Combined Decompression of Pudendal and Inferior Cluneal Nerves for Entrapment Neuralgias Using Transperitoneal Robotic Laparoscopy: Feasibility and Our Four-Step Technique.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of a combined decompression of pudendal and inferior cluneal nerves for entrapment syndrome using a transperitoneal robotic laparoscopy. DESIGN: Demonstration of our 4-step technique with narrated video footage. SETTING: Pudendal and inferior cluneal neuralgias caused by an entrapment syndrome are both responsible for perineal pain [1]. Although more precise data are lacking, these 2 neuralgias are frequently associated. Failure of surgical pudendal nerve decompression in the early 2000 has driven to discover the entity of a potential entrapment syndrome of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the tight and its inferior cluneal branches between the ischium bone and the sacrotuberous ligament [2]. The corresponding neuralgia is responsible for a neuropathic pain to a more posterior part of the perineum and the thigh, without any neurovegetative symptom. In case of failure of medical treatment, surgery can be proposed using an invasive open transgluteal approach as a standard treatment [3-5]. INTERVENTIONS: Transperitoneal robotic laparoscopy for a mini-invasive releasing of both pudendal and inferior cluneal nerves, following a 4-step technique: 1. Opening of the peritoneum between the external iliac vessels and the umbilical ligament 2. Dissection of the internal iliac and pudendal arteries up to the pudendal nerve 3. Section of the sacrospinous ligament and release of the pudendal nerve 4. Section of the sacrotuberous ligament and release of the inferior cluneal nerve CONCLUSION: Previously, pudendal and inferior cluneal neuralgias have been managed with an invasive open transgluteal surgery. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of a mini-invasive transperitoneal robotic laparoscopy, with a standardized 4-step surgical technique. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Enhanced Recovery after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Cancer: Is it Better for Patients to Have a Quick Discharge?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of an enhanced recovery program (ERP) after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for cancer. METHODS: It was a monocentric, retrospective, comparative study. An ERP after RAPN was introduced at our institution in 2015 and proposed to all consecutive patients admitted for RAPN. The control group for this study was composed of patients managed immediately before the introduction of the ERP. We collected information on patient characteristics, tumor sizes, ischemia times, biology, hospital length of stays, postoperative (≤30 days) complications, and readmission rates. Group comparisons were made using the Pearson χ2 test for qualitative data and the Student t test for quantitative data. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, 112 patients were included in the ERP group. Fifty patients were included in the control group. Ninety patients in the ERP group (80.4%) were discharged at or before postoperative day (POD) 2 versus 10 patients (20%) in the control group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the ERP and control groups for the urinary retention rate (respectively 3.6 vs. 2%; p = 0.593). Resumption of normal bowel function was significantly shorter in the ERP group (94.6% at POD1 vs. 69.6% in the control group, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences for postoperative complications (15.2% in the ERP group vs. 20% in the control group, p = 0.447) or readmissions within 30 days (8.04 vs. 0.2%, p = 0.140). CONCLUSIONS: ERP after RAPN seems to reduce postoperative length of stay without increasing postoperative complications or readmissions.