la capacidad para disecar la región suprapancreática, aumentando potencialmente riesgo de complicaciones locales, especialmente de fistula pancreática. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar el grosor de la grasa perirrenal como marcador subrogado de grasa visceral para determinar si se relacionaba con complicaciones tras gastrectomía distal laparoscópica. MÉTODOS: El grosor de la grasa perirrenal se midió a nivel dorsal del riñón izquierdo como indicador de grasa visceral en pacientes con cáncer gástrico sometidos a gastrectomía distal laparoscópica. Los pacientes fueron divididos en dos grupos: aquellos con y sin complicaciones. Se evaluó la relación entre grosor de la grasa perirrenal y las complicaciones postoperatorias. RESULTADOS: El punto de corte óptimo para predecir la morbilidad utilizando el grosor del tejido adiposo fue de 10,7 mm, por lo que una distancia igual o mayor a este nivel fue considerado como signo positivo de engrosamiento de la grasa perirrenal (peri-renal fat thickness sign, PTS). Un PTS positivo mostró una correlación significativa con el área de grasa visceral. Los análisis multivariables demostraban que un PTS positivo era un factor de riesgo independiente para complicaciones (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio 4,418; i.c. del 95% 2,307-8,855; P < 0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: El grosor de grasa perirrenal como indicador de la grasa visceral fue un predictor independiente de complicaciones postoperatorias tras una gastrectomía distal laparoscópica por cáncer gástrico.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor dissection.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic wedge resections are increasingly applied for gastric submucosal tumors such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Despite this, no defined strategy exists to guide the surgeon in choosing the appropriate laparoscopic technique for an individual case on the basis of tumor characteristics such as location or size. This study aimed to introduce a laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric wedge resection that is applicable for submucosal tumor resection independent of tumor location and size. METHODS: Seven patients underwent LECS for the resection of gastric submucosal tumors. Both mucosal and submucosal layers around the tumor were circumferentially dissected using endoscopic submucosal dissection via intraluminal endoscopy. Subsequently, the seromusclar layer was laparoscopically dissected on the exact three-fourths cut line around the tumor. The submucosal tumor then was exteriorized to the abdominal cavity and dissected with a standard endoscopic stapling device. RESULTS: In all cases, the LECS procedure was successful for dissecting out the gastric submucosal tumor. In four of seven cases, the tumor was located in the upper gastric portion near the esophagogastric junction. The remaining three tumors were in the posterior gastric wall. In two cases, the tumors were more than 5 cm in diameter, and one was a GIST of the remnant stomach. The mean operation time was 169 +/- 17 min, and the estimated blood loss was 7 +/- 2 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The LECS procedure for dissection of gastric submucosal tumors such as GIST may be performed safely with reasonable operation times, less bleeding, and adequate cut lines. In addition, the success of the procedure does not depend on the tumor location such as the vicinity of the esophagogastric junction or pyloric ring.