Medicinal Plants in the Treatment of Colitis: Evidence from Preclinical Studies.

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition whose treatment includes aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators. Medicinal plants seem to be an important alternative treatment for this condition. They have been the subject of a great number of studies in recent years. This study was conducted to systematically review the medicinal plants tested in experimental models of ulcerative colitis. We conducted a systematic literature search through specialized databases (PUBMED, SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, LILACS, SCIELO, and SCISEARCH) and selected articles published between January 2000 and June 21, 2016 by using "medicinal plants" and "ulcerative colitis" as key words. Sixty-eight studies were included, and the families Asteraceae and Lamiaceae presented the largest number of studies, but plants from several other families were cited; many of them have shown good results in experimental animals. However, only a few species (such as Andrographis paniculata and Punica granatum) have undergone clinical tests against ulcerative colitis, and the observation that many preclinical studies reviewed are purely descriptive has certainly contributed to this fact. Chemical constituents (mainly flavonoids and terpenes) seem to play a role in the effects of the plants. Thus, the data herein reviewed reinforce the potential of medicinal plants as a source of alternative approaches to the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Myrtenol Reduces Orofacial Nociception and Inflammation in Mice Through p38-MAPK and Cytokine Inhibition.

Orofacial pain is one of the commonest and most complex complaints in dentistry, greatly impairing life quality. Preclinical studies using monoterpenes have shown pharmacological potential to treat painful conditions, but the reports of the effects of myrtenol on orofacial pain and inflammation are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of myrtenol in experimental models of orofacial pain and inflammation. Orofacial nociceptive behavior and the immunoreactivity of the phosphorylated p38 (P-p38)-MAPK in trigeminal ganglia (TG) and spinal trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (STSC) were determined after the injection of formalin in the upper lip of male Swiss mice pretreated with myrtenol (12.5 and 25 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle. Orofacial inflammation was induced by the injection of carrageenan (CGN) in the masseter muscle of mice pretreated with myrtenol (25 and 50 mg/kg, i.p.) or its vehicle (0.02% Tween 80 in saline). Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and histopathological changes in the masseter muscle and interleukin (IL)-1ß levels in the TG and STSC were measured. The increase in face-rubbing behavior time induced by formalin and P-p38-MAPK immunostaining in trigeminal ganglia were significantly reduced by myrtenol treatment (12.5 and 25 mg/kg). Likewise, increased MPO activity and inflammatory histological scores in masseter muscle, as well as augmented levels of IL-1ß in the TG AND STSC, observed after CGN injection, were significantly decreased by myrtenol (25 and 50 mg/kg). Myrtenol has potential to treat orofacial inflammation and pain, which is partially related to IL-1ß levels in the trigeminal pathway and p38-MAPK modulation in trigeminal ganglia.

Natural products for orofacial nociception in pre-clinical studies: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the use of natural products (NP) in the treatment of orofacial nociception in animal models. METHODS: Pre-clinical studies that have evaluated the efficacy of NPs in experimental orofacial nociception were sought in the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, SciELO, LILACS and Scholar databases in January 2020, covering the period since the inception of each one. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. RESULTS: We included 41 records in qualitative synthesis. Fifty different NPs were investigated. All studies presented positive results for at least one orofacial nociception test. Regarding the risk of bias, most studies presented poor experimental design, mainly lack of randomization and blinding. The main class of isolated compounds tested was terpenes, of which monoterpenes were investigated in the majority of the studies. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that NPs are effective in treating experimental orofacial nociception and highlight some of these NPs, mainly terpenes, suggesting their potential for translational research.