Outcome of radiosurgery treatment with a linear accelerator in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. / Resultados de la aplicación de radiocirugía con acelerador lineal en pacientes con neuralgia del trigémino.

INTRODUCTION: An overview of the effectiveness of radiosurgery in patients diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia with an analysis of potential predictors of good outcome. METHODS: All patients treated with linear accelerator radiosurgery between 2004 and 2011 were analysed. A dose of 60Gy dose was administered 1 to 2mm from the root entry zone with a maximum isodose of 20% delivered to the brainstem. Clinical results for pain control and any side effects were analysed at 12 and 36 months (BNI score). RESULTS: The study included 71 patients (mean follow-up 50.5 months). Pain improvement at 12 months was observed in 68.11% of the total (28.98% with BNI score i-ii; 39.12% with BNI score iii) and at 36 months in 58.21% (23.88% BNI score i-ii; 34.32% BNI score iii). Average recovery time was 3.69 months and the relapse rate was 44.68%. Patients with typical pain displayed statistically significant differences in improvement rates at 12 and at 36 months (P<047 and P<.002). Onset of improvement was analysed using Kaplan-Meyer plots. Statistically significant differences were observed between patients with typical and atypical pain at 36 months (P<.012) in Kaplan-Meyer plots. Side effects were recorded in 15 patients (20.89%), including 9 cases of facial numbness (13.43%); only 2 cases were clinically relevant (2.98%). CONCLUSION: According to our results, radiosurgery is an effective treatment for trigeminal neuralgia, with few side effects. Typical pain seems to be a good predictor of pain relief.

[Spinal cord stimulation in refractory complex regional pain syndrome. A prospective study]. / Estimulación medular en el síndrome de dolor regional complejo refractario. Un estudio prospectivo.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The objective of treatment of complex regional pain syndrome is to relieve pain and restore function in the affected limb. The aim of this study is to evaluate spinal cord stimulation as a therapy for patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome, for whom adequate pain control could not be achieved with other previous treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. We included patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome refractory to other treatments or techniques, classified by demographic data. Efficacy, functionality and opioid dependence in each patient were subsequently monitored for one year. RESULTS: Seven of the 13 patients (53.84%) included in the study achieved significant pain relief with spinal cord stimulation. Improvements in pain and functionality were obtained, and both were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index/Neck Disability Index (ODI/NDI) was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.011) and was lower as BMI increased. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that spinal cord stimulation is an effective therapeutic option for patients with CRPS refractory to other treatments. BMI and ODI/NDI also showed a significant correlation.

TITLE: Estimulación medular en el síndrome de dolor regional complejo refractario. Un estudio prospectivo.Introducción y objetivos. En el tratamiento del síndrome de dolor regional complejo se pretende aliviar el dolor y restaurar la función de la extremidad afectada. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la estimulación de la médula espinal como terapia para pacientes a quienes se les diagnosticó síndrome de dolor regional complejo, en los que no se ha podido conseguir un control adecuado del dolor con otros tratamientos previos. Pacientes y métodos. Se realizó un estudio prospectivo de 2018 a 2020. Se incluyó a pacientes diagnosticados de síndrome de dolor regional complejo refractario a otros tratamientos o técnicas, clasificados por datos demográficos. Posteriormente, se hizo seguimiento de la eficacia, la funcionalidad y la dependencia de opioides de cada paciente durante un año. Resultados. Siete de los 13 (53,84%) pacientes incluidos en el estudio consiguieron un alivio significativo de su dolor con la estimulación medular. Se obtuvo mejoría del dolor y de la funcionalidad, y ambas fueron estadísticamente significativas (p < 0,001 y p = 0,003, respectivamente). La mejoría en el Oswestry Disability Index/Neck Disability Index (ODI/NDI) se asoció significativamente con el índice de masa corporal (IMC) (p = 0,011) y fue menor cuanto mayor era el IMC. Conclusiones. Los resultados sugieren que la estimulación de la médula espinal es una opción terapéutica eficaz para pacientes con SDRC refractario a otros tratamientos. Además, el IMC y el ODI/NDI mostraron una correlación significativa.

[Multiple calcified cerebral lesions, probably due to metastasis]. / Multiples lesiones cerebrales calcificadas de probable origen metastásico.

INTRODUCTION: Metastases are an infrequent (though possible) cause of cerebral calcifications due to the speed with which they grow. We report the case of a patient in whom some metastatic looking calcified cerebral lesions led to the discovery that she was suffering from lung cancer. CASE REPORT: Woman, aged 60, with no antecedents of interest except hyperlipaemia who came to clinic after suffering from alterations of her higher functions for three weeks. Nothing abnormal was found during the general exploration. Neurologically, she was found to have sensory aphasia together with impaired gnosia and praxis. A brain CAT scan revealed several calcified cerebral lesions throughout both hemispheres, associated with perilesional edema and mass effect with contrast enhancement. Cerebral MRI confirmed these findings. X ray of the thorax was normal but the thoracic CAT scan revealed a spiculated lesion that suggested a malign primary lung neoplasia. CONCLUSION: The presence of cerebral calcifications with perilesional edema and contrast enhancement forces us to rule out a metastatic origin. Although no respiratory clinical features are present, a study of the lungs should be performed as they are the most probable source of the aetiology.