Achalasia: a 13-year, single-centre experience comparing endoscopic balloon dilatation and laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic achalasia is a non-curable, primary motility disorder of the oesophagus. Most established long-term palliative treatment options are laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and endoscopic balloon dilatation (BD). AIM: We aimed to compare the outcome of both therapies and the risk of serious complications, defined as perforation or death, in a single-centre series. METHOD: In this retrospective study, patients with BD or LHM were identified from 1997-2010. The symptom score (modified Zaninotto score) before treatment and at time of interview was evaluated via a telephone questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and treatment was provided with BD-only in 63, surgery-only in 23, BD crossover to surgery in 12, and surgery crossover to BD in one patient. Mean age was 62 years in the BD-only, and 39 years in the surgery-only group. One hundred and fifteen BD were performed on 76 patients with multiple dilatations required in 46 patients (38%). Sixty-four percent of all patients alive (n=81) were interviewed. Satisfactory outcomes were achieved in 79% in the BD group and in 88% in the surgery group, with a mean follow-up of 81 and 69 months, respectively. There was a single perforation in the BD group (0.9%) and no deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: LHM and on-demand BD were safe and within the limitations of our study design both methods appeared similarly effective treatments for achalasia, resulting in a satisfactory outcome in 88% and 79% of patients with a mean follow-up of 69 and 81 months. Serious complications occurred in less than 1% of procedures and there were no deaths.

Wrapped in controversy: trends in fundoplication at myotomy for achalasia in Christchurch, New Zealand.

AIM: A surgical approach to the management of achalasia involves myotomy, typically with added anti-reflux procedure. The most appropriate fundoplication in this setting (total Nissen, partial anterior Dor, or partial posterior Toupet) remains controversial. We present the trends in fundoplication procedures performed at myotomy in Christchurch between 1997 and 2009, and compare this with the literature. METHODS: 34 cases of achalasia managed with myotomy and various types of fundoplication in Christchurch between 1997 and 2009 were separated into two temporal groups, and the type of surgery in each group analysed. Data was obtained from the clinical records on specific short and long-term postoperative complications. RESULTS: There is a decrease over time in myotomy without fundoplication and in total Nissen fundoplications performed. The number of posterior fundoplications remains equal over both time periods; however the proportion of anterior fundoplications is significantly increased in the later group. Three cases of mucosal perforation occurred during myotomy associated with anterior fundoplication, and reintervention rates were highest in myotomy only and anterior fundoplication patients. CONCLUSION: Trends in anti-reflux surgery in Christchurch reflect the development of the evidence base in the literature. The change in fundoplication procedure is not clearly explained by the complication rates.

Post-acute surgical ward round proforma improves documentation.

In health care, record keeping of doctor-patient encounters is vital for quality patient care and medico-legal reasons. We audited the documentation of post-acute consultant ward round (PACWR) in our department before and six months after an introduction of a proforma (standard form). The clinical notes of all patients admitted acutely under General Surgery over a period of one week before and one week after the introduction of a proforma were reviewed to note whether time and date, signature, impression and dietary plan were documented after PACWR. The nurses were also surveyed on the day of the PACWR for their certainty regarding the dietary plan of their patients and whether they had to contact the surgical team for clarification. There were 108 and 103 patients eligible for the first and second study periods respectively. After the introduction of the proforma, there was a statistically significant improvement in the documentation of time and date (37% vs. 72%, p-value < 0.01) and impression (40% vs. 61%, p-value < 0.01). Improvement in the documentation of the dietary plan reached statistical significant only when the analysis was restricted to the cases where a proforma was filled out (78 out of 103 patients). Introduction of the proforma had no statistically significant impact on the nurses' certainty regarding their patients' dietary plan and the number of times they had to contact the surgical teams. In conclusion, PACWR proforma improves overall documentation. This will help in avoiding adverse effects on patient care and medico-legal ramifications.