Treatment patterns from 647 patients with Gaucher disease: An analysis from the Gaucher Outcome Survey.

The Gaucher Outcome Survey (GOS) is an international disease-specific registry established in 2010 for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Gaucher disease (GD), regardless of GD type or treatment status. For insight into how GD management varies among countries, we analyzed treatment patterns in GOS. As of October 30, 2015, data on GD-specific treatment (enzyme replacement therapy, substrate reduction therapy, or chemical chaperone therapy) received at any time were available for 647 patients. At analysis, velaglucerase alfa (316/573, 55.1%) and imiglucerase (184/573, 32.1%) were the treatments most widely used. Of the 647 treated patients, 446 (68.9%) had been treated for >5years and 368 (56.9%) had received only one GD-specific drug therapy. There were 377 patients who received velaglucerase alfa. Velaglucerase alfa was most widely used at 60U/kg every other week (134/492 dose entries, 27.2%), but there were differences in dosing between the three highest-enrolling countries (defined as >100 GOS patients enrolled in each), with most patients in Israel receiving <20U/kg, most patients in the United Kingdom receiving 20 to <40U/kg, and most in the United States receiving 60U/kg. This analysis provides a foundation upon which to examine real-life outcomes data from different treatment regimens globally.

The United Kingdom Primary Immune Deficiency (UKPID) Registry: report of the first 4 years' activity 2008-2012.

This report summarizes the establishment of the first national online registry of primary immune deficency in the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom Primary Immunodeficiency (UKPID Registry). This UKPID Registry is based on the European Society for Immune Deficiency (ESID) registry platform, hosted on servers at the Royal Free site of University College, London. It is accessible to users through the website of the United Kingdom Primary Immunodeficiency Network (www.ukpin.org.uk). Twenty-seven centres in the United Kingdom are actively contributing data, with an additional nine centres completing their ethical and governance approvals to participate. This indicates that 36 of 38 (95%) of recognized centres in the United Kingdom have engaged with this project. To date, 2229 patients have been enrolled, with a notable increasing rate of recruitment in the past 12 months. Data are presented on the range of diagnoses recorded, estimated minimum disease prevalence, geographical distribution of patients across the United Kingdom, age at presentation, diagnostic delay, treatment modalities used and evidence of their monitoring and effectiveness.

Omalizumab therapy: patients who achieve greatest benefit for their asthma experience greatest benefit for rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Asthma and rhinitis are considered components of a single IgE-mediated inflammatory disorder. However, despite being shown to often co-exist, they are typically treated as independent conditions. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, has proven effective in the treatment of both asthma and rhinitis. AIMS: To examine whether a response to omalizumab in terms of asthma control predicts a higher likelihood of rhinitis response in patients with concomitant allergic asthma and rhinitis. METHODS: This post hoc analysis was conducted on efficacy results from the SOLAR trial in which patients with moderate-to-severe asthma and rhinitis were randomized to receive omalizumab or placebo for 28 weeks. Patients were classified as asthma responders based on the physician's overall assessment (complete control or marked improvement in a five-level evaluation). Rhinitis responders were identified using the Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) questionnaire (> or = 1.0 point improvement in overall score). RESULTS: Data were available for 207 omalizumab-treated patients and 192 placebo patients. According to the physicians overall assessment, 123 (59.4%) of omalizumab-treated patients were asthma responders, with the likelihood of a rhinitis response significantly (P < 0.001) greater in these patients than in the placebo group. The odds ratio for rhinitis response in omalizumab-treated asthma responders vs nonresponders was 3.56 (95% CI: 1.94-6.54). CONCLUSIONS: A response in terms of asthma following omalizumab therapy is associated with a significantly increased probability of improvement in rhinitis.

Effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent allergic asthma: an open-label study.

BACKGROUND: In a 1-year, randomized, open-label study in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic (immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated) asthma, adding omalizumab to best standard care (BSC) significantly improved efficacy outcomes compared with BSC alone (control). We assessed the efficacy of omalizumab in the subgroup of patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent allergic asthma despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA), which reflects the European Union (EU) label population. METHODS: Efficacy outcomes included annual asthma exacerbation rate, annual asthma deterioration-related incident (ADRI) rate, % predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), asthma symptoms (Wasserfallen score) and quality of life (Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ)), which were compared in the omalizumab and control groups. Outcomes were also determined for omalizumab-treated patients judged to have responded to therapy (> or = 0.5-point improvement in Mini-AQLQ overall score at 27 weeks). RESULTS: In total, 164 patients (omalizumab, n=115; control, n=49) were receiving high-dose ICS plus a LABA. Annual asthma exacerbation rate was significantly reduced by 59% in the omalizumab group vs. control (1.26 vs. 3.06; P<0.001). ADRI rate was significantly reduced by 40% in the omalizumab group compared with control (5.61 vs. 9.40; P<0.05). Significant improvements were also seen in % predicted FEV(1) (71% vs. 60%; P<0.001), change from baseline in asthma symptom scores (-6.7 vs. 0.5; P<0.05) and Mini-AQLQ overall score (1.32 vs. 0.17; P<0.001). In omalizumab-treated patients, 71/102 (70%) were judged to have responded to therapy. In these Mini-AQLQ-assessed responders, exacerbation rate was reduced by 64% vs. control (1.12 vs. 3.06; P<0.001), ADRI rate was reduced by 50% vs. control (4.71 vs. 9.40; P<0.01). Percent predicted FEV(1) (73% vs. 60%; P<0.001), change from baseline in asthma symptom scores (-8.1 vs. 0.5; P<0.001) and Mini-AQLQ overall score (1.81 vs. 0.17; P<0.001) were also further significantly improved vs. control. CONCLUSIONS: Adding omalizumab to BSC is efficacious in patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent allergic asthma despite high-dose ICS plus a LABA (EU label population), with further efficacy observed in patients judged to have responded to therapy which may more accurately illustrate the actual benefit of omalizumab therapy in clinical practice. The naturalistic setting of this study confirms the benefits observed in double-blind randomized clinical trials.