Development of irreversible pancreatic ductal change triggered by pancreatic duct stenting in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stent-induced ductal change is a complication of endoscopic pancreatic stent placement for chronic pancreatitis, potentially leading to irreversible changes that may contribute to pancreatic dysfunction. This study aimed to examine the long-term outcomes of stent-induced ductal change and evaluate factors that correlate with the development of irreversible ductal changes. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2022, 52/223 patients with chronic pancreatitis in whom an S-type plastic stent was successfully placed from the main papilla for duct stricture were detected with stent-induced ductal change on pancreatography at stent removal. We retrospectively investigated the clinical features of patients whose main pancreatic duct was reassessed by endoscopic pancreatography after >1 month without stent and whose residual stent-induced ductal change was irreversible. RESULTS: The patients with chronic pancreatitis with stent-induced ductal change (n = 28) (elevated change, 15; stricture change, 13) were evaluated using follow-up pancreatography. Eleven patients (39.3%) showed residual change associated with stent-induced ductal change, the degree of which was partial improvement, no change, and obstructive change in one, seven, and three patients, respectively. Stricture changes during stent removal and duration of stent placement that triggered ductal changes were significantly associated with the development of residual ductal changes. CONCLUSIONS: Irreversible stent-induced ductal change in patients with chronic pancreatitis was associated with stricture changes in the main pancreatic duct and continued plastic-stent placement. Careful evaluation of the pancreatic duct is required during plastic-stent placement. Early plastic-stent removal may result in an effective response to the development of stent-induced ductal change.

Current status and future perspectives for endoscopic treatment of local complications in chronic pancreatitis.

Chronic pancreatitis is a progressive disease characterized by irregular fibrosis, cellular infiltration, and parenchymal loss within the pancreas. Chronic pancreatitis treatment includes lifestyle modifications based on disease etiology, dietary adjustments appropriate for each stage and condition, drug therapy, endoscopic treatments, and surgical treatments. Although surgical treatments of symptomatic chronic pancreatitis provide good pain relief, endoscopic therapies are recommended as the first-line treatment because they are minimally invasive. In recent years, endoscopic therapy has emerged as an alternative treatment method to surgery for managing local complications in patients with chronic pancreatitis. For pancreatic stone removal, a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic extraction is used. For refractory pancreatic duct stones, intracorporeal fragmentation techniques, such as pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy, offer additional options. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound has become the primary treatment modality for pancreatic pseudocysts, except in the absence of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. This review focuses on the current status of endoscopic therapies for common local complications of chronic pancreatitis, including updated information in the past few years.

Proposal of classification and terminology of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography.

Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosongraphy (I-EUS) procedures have rapidly evolved since their introduction three decades ago; however, the classification and terminology for these procedures remain unstandardized. To address this, the Subcommittee for Terminology of I-EUS in the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society was established to define classifications and a glossary of I-EUS terms. They categorized I-EUS procedures into five types based on purpose and method: (i) EUS-guided sampling; (ii) EUS-guided through-the-needle examination; (iii) EUS-guided drainage/anastomosis (EUS-D/A); (iv) trans-endosonographically/EUS-guided created route (ESCR) procedures; and (v) EUS-guided delivery. EUS-guided sampling includes tissue acquisition and fluid sampling, classified by needle type into fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy. Through-the-needle examinations include imaging, measurements, and biopsies. EUS-D/A includes organ drainage/anastomosis, fluid collection drainage, and digestive tract anastomosis. In the EUS-D/A route, "anastomosis" is used for organ-to-organ procedures, whereas "tract" is for fluid drainage. ESCR is a newly proposed term for procedures via anastomosis or tract, such as endoscopic necrosectomy and EUS-guided antegrade stenting. The term "trans-luminal drainage/anastomosis stent" is used for stents that maintain the ESCR rather than treating strictures. EUS-guided delivery involves the delivery of substances, such as fluids, drugs, medical devices, and energy. This proposed categorization and terminology aimed to clarify I-EUS procedures and will require updates as new techniques and concepts emerge.

Focal pancreatic ductal change induced by 10-Fr S-type plastic stent in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stent-induced ductal change (SIDC) is a complication of endoscopic pancreatic stenting (EPS) in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). However, the evaluation of SIDC associated with S-type pancreatic plastic stent (PS) and large-caliber PS, such as 10 Fr, is limited. This study aimed to analyze the SIDC of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) associated with 10-Fr S-type PS in patients with CP. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2021, 132 patients with CP in whom a 10-Fr S-type PS had been installed by EPS were retrospectively reviewed. The SIDC incidence rate was examined, and the clinical features of patients with and without SIDC were investigated, including the outcomes for detected SIDC. RESULTS: Stent-induced ductal change during EPS was confirmed in 41 patients (31.1%) of 132 patients at a site coincident with the PS tip or distal flap in the MPD. All patients were asymptomatic during the development of SIDC. Morphological changes in the MPD were detected as elevated (75.6%) or bearing stricture changes (24.4%). A total of 90.2% of SIDC developed after the first 10-Fr PS installation. No significant differences were noted between the patients with and without SIDC. The outcomes of continued PS installment for SIDC showed persistence and secondary change. CONCLUSIONS: Stent-induced ductal change-associated 10-Fr PS installation was performed in just under one-third of the patients, indicating a substantial incidence rate and a possible development of SIDC from early stages onwards. More emphasis should be placed on SIDC as the complication.

[A case of diverticulitis in the horizontal part of the duodenum].

A 38-year-old woman was referred to our department to investigate epigastric discomfort. Laboratory studies showed increases in the peripheral white blood cell count and the level of C-reactive protein. Abdominal computed tomography depicted inflammation and a mass in the horizontal part of the duodenum. To observe it directly, we performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), but it was very difficult to reach the lesion. Therefore, we performed enteroscopy by using SIF-H290S (Olympus Europa SE & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany), which revealed a diverticulum containing food residue in the horizontal part of the duodenum. Using grasping forceps, we removed the food residue. The patient recovered over the next several days. Endoscopic therapy was thus effective for duodenal diverticulitis caused by food residue, but attention to technique was necessary.

[Efficacy of Sorafenib versus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Refractory to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization].

We compared the benefits of sorafenib with that of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (ad-HCC) refractory to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). We evaluated the patient characteristics, the median survival time (MST), and the prognostic factors in 17 patients in the sorafenib group and in 26 patients in the HAIC group. No significant difference was observed in the patient characteristics between the groups. The MST in the sorafenib group and HAIC group was 483 days and 284 days, respectively. A significantly longer survival time was noted in the sorafenib group (p=0.033). The prognostic factors were sorafenib therapy in all 43 patients(hazard ratio: 3.32 [95% CI: 1.36-8.10], p=0.008) and the longer treatment period of sorafenib in the sorafenib group(hazard ratio: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.984- 0.999], p=0.009). When compared with HAIC, sorafenib showed favorable treatment results in patients with ad-HCC refractory to TACE.

Comparison of Sorafenib and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This prospective non-randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy of sorafenib vs hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: Forty-seven patients treated with sorafenib (sorafenib group) and 77 patients treated with HAIC (HAIC group) were investigated retrospectively using propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize selection bias. The cumulative survival rate was investigated before and after PSM in each of the sorafenib and HAIC groups. The cumulative survival rate was compared between the sorafenib and HAIC groups, and among the TNM stage by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ TNM stage). RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in overall survival (OS) between the sorafenib and HAIC groups regardless of before or after PSM. On comparison of the cumulative survival rate between the groups by the same LCSGJ TNM stage, significant prolongation of OS was noted in stage IVB only in the sorafenib group (p = 0.032) after PSM. CONCLUSIONS: It may be better to actively introduce sorafenib for stage IVB, i.e., patients with extrahepatic metastasis.

Two-devices-in-one-channel method for fractured pancreatic duct stent retrieval in a case of severe chronic pancreatitis.

When a pancreatic plastic stent for symptomatic chronic pancreatitis breaks during its removal, severe pancreatic duct stenosis may complicate its retrieval. Takuma and colleagues report on the successful retrieval of a fragmented and displaced pancreatic plastic stent by applying the two-device-in-one-channel method using forceps and a snare.

Symptomatic hepatic cyst treated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and minocycline hydrochloride injection: a case report.

A 72 year-old male patient with a history of a hepatic cyst presented to our hospital with epigastric pain. The cyst had enlarged to approximately 130 mm and was diagnosed as a symptomatic hepatic cyst. Percutaneous cyst drainage was deemed challenging because of the risk of intestinal perforation; therefore, transgastric endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepatic cyst drainage was performed with external nasal cyst drainage. After cyst shrinkage was confirmed, minocycline hydrochloride was injected into the cyst through the nasal drainage tube, and the nasal cyst drainage was removed. Nine months after treatment, the cyst diameter markedly reduced to 12 mm on computed tomography, and the symptoms improved. In cases where surgery is complex or it is difficult to secure a percutaneous puncture line, endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and minocycline hydrochloride injection may be effective if a puncture route can be secured under endoscopic ultrasound.

Pancreatico-renal fistula associated with pancreatic cysts caused by type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis.

To our best knowledge, the formation of a pancreatico-renal fistula and the presence of pancreatic fluid collection in the renal subcapsular space have not been reported as autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) complications. We describe a case of a pancreatico-renal fistula associated with type 1 AIP. The patient presented with abdominal and back pain accompanied by pancreatic cystic lesions during an untreated course of AIP. The diagnosis of pancreatico-renal fistula was based on the presence of a left renal subcapsular fluid collection containing pancreatic amylase, disappearance of pancreatic cysts, and a defect in the partial anterior renal fascia observed on imaging studies. Treatment with steroids and percutaneous drainage resulted in improvement. Pancreatic pseudocysts can affect other organs owing to their digestive action. Similar symptoms may occur in patients with AIP.

Necessity for endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary stenting in cases of malignant biliary obstruction.

Endoscopic biliary stenting is a useful way to treat distal malignant biliary strictures that are not eligible for surgery. A 10-Fr plastic or metal stent is used for stenting. Typically, endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has often been carried out as a way to prevent pancreatitis after stent placement given the ease of stent insertion, but EST has flaws such as bleeding and stent migration.The present study describes the need for EST prior to stent placement.

Right hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm complicating acute pancreatitis: a case report.

OBJECTIVE: To report a rare case of right hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm complicating acute pancreatitis based upon imaging findings obtained before and after the development of pseudoaneurysm. CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND INTERVENTION: A 32-year-old male with a history of acute pancreatitis 1 year prior was readmitted for acute pancreatitis. Computed tomography (CT) and angiography after admission revealed pseudoaneurysm of the right hepatic artery. Transcatheter arterial embolization with coils was used to successfully treat the pseudoaneurysm. A CT and angiography 1 year earlier did not reveal any pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSION: This patient with a rare right hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm complicating acute pancreatitis was successfully treated with coil embolization.

Are Newer Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Models Truly Improving Pancreatolithiasis Lithotripsy Performance? A Japanese Single-Center Study Using Endoscopic Adjunctive Treatment.

Background/Aims: Many Japanese institutions use electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) systems for treating pancreatic duct stones. However, there are no reports on direct comparisons between recent electromagnetic lithotripters. This study aimed to verify whether the new electromagnetic lithotripter can improve the efficiency of pancreatic stone fragmentation, and to clarify the role of combined endoscopic treatment on the clearance of pancreatic duct stones. Methods: We retrospectively identified 208 patients with pancreatolithiasis who underwent endoscopic adjunctive treatment after pancreatic ESWL at a single Japanese center over a 17-year period. We evaluated the outcome data of this procedure performed with SLX-F2 (last 2 years; group A) and Lithostar/Lithoskop (first 15 years; group B), as well as additional endoscopic treatments for pancreatolithiasis. We also performed logistic regression analysis to detect various factors associated with the procedure. Results: For pancreatic head stones, ESWL disintegration was achieved in 93.7% of group A patients and 69.0% of group B patients (p=0.004), and adjunctive endoscopic treatment removed stones in 96.8% of group A patients and 73.0% of group B patients (p=0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that lithotripter type (odds ratio, 6.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 31.33; p<0.01) and main pancreatic duct stricture (odds ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 6.45; p<0.01) were significant factors for ESWL fragmentation. Conclusions: The SLX F2 showed high performance in fragmenting the pancreatic duct stones. In addition, endoscopic adjunctive treatment improved the overall success rate of the procedure. The improved ESWL lithotripter has many advantages for patients undergoing pancreatic lithotripsy treatment.

Identification of bleeding points after bile duct biopsy using red dichromatic imaging during peroral cholangioscopy: A case report.

Red dichromatic imaging is a new image-enhancement technology that clarifies the differences in blood concentrations and improves the visibility of the bleeding point. A 71-year-old man was presented with a common bile duct stone, which was completely removed using electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy with peroral cholangioscopy. During peroral cholangioscopy, a nodular lesion was found at the confluence of the cystic duct, and a forceps biopsy was performed. It was difficult to confirm the bleeding point using white-light imaging because of the pooling of blood. After switching to red dichromatic imaging mode 2 and washing the bile duct with saline solution, the bleeding point was observed in darker yellow than the surrounding blood, allowing the identification of the bleeding point. Red dichromatic imaging can be used in the future to maintain hemostasis during peroral cholangioscopy.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion gene positive that responded to pemigatinib and caused hypophosphatemia.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a condition with a poor prognosis. Traditionally, there was no cure unless important drugs such as gemcitabine, cisplatin, and tegafur/gimeracil/uracil potassium showed efficacy. Pemigatinib has recently become accessible for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement gene abnormalities. Hyperphosphatemia is typically linked to pemigatinib. In the current case, pemigatinib was used to effectively treat a 48-year-old woman, and hypophosphatemia was observed. Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should undergo aggressive cancer multigene panel testing as well as careful monitoring of serum phosphorus levels.

Case of immunoglobulin G4-related cholangitis accompanying autoimmune pancreatitis: diagnosis by peroral cholangioscopy and treatment by endoscopic biliary stenting.

Recently, the progress of endoscopy has made it possible to evaluate bile duct mucosa by peroral cholangioscopy. Herein, we report a case of immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis accompanying autoimmune pancreatitis in a patient who improved with treatment by steroid therapy and endoscopic biliary stenting, and observed the bile duct mucosa by peroral cholangioscopy before and after treatment.

Usefulness of partial splenic embolization for left-sided portal hypertension in a patient with a pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: a case report and review of the literature.

Left-side portal hypertension (LSPH) is caused by isolated obstruction of the splenic vein and is associated with esophagogastric varices that extend from the lower esophagus to the greater curvature of the gastric body. Here, we report on a 74-year-old man with a pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) in the pancreatic tail with multiple liver metastases. We decided that partial splenic embolization (PSE) was the best course of treatment to prevent rupture of the gastric varices, which were classified as markedly enlarged, nodular, or tumor-shaped and showed erosion of the mucosa. After PSE, the patient had no major complications and was discharged. At 3 and 6 months after the procedure, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and enhanced computerized tomography showed that the gastric varices had improved. This case demonstrates the usefulness of PSE for LSPH in patients with unresected pancreatic NEN.

Peroral Pancreatoscopy with Videoscopy and Narrow-Band Imaging in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms with Dilatation of the Main Pancreatic Duct.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) is useful in determining whether the lesions are benign or malignant. This study aimed to examine the usefulness of peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS) in determining the prognosis of IPMNs. METHODS: POPS with videoscopy was performed using the mother-baby scope technique. After surgery, computed tomography/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or ultrasonography and blood tests were performed every 6 months during the follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients with main pancreatic duct (MPD)-type IPMNs underwent POPS using a videoscope, and the protrusions in the MPD were observed in 36 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology/biopsy performed at the time of POPS were 85% and 87.5%, respectively. Of 19 patients who underwent surgery, 18 (95%) patients had negative surgical margins and 1 (5%) patient had a positive margin. CONCLUSION: In IPMNs with dilatation of the MPD, POPS is considered effective if the lesions can be directly observed. The diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions is possible depending on the degree of lesion elevation. However, in some cases, slightly elevated lesions may increase in size during the follow-up or multiple lesions may be simultaneously present; therefore, careful follow-up is necessary.