Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 37(4): E231-E241, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34320553

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare and productivity costs between patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who received verbal discharge instructions only and patients who received an additional flyer with or without video instructions. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) of 6 hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 1155 adult patients with mTBI (384 with verbal instructions; 771 with additional flyer with or without video instructions) were included. DESIGN: Cost study with comparison between usual care and intervention. METHODS: Medical and productivity costs up to 3 months after presentation at the ED were compared between mTBI patients with usual care and mTBI patients who received the intervention. RESULTS: Mean medical costs per mTBI patient were slightly higher for the verbal instructions-only cohort (€337 vs €315), whereas mean productivity costs were significantly higher for the flyer/video cohort (€1625 vs €899). Higher productivity costs were associated with higher working age, injury severity, and postconcussion symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the implementation of flyer (and video) discharge instructions for patients with mTBI who present at the ED increased reports of postconcussion symptoms and reduced medical costs, whereas productivity costs were found to be higher for the working population in the first 3 months after the sustained head injury.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Alta do Paciente , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/diagnóstico
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 77(3): 327-337, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618811

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We measure the effect of video discharge instructions on postconcussion symptoms in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted in which patients with mild traumatic brain injury were randomly assigned to either intervention (verbal, written, and video discharge information) or control (verbal and written discharge information only). All patients were interviewed 1 week and 3 months from randomization. Primary outcome measure was the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were correct recall, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score, health-related quality of life (12-Item Short Form Health Survey), return visits, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 2,883 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 381 were included in the control group and 390 in the video intervention group. Difference in mean total Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire score between the 2 groups was 0.2 at 1 week and 0.3 at 3 months after traumatic brain injury (estimated effect -0.7; 95% confidence interval -2.1 to 0.7). There was also no difference in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score, recall, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey score, return visits, and patient satisfaction between the control and intervention group. CONCLUSION: Severity of postconcussion symptoms in patients with mild traumatic brain injury did not improve by adding video information to standard care. Also, there was no difference in recall, health-related quality of life, return visits, and patient satisfaction between the control and intervention groups.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Alta do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Gravação em Vídeo , Adulto , Idoso , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Concussão Encefálica/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/diagnóstico , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/fisiopatologia , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/prevenção & controle , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 33(4): e124-e130, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30893220

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a conventional fracture hematoma block (FHB) or an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block has more superior analgesic effect during nonoperative management of distal radius fractures in an emergency department setting. Two peripheral nerve block types were investigated, one at the level of the elbow, or cubital nerve block (CNB), and another an axillary nerve block (ANB). DESIGN: Two prospective randomized controlled studies were performed to compare the difference in pain intensity during closed reduction of a distal radius fracture between FHB-, CNB-, and, ANB-treated patients. SETTING: Level 2 trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred ten patients with radiographic displaced distal radius fractures were randomized. Fifty patients were randomized between FHB and CNB, and 60 patients were randomized between CNB and ANB. INTERVENTION: FHB, CNB, or ANB. These were performed by 3 physicians new to ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks and trained before onset of this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Pain was sequentially measured using an NRS during closed distal radius fracture reduction. RESULTS: CNB patients experienced less pain during block procedure (P = 0.002), finger trap traction (P = 0.007), fracture reduction (P = 0.00001), after plaster cast application (P = 0.01), and after control radiography (P = 0.01). In our second study, ANB-treated patients reported less pain during block procedure (P = 0.04), during finger trap traction (P < 0.0001), fracture reduction (P < 0.0001), after plaster cast application (P = 0.0001), and after control radiography (P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Although participating clinicians had minimal expertise using ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks, nonoperative management of distal radius fracture using an ANB was less painful. These block types are expected to completely eradicate sensation the best. Future studies should address technical factors including adequate placement and time to let the block set up, as well as issues such as resource utilization including time and clinician availability to better determine the relative advantages and disadvantages to other analgesia techniques such as the FHB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Analgesia/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor/etiologia , Dor/prevenção & controle , Fraturas do Rádio/complicações , Fraturas do Rádio/terapia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA