Prophylactic therapy using epigenetic agents for RUNX1::RUNXT1-positive high-risk AML after Allo-HSCT.

Disease recurrence is the leading cause of treatment failure in patients with RUNX1::RUNXT1-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Post-transplant maintenance therapy, guided by monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD), is commonly administered; however, relapse rates remain high. This prospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of epigenetic agents as prophylactic therapy in patients with RUNX1::RUNXT1-positive AML. Thirty high-risk patients received prophylactic therapy (n = 17 and n = 13 in the chidamide and AZA groups, respectively) between January 2019 and July 2023. 34 high-risk patients who received preemptive treatment due to molecular relapse were included in the analysis. The two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in the prophylactic group compared to the preemptive group (82.82% vs. 51.38%, P = 0.014; 86.42% vs. 56.16%, P = 0.025, respectively); 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse rates were 13.8% and 36.40%, respectively (P = 0.037). In conclusion, prophylactic therapy with epigenetic agents may improve long-term prognosis and is well-tolerated in patients with RUNX1::RUNXT1-positive high-risk AML. Timely post-transplant prophylactic therapy may be more effective than preemptive therapy based on positive MRD results.

WT1 gene mutations impact post-transplant relapse in myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts 2 patients.

Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene mutations are infrequent in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but MDS with WT1 mutations (WT1mut) is considered high risk for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation. The influence of WT1 mutations in patients with MDS after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of 136 MDS with excess blasts 2 (MDS-EB2) patients with available WT1 status who underwent their first allo-HSCT between 2017 and 2022 in our center. There were 20 (20/136, 15%) cases in the WT1mut group and 116 (116/136, 85%) cases in the WT1 wild-type (WT1wt) group. WT1mut patients had a higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than WT1wt cases (26.2% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.037) after allo-HSCT. Multivariate analysis of relapse showed that WT1 mutations (HR, 6.0; p = 0.002), TP53 mutations (HR, 4.2; p = 0.021), and ≥ 5% blasts in bone marrow (BM) at transplantation (HR, 6.6; p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for relapse. Patients were stratified into three groups according to the risk factors. Two-year CIR differed significantly in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups (31.8%, 11.6%, and 0%, respectively). Hence, WT1 mutations may be related to post-transplant relapse in patients with MDS-EB2, which warrants further study.

Identification of key genes of diabetic cardiomyopathy in hiPSCs-CMs based on bioinformatics analysis.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM) is one of the most common vascular complications of diabetes, and can cause heart failure and threaten the life of patients. The pathogenesis is complex, and key genes have not fully identified. In this study, bioinformatics analysis was used to predict DbCM-related gene targets. Published datasets from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus with accession numbers GSE62203 and GSE197850 were selected for analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by the online tool GEO2R. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the DAVID online database. Protein-protein interaction network construction and hub gene identification were performed using STRING and Cytoscape. We used 30 mM and 1 µM hydrocortisone-stimulated AC16 cells as an in vitro model of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to validate the expression levels of hub genes. A total of 73 common DEGs were identified in both datasets, including 47 upregulated and 26 downregulated genes. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses revealed that the DEGs were significantly enriched in metabolism, hypoxia response, apoptosis, cell proliferation regulation, and cytoplasmic and HIF signalling pathways. The top 10 hub genes were LDHA, PGK1, SLC2A1, ENO1, PFKFB3, EGLN1, MYC, PDK1, EGLN3 and BNIP3. In our in vitro study, we found that PGK1, SLC2A1, PFKFB3, EGLN1, MYC, EGLN3 and BNIP3 were upregulated, ENO1 was downregulated, and LDHA was unchanged. Except for PGK1 and ENO1, these hub genes have been previously reported to be involved in DbCM. In summary, we identified DEGs and hub genes and first reported PGK1 and ENO1 in DbCM, which may serve as potential candidate genes for DbCM targeted therapy.

Ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria in hematological patients: Experience in a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Limited experience exists with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in treating bacteremia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) in hematological patients. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational study including patients who received CAZ-AVI for bacteremia due to CRE or CRPA between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. We conducted a multivariable analysis to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS: 56 patients were included and 57 (41 CRE and 16 CRPA) strains were isolated. 35 strains produced carbapenemase, including 25 metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) and 10 serine-beta-lactamase. 48 patients (85.7 %) received combination therapy. All patients with MBL-CRE bacteremia (n = 24) received combination therapy with aztreonam (AZT). The susceptibility rates to CAZ-AVI were only 26.8 % (11/41) in CRE and 80.0 % (8/10) in CRPA. The 30-day survival rates were 85.0 % (34/40) in the CRE group and 81.3 % (13/16) in the CRPA group. In patients with MBL-CRE bacteremia, the 30-day survival was as high as 91.7 % (22/24) due to combination with AZT. Ceftazidime did not influence the activity of aztreonam-avibactam against MBL-CRE in-vitro. Multivariable cox analysis revealed neutropenia >14 days (P = 0.002, HR: 34.483, 95%CI: 3.846-333.333) and a higher Pitt bacteremia score (P = 0.005, HR: 2.074, 95%CI: 1.253-3.436) were risk factors for 30-day survival. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI is highly effective in treating bacteremia due to CRPA and serine-beta-lactamase CRE. The combination of avibactam with AZT is highly effective in treating bacteremia due to AZT-resistant MBL producers.

Exploring strategies to optimise outcomes in hepatitis-associated aplastic anaemia patients following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

This study aimed to assess haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) safety and efficacy while exploring strategies for optimising outcomes in patients with hepatitis-associated aplastic anaemia (HAAA). We retrospectively reviewed 35 HAAA patients who underwent HSCT at a large Chinese blood disease hospital between 2008 and 2022. HAAA patients receiving HSCT typically presented with severe (28.6%) and very severe (65.7%) AA. Male patients predominated (68.6%), with a median onset age of 23 years (range, 9-44). Haploidentical donor-HSCT and matched sibling donor-HSCT were in comparable proportions. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 74.0%, with cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 37.1% and 22.4%, respectively. A diagnosis-to-HSCT interval ≥ 75 days, acute GVHD, and post-HSCT liver events (e.g., hepatic GVHD and a three-fold increase in aminotransferase or bilirubin) significantly worsened 5-year OS. In the multivariate models, recipients with sex-matched grafts had better OS, and those with younger male donors had a lower incidence of II-IV aGVHD. Higher HLA matching degree (HLA > = 7/10) was an independent prognostic factor associated with better OS and GFFS. A diagnosis-to-HSCT interval ≥ 75 days was predictive of post-transplant liver events in HAAA patients. In conclusion, HSCT was a safe and effective treatment for HAAA. Early transplantation, careful donor selection and improving post-transplant liver events were crucial to optimise outcomes.

Ursodeoxycholic acid does not reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection in newly allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a prospective NICHE cohort.

Introduction: Retrospective studies have suggested that Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) provide a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in patients with liver disease. However, it is uncertain whether this finding can be extended to the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) cohort. Therefore, we aim to examine the protective potential of UDCA against SARS-CoV-2 infection in recently received allo-HSCT patients. Methods: During the initial Omicron variant wave in China (December 2022 to February 2023), we conducted a prospective observational study involving 91 hospitalized patients who had undergone allo-HSCT within the previous 6 months as part of the National Longitudinal Cohort of Hematological Diseases (NICHE). Throughout hospitalization, we continuously monitored the status of COVID-19 using SARS-CoV-2 PCR kits or SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Tests. Results: Among these patients, 67.0% (n = 61) were confirmed to have contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection. For the 52 patients evaluated, 23.1% experienced a severe or critical clinical course. There was no difference in the infection rate or severity of COVID-19 between the UDCA group and the non-UDCA group. We found that only patients transplanted between 3 and 6 months ago demonstrated a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those who received allo-HSCT within 3 months (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.241, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.287-8.814, P = 0.016). But other clinical factors, such as administration of UDCA, showed no difference. Notably, only age ≥38 years old remained as an independent risk factor for a severe clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR: 3.664, 95% CI: 1.129-13.007, P = 0.035). Conclusion: The effectiveness of UDCA in protecting newly allo-HSCT recipients against SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unconfirmed. Presently, the most effective strategy appears to be minimizing exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04645199, identifier NCT04645199.

Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: validation, comparison and improvement of 2022 ELN genetic risk system.

The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) updated the previous risk classification published in 2017 but the prognostic significance for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains unclear. We enrolled 600 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who underwent allo-HSCT to validate ELN-2022 genetic risk system and compared it with ELN-2017. There were 214 (35.67%), 162 (27.0%), and 224 (37.33%) patients in ELN-2022 favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk group respectively and 86 patients (14.33%) experienced a shift in risk stratification compared to ELN-2017. Median and maximum follow-up time were 2.89 (95% CI 2.67 to 3.03) years and 8.78 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 73.8% (95% CI 67.5% to 80.3%), 63.9% (95% CI 56.7% to 72.0%) and 57.6% (95% CI 50.4% to 65.9%) in ELN-2022 favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk group (P < 0.001). OS shortened significantly as the ELN-2022 risk stratification increased but didn't significantly in ELN-2017 intermediate-risk compared to favorable-risk. Both ELN-2022 and ELN-2017 adverse-risk were associated with increased cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that both ELN-2017 and ELN-2022 risk systems had limited prognostic ability for OS. We modified ELN-2022 risk system with pre-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) and the modified risk system performed a significantly superior efficacy to ELN-2022 system.