Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 90(1): 96-100, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30465771

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) increases colorectal cancer risk. We describe the numbers of colonoscopies and polypectomies performed to achieve and maintain low polyp burdens, and the feasibility of expanding surveillance intervals in patients who achieve endoscopic control. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a prospectively collected database on 115 patients with SPS undergoing surveillance at Indiana University Hospital between June 2005 and May 2018. The endoscopist provided surveillance interval recommendations based on polyp burden. Endoscopic control was considered successful if surveillance examinations exhibited fewer polyps and if no or only an occasional polyp ≥1 cm in size was present at follow-up. Initial control was designated as the clearing phase and the maintenance phase was surveillance after control was established. RESULTS: In total, 87 patients (75.7%) achieved endoscopic control, with some others currently in the clearing phase. Achieving control required a mean of 2.84 colonoscopies (including the baseline) over 20.4 months and a mean total of 27.9 polyp resections. After establishing control, 71 patients were recommended to receive ≥24-month follow-up. Of those, 60 patients (69.0% of patients with initial control) continued surveillance at our center. The mean interval between colonoscopies during maintenance was 19.3 months with 6.74 mean polypectomies per procedure on polyps primarily <1 cm. There were no incident cancers or colon surgeries during maintenance. CONCLUSION: Most patients achieved control of polyp burden with 2 to 3 colonoscopies over 1 to 2 years. After reaching control, 60 patients returned at intervals up to 24 months with no incident cancers and no surgeries required. Expansion of surveillance intervals to 24 months is effective and safe for many patients with SPS who reach control of polyp burden.


Assuntos
Pólipos Adenomatosos/cirurgia , Pólipos do Colo/cirurgia , Colonoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Pólipos Adenomatosos/patologia , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Pólipos do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperplasia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome , Carga Tumoral
2.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 82(2): 376-380.e1, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26071067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Resect and discard is a new paradigm for management of diminutive colon polyps. Little is known regarding whether patients would accept resect and discard. We surveyed colonoscopy patients and their drivers regarding acceptance of resect and discard. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of colonoscopy outpatients and their drivers at two outpatient academic endoscopy centers. RESULTS: Four hundred fifteen colonoscopy patients and 293 drivers completed the survey (93.5% of all invited participants). Results for the two groups were similar. Overall, 66.3% indicated they would accept resect and discard. Participants who were younger, white, and seen at the ambulatory surgery center (vs the hospital outpatient department) were more likely to accept. Those declining resect and discard were more likely to be willing to pay some amount out-of-pocket to have diminutive polyps checked by pathology (97.1% vs 44.5%). Of those unwilling to accept resect and discard, 49.8% would require a zero chance of cancer in diminutive polyps before accepting resect and discard. CONCLUSIONS: Patient acceptance of resect and discard appears promising but is quite variable. Eliciting individual patient acceptance of resect and discard will be important during initial implementation into clinical practice.


Assuntos
Adenoma/psicologia , Neoplasias do Colo/psicologia , Pólipos do Colo/psicologia , Colonoscopia/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adenoma/patologia , Adenoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Pólipos do Colo/patologia , Pólipos do Colo/cirurgia , Colonoscopia/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Eliminação de Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Carga Tumoral
3.
Gastroenterology Res ; 17(2): 64-71, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716284

RESUMO

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate the risk factors associated with the development of small bowel obstruction (SBO) in Crohn's disease (CD) after small bowel resection (SBR) that are not due to active/recurrent inflammation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had SBR for active or complicated CD. Abstracted data included demographics, phenotype, therapies for CD, endoscopic disease recurrence, and several surgical variables. The primary outcome was the development of non-inflammatory SBO (NI-SBO) within 5 years after SBR. Results: A total of 335 patients were included. The cumulative rates of NI-SBO at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years were 5 (1.5%), 8 (2.4%), and 29 (8.9%), respectively. Variables associated with the development of NI-SBO were active macroscopic or microscopic inflammation in the surgical margins (13 (56%) vs. 65 (27%), P = 0.004), open resection (vs. laparoscopic resection) (12 (41.4%) vs. 60 (19.5%), P = 0.0006) and a higher median number of previous resections (2 (interquartile range (IQR) 2 - 3) vs. 1 (IQR 1 - 2), P = 0.0002). Only 21% of patients who developed NI-SBO required surgical intervention. Conclusions: The incidence of NI-SBO after SBR in CD is low and associated with inflammation at the margins of the resected bowel, previous bowel resections, and an open laparotomy approach. Most NI-SBOs resolve with medical management.

4.
Endosc Int Open ; 4(4): E472-4, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27092331

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is generally managed by colectomy, but in some cases surgery is delayed and polyp burdens are managed endoscopically. We aimed to describe the use of cold snare polypectomy to control the polyp burden in selected patients with FAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Polyps were counted and the range of polyp size recorded at each examination. Patients with a reduction in polyp number and mean size were considered to have successful endoscopic reduction of their polyp burdens. RESULTS: Of 79 patients with FAP, 21 had an attempt at delaying surgery by cold snaring of at least 30 adenomas, and had at least one follow-up at our institution. Ten patients had intact colons, 6 had intact rectums, and 5 had heavy polyp burdens in an ileo-anal pouch. Among the 21 patients, the mean number of polyps resected at the first examination was 85, range 30 - 342. Nineteen of 21 patients had fewer polyps at the second examination, and of those, only one had any persistence of adenomas ≥ 1 cm in size. During follow-up, two patients underwent surgical resection and the remainder had reductions in their polyp burdens at follow-up endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Cold snare polypectomy effectively reduces polyp burden in selected FAP patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA