RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Radiological localization imaging aids in the identification of abnormal parathyroid glands resulting in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), thereby facilitating minimally invasive parathyroid surgery. Sometimes initial imaging may fail to identify the abnormal gland and imaging may therefore be repeated. This study explored patient outcomes of repeated parathyroid localization imaging, after initial negative gland localization, at a United Kingdom institution. METHODOLOGY: Data was retrospectively collected and analyzed for patients with PHPT undergoing repeated imaging during a five-year period (2015-2020). The total number of episodes of scanning, types of scans performed, the time interval between scans and the imaging success of gland localization were recorded. We explored the reasons for repeated imaging and attempted to identify any factors that might predict subsequent positive radiological localization. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were identified who underwent repeated localizing imaging after first localizing imaging was negative. Of these, 39 did not undergo surgery despite repeat imaging being undertaken; 11 out of these 39 patients (28%) had subsequent positive localization scans. Again, a large proportion of patients were managed conservatively, despite the repeated sets of imaging being done. Patients undergoing three or four sets of repetitive imaging did not have imaging or surgical success. CONCLUSION: A streamlined parathyroid pathway should be followed whereby patients should be triaged for suitability for surgery prior to repeated imaging. A second set of scans should be offered when patients are unsuitable for conservative management and are willing and fit to undergo surgery. There is no merit to repeating imaging more than twice.
RESUMO
Background: Foundation training in the UK has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgical education in particular has been impacted due to the reduced exposure of teaching in theatres and clinics. To combat this waning exposure, an online teaching series for the foundation doctors, in affiliation with the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, was designed and delivered nationally during the pandemic. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and the reception of an online teaching programme to become an integral part of surgical education. Methods: A series of virtual teaching sessions lasting between 30 and 60 mintues were delivered live by senior surgical trainees and consultants to foundation trainees nationwide. Online feedback was completed after each session and the results were analysed using Microsoft Excel™. Results: 95.2% of the foundation trainees felt more confident on the subjects taught and were satisfied with the teaching series. The majority of the trainees preferred sessions which were short, held every two or three weeks, delivered by senior surgeons, covering a wide range of surgical specialties and conditions. Conclusion: An online surgical teaching series has been shown to be well received by foundation trainees. It provides a realistic opportunity to have a blended learning environment for surgical training nationally during the pandemic.
RESUMO
Aim Our study aimed to find a correlation between low absolute lymphocyte count and COVID-19-related mortality. Methods This study followed a retrospective observational cohort design to analyze the data of patients who presented with symptoms and signs of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), at the Conquest Hospital and Eastbourne District General Hospital in East Sussex, United Kingdom, between February 10, 2020 and May 1, 2020, retrospectively. Survival and mortality for the first 30 days and comorbidities were analyzed for all patients who were tested for COVID-19 irrespective of swab results and had blood lymphocyte levels taken at the time of their visit to the ED and their data were analyzed for statistical significance. Results A total of 1226 patients had SARS-CoV-2 RNA identification swabs taken between February 10, 2020 and May 1, 2020. A cohort of 742 patients of these patients tested for COVID-19 also had blood lymphocyte levels measured. Overall, the lymphocyte count did not differ significantly between patients suspected to have COVID-19 infection with either positive or negative COVID-19 swab results. The lymphocyte count, however, was significantly lower in those who died from COVID-19 (p < 0.001) but when comorbidities were analyzed, we found an association between an increased number of comorbidities and a significantly decreased lymphocyte count. Conclusion Once adjusted for comorbidities, the lymphocyte count had no association with COVID-19 infection and mortality.