Editorial Commentary: Addition of Dexmedetomidine to Local Analgesia for Knee Arthroscopy.

The search for the ideal pain management strategy after knee arthroscopy continues. For patients unable to receive regional anesthesia, peri-articular or intra-articular injections of local anesthetics with other medications offer a promising solution. Dexmedetomidine (a short-term sedative analgesic marketed under the names Dexdor and Precedex), when added to local anesthetics, may offer an increase in the length of time between surgery and the need for a rescue analgesic agent. Whether the addition of dexmedetomidine results in lower pain scores or decreased opioid consumption remains to be proven. Systemic effects of dexmedetomidine, such as sedation and hypotension, appear less likely to occur with intra-articular injections, suggesting a favorable safety profile. The effects of dexmedetomidine on chondrocytes, as well as the effects of combining medications in the intra-articular environment, are less well understood and should be a focus of further research. Similarly, there is still a need to identify the best patients, best procedures, best combination of medications, and best doses to optimize our approach to post-operative pain management via intra-articular injection.

Editorial Commentary: Rate of Shoulder Instability, and Outcome After Arthroscopic Bankart Stabilization, Are Equal Among Men and Women When Similar Sports Are Compared.

Male athletes have been shown to have a higher incidence of shoulder instability and higher rates of recurrence after arthroscopic stabilization. However, when similar sports are compared, the incidence of instability effectively equalizes. When similar sports are compared, outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair may also equalize when compared by sex. Next, contact and collision athletes with shoulder instability have more severe intra-articular pathologies that affect their treatment and outcomes. As these sports become more available to women worldwide, we may see more women athletes with more complex shoulder instability-related pathology. Ultimately, the solution may be to ensure equal resources available to optimize surgical outcomes for athletes after surgery, regardless of sex. We must not leave female athletes on the bench.

Post-total joint arthroplasty opioid prescribing practices vary widely and are not associated with opioid refill: an observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Optimized health system approaches to improving guideline-congruent care require evaluation of multilevel factors associated with prescribing practices and outcomes after total knee and hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic health data from patients who underwent a total knee or hip arthroplasty between January 2016-January 2020 in the Military Health System Data were retrospectively analyzed. A generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) examined the relationship between fixed covariates, random effects, and the primary outcome (30-day opioid prescription refill). RESULTS: In the sample (N = 9151, 65% knee, 35% hip), the median discharge morphine equivalent dose was 660 mg [450, 892] and varied across hospitals and several factors (e.g., joint, race and ethnicity, mental and chronic pain conditions, etc.). Probability of an opioid refill was higher in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty, were white, had a chronic pain or mental health condition, had a lower age, and received a presurgical opioid prescription (all p < 0.01). Sex assigned in the medical record, hospital duration, discharge non-opioid prescription receipt, discharge morphine equivalent dose, and receipt of an opioid-only discharge prescription were not significantly associated with opioid refill. CONCLUSION: In the present study, several patient-, care-, and hospital-level factors were associated with an increased probability of an opioid prescription refill within 30 days after arthroplasty. Future work is needed to identify optimal approaches to reduce unwarranted and inequitable healthcare variation within a patient-centered framework.

Magnetic resonance imaging does not reliably detect Kaplan fiber injury in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament tear.

PURPOSE: There has been a continued effort to better understand the role Kaplan fiber injury plays in persistent instability following ACL tears. However, the prevalence of these injuries remains poorly understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to define the prevalence of Kaplan fiber injury in the setting of complete anterior cruciate ligament tear using a commonly used grading system for assessing ligament injuries. The inter-rater reliability of this commonly used grading system and the relationship between Kaplan fiber injury and injury to other structures commonly found in conjunction with ACL tears was also evaluated. METHODS: All isolated, complete anterior cruciate ligament tears confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging within 90 days of injury between 2014 and 2020 at a single institution were included for analysis. Each scan was read by two, fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Kaplan fiber injury was evaluated using a previously described grading scheme. Kappa, [Formula: see text], of inter-rater agreement was determined for all magnetic resonance image scans. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to assess for associations between Kaplan fiber injury and magnet strength (1.5 T vs. 3.0 T), patient gender, the presence of medial and/or lateral meniscal tears, and/or posterolateral tibial bone bruise. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2020, 131 patients (94 males, 37 females) with a complete anterior cruciate ligament tear were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the cohort was 27.8 ± 6.8 years. Kaplan fiber injuries were identified in 51 of 131 (38.9%, CI 31.0-47.5%) scans with complete anterior cruciate ligament injuries (Grade 1: 28, Grade 2: 18, and Grade 3: 5). Inter-rater agreement for Kaplan fiber injury was fair ([Formula: see text] with 43 (32.8%) scans requiring third reviewer adjudication. There were no significant associations between Kaplan fiber injury and gender, magnet strength, meniscal tears, or posterolateral tibial bone bruise. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of Kaplan fiber injuries was comparable to previously described rates; however, the classification system used to report Kaplan fiber injury was associated with low inter-rater reliability. The presence of Kaplan fiber injury was not associated with other injuries commonly observed in conjunction with ACL tear. The previously proposed Kaplan fiber injury classification system is not reproducible nor is it likely to aid surgeons in distinguishing higher grades of rotatory knee instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Can an integrated orthotic and rehabilitation program decrease pain and improve function after lower extremity trauma?

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe lower extremity trauma have significant disability 2 years after injury that worsens by 7 years. Up to 15% seek late amputation. Recently, an energy-storing orthosis demonstrated improved function compared with standard orthoses; however, the effect when integrated with rehabilitation over time is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does an 8-week integrated orthotic and rehabilitation initiative improve physical performance, pain, and outcomes in patients with lower extremity functional deficits or pain? (2) Is the magnitude of recovery different if enrolled more than 2 years after their injury versus earlier? (3) Does participation decrease the number considering late amputation? METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 84 service members (53 less than and 31 > 2 years after injury) who enrolled in the initiative. Fifty-eight sustained fractures, 53 sustained nerve injuries with weakness, and six had arthritis (there was some overlap in the patients with fractures and nerve injuries, which resulted in a total of > 84). They completed 4 weeks of physical therapy without the orthosis followed by 4 weeks with it. Testing was conducted at Weeks 0, 4, and 8. Validated physical performance tests and patient-reported outcome surveys were used as well as questions pertaining to whether patients were considering an amputation. RESULTS: By 8 weeks, patients improved in all physical performance measures and all relevant patient-reported outcomes. Patients less than and greater than 2 years after injury improved similarly. Forty-one of 50 patients initially considering amputation favored limb salvage at the end of 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We found this integrated orthotic and rehabilitation initiative improved physical performance, pain, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with severe, traumatic lower extremity deficits and that these improvements were sustained for > 2 years after injury. Efforts are underway to determine whether the Return to Run clinical pathway with the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) can be successfully implemented at additional military centers in patients > 2 years from injury while sustaining similar improvements in patient outcomes. The ability to translate this integrated orthotic and rehabilitation program into the civilian setting is unknown and warrants further investigation.

Discharge Opioid Dose Indirectly Associated With Functional Outcomes 2 Weeks After Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy in a US Military Sample.

INTRODUCTION: Postsurgical opioid utilization may be directly and indirectly associated with a range of patient-related and surgery-related factors, above and beyond pain intensity. However, most studies examine postsurgical opioid utilization without accounting for the multitude of co-occurring relationships among predictors. Therefore, this study aimed to identify factors associated with opioid utilization in the first 2 weeks after arthroscopic surgery and examine the relationship between discharge opioid prescription doses and acute postsurgical outcomes. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal observational study, 110 participants undergoing shoulder or knee arthroscopies from August 2016 to August 2018 at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center completed self-report measures before and at 14 days postoperatively. The association between opioid utilization and both patient-level and surgery-related factors was modeled using structural equation model path analysis. RESULTS: Participants who were prescribed more opioids took more opioids, which was associated with worse physical function and sleep problems at day 14, as indicated by the significant indirect effects of discharge opioid dose on day 14 outcomes. Additional patient-level and surgery-related factors were also significantly related to opioid utilization dose and day 14 outcomes. Most participants had opioid medications leftover at day 14. CONCLUSION: Excess opioid prescribing was common, did not result in improved pain alleviation, and was associated with poorer physical function and sleep 14 days after surgery. As such, higher prescribed opioid doses could reduce subacute functioning after surgery, without benefit in reducing pain. Future patient-centered studies to tailor opioid postsurgical prescribing are needed.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Strength and Speed of Recovery in an Active-Duty Soldier with Isolated Injury to the Lateral Collateral Ligament of the Knee: A Case Report.

