[Implementation of the HEARTS Initiative in Argentina: initial resultsImplementação da Iniciativa HEARTS na Argentina: primeiros resultados]. / Implementación de la Iniciativa HEARTS en Argentina: primeros resultados.

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the Region of the Americas, and hypertension is one of the main risk factors. In 2018, Argentina began implementing the HEARTS Initiative in five primary health care centers, through the National Plan for the Prevention and Control of Arterial Hypertension. This study presents the impact its implementation has had on the indicators of effective coverage, treatment, combination therapy, and control. The HEARTS Initiative has multiple components; these include training health teams, reassigning tasks based on the transfer of clinical competencies, providing automatic and clinically validated blood pressure measurement devices, and using a single standardized treatment protocol. A longitudinal data model (generalized estimating equation analysis) was used, and the information from the five health centers was grouped using weighted averages according to the size of the population under coverage. Analysis of the results was stratified into two time periods delimited by the imposition of restrictions due to COVID-19. During the first period of 18 months, significant improvement was observed in treatment (5.9%; p<0.01) and combination therapy (13.4%; p<0.01), with no significant change in coverage (8.4%; p=0.87) and with a paradoxical decrease in control (-3.3%; p=0.02). When the period of restrictions was compared to the previous period, a generalized reduction was observed in all indicators, particularly coverage (-23.6%; p<0.01) and control (-12.5%; p<0.01). However, treatment and combination therapy levels remained above baseline values (1.7%; p<0.01 and 5.4%; p<0.01, respectively).

As doenças cardiovasculares são a principal causa de morbimortalidade, e a hipertensão, seu principal fator de risco. Em 2018, a Argentina começou a implementar a Iniciativa HEARTS em 5 centros de atenção primária à saúde por meio do Plano Nacional de Prevenção e Controle da Hipertensão Arterial. Este estudo apresenta o impacto de sua implementação nos indicadores de cobertura efetiva, tratamento, tratamento combinado e controle. A Iniciativa HEARTS inclui vários componentes. Entre eles, se destacam a capacitação das equipes de saúde, a reorganização das tarefas com base na transferência de competências clínicas, a disponibilização de aparelhos automáticos e clinicamente validados para aferição da pressão arterial e a utilização de um único protocolo padronizado de tratamento. Foi utilizado um modelo de equações de estimativas generalizadas para a análise de dados longitudinais, e as informações dos 5 centros de saúde foram agrupadas por meio de médias ponderadas de acordo com o tamanho da população coberta. A análise dos resultados foi estratificada em dois períodos de tempo delimitados pela irrupção das restrições em virtude da COVID-19. Durante os primeiros 18 meses, houve melhora significativa no tratamento (5,9%; p<0,01) e no tratamento combinado (13,4%; p<0,01), sem mudança significativa na cobertura (8,4%; p=0,87) e com uma diminuição paradoxal no controle (−3,3%; p=0,02). Durante as restrições e em relação ao período anterior, verificou-se redução generalizada em todos os indicadores, principalmente na cobertura (−23,6%; p<0,01) e no controle (−12,5%; p<0,01). No entanto, os níveis de tratamento e tratamento combinado persistiram acima dos valores basais (1,7%; p<0,01 e 5,4%; p<0,01, respectivamente).

Is Isolated Diastolic Hypertension an Important Phenotype?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) is a frequent hypertension phenotype. We review IDH pathophysiology, risk stratification, and therapeutic decisions. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent guidelines lowering blood pressure cutoff levels have increased IDH prevalence and likely decreased associated cardiovascular risk. Long-term cardiovascular risk and pharmacological intervention in IDH are controversial. Narrow pulse pressure and other physiological and epidemiological characteristics are shared with a systodiastolic hypertension (SDH) subgroup. We propose that IDH be incorporated into a broader category, predominantly diastolic hypertension (PDH), defined by pulse pressure ≤ 45 mmHg and includes IDH and SDH with a narrow pulse pressure. IDH-PDH is associated with cardiovascular risk in the long term, especially in young patients. Standardization of the IDH definition and population may contribute to future research to understand genetics, pathophysiology, and eventually therapy in this important subgroup of hypertensive patients.

[São Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020Llamado a la acción de San Pablo para la prevención y el control de la hipertensión arterial, 2020]. / Chamado à ação de São Paulo para prevenção e controle da hipertensão arterial, 2020.

About 1/4th of adults have high blood pressure which is the single most important risk for death (including heart disease and stroke).There are effective policies that could facilitate people making healthy choices to prevent raised blood pressure, and if fully implemented, could largely prevent hypertension from occurring.Hypertension is easy to screen and treat for BUT only about 50% of adults with hypertension are aware of their condition and only about 1 in 7 is adequately treated.Preventing and controlling high blood pressure is the major mechanism for NCD prevention and control and a model for other NCD risks.Effective lifestyle and drug treatments could prevent and control hypertension in most individuals if systematically applied to the population, simple interventions are feasible in all settings, and can be used to enhance primary care.Urgent sustained action is needed is needed for effective public policies and health system changes to prevent and control hypertension.

Cerca de una cuarta parte de los adultos tienen hipertensión, el principal factor de riesgo de muerte (inclusive la causada por cardiopatía y accidente cerebrovascular).Existen políticas eficaces que podrían ayudar a las personas a elegir opciones saludables para prevenir el aumento de la presión arterial; si se las aplicara plenamente, se podría evitar en gran medida el desarrollo de hipertensión.La hipertensión es fácil de detectar y tratar, PERO solo alrededor de 50% de los adultos que presentan dicha afección son conscientes de su situación y solamente 1 de cada 7 de ellos recibe el tratamiento adecuado.La prevención y el control de la hipertensión es el mecanismo principal para prevenir y controlar las enfermedades no transmisibles y un modelo para evitar otros riesgos de presentar dichas enfermedades.La adopción de un modo de vida saludable y el tratamiento farmacológico efectivo podrían prevenir y controlar la hipertensión en la mayoría de las personas si se implementaran de manera sistemática en la población; en todos los entornos es posible aplicar intervenciones sencillas, que pueden usarse para mejorar la atención primaria.Es urgente adoptar medidas sostenidas para introducir cambios eficaces en las políticas públicas y los sistemas de salud pública con miras a prevenir y controlar la hipertensión.

[São Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020Chamado à ação de São Paulo para prevenção e controle da hipertensão arterial: 2020]. / Llamado a la acción de San Pablo para la prevención y el control de la hipertensión arterial, 2020.

About 1/4th of adults have high blood pressure which is the single most important risk for death (including heart disease and stroke).There are effective policies that could facilitate people making healthy choices to prevent raised blood pressure, and if fully implemented, could largely prevent hypertension from occurring.Hypertension is easy to screen and treat for BUT only about 50% of adults with hypertension are aware of their condition and only about 1 in 7 is adequately treated.Preventing and controlling high blood pressure is the major mechanism for NCD prevention and control and a model for other NCD risks.Effective lifestyle and drug treatments could prevent and control hypertension in most individuals if systematically applied to the population, simple interventions are feasible in all settings, and can be used to enhance primary care.Urgent sustained action is needed is needed for effective public policies and health system changes to prevent and control hypertension.

Cerca de » dos adultos têm hipertensão arterial, que é o fator de risco isolado mais importante para morte (incluídas as mortes por cardiopatia e acidente vascular cerebral).Existem políticas eficazes que poderiam facilitar escolhas pessoais saudáveis para evitar a elevação da pressão arterial e, se plenamente implementadas, podem prevenir a ocorrência da hipertensão arterial.É fácil rastrear e tratar a hipertensão, MAS somente cerca de 50% dos adultos hipertensos estão cientes de sua condição, e apenas cerca de 1 em cada 7 é tratado adequadamente.A prevenção e controle da hipertensão é o principal mecanismo de prevenção e controle das doenças não transmissíveis e um modelo para outros riscos de doenças não transmissíveis.Tratamentos eficazes com mudanças de estilo de vida e medicamentos poderiam prevenir e controlar a hipertensão arterial na maioria das pessoas se aplicados sistematicamente à população; as intervenções simples são viáveis em todos os ambientes e podem melhorar a atenção primária.É necessária a ação continuada e urgente a fim de obter mudanças efetivas nas políticas públicas e no sistema de saúde para prevenir e controlar a hipertensão arterial.

Hypertension and kidney disease progression.

Hypertension is a common finding in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and it is associated with kidney disease progression. Hypertensive nephropathy is a diagnosis, mostly based on clinical suspicion and defines many cases of CKD of unknown etiology. The risk of progression of hypertension-attributed nephropathy seems to have a genetic background as has been demonstrated in African-American patients with APOL1 gene risk variants.

Prevalence of factors related to vascular calcifications in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis.

The main aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of vascular calcifications in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis in our population assessed by X-ray. The secondary objectives were to determine the cardiovascular risk factors associated with the presence of vascular calcifications and to evaluate the complementary use of the echocardiogram in a cross-sectional, observational, multicentric study. We included patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis, age =18 years with at least 3 months of renal replacement therapy in 8 dialysis centres in Argentina. The degree of vascular calcification was determined using Adragao and Kauppila scores. The presence of valvular calcifications was established through a trans-thoracic doppler echocardiogram. Univariate and multivariate analysis were undertaken, considering the degree of vascular calcification as the dependent variable; 443 adult patients were evaluated at 8 centres across 5 provinces in Argentina. The prevalence of vascular calcifications by the X-rays was 63%, while 73% presented calcifications in hands and pelvis, with an Adragao score > 3, and 60% presented calcifications in the abdominal aorta with a Kauppila score > 4. The prevalence of valvular calcifications: 28%. We have shown a higher rate of vascular calcifications with the use of plain X-rays when compared to the prevalence of valvular calcifications obtained with echocardiograms. In this regard, valvular calcifications were present particularly in those patients with a severe level of radiological vascular calcification.

Does kidney disease cause hypertension?

Hypertension complicates most cases of chronic kidney disease. While the prevalence and severity of hypertension increase as glomerular filtration rate falls, hypertension is often observed in patients with structural kidney disease while renal function is normal, in particular those with polycystic kidney disease or proteinuric glomerular diseases. On the other hand, even severe reductions in renal function may not result in hypertension, especially if there is effective control of extracellular fluid volume. Recent clinical and experimental data indicate that proteinuria may mediate sodium retention and hypertension via plasmin-mediated activation of the epithelial sodium channel. Current evidence supports the notion that chronic kidney disease is a cause of chronic hypertension, even in the absence of detectable changes in glomerular filtration rate.

It is strongly recommended to not conduct, fund, or publish research studies that use spot urine samples with estimating equations to assess individuals' sodium (salt) intake in association with health outcomes: a policy statement of the World Hypertension League, International Society of Hypertension and Resolve to Save Lives.

Spot urine samples with estimating equations have been used to assess individuals' sodium (salt) intake in association with health outcomes. There is large random and systematic error in estimating sodium intake using this method and spurious health outcome associations. Substantial controversy has resulted from false claims the method is valid. Hence, the World Hypertension League, International Society of Hypertension and Resolve to Save Lives, supported by 21 other health organizations, have issued this policy statement that strongly recommends that research using spot urine samples with estimating equations to assess individuals' sodium (salt) intake in association with health outcomes should not be conducted, funded or published. Literature reviews on the health impacts of reducing dietary sodium that include studies that have used spot and short duration timed urine samples with estimating equations need to explicitly acknowledge that the method is not recommended to be used and is associated with spurious health outcome associations.

Personalised recommendations for hospitalised patients with Acute Kidney Injury using a Kidney Action Team (KAT-AKI): protocol and early data of a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Although studies have examined the utility of clinical decision support tools in improving acute kidney injury (AKI) outcomes, no study has evaluated the effect of real-time, personalised AKI recommendations. This study aims to assess the impact of individualised AKI-specific recommendations delivered by trained clinicians and pharmacists immediately after AKI detection in hospitalised patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: KAT-AKI is a multicentre randomised investigator-blinded trial being conducted across eight hospitals at two major US hospital systems planning to enrol 4000 patients over 3 years (between 1 November 2021 and 1 November 2024). A real-time electronic AKI alert system informs a dedicated team composed of a physician and pharmacist who independently review the chart in real time, screen for eligibility and provide combined recommendations across the following domains: diagnostics, volume, potassium, acid-base and medications. Recommendations are delivered to the primary team in the alert arm or logged for future analysis in the usual care arm. The planned primary outcome is a composite of AKI progression, dialysis and mortality within 14 days from randomisation. A key secondary outcome is the percentage of recommendations implemented by the primary team within 24 hours from randomisation. The study has enrolled 500 individuals over 8.5 months. Two-thirds were on a medical floor at the time of the alert and 17.8% were in an intensive care unit. Virtually all participants were recommended for at least one diagnostic intervention. More than half (51.6%) had recommendations to discontinue or dose-adjust a medication. The median time from AKI alert to randomisation was 28 (IQR 15.8-51.5) min. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethics committee of each study site (Yale University and Johns Hopkins institutional review board (IRB) and a central IRB (BRANY, Biomedical Research Alliance of New York). We are committed to open dissemination of the data through clinicaltrials.gov and sharing of data on an open repository as well as publication in a peer-reviewed journal on completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04040296.

Three Times Weekly Dosing of Daprodustat versus Conventional Epoetin for Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients: ASCEND-TD: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Daprodustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) being investigated for the treatment of anemia of CKD. In this noninferiority trial, we compared daprodustat administered three times weekly with epoetin alfa (epoetin) in patients on prevalent hemodialysis switching from a prior erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients on hemodialysis with a baseline hemoglobin of 8-11.5 g/dl receiving an ESA were randomized 2:1 to daprodustat three times weekly (n=270) or conventional epoetin (n=137) for 52 weeks. Dosing algorithms aimed to maintain hemoglobin between 10 and 11 g/dl. The primary end point was mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to the average during the evaluation period (weeks 28-52). The principal secondary end point was average monthly intravenous iron dose. Other secondary end points included BP and hemoglobin variability. RESULTS: Daprodustat three times weekly was noninferior to epoetin for mean change in hemoglobin (model-adjusted mean treatment difference [daprodustat-epoetin], -0.05; 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to 0.10). During the evaluation period, mean (SD) hemoglobin values were 10.45 (0.55) and 10.51 (0.85) g/dl for daprodustat and epoetin groups, respectively. Responders (defined as mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period in the analysis range of 10 to 11.5 g/dl) were 80% in the daprodustat group versus 64% in the epoetin group. Proportionately fewer participants in the daprodustat group versus the epoetin group had hemoglobin values either below 10 g/dl or above 11.5 g/dl during the evaluation period. Mean monthly intravenous iron use was not significantly lower with daprodustat versus epoetin. The effect on BP was similar between groups. The percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between daprodustat (75%) and epoetin (79%). CONCLUSIONS: Daprodustat was noninferior to epoetin in hemoglobin response and was generally well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease: Erythropoiesis via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Daprodustat-Three Times Weekly Dosing in Dialysis (ASCEND-TD), NCT03400033.

Bedtime dosing of antihypertensive medications: systematic review and consensus statement: International Society of Hypertension position paper endorsed by World Hypertension League and European Society of Hypertension.

Antihypertensive drug therapy is one of the most efficient medical interventions for preventing disability and death globally. Most of the evidence supporting its benefits has been derived from outcome trials with morning dosing of medications. Accumulating evidence suggests an adverse prognosis associated with night-time hypertension, nondipping blood pressure (BP) profile and morning BP surge, with increased incidence of cardiovascular events during the first few morning hours. These observations provide justification for complete 24-h BP control as being the primary goal of antihypertensive treatment. Bedtime administration of antihypertensive drugs has also been proposed as a potentially more effective treatment strategy than morning administration. This Position Paper by the International Society of Hypertension reviewed the published evidence on the clinical relevance of the diurnal variation in BP and the timing of antihypertensive drug treatment, aiming to provide consensus recommendations for clinical practice. Eight published outcome hypertension studies involved bedtime dosing of antihypertensive drugs, and all had major methodological and/or other flaws and a high risk of bias in testing the impact of bedtime compared to morning treatment. Three ongoing, well designed, prospective, randomized controlled outcome trials are expected to provide high-quality data on the efficacy and safety of evening or bedtime versus morning drug dosing. Until that information is available, preferred use of bedtime drug dosing of antihypertensive drugs should not be routinely recommended in clinical practice. Complete 24-h control of BP should be targeted using readily available, long-acting antihypertensive medications as monotherapy or combinations administered in a single morning dose.

Standardized treatment to improve hypertension control in primary health care: The HEARTS in the Americas Initiative.

Hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) worldwide. Despite the availability of effective antihypertensive medications, the control of hypertension at a global level is dismal, and consequently, the CVD burden continues to increase. In response, countries in Latin America and the Caribbean are implementing the HEARTS in the Americas, a community-based program that focuses on increasing hypertension control and CVD secondary prevention through risk factor mitigation. One key pillar is the implementation of a standardized hypertension treatment protocol supported by a small, high-quality formulary. This manuscript describes the methodology used by the HEARTS in the Americas program to implement a population-based standardized hypertension treatment protocol. It is rooted in a seamless transition from existing treatment practices to best practice using pharmacologic protocols built around a core set of ideal antihypertensive medications. In alignment with recent major hypertension guidelines, the HEARTS in the Americas protocols call for the rapid control of blood pressure, through the use of two antihypertensive medications, preferably in the form of a single pill, fixed-dose combination, in the initial treatment of hypertension. To date, the HEARTS in the Americas program has seen the improvement in antihypertensive medication formularies and the establishment of pharmacologic treatment protocols tailored to individual participating countries. This has translated to significant increases in hypertension control rates post-program implementation in these jurisdictions. Thus, the HEARTS in the Americas program could serve as a model, for not only the Americas Region but globally, and ultimately decrease the burden of CVD.

Is there a role for direct renin inhibitors in chronic kidney disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the evidence supporting the use of renin inhibitors to control hypertension, limit kidney disease progression, and decrease cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). RECENT FINDINGS: The literature on the subject is still limited. Most of the studies have used aliskiren as the study drug. Animal models show improved survival and decreased renal injury in animals receiving aliskiren. Human studies in patients with normal renal function show effective blood pressure control alone or in combination with different agents. There are no studies focusing on blood pressure control in patients with CKD, though the drug has been safely used in CKD. In a randomized clinical trial, aliskiren decreased albuminuria when added to losartan in patients with early diabetic nephropathy. Ongoing studies are evaluating the role of renin inhibitors in the prevention of cardiovascular events and slowing of kidney disease progression in CKD. SUMMARY: Renin inhibitors, specifically aliskiren, effectively decrease albuminuria. Their role in improving hard renal endpoints and decreasing cardiovascular events in CKD still remains to be established.

Association of ACE genotype and predominantly diastolic hypertension: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: The insertion/deletion (I/D) angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) polymorphism has been established as a cardiovascular risk factor in some populations, but the association with essential hypertension is controversial. Predominantly diastolic hypertension (PDH), or narrow pulse pressure hypertension, has been shown to have increased peripheral resistance. Because a DD genotype has been associated with higher plasma ACE levels and angiotensin II activity, we genotyped PDH patients for ACE I/D polymorphism. METHODS: Ninety-three patients with systolic blood pressure (BP)<140 mmHg systolic and diastolic BP>90 mmHg, or BP>140/90 mmHg with a pulse pressure<45 mmHg, were defined as PDH. The II, ID and DD genotype variants of ACE were characterised by the triple primer nested-PCR method. Results were compared to 75 normotensive control individuals. Statistical significance was assessed by the Chi square test. RESULTS: The genotype distribution among PDH patients was II=20 (21.5%), ID=34 (36.5%), DD=39 (42%), while the distribution among normotensive controls was II=16 (21.4%), ID=42 (56%), DD=17 (22.6%). The difference in genotype distribution between PDH patients and controls was significant (p<0.02). ACE allele frequencies in PDH patients and controls were D=0.60, I=0.40 and D=0.51, I=0.49, respectively, statistically non-significant (ns). CONCLUSION: These results suggest an association between ACE genotype DD and predominantly diastolic hypertension.

Implementing standardized performance indicators to improve hypertension control at both the population and healthcare organization levels.

The ability to reliably evaluate the impact of interventions and changes in hypertension prevalence and control is critical if the burden of hypertension-related disease is to be reduced. Previously, a World Hypertension League Expert Committee made recommendations to standardize the reporting of population blood pressure surveys. We have added to those recommendations and also provide modified recommendations from a Pan American Health Organization expert meeting for "performance indicators" to be used to evaluate clinical practices. Core indicators for population surveys are recommended to include: (1) mean systolic blood pressure and (2) mean diastolic blood pressure, and the prevalences of: (3) hypertension, (4) awareness of hypertension, (5) drug-treated hypertension, and (6) drug-treated and controlled hypertension. Core indicators for clinical registries are recommended to include: (1) the prevalence of diagnosed hypertension and (2) the ratio of diagnosed hypertension to that expected by population surveys, and the prevalences of: (3) controlled hypertension, (4) lack of blood pressure measurement within a year in people diagnosed with hypertension, and (5) missed visits by people with hypertension. Definitions and additional indicators are provided. Widespread adoption of standardized population and clinical hypertension performance indicators could represent a major step forward in the effort to control hypertension.

Implementación de la Iniciativa HEARTS en Argentina: primeros resultados / Implementation of the HEARTS Initiative in Argentina: initial results / Implementação da Iniciativa HEARTS na Argentina: primeiros resultados

RESUMEN Las enfermedades cardiovasculares son la principal causa de morbimortalidad, y la hipertensión es su principal factor de riesgo. En 2018, Argentina comenzó a implementar la Iniciativa HEARTS en 5 centros de atención primaria de salud a través del Plan Nacional de Prevención y Control de la Hipertensión Arterial. En este estudio se presenta el impacto de su implementación en los indicadores de cobertura efectiva, tratamiento, tratamiento combinado y control. La Iniciativa HEARTS incluye múltiples componentes; entre ellos se destacan la capacitación de los equipos de salud, la reorganización de las tareas basada en la transferencia de competencias clínicas, la provisión de dispositivos de medición de la presión arterial automáticos y clínicamente validados, y la utilización de un único protocolo de tratamiento estandarizado. Se utilizó un modelo de datos longitudinales del tipo ecuación de estimación generalizada, y se agrupó la información de los 5 centros de salud mediante promedios ponderados según el tamaño de la población bajo cobertura. El análisis de los resultados fue estratificado en dos períodos de tiempo delimitados por la irrupción de las restricciones debidas al COVID-19. Durante el primer período de 18 meses se observó una mejoría significativa en el tratamiento (5,9%; p<0,01) y el tratamiento combinado (13,4%; p<0,01), sin cambios significativos en la cobertura (8,4%; p=0,87) y con un descenso paradojal en el control (−3,3%; p=0,02). Durante las restricciones y respecto del período previo, se constató una reducción generalizada en todos los indicadores, principalmente en la cobertura (−23,6%; p<0,01) y el control (−12,5%; p<0,01). Sin embargo, los niveles de tratamiento y tratamiento combinado persistieron por encima de los valores basales (1,7%; p<0,01 y 5,4%; p<0,01, respectivamente).

ABSTRACT Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the Region of the Americas, and hypertension is one of the main risk factors. In 2018, Argentina began implementing the HEARTS Initiative in five primary health care centers, through the National Plan for the Prevention and Control of Arterial Hypertension. This study presents the impact its implementation has had on the indicators of effective coverage, treatment, combination therapy, and control. The HEARTS Initiative has multiple components; these include training health teams, reassigning tasks based on the transfer of clinical competencies, providing automatic and clinically validated blood pressure measurement devices, and using a single standardized treatment protocol. A longitudinal data model (generalized estimating equation analysis) was used, and the information from the five health centers was grouped using weighted averages according to the size of the population under coverage. Analysis of the results was stratified into two time periods delimited by the imposition of restrictions due to COVID-19. During the first period of 18 months, significant improvement was observed in treatment (5.9%; p<0.01) and combination therapy (13.4%; p<0.01), with no significant change in coverage (8.4%; p=0.87) and with a paradoxical decrease in control (−3.3%; p=0.02). When the period of restrictions was compared to the previous period, a generalized reduction was observed in all indicators, particularly coverage (−23.6%; p<0.01) and control (−12.5%; p<0.01). However, treatment and combination therapy levels remained above baseline values (1.7%; p<0.01 and 5.4%; p<0.01, respectively).

RESUMO As doenças cardiovasculares são a principal causa de morbimortalidade, e a hipertensão, seu principal fator de risco. Em 2018, a Argentina começou a implementar a Iniciativa HEARTS em 5 centros de atenção primária à saúde por meio do Plano Nacional de Prevenção e Controle da Hipertensão Arterial. Este estudo apresenta o impacto de sua implementação nos indicadores de cobertura efetiva, tratamento, tratamento combinado e controle. A Iniciativa HEARTS inclui vários componentes. Entre eles, se destacam a capacitação das equipes de saúde, a reorganização das tarefas com base na transferência de competências clínicas, a disponibilização de aparelhos automáticos e clinicamente validados para aferição da pressão arterial e a utilização de um único protocolo padronizado de tratamento. Foi utilizado um modelo de equações de estimativas generalizadas para a análise de dados longitudinais, e as informações dos 5 centros de saúde foram agrupadas por meio de médias ponderadas de acordo com o tamanho da população coberta. A análise dos resultados foi estratificada em dois períodos de tempo delimitados pela irrupção das restrições em virtude da COVID-19. Durante os primeiros 18 meses, houve melhora significativa no tratamento (5,9%; p<0,01) e no tratamento combinado (13,4%; p<0,01), sem mudança significativa na cobertura (8,4%; p=0,87) e com uma diminuição paradoxal no controle (−3,3%; p=0,02). Durante as restrições e em relação ao período anterior, verificou-se redução generalizada em todos os indicadores, principalmente na cobertura (−23,6%; p<0,01) e no controle (−12,5%; p<0,01). No entanto, os níveis de tratamento e tratamento combinado persistiram acima dos valores basais (1,7%; p<0,01 e 5,4%; p<0,01, respectivamente).

Implementación de la Iniciativa HEARTS en Argentina: primeros resultados

[RESUMEN]. Las enfermedades cardiovasculares son la principal causa de morbimortalidad, y la hipertensión es su principal factor de riesgo. En 2018, Argentina comenzó a implementar la Iniciativa HEARTS en 5 centros de atención primaria de salud a través del Plan Nacional de Prevención y Control de la Hipertensión Arterial. En este estudio se presenta el impacto de su implementación en los indicadores de cobertura efectiva, tratamiento, tratamiento combinado y control. La Iniciativa HEARTS incluye múltiples componentes; entre ellos se destacan la capacitación de los equipos de salud, la reorganización de las tareas basada en la transferencia de competencias clínicas, la provisión de dispositivos de medición de la presión arterial automáticos y clínicamente validados, y la utilización de un único protocolo de tratamiento estandarizado. Se utilizó un modelo de datos longitudinales del tipo ecuación de estimación generalizada, y se agrupó la información de los 5 centros de salud mediante promedios ponderados según el tamaño de la población bajo cobertura. El análisis de los resultados fue estratificado en dos períodos de tiempo delimitados por la irrupción de las restricciones debidas al COVID-19. Durante el primer período de 18 meses se observó una mejoría significativa en el tratamiento (5,9%; p<0,01) y el tratamiento combinado (13,4%; p<0,01), sin cambios significativos en la cobertura (8,4%; p=0,87) y con un descenso paradojal en el control (−3,3%; p=0,02). Durante las restricciones y respecto del período previo, se constató una reducción generalizada en todos los indicadores, principalmente en la cobertura (−23,6%; p<0,01) y el control (−12,5%; p<0,01). Sin embargo, los niveles de tratamiento y tratamiento combinado persistieron por encima de los valores basales (1,7%; p<0,01 y 5,4%; p<0,01, respectivamente).

[ABSTRACT]. Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the Region of the Americas, and hypertension is one of the main risk factors. In 2018, Argentina began implementing the HEARTS Initiative in five primary health care centers, through the National Plan for the Prevention and Control of Arterial Hypertension. This study presents the impact its implementation has had on the indicators of effective coverage, treatment, combination therapy, and control. The HEARTS Initiative has multiple components; these include training health teams, reassigning tasks based on the transfer of clinical competencies, providing automatic and clinically validated blood pressure measurement devices, and using a single standardized treatment protocol. A longitudinal data model (generalized estimating equation analysis) was used, and the information from the five health centers was grouped using weighted averages according to the size of the population under coverage. Analysis of the results was stratified into two time periods delimited by the imposition of restrictions due to COVID-19. During the first period of 18 months, significant improvement was observed in treatment (5.9%; p<0.01) and combination therapy (13.4%; p<0.01), with no significant change in coverage (8.4%; p=0.87) and with a paradoxical decrease in control (−3.3%; p=0.02). When the period of restrictions was compared to the previous period, a generalized reduction was observed in all indicators, particularly coverage (−23.6%; p<0.01) and control (−12.5%; p<0.01). However, treatment and combination therapy levels remained above baseline values (1.7%; p<0.01 and 5.4%; p<0.01, respectively).

[RESUMO]. As doenças cardiovasculares são a principal causa de morbimortalidade, e a hipertensão, seu principal fator de risco. Em 2018, a Argentina começou a implementar a Iniciativa HEARTS em 5 centros de atenção primária à saúde por meio do Plano Nacional de Prevenção e Controle da Hipertensão Arterial. Este estudo apresenta o impacto de sua implementação nos indicadores de cobertura efetiva, tratamento, tratamento combinado e controle. A Iniciativa HEARTS inclui vários componentes. Entre eles, se destacam a capacitação das equipes de saúde, a reorganização das tarefas com base na transferência de competências clínicas, a disponibilização de aparelhos automáticos e clinicamente validados para aferição da pressão arterial e a utilização de um único protocolo padronizado de tratamento. Foi utilizado um modelo de equações de estimativas generalizadas para a análise de dados longitudinais, e as informações dos 5 centros de saúde foram agrupadas por meio de médias ponderadas de acordo com o tamanho da população coberta. A análise dos resultados foi estratificada em dois períodos de tempo delimitados pela irrupção das restrições em virtude da COVID-19. Durante os primeiros 18 meses, houve melhora significativa no tratamento (5,9%; p<0,01) e no tratamento combinado (13,4%; p<0,01), sem mudança significativa na cobertura (8,4%; p=0,87) e com uma diminuição paradoxal no controle (−3,3%; p=0,02). Durante as restrições e em relação ao período anterior, verificou-se redução generalizada em todos os indicadores, principalmente na cobertura (−23,6%; p<0,01) e no controle (−12,5%; p<0,01). No entanto, os níveis de tratamento e tratamento combinado persistiram acima dos valores basais (1,7%; p<0,01 e 5,4%; p<0,01, respectivamente).

Clinical Perspective on Antihypertensive Drug Treatment in Adults With Grade 1 Hypertension and Low-to-Moderate Cardiovascular Risk: An International Expert Consultation.

Hypertension is a leading risk factor for disease burden globally. An unresolved question is whether grade 1 hypertension (140-159/90-99mmHg) with low (cardiovascular mortality <1% at 10 years) to moderate (cardiovascular mortality ≥1% and <5% at 10 years) absolute total cardiovascular risk (CVR) should be treated with antihypertensive agents. A virtual international consultation process was undertaken to summarize the opinions of select experts. After holistic analysis of all epidemiological, clinical, psychosocial, and public health elements, this consultation process reached the following consensus in hypertensive adults aged <80 years: (1) The question of whether drug treatment in grade 1 should be preceded by a period of some weeks or months during which only lifestyle measures are recommended cannot be evidence based, but the consensus opinion is to have a period of lifestyle alone reserved only to patients with grade 1 "isolated" hypertension (grade 1 uncomplicated hypertension with low absolute total CVR, and without other major CVR factors and risk modifiers). (2) The initiation of antihypertensive drug therapy in grade 1 hypertension with moderate absolute total CVR should not be delayed. (3) Men ≥55 years and women ≥60 years with uncomplicated grade 1 hypertension should automatically be classified within the moderate absolute total CVR category, even in the absence of other major CVR factors and risk modifiers. (4) Statins should be considered along with blood-pressure lowering therapy, irrespective of cholesterol levels, in patients with grade 1 hypertensive with moderate CVR.