The state of UK anaesthesia: a survey of National Health Service activity in 2013.

BACKGROUND: Details of current UK anaesthetic practice are unknown and were needed for interpretation of reports of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (GA) within the 5th National Audit Project. METHODS: We surveyed NHS anaesthetic activity to determine numbers of patients managed by anaesthetists and details of 'who, when, what, and where': activity included GA, local anaesthesia, sedation, or patients managed awake. Anaesthetists in NHS hospitals collected data on all patients for 2 days. Scaling enabled estimation of annual activity. RESULTS: Hospital response rate was 100% with 20,400 returns. The median return rate within departments was 98% (inter-quartile range 0.95-1). Annual numbers (% of total) of general anaesthetics, sedation, and awake cases were 2,766,600 (76.9%), 308,800 (8.6%), and 523,100 (14.5%), respectively. A consultant or career grade anaesthetist was present in more than 87% of cases. Emergency cases accounted for 23.1% of workload, 75% of which were undertaken out of hours. Specialties with the largest workload were orthopaedics/trauma (22.1%), general surgery (16.1%), and gynaecology (9.6%): 6.2% of cases were non-surgical. The survey data describe: who anaesthetized patients according to time of day, urgency, and ASA grade; when anaesthesia took place by day and by weekday; the distribution of patient types, techniques, and monitoring; where patients were anaesthetized. Nine patients out of 15 460 receiving GA died intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthesia in the UK is currently predominantly a consultant-delivered service. The low mortality rate supports the safety of UK anaesthetic care. The survey data should be valuable for planning and monitoring anaesthesia services.

5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: protocol, methods, and analysis of data.

BACKGROUND: Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA) with recall is a potentially distressing complication of general anaesthesia that can lead to psychological harm. The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) was designed to investigate the reported incidence, predisposing factors, causality, and impact of accidental awareness. METHODS: A nationwide network of local co-ordinators across all the UK and Irish public hospitals reported all new patient reports of accidental awareness to a central database, using a system of monthly anonymized reporting over a calendar year. The database collected the details of the reported event, anaesthetic and surgical technique, and any sequelae. These reports were categorized into main types by a multidisciplinary panel, using a formalized process of analysis. RESULTS: The main categories of accidental awareness were: certain or probable; possible; during sedation; on or from the intensive care unit; could not be determined; unlikely; drug errors; and statement only. The degree of evidence to support the categorization was also defined for each report. Patient experience and sequelae were categorized using current tools or modifications of such. CONCLUSIONS: The NAP5 methodology may be used to assess new reports of AAGA in a standardized manner, especially for the development of an ongoing database of case reporting. This paper is a shortened version describing the protocols, methods, and data analysis from NAP5--the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home.

5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: patient experiences, human factors, sedation, consent, and medicolegal issues.

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland into accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA) yielded data related to psychological aspects from the patient, and the anaesthetist, perspectives; patients' experiences ranged from isolated auditory or tactile sensations to complete awareness. A striking finding was that 75% of experiences were for <5 min, yet 51% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 43-60%] experienced distress and 41% (95% CI 33-50%) suffered longer term adverse effect. Distress and longer term harm occurred across the full range of experiences but were particularly likely when the patient experienced paralysis (with or without pain). The patient's interpretation of what is happening at the time of the awareness seemed central to later impact; explanation and reassurance during suspected AAGA or at the time of report seemed beneficial. Quality of care before the event was judged good in 26%, poor in 39%, and mixed in 31%. Three-quarters of cases of AAGA (75%) were judged preventable. In 12%, AAGA care was judged good and the episode not preventable. The contributory and human factors in the genesis of the majority of cases of AAGA included medication, patient, and education/training. The findings have implications for national guidance, institutional organization, and individual practice. The incidence of 'accidental awareness' during sedation (~1:15,000) was similar to that during general anaesthesia (~1:19,000). The project raises significant issues about information giving and consent for both sedation and anaesthesia. We propose a novel approach to describing sedation from the patient's perspective which could be used in communication and consent. Eight (6%) of the patients had resorted to legal action (12, 11%, to formal complaint) at the time of reporting. NAP5 methodology provides a standardized template that might usefully inform the investigation of claims or serious incidents related to AAGA.

5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors.

We present the main findings of the 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA). Incidences were estimated using reports of accidental awareness as the numerator, and a parallel national anaesthetic activity survey to provide denominator data. The incidence of certain/probable and possible accidental awareness cases was ~1:19,600 anaesthetics (95% confidence interval 1:16,700-23,450). However, there was considerable variation across subtypes of techniques or subspecialities. The incidence with neuromuscular block (NMB) was ~1:8200 (1:7030-9700), and without, it was ~1:135,900 (1:78,600-299,000). The cases of AAGA reported to NAP5 were overwhelmingly cases of unintended awareness during NMB. The incidence of accidental awareness during Caesarean section was ~1:670 (1:380-1300). Two-thirds (82, 66%) of cases of accidental awareness experiences arose in the dynamic phases of anaesthesia, namely induction of and emergence from anaesthesia. During induction of anaesthesia, contributory factors included: use of thiopental, rapid sequence induction, obesity, difficult airway management, NMB, and interruptions of anaesthetic delivery during movement from anaesthetic room to theatre. During emergence from anaesthesia, residual paralysis was perceived by patients as accidental awareness, and commonly related to a failure to ensure full return of motor capacity. One-third (43, 33%) of accidental awareness events arose during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia, mostly due to problems at induction or towards the end of anaesthesia. Factors increasing the risk of accidental awareness included: female sex, age (younger adults, but not children), obesity, anaesthetist seniority (junior trainees), previous awareness, out-of-hours operating, emergencies, type of surgery (obstetric, cardiac, thoracic), and use of NMB. The following factors were not risk factors for accidental awareness: ASA physical status, race, and use or omission of nitrous oxide. We recommend that an anaesthetic checklist, to be an integral part of the World Health Organization Safer Surgery checklist, is introduced as an aid to preventing accidental awareness. This paper is a shortened version describing the main findings from NAP5--the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home.

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: protocol, methods and analysis of data.

Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia with recall is a potentially distressing complication of general anaesthesia that can lead to psychological harm. The 5th National Audit Project was designed to investigate the reported incidence, predisposing factors, causality and impact of accidental awareness. A nationwide network of local co-ordinators across all UK and Irish public hospitals reported all new patient reports of accidental awareness to a central database, using a system of monthly anonymised reporting over a calendar year. The database collected the details of the reported event, anaesthetic and surgical technique, and any sequelae. These reports were categorised into main types by a multidisciplinary panel, using a formalised process of analysis. The main categories of accidental awareness were: certain or probable; possible; during sedation; on or from the intensive care unit; could not be determined; unlikely; drug errors; and statement only. The degree of evidence to support the categorisation was also defined for each report. Patient experience and sequelae were categorised using current tools or modifications of such. The 5th National Audit Project methodology may be used to assess new reports of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia in a standardised manner, especially for the development of an ongoing database of case reporting. This paper is a shortened version describing the protocols, methods and data analysis from 5th National Audit Project - the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home#pt.

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors.

We present the main findings of the 5th National Audit Project on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia. Incidences were estimated using reports of accidental awareness as the numerator, and a parallel national anaesthetic activity survey to provide denominator data. The incidence of certain/probable and possible accidental awareness cases was ~1:19 600 anaesthetics (95% CI 1:16 700-23 450). However, there was considerable variation across subtypes of techniques or subspecialties. The incidence with neuromuscular blockade was ~1:8200 (1:7030-9700), and without it was ~1:135 900 (1:78 600-299 000). The cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia reported to 5th National Audit Project were overwhelmingly cases of unintended awareness during neuromuscular blockade. The incidence of accidental awareness during caesarean section was ~1:670 (1:380-1300). Two thirds (82, 66%) of cases of accidental awareness experiences arose in the dynamic phases of anaesthesia, namely induction of and emergence from anaesthesia. During induction of anaesthesia, contributory factors included: use of thiopental; rapid sequence induction; obesity; difficult airway management; neuromuscular blockade; and interruptions of anaesthetic delivery during movement from anaesthetic room to theatre. During emergence from anaesthesia, residual paralysis was perceived by patients as accidental awareness, and commonly related to a failure to ensure full return of motor capacity. One third (43, 33%) of accidental awareness events arose during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia, most due to problems at induction or towards the end of anaesthesia. Factors increasing the risk of accidental awareness included: female sex; age (younger adults, but not children); obesity; anaesthetist seniority (junior trainees); previous awareness; out-of-hours operating; emergencies; type of surgery (obstetric, cardiac, thoracic); and use of neuromuscular blockade. The following factors were not risk factors for accidental awareness: ASA physical status; race; and use or omission of nitrous oxide. We recommend that an anaesthetic checklist, to be an integral part of the World Health Organization Safer Surgery checklist, is introduced as an aid to preventing accidental awareness. This paper is a shortened version describing the main findings from 5th National Audit Project - the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home#pt.

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: patient experiences, human factors, sedation, consent and medicolegal issues.

The 5th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland into accidental awareness during general anaesthesia yielded data related to psychological aspects from the patient, and the anaesthetist, perspectives; patients' experiences ranged from isolated auditory or tactile sensations to complete awareness. A striking finding was that 75% of experiences were for < 5 min, yet 51% of patients (95% CI 43-60%) experienced distress and 41% (95% CI 33-50%) suffered longer-term adverse effect. Distress and longer-term harm occurred across the full range of experiences but were particularly likely when the patient experienced paralysis (with or without pain). The patient's interpretation of what is happening at the time of the awareness seemed central to later impact; explanation and reassurance during suspected accidental awareness during general anaesthesia or at the time of report seemed beneficial. Quality of care before the event was judged good in 26%, poor in 39% and mixed in 31%. Three quarters of cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (75%) were judged preventable. In 12% of cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia, care was judged good and the episode not preventable. The contributory and human factors in the genesis of the majority of cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia included medication, patient and education/training. The findings have implications for national guidance, institutional organisation and individual practice. The incidence of 'accidental awareness' during sedation (~1:15 000) was similar to that during general anaesthesia (~1:19 000). The project raises significant issues about information giving and consent for both sedation and anaesthesia. We propose a novel approach to describing sedation from the patient's perspective which could be used in communication and consent. Eight (6%) of the patients had resorted to legal action (12, 11%, to formal complaint) at the time of reporting. The 5th National Audit Project methodology provides a standardised template that might usefully inform the investigation of claims or serious incidents related to accidental awareness during general anaesthesia.

Experience with an incontinence clinic.

In an "incontinence clinic," a study of 309 elderly patients showed the most common causes of incontinence to be: unstable bladder (57 percent), outflow obstruction (13 percent), and atonic bladder (7 percent). Pure stress incontinence was rare (2 percent). One third of the patients improved, one third had to be catheterized, and one third did not improve. An individually designed program of bladder retraining for the patient, coupled with support and instruction for the relatives and for the professional care providers, offered the best chance of success.

Evolution of complex chromosomal rearrangements in a case of biphenotypic pre-B/myeloid acute leukemia.

A case of acute biphenotypic leukemia, in which blast cells coexpress antigens of both lymphoid and myeloid lineages, was seen in a 24-year-old female. The clonal karyotype was complex but did not include any of the abnormalities previously found in biphenotypic leukemia. Chromosome abnormalities included breakpoints seen in both acute lymphoblastic and acute myeloid leukemias as well as a number of known fragile sites, namely the rare heritable fragile site at 10q24, and the common, aphidicolin-induced sites on chromosome 7.

Differences between white and black youth who drink heavily.

This study compares the attitudes and beliefs of white and black adolescents who drink heavily. The study's sample comprises 1,533 youth who responded in 1987 to a survey of 10,259 7th to 12th grade students, and reported that they had gotten drunk at least six times within the previous year. The ratio of blacks to whites decreased with drinking severity. Controlling for age, sex, and living situation, a logistic regression revealed that blacks were significantly more likely than whites to believe that getting drunk would lead to health problems and that alcohol is addicting. Blacks were also more concerned than whites about their parents' disapproval of their drinking alcohol, while whites were more concerned than blacks about their friends' disapproval. The study suggests that programs targeted towards black youth who drink heavily should focus less on enhancing peer refusal skills and more on ensuring that black parents and other adults make explicit their negative attitudes towards alcohol use.

The functional pectoralis major musculocutaneous island flap in head and neck reconstruction.

We describe our experience with the true island pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap in patients with high-volume defects for whom free-tissue transfer is unsuitable. Our operative technique is presented. We have modified the method of making a true island of the pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap on a muscle-free pedicle as first described by Wei et al. in 1984. This maintains maximal donor-site muscle function and facilitates closure of the donor-site defect. We present our results in 24 patients, in whom the flap has proved to be robust and reliable. The flap's advantages in terms of increased pedicle length, wider arc of rotation, decreased pedicle bulk, and improved cosmesis of the reconstruction are discussed.

Reducing non-attendance at outpatient clinics.

Outpatient non-attendance is a common source of inefficiency in a health service, wasting time and resources and potentially lengthening waiting lists. A prospective audit of plastic surgery outpatient clinics was conducted during the six months from January to June 1997, to determine the clinical and demographic profile of non-attenders. Of 6095 appointments 16% were not kept. Using the demographic information, we changed our follow-up guidelines to reflect risk factors for multiple non-attendances, and a self-referral clinic was introduced to replace routine follow-up for high risk non-attenders. After these changes, a second audit in the same six months of 1998 revealed a non-attendance rate of 11%--i.e. 30% lower than before. Many follow-up appointments are sent inappropriately to patients who do not want further attention. This study, indicating how risk factor analysis can identify a group of patients who are unlikely to attend again after one missed appointment, may be a useful model for the reduction of outpatient non-attendance in other specialties.

Prevalence of alcohol and drug use among North Carolina public school students.

During spring 1987, North Carolina conducted a drug prevalence survey on a randomly selected, stratified cluster sample of 10,259 seventh-12th grade students enrolled in public schools. The survey assisted in development of new drug prevention programs funded by the Drug-Free Schools Act of 1986. Results indicated alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana were the most commonly used drugs; males and whites were more frequent users than females and blacks; and almost 20% of 11th and 12th grade students reported coming to school drunk in the year preceding the survey. Extensive use of wine coolers and smokeless tobacco was noted. The need is discussed for other states to conduct similar surveys to establish a data base from which better programming decisions can be made.

T1G3 bladder cancer--indications for early cystectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To review our experience with early radical cystectomy in patients with T1G3 Transitional Cell Carcinoma of bladder (TCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients, who underwent early radical cystectomy over a 10-year period for clinical stage T1G3 TCC bladder, were studied. Of these 21 (70%) had radical cystectomy without treatment with intravesical chemo/immunotherapy. The number of tumours, presence or absence of Carcinoma In-Situ (CIS) and the pathological stage of the cystectomy specimen were recorded in each patient. Disease specific survival was determined in the subgroups using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent radical surgery for a single tumour without concomitant CIS (Group A). The other 13 had multiple tumours with or without concomitant CIS or a single tumour with CIS (Group B). The disease was upstaged after cystectomy in 1 (6%) patient in Group A compared to 7 (55%) in Group B, (p = 0.009). Nine (53%) had pT0 disease in Group A compared to 0% in Group B, (p = 0.0017). The 5-year cancer specific survival rates were 92% in Group A and 82% in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multiple T1G3 tumours with or without associated CIS, or in those with single T1G3 tumour with associated CIS the incidence of the disease being already muscle invasive at the time of clinical diagnosis is 55%. Early radical cystectomy should be advocated in this group. Conversely, for a single T1G3 tumour without associated CIS, conservative bladder preserving strategy with immuno-chemotherapy and close surveillance is justified.

Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: a report of two cases.

Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord usually occurs as a painless slow growing scrotal swelling and can present with sudden enlargement of the mass. Recurrences are frequent, owing to incomplete surgical removal of the tumour.

Cocaine and crack users compared.

Because crack use is such a recent phenomenon, little is known about users of this highly addictive drug, the harmful effects of which have been widely publicized. This study hypothesized that crack users would be more depressed and more alienated from family, friends, and school staff than would cocaine users, and would consider as less important reasons not to use crack and cocaine. The authors compared 411 users of cocaine (but not crack) to 156 crack users, all but 22 of whom had also used cocaine. The sample was derived from a larger random survey of 7th- through 12th-grade students in North Carolina. Results indicated that crack users were younger than cocaine users, made poorer grades, were more depressed, and were more likely to be alienated from family and friends. However, cocaine and crack users were equally unlikely to confide in anyone in their school if they had a drinking or drug problem. Further, crack users were more likely to have talked once to a teacher or counselor in the past year about their problems. The implications of these seemingly inconsistent findings are explored. Crack users appear to be a particularly vulnerable population.