Disinfectant efficacy of chlorite and chlorine dioxide in drinking water biofilms.

The drinking water industry is closely examining options to maintain disinfection in distribution systems. In particular this research compared the relative efficiency of the chlorite ion (ClO2-) to chlorine dioxide (ClO2) for biofilm control. Chlorite levels were selected for monitoring since they are typically observed in the distribution system as a by-product whenever chlorine dioxide is applied for primary or secondary disinfection. Previous research has reported the chlorite ion to be effective in mitigating nitrification in distribution systems. Annular reactors (ARs) containing polycarbonate and cast iron coupons were used to simulate water quality conditions in a distribution system. Following a 4 week acclimation period, individual ARs operated in parallel were dosed with high (0.25mg/l) and low (0.1mg/l) chlorite concentrations and with high (0.5 mg/l) and low (0.25mg/l) chlorine dioxide concentrations, as measured in the effluent of the AR. Another set of ARs that contained cast iron and polycarbonate coupons served as controls and did not receive any disinfection. The data presented herein show that the presence of chlorite at low concentration levels was not effective at reducing heterotrophic bacteria. Log reductions of attached heterotrophic bacteria for low and high chlorite ranged between 0.20 and 0.34. Chlorine dioxide had greater log reductions for attached heterotrophic bacteria ranging from 0.52 to 1.36 at the higher dose. The greatest log reduction in suspended heterotrophic bacteria was for high dose of ClO2 on either cast iron or polycarbonate coupons (1.77 and 1.55). These data indicate that it would be necessary to maintain a chlorine dioxide residual concentration in distribution systems for control of microbiological regrowth.

Preparing health care professionals for quality improvement: the George Washington University/George Mason University experience.

Seventy-seven medical, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, and health services management students were provided training in quality improvement, community-oriented primary care, and teamwork. These students were then formed into 13 interdisciplinary teams to apply their knowledge in underserved areas ("service learning") under a community and faculty preceptor.

Examination of plant performance and filter ripening with particle counters at full-scale water treatment plants.

Filter performance has traditionally been assessed using turbidity as the main water quality parameter. However interest in process optimization and the ability to accurately monitor filtration and particle removal has led to particle counting becoming increasingly more popular. The objective of this research was to evaluate filtration performance and filter ripening at four full-scale water treatment plants. Most of the plants investigated in this study were capable of achieving 2 log total particle removal as well as an effluent turbidity of 0.1 NTU. In some cases 2 log removal was achieved in the lower particle size ranges of 2-5 and 5-10 microm. Log removals in this study compare particle counts in the filtered and raw water. For water treatment plants that do not filter to waste, the ripening period following a filter backwash represents a time where the plant may be most vulnerable to breakthrough of waterborne pathogens. For the plants studied, the ripening period which was defined as the time required to reach peak particle removal and a turbidity of 0.1 NTU, were very similar in duration. The ripening period generally lasted for one hour after the backwash event had been completed. Because the times to reach 2 log total particle removal and 0.1 NTU are similar, the practice of using 0.1 NTU turbidity as a measure of filter ripening may be a useful benchmark for utilities that do not have particle counters.