Ligamentous injuries of the knee occur in the military, but constitute an overwhelmingly disproportionate number of medical discharges, which can be due to prolonged recovery through traditional use of physical therapy (PT) and other non-operative modalities. The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may substantially increase the speed of recovery and patient outcomes but is little explored for less common isolated ligamentous injuries, such as the lateral collateral ligament, especially in active-duty populations. We describe the use of PRP in a young, otherwise healthy active-duty male to treat an isolated LCL injury with significant positive outcomes. These findings support consideration for early use of PRP in similar cases to improve recovery timelines and aid in return to duty.

Longitudinal Predictors of PROMIS Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities After Shoulder and Knee Sports Orthopaedic Surgery in United States Military Servicemembers: An Observational Study.

Background: Satisfaction with social roles and activities is an important outcome for postsurgical rehabilitation and quality of life but not commonly assessed. Purpose: To evaluate longitudinal patterns of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities measure, including how it relates to other biopsychosocial factors, before and up to 6 months after sports-related orthopaedic surgery. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Participants (N = 223) who underwent knee and shoulder sports orthopaedic surgeries between August 2016 and October 2020 completed PROMIS computer-adaptive testing item banks and pain-related measures before surgery and at 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. In a generalized additive mixed model, covariates included time point; peripheral nerve block; the PROMIS Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance, and Pain Behavior measures; and previous 24-hour pain intensity. Patient-reported outcomes were modeled as nonlinear (smoothed) effects. Results: The linear (estimate, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.77-3.35; P = .002) and quadratic (estimate, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.78-4.08; P < .001) effects of time, as well the nonlinear effects of PROMIS Anxiety (P < .001), PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (P < .001), PROMIS Pain Behavior (P < .001), and pain intensity (P = .02), were significantly associated with PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities. The cubic effect of time (P = .06) and peripheral nerve block (P = .28) were not. The proportion of patients with a 0.5-SD improvement in the primary outcome increased from 23% at 6 weeks to 52% by 6 months postsurgery, whereas those reporting worsening PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities decreased from 30% at 6 weeks to 13% at 6 months. Conclusion: The PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities measure was found to be related to additional domains of function (eg, mental health, behavioral, pain) associated with postsurgical rehabilitation.

Lagged effect of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance on subacute postsurgical PROMIS Pain Behavior.

Sleep disturbance is a modifiable risk factor that, when reduced, may improve subacute postsurgical outcomes (e.g., pain-related impact). Evidence also indicates that pain and sleep may have a bidirectional longitudinal relationship before to (sub) acutely after surgery. The objective of the present study is to examine the degree to which sleep disturbances and pain behavior have uni- or bidirectional relationships in a sample of patients undergoing sports orthopedic surgery. In this observational, longitudinal cohort study, participants ( = 296) were adult (ages 18+) active duty service members who underwent open or arthroscopic shoulder or knee surgery at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Participants were asked to complete PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Pain Behavior computer adaptive testing item banks before surgery, 6 weeks postsurgery, and 3 months postsurgery. Patient-level covariates were analyzed for interrelationships using nonparametric bivariate statistics. Autoregressive and cross-lagged structural equation modeling examined the bidirectional relationships of patient-level covariates and PROMIS outcomes. When controlling for patient-level covariates, sleep disturbance at presurgical and 2-week postsurgical timepoints were positively associated with both sleep disturbance and pain behavior at the subsequent timepoint. Sleep disturbance may contribute to pain-related functioning and quality of life after sports orthopedic surgery. Future studies utilizing multidimensional patient report outcomes and robust analytics are needed to better understand whether sleep-targeted interventions can improve subacute and long-term orthopedic sports surgery outcomes.

The Glenoid Track Paradigm Does Not Reliably Affect Military Surgeons' Approach to Managing Shoulder Instability.

Purpose: To report the frequencies of surgical stabilization procedures performed by military shoulder surgeons and to use decision tree analysis to describe how bipolar bone loss affects surgeons' decision to perform arthroscopic versus open stabilization procedures. Methods: The Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network (MOTION) database was queried for anterior shoulder stabilization procedures from 2016 to 2021. A nonparametric decision tree analysis was used to generate a framework for classifying surgeon decision making based on specified injury characteristics (labral tear location, glenoid bone loss [GBL], Hill-Sachs lesion [HSL] size, and on-track vs off-track HSL). Results: A total of 525 procedures were included in the final analysis, with a mean patient age of 25.9 ± 7.2 years and a mean GBL percentage of 3.6% ± 6.8%. HSLs were described based on size as absent (n = 354), mild (n = 129), moderate (n = 40), and severe (n = 2) and as on-track versus off-track in 223 cases, with 17% (n = 38) characterized as off-track. Arthroscopic labral repair (n = 428, 82%) was the most common procedure, whereas open repair (n = 10, 1.9%) and glenoid augmentation (n = 44, 8.4%) were performed infrequently. Decision tree analysis identified a GBL threshold of 17% or greater that resulted in an 89% probability of glenoid augmentation. Shoulders with GBL less than 17% combined with a mild or absent HSL had a 95% probability of an isolated arthroscopic labral repair, whereas a moderate or severe HSL resulted in a 79% probability of arthroscopic repair with remplissage. The presence of an off-track HSL did not contribute to the decision-making process as defined by the algorithm and data available. Conclusions: Among military shoulder surgeons, GBL of 17% or greater is predictive of a glenoid augmentation procedure whereas HSL size is predictive of remplissage for GBL less than 17%. However, the on-track/off-track paradigm does not appear to affect military surgeons' decision making. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The changing face of disability in the US Army: the Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom effect.

Orthopaedic disorders account for significant disability among adults in the United States. Previous studies have demonstrated long-term disability in military personnel with musculoskeletal conditions. However, these studies focused primarily on battlefield-injured service members and did not evaluate the entire population. The goal of this study was to determine and compare the disabling conditions of the entire United States Army during peacetime and war. We identified the conditions leading to separation from military service before and during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. During war, more soldiers are found to be unfit for duty, and they have more conditions per individual that make them unfit. Orthopaedic conditions account for the greatest number of soldiers separated from military service at both time points studied (ie, January through March 2001, January through March 2009). Back pain and osteoarthritis are the two most common causes of separation from military service; these conditions are responsible for the most disability during peacetime and war.

Management of posttraumatic osteoarthritis with an integrated orthotic and rehabilitation initiative.

Posttraumatic osteoarthritis affects approximately 5.6 million Americans annually. Those affected are typically younger and more active than persons with primary osteoarthritis. Arthrodesis is the typical management option for persons with end-stage ankle and subtalar posttraumatic arthritis. Arthroplasty is typically reserved for elderly persons. The functional limitations resulting from any of these strategies make treatment of this young population challenging. Combat wounds frequently lead to severe lower extremity injuries. We present a series of patients with severe posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle and subtalar joint after combat trauma. They were treated at our institution with an integrated orthotic and rehabilitation initiative called the Return To Run clinical pathway. This clinical pathway may serve as an alternative or adjunct to arthrodesis and arthroplasty for young patients with severe posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle and subtalar joint.

Quantification of posterior ankle exposure through an achilles tendon-splitting versus posterolