Assessment of Advanced Diagnostic Bronchoscopy Outcomes for Peripheral Lung Lesions: A Delphi Consensus Definition of Diagnostic Yield and Recommendations for Patient-centered Study Designs. An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Research Statement.

Background: Advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy targeting the lung periphery has developed at an accelerated pace over the last two decades, whereas evidence to support introduction of innovative technologies has been variable and deficient. A major gap relates to variable reporting of diagnostic yield, in addition to limited comparative studies. Objectives: To develop a research framework to standardize the evaluation of advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy techniques for peripheral lung lesions. Specifically, we aimed for consensus on a robust definition of diagnostic yield, and we propose potential study designs at various stages of technology development. Methods: Panel members were selected for their diverse expertise. Workgroup meetings were conducted in virtual or hybrid format. The cochairs subsequently developed summary statements, with voting proceeding according to a modified Delphi process. The statement was cosponsored by the American Thoracic Society and the American College of Chest Physicians. Results: Consensus was reached on 15 statements on the definition of diagnostic outcomes and study designs. A strict definition of diagnostic yield should be used, and studies should be reported according to the STARD (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) guidelines. Clinical or radiographic follow-up may be incorporated into the reference standard definition but should not be used to calculate diagnostic yield from the procedural encounter. Methodologically robust comparative studies, with incorporation of patient-reported outcomes, are needed to adequately assess and validate minimally invasive diagnostic technologies targeting the lung periphery. Conclusions: This American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians statement aims to provide a research framework that allows greater standardization of device validation efforts through clearly defined diagnostic outcomes and robust study designs. High-quality studies, both industry and publicly funded, can support subsequent health economic analyses and guide implementation decisions in various healthcare settings.

Neighborhood-level deprivation and survival in lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in lung cancer therapeutics and improving overall survival, disparities persist among socially disadvantaged populations. This study aims to determine the effects of neighborhood deprivation indices (NDI) on lung cancer mortality. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study assessing the relationship between NDI and overall survival adjusted for age, disease stage, and DNA methylation among biopsy-proven lung cancer patients. State-specific NDI for each year of sample collection were computed at the U.S. census tract level and dichotomized into low- and high-deprivation. RESULTS: A total of 173 non small lung cancer patients were included, with n = 85 (49%) and n = 88 (51%) in the low and high-deprivation groups, respectively. NDI was significantly higher among Black patients when compared with White patients (p = 0.003). There was a significant correlation between DNA methylation and stage for HOXA7, SOX17, ZFP42, HOXA9, CDO1 and TAC1. Only HOXA7 DNA methylation was positively correlated with NDI. The high-deprivation group had a statistically significant shorter survival than the low-deprivation group (p = 0.02). After adjusting for age, race, stage, and DNA methylation status, belonging to the high-deprivation group was associated with higher mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.81 (95%CI: 1.03-3.19). CONCLUSIONS: Increased neighborhood-level deprivation may be associated with liquid biopsy DNA methylation, shorter survival, and increased mortality. Changes in health care policies that consider neighborhood-level indices of socioeconomic deprivation may enable a more equitable increase in lung cancer survival.

Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening can reduce mortality but can be a complex, multi-step process. Poor health literacy is associated with unfavorable outcomes and decreased use of preventative services, so it is important to address barriers to care through efficient and practical education. The readability of lung cancer screening materials for patients is unknown and may not be at the recommended 6th grade reading level set by the American Medical Association. Our goals were to: (1) measure the health literacy of a lung cancer screening population from an urban academic medical center, and (2) examine the readability of online educational materials for lung cancer screening. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross sectional study at a single urban academic center. Health literacy was assessed using three validated screening questions. To assess the readability of educational materials, we performed a Google search using the phrase, "What is lung cancer screening?" and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) formula was used to estimate the grade level required to understand the text. RESULTS: There were 404 patients who underwent lung cancer screening during the study period. The prevalence of inadequate/marginal health literacy was 26.7-38.0%. Fifty websites were reviewed and four were excluded from analysis because they were intended for medical providers. The mean FKGL for the 46 websites combined was 10.6 ± 2.2. CONCLUSIONS: Low health literacy was common and is likely a barrier to appropriate education for lung cancer screening. The current online educational materials regarding lung cancer screening are written above the recommended reading level set by the American Medical Association.

Understanding the Social Risk Factors That Avert Equitable Lung Cancer Care.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. There is an association between certain social determinants of health (SDOH) and adverse cancer outcomes. These include Black race and low-income, which are associated with poorer adherence to lung cancer screening and presentation at a later stage of disease. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer at a single urban, academic center from 2015 to 2021. Demographic data including race and clinical data including time taken to progress through various checkpoints (ie, concerning CT scan to diagnosis, diagnosis to treatment) were collected. Income data was approximated based on population medians at patient's home address zip code. RESULTS: A total of 550 patients were included in the final analysis. The study population was 57.4% Black and 61.2% of patients presenting with a household income of $40,000 US Dollars or lower based on approximated median household income. The time from CT scan to first treatment for the entire cohort was 121.3 days with no statistically significant variance by race. However, among patients presenting at stage IV, 72.7% were black and 76.0% resided in a zip code with a median income < $40,000. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no significant delays in progressing through checkpoints of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment on the basis of race or income approximation. Black patients and patients in low-income households were diagnosed with lung cancer at a more advanced stage. Efforts to close the gap in lung cancer disparities should be focused on targeting screening and early identification toward social groups that may be at highest risk of late presentation. Institutional focus on patient navigation through these stages should be paramount. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: There were no delays in progression to lung cancer diagnostic and therapeutic milestones based on race or income approximation. Black race and residing in a low-income area are predictors for presenting at stage IV.

Loss of STK11 Suppresses Lipid Metabolism and Attenuates KRAS-Induced Immunogenicity in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

As many as 30% of the patients with non-small cell lung cancer harbor oncogenic KRAS mutations, which leads to extensive remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment. Although co-mutations in several genes have prognostic relevance in KRAS-mutated patients, their effect on tumor immunogenicity are poorly understood. In the present study, a total of 189 patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent a standardized analysis including IHC, whole-exome DNA sequencing, and whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing. Patients with activating KRAS mutations demonstrated a significant increase in PDL1 expression and CD8+ T-cell infiltration. Both were increased in the presence of a co-occurring TP53 mutation and lost with STK11 co-mutation. Subsequent genomic analysis demonstrated that KRAS/TP53 co-mutated tumors had a significant decrease in the expression of glycolysis-associated genes and an increase in several genes involved in lipid metabolism, notably lipoprotein lipase, low-density lipoprotein receptor, and LDLRAD4. Conversely, in the immune-excluded KRAS/STK11 co-mutated group, we observed diminished lipid metabolism and no change in anaerobic glycolysis. Interestingly, in patients with low expression of lipoprotein lipase, low-density lipoprotein receptor, or LDLRAD4, KRAS mutations had no effect on tumor immunogenicity. However, in patients with robust expression of these genes, KRAS mutations were associated with increased immunogenicity and associated with improved overall survival. Our data further suggest that the loss of STK11 may function as a metabolic switch, suppressing lipid metabolism in favor of glycolysis, thereby negating KRAS-induced immunogenicity. Hence, this concept warrants continued exploration, both as a predictive biomarker and potential target for therapy in patients receiving ICI-based immunotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: In patients with lung cancer, we demonstrate that KRAS mutations increase tumor immunogenicity; however, KRAS/STK11 co-mutated patients display an immune-excluded phenotype. KRAS/STK11 co-mutated patients also demonstrated significant downregulation of several key lipid metabolism genes, many of which were associated with increased immunogenicity and improved overall survival in KRAS-mutated patients. Hence, alteration to lipid metabolism warrants further study as a potential biomarker and target for therapy in patients with KRAS-mutated lung cancer.

Increased Utilization of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy is Associated with Decreased Disparities and Improved Survival for Early-Stage NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine if increased use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was associated with decreased disparities in the receipt of definitive treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to determine the proportion of patients with NSCLC receiving surgery, SBRT, or no definitive treatment for clinical cT1-2aN0M0 NSCLC from 2004-2017. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used. Age-adjusted mortality rates were calculated using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2017, the proportion of early-stage NSCLC undergoing no definitive treatment declined from 22% to 10.5% (P<.001), while the proportion receiving SBRT increased from 1% (0.9%-1.3%) to 22% (21.4%-22.3%; P<.001). Among Whites, the proportion undergoing no definitive treatment decreased from 21% to 10% (P<.001), as compared to Blacks, which had a higher decrease, of 32% to 15% (P<.001). The proportion of Blacks receiving SBRT increased from 1% (0.3%-1.7%) to 22% (20.8%-23.5%) (P<.001). Between 2011 and 2017 likelihood of Blacksreceiving curative therapy increased compared to Whites [OR: 0.55 (0.48-0.64) to 0.70 (0.62-0.79; P<.001]. Furthermore, the age-adjusted mortality rate of early-stage NSCLC decreased from 4.3 (4.0-4.5) in 2004 to 0.8 (0.7-0.9) in 2017 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased utilization of SBRT significantly increased the proportion of patients receiving curative therapy for early-stage NSCLC and was associated with an improvement in mortality.  Furthermore, the use of SBRT reduced previously seen disparities in receipt of treatment between Whites and Blacks. SBRT was also associated with decreased mortality from early-stage NSCLC.

Perspectives of private payers on multicancer early-detection tests: informing research, implementation, and policy.

Emerging blood-based multicancer early-detection (MCED) tests may redefine cancer screening, reduce mortality, and address health disparities if their benefit is demonstrated. U.S. payers' coverage policies will impact MCED test adoption and access; thus, their perspectives must be understood. We examined views, coverage barriers, and evidentiary needs for MCED from 19 private payers collectively covering 150 000 000 enrollees. Most saw an MCED test's potential merit for cancers without current screening (84%), but fewer saw its merit for cancers with existing screening (37%). The largest coverage barriers were inclusion of cancers without demonstrated benefits of early diagnosis (73%), a high false-negative rate (53%), and lack of care protocols for MCED-detected but unconfirmed cancers (53%). The majority (58%) would not require mortality evidence and would accept surrogate endpoints. Most payers (64%) would accept rigorous real-world evidence in the absence of a large randomized controlled trial. The majority (74%) did not expect MCED to reduce disparities due to potential harm from overtreatment resulting from an MCED and barriers to downstream care. Payers' perspectives and evidentiary needs may inform MCED test developers, researchers producing evidence, and health systems framing MCED screening programs. Private payers should be stakeholders of a national MCED policy and equity agenda.

Impact of CT screening in lung cancer: Scientific evidence and literature review.

The treatment of lung cancer has improved significantly in recent years however, lung cancer remains as a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Lung cancer screening has been explored, over the past several decades, as a means of reducing lung cancer mortality, to identify asymptomatic disease when it is potentially curable. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) established that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans of the chest can be instrumental in reducing lung cancer mortality but the criteria for screening implemented in this trial may not be equitably sensitive across racial and sex subpopulations. Furthermore, the high false detection rate reported in this trial has raised concerns regarding overdiagnosis with LDCT alone. The aim of this review is to summarize the history of lung cancer screening trials, limitations of lung cancer screening, the impact of alternative risk prediction models in reducing disparities, and the use of biomarkers in conjunction with imaging to improve diagnostic authenticity.

Increased Disparities in Patients Diagnosed with Metastatic Lung Cancer Following Lung CT Screening in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if implementation of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer in the United States had led to changes in patients being diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database was utilized to determine the proportion of lung cancers diagnosed as stage I to III and stage IV from 2009-2018. Changes in lung cancer stage distribution were compared in the overall population and by race. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, the proportion of stage I to III lung cancers increased from 52% (51.3%-53.2%) in 2009 to 56% (54.0%-55.8%) in 2018 (P < .001). Correspondingly, the proportion of lung cancers diagnosed in stage IV decreased from 48% (46.8%-48.7%) in 2009 to 45% (44.2%-46.0%) (P < .001) in 2018. For white patients, the proportion increased from 53% (51.6%-53.7%) to 56% (55.1%-57.1%) (P < .001). However, for black patients, no trend was present, with the proportion being 51% (47.9%-53.4%) in 2009 and 52% (49.0%-54.2%) in 2018 (P = .303). CONCLUSION: Since the implementation of LDCT screening, the proportion of early-stage lung cancers increased in the general population. These changes in stage distribution were not present in black patients.

Surgery for early-stage lung cancer with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy: A narrative review.

Recommending video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) over open thoracotomy to patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. Accordingly, we reviewed randomized comparative studies to determine the risks and benefits of VATS lobectomy. Electronic searches on PubMed with standard search terms revealed 97 comparative studies published between 1990 and 2022. Of those, only 5 were randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) and 1 is still ongoing although initial data has been published as an abstract form. A total of 918 patients were evaluated in 5 RCT's. All studies included patients with known or suspected primary lung cancer randomized in a 1:1 ratio to VATS or thoracotomy. Between 2 studies, reports of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival were found to be similar across surgical modalities. Additionally, no differences were found in the rates of locoregional and distant recurrence. Three studies reported no statistical differences in the number of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes sampled. Two studies found decreased length of stay following VATS (4 days v 5 days, P = 0.027 and P = 0.008), while 2 found no difference. Increased in-hospital complications were seen in 2 studies (P = 0.008 and P = 0.039). VATS was associated with decreased pain scores, better self-reported QOL at 52 weeks (P = 0.014). Few randomized clinical trials comparing VATS lobectomy to open thoracotomy and lobectomy in early stage NSCLC have been reported. These studies suggest that VATS lobectomy offers similar outcomes with decreased in-hospital complications, pain, length of stay, and improved physical functioning when compared to thoracotomy.

Age-based disparities in telehealth use in an urban, underserved population in cancer and pulmonary clinics: A need for policy change.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth rapidly emerged as an essential health care service and became particularly important for patients with cancer and chronic conditions. However, the benefits of telehealth have not been fully realized for some of the most vulnerable populations due to inequitable access to telehealth capable technology. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess accessibility and satisfaction with telehealth technology by vulnerable patients with cancer and pulmonary disease. METHODOLOGY: A paper survey and internet-based survey were developed and administered to adult (≥18 years) cancer and pulmonary clinic patients (July 1, 2020 to October 30, 2020). RESULTS: Descriptive statistics and Fisher exact test were performed. Two hundred eleven patients completed the survey. Adults ≥50 years old (older) had reduced access to smartphone video capability and internet connection compared with adults less than 50 years old (59% vs. 90%, p < .01). Older adults reported more challenges with telehealth visits compared with younger adults (50.3%, 28.6%; p < .01). No difference in access to technology and preferences for telehealth versus in-person care was found by race, gender, or education level. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all patients (95%) who had a previous experience with a telehealth visit felt confident in the quality of care they received via telehealth. Younger adults preferred video visits compared with older adults (75% vs. 50.6%, p < .01). Older adults were less likely to have access to smartphones with internet access, have more challenges with telehealth visits, and were less likely to prefer audio-video telehealth visits compared with younger adults. IMPLICATIONS: Ensuring equitable access to all health care delivery modalities by telehealth, including audio-only visits for patients across the age continuum, is paramount.

Addressing Sex Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility: USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 Criteria.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States. Prospective randomized lung screening trials suggest a greater lung cancer mortality benefit from screening women compared with men. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) lung screening guidelines that are based solely on age and smoking history contribute to sex disparities in eligibility, and if so, does the use of the PLCOm2012 risk prediction model that is based on 11 predictors of lung cancer reduce sex disparities? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of 883 lung cancer cases in the Chicago Race Eligibility for Screening Cohort (CREST) determined the sensitivity of USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 eligibility criteria, stratified according to sex. For comparisons vs the USPSTF 2013 and the recently published USPSTF 2021 (released March 9, 2021) eligibility criteria, the PLCOm2012 model was used with risk thresholds of ≥ 1.7%/6 years (6y) and ≥ 1.0%/6y, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivities for screening by the USPSTF 2013 were 46.7% for women and 64.6% for men (P = .003) and by the USPSTF 2021 were 56.8% and 71.8%, respectively (P = .02). In contrast, the PLCOm2012 ≥ 1.7%/6y sensitivities were 64.6% and 70.4%, and the PLCOm2012 ≥ 1.0%/6y sensitivities were 77.4% and 82.4%. The PLCOm2012 differences in sensitivity using ≥ 1.7%/6y and ≥ 1.0%/6y thresholds between women and men were nonsignificant (both, P = .07). Compared with men, women were more likely to be ineligible according to the USPSTF 2021 criteria because their smoking exposures were < 20 pack-years (22.8% vs 14.8%; ORWomen vs Men, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.19-2.44; P = .002), and 27% of these ineligible women were eligible according to the PLCOm2012 ≥ 1.0%/6y criteria. INTERPRETATION: Although the USPSTF 2021 eligibility criteria are more sensitive than the USPSTF 2013 guidelines, sex disparities in eligibility remain. Adding the PLCOm2012 risk prediction model to the USPSTF guidelines would improve sensitivity and attenuate sex disparities.

Severe Psychiatric Symptoms in a Patient With EGFR Exon-20 Insertion Mutation Receiving Mobocertinib: A Case Report.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is an established standard of care for patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations, but a worse prognosis has been observed in patients with specific EGFR exon-20 insertion mutations. Mobocertinib (TAK-788) is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed to target EGFR exon-20 insertion and has exhibited promising response rates and acceptable safety in phase 1 and 2 trials. We report a case of a 59-year-old woman with metastatic NSCLC and EGFR exon-20 mutation responsive to mobocertinib therapy, who developed severe depression and catatonia approximately 4 months after mobocertinib initiation, ultimately necessitating its permanent discontinuation. Given the observed severe depression in this case report, we recommend that, for patients on mobocertinib who develop neuropsychiatric adverse effects, strong consideration should be given for dose interruption or discontinuation.

Brief Report: Risk Prediction Model Versus United States Preventive Services Task Force 2020 Draft Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria-Reducing Race Disparities.

INTRODUCTION: Eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening based solely on age and smoking history are less sensitive than validated risk prediction models. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has proposed new guidelines to improve the sensitivity for selecting high-risk individuals and to decrease race disparity. In this retrospective study, termed the Chicago Race Eligibility for Screening Cohort, we compare the sensitivity of the proposed USPSTF2020 criteria versus the PLCOm2012 risk prediction model for selecting a racially diverse lung cancer population with a smoking history for lung cancer screening. METHODS: This Chicago Race Eligibility for Screening Cohort study applies the PLCOm2012 model with a risk threshold of 1.0%/6 years and the USPSTF2020 criteria (age 50-80 y, pack-years ≥ 20 y, quit-years ≤ 15 y) to 883 individuals with a smoking history diagnosed with having lung cancer. RESULTS: The PLCOm2012 was more sensitive than the USPSTF2020 overall (79.1% versus 68.6%, p < 0.0001) in White (81.5% versus 75.4%, p = 0.029) and in African American (82.8% versus 70.6% p < 0.0001) individuals. Of the total cohort, 254 (28.8%) would not have qualified owing to less than 20 pack-years, quit-time of more than 15 years, and age less than 50 years. Of these 254 cases, 40% would have qualified by the PLCOm2012 model. For the 20 pack-year criterion, of the 497 African American individuals, 19.3% did not meet this criterion, and of these, an additional 31.3% would have qualified by the PLCOm2012 model (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although more sensitive than USPSTF2013, the proposed USPSTF2020 draft guidelines still have a race disparity in eligibility for screening. This study provides "real world" evidence that use of the PLCOm2012 risk prediction model eliminates this race disparity.

Outcomes of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that harbor a STK11 mutation.

BACKGROUND: STK11 mutation (STK11m ) in patients (pts) with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with inferior survival and poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The significance of STK11m in stage III NSCLC pts treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) with or without consolidation ICI is unknown. METHODS: Stage III NSCLC patients who received CCRT and had known STK11 mutational status were included in this retrospective study. The data on the STK11m pts were collected from 4 cancer institutions. A cohort of pts with wild type STK11 (STK11w ) from the University of Iowa served as a comparison group. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were collected. Cox regression models were used to explore the effect of STK11 mutation on survival. RESULTS: 75 pts with stage III NSCLC who had known STK11 mutational status were identified. 16/75 (21%) had STK11m . 5/16 with STK11 m did not receive CCRT so they were excluded from the analysis. The clinical and demographic characteristics for the 11 STK11m and 59 STK11w pts were not statistically different (STK11m vs. STK11w ): mean age: 57 vs. 64 yrs, non-squamous histology: 8/11 (73%) vs. 37/59 (63%), KRAS mutation: 3/11 (27%) vs. 11/59 (19%), TP53 mutation: 6/11 (55%) vs. 15/59 (25%), PD-L1 ≥50%: 1/8 (13%) vs. 10/32 (31%), and consolidation ICI 6/11 (55%) vs. 17/59 (29%). Regarding the 6 STK11m pts who received ICI (4 pembrolizumab, 2 durvalumab), the median number of ICI infusions was 8 (range, 3-17) vs. 6 (range, 1-25) in the 17 pts with STK11w who received ICI (durvalumab). After adjusting for performance status and cancer stage, multivariable analysis showed that progression free survival (PFS) for the STK11m pts was significantly worse than STK11 w pts (HR =2.25; 95% CI, 1.03-4.88, P=0.04), whereas overall survival (OS) showed no significant difference for STK11m vs. STK11w patients (HR 1.47, 95% CI, 0.49-4.38, P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: In stage III NSCLC patients who received CCRT, STK11m was associated with worse PFS compared to STK11w . Larger studies are needed to further explore the prognostic implications of STK11m in stage III NSCLC and whether ICI impacts survival for this subgroup.

Single-cell transcriptional changes associated with drug tolerance and response to combination therapies in cancer.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors were found to be clinically effective for treatment of patients with certain subsets of cancers carrying somatic mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases. However, the duration of clinical response is often limited, and patients ultimately develop drug resistance. Here, we use single-cell RNA sequencing to demonstrate the existence of multiple cancer cell subpopulations within cell lines, xenograft tumors and patient tumors. These subpopulations exhibit epigenetic changes and differential therapeutic sensitivity. Recurrently overrepresented ontologies in genes that are differentially expressed between drug tolerant cell populations and drug sensitive cells include epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, epithelium development, vesicle mediated transport, drug metabolism and cholesterol homeostasis. We show analysis of identified markers using the LINCS database to predict and functionally validate small molecules that target selected drug tolerant cell populations. In combination with EGFR inhibitors, crizotinib inhibits the emergence of a defined subset of EGFR inhibitor-tolerant clones. In this study, we describe the spectrum of changes associated with drug tolerance and inhibition of specific tolerant cell subpopulations with combination agents.

Risk Prediction Model Versus United States Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria: Reducing Race Disparities.

INTRODUCTION: Disparities exist in lung cancer outcomes between African American and white people. The current United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) lung cancer screening eligibility criteria, which is based solely on age and smoking history, may exacerbate racial disparities. We evaluated whether the PLCOm2012 risk prediction model more effectively selects African American ever-smokers for screening. METHODS: Lung cancer cases diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 at an urban medical center serving a racially and ethnically diverse population were retrospectively reviewed for lung cancer screening eligibility based on the USPSTF criteria versus the PLCOm2012 model. RESULTS: This cohort of 883 ever-smokers comprised the following racial and ethnic makeup: 258 white (29.2%), 497 African American (56.3%), 69 Hispanic (7.8%), 24 Asian (2.7%), and 35 other (4.0%). Compared with the USPSTF criteria, the PLCOm2012 model increased the sensitivity for the African American cohort at lung cancer risk thresholds of 1.51%, 1.70%, and 2.00% per 6 years (p < 0.0001). For example, at the 1.70% risk threshold, the PLCOm2012 model identified 71.3% African American cases, whereas the USPSTF criteria only identified 50.3% (p < 0.0001). In contrast, in case of whites there was no difference (66.0% versus 62.4%, respectively [p = 0.203]). Of the African American ever-smokers who were PLCO1.7%-positive and USPSTF-negative, the criteria missed from the USPSTF were those with pack-years less than 30 (67.7%), quit time of greater than 15 years (22.5%), and age less than 55 years (13.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The PLCOm2012 model was found to be preferable over the USPSTF criteria at identifying African American ever-smokers for lung cancer screening. The broader use of this model in racially diverse populations may help overcome disparities in lung cancer screening and outcomes.

Detection of Promoter DNA Methylation in Urine and Plasma Aids the Detection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Low-dose CT screening can reduce lung cancer-related mortality. However, CT screening has an FDR of nearly 96%. We sought to assess whether urine samples can be a source for DNA methylation-based detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This nested case-control study of subjects with suspicious nodules on CT imaging obtained plasma and urine samples preoperatively. Cases (n = 74) had pathologic confirmation of NSCLC. Controls (n = 27) had a noncancer diagnosis. We detected promoter methylation in plasma and urine samples using methylation on beads and quantitative methylation-specific real-time PCR for cancer-specific genes (CDO1, TAC1, HOXA7, HOXA9, SOX17, and ZFP42). RESULTS: DNA methylation at cancer-specific loci was detected in both plasma and urine, and was more frequent in patients with cancer compared with controls for all six genes in plasma and in CDO1, TAC1, HOXA9, and SOX17 in urine. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that methylation detection in each one of six genes in plasma and CDO1, TAC1, HOXA9, and SOX17 in urine were significantly associated with the diagnosis of NSCLC, independent of age, race, and smoking pack-years. When methylation was detected for three or more genes in both plasma and urine, the sensitivity and specificity for lung cancer diagnosis were 73% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DNA methylation-based biomarkers in plasma and urine could be useful as an adjunct to CT screening to guide decision-making regarding further invasive procedures in patients with pulmonary nodules.

Adjuvant chemotherapy following stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer is associated with lower overall: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Adjuvant chemotherapy is routinely offered post-surgical resection for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≥4 cm; however, its role following definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has not been well defined. We investigated the association between receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy post-SBRT and overall survival (OS) for patients with T1-T3N0M0 NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NCDB was queried for patients with T1-T3N0M0 NSCLC treated with definitive SBRT from 2004 to 2014. The association between non-randomized receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and OS was analyzed for all patients (n = 24,011) and a propensity-matched cohort (n = 608) using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models. A subset analysis was performed for patients with tumors ≥4 cm (n = 2,323). RESULTS: There were 24,011 patients in the cohort with a median follow-up of 32.5 months. Of these, 322 (1.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Three-year OS was 41.3% with adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 50.6% without adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with higher overall mortality (hazard ratio:1.22, 95% confidence interval:1.06-1.40, p = 0.005). For tumors ≥4 cm, 3-year OS was 38.2% with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 80) compared to 33.0% without adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.81). After propensity-score matching, there was a persistent association between lower OS and adjuvant chemotherapy with those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 322) having 3-year OS of 41.3% compared to 60.9% without adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy following definitive SBRT for T1-3N0M0 NSCLC is associated with lower OS and is not associated with a survival benefit for patients with tumors ≥4 cm.