Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 194(11): 1060-1065, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30014236

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced morphea (RIM) is a circumscribed localized scleroderma that occurs most often in the breast. After an asymptomatic period of one month to several years, the symptoms (circumscribed inflammation, edema, sclerosis) often arise suddenly and cannot be clinically distinguished from a local recurrence in the form of inflammatory carcinoma. CASE: We present a case of a 74-year-old woman who developed this rare and serious local side-effect in connective tissue following neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib (Verzenio®) and aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (Arimidex®) therapy and subsequent radiation therapy of the breast. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about risk factors and pathogenesis of RIM. Here we describe the first case of RIM following immunotherapy. The diagnosis is based on clinical appearance and histopathological examination. Treatment should be initiated in the inflammatory stage in order to prevent or delay irreversible fibrosis and atrophy of the breast.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Mama/efeitos da radiação , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Esclerodermia Localizada/etiologia , Idoso , Aminopiridinas/administração & dosagem , Aminopiridinas/efeitos adversos , Anastrozol/administração & dosagem , Anastrozol/efeitos adversos , Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , Biópsia , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Terapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Esclerodermia Localizada/patologia
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 11(7)2019 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31277254

RESUMO

High-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has the potential to progress into lethal disease. Treatment options are manifold but, given a lack of surrogate biomarkers, it remains unclear which treatment offers the best results. Several studies have reported circulating tumor cells (CTCs) to be a prognostic biomarker in metastatic PCa. However, few reports on CTCs in high-risk non-metastatic PCa are available. Herein, we evaluated CTC detection in high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients using the in vivo CellCollector CANCER01 (DC01) and CellSearch system. CTC counts were analyzed and compared before and after radiotherapy (two sampling time points) in 51 high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients and were further compared according to isolation technique; further, CTC counts were correlated to clinical features. Use of DC01 resulted in a significantly higher percentage of CTC-positive samples compared to CellSearch (33.7% vs. 18.6%; p = 0.024) and yielded significantly higher CTC numbers (range: 0-15 vs. 0-5; p = 0.006). Matched pair analysis of samples between two sampling time points showed no difference in CTC counts determined by both techniques. CTC counts were not correlated with clinicopathological features. In vivo enrichment using DC01 has the potential to detect CTC at a higher efficiency compared to CellSearch, suggesting that CTC is a suitable biomarker in high-risk non-metastatic PCa.

3.
Sci Rep ; 7: 43424, 2017 02 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28233867

RESUMO

Enumeration and especially molecular characterization of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) holds great promise for cancer management. We tested a modified type of an in vivo enrichment device (Catch&Release) for its ability to bind and detach cancer cells for the purpose of single-cell molecular downstream analysis in vitro. The evaluation showed that single-cell analysis using array comparative genome hybridization (array-CGH) and next generation sequencing (NGS) is feasible. We found array-CGH to be less noisy when whole genome amplification (WGA) was performed with Ampli1 as compared to GenomePlex (DLRS values 0.65 vs. 1.39). Moreover, Ampli1-processed cells allowed detection of smaller aberrations (median 14.0 vs. 49.9 Mb). Single-cell NGS data obtained from Ampli1-processed samples showed the expected non-synonymous mutations (deletion/SNP) according to bulk DNA. We conclude that clinical application of this refined in vivo enrichment device allows CTC enumeration and characterization, thus, representing a promising tool for personalized medicine.


Assuntos
Separação Celular/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/metabolismo , Análise de Célula Única/métodos , Anticorpos/química , Anticorpos/metabolismo , Adesão Celular , Contagem de Células , Separação Celular/instrumentação , Hibridização Genômica Comparativa , Molécula de Adesão da Célula Epitelial/genética , Molécula de Adesão da Célula Epitelial/metabolismo , Expressão Gênica , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/patologia , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patologia , Medicina de Precisão , Análise de Célula Única/instrumentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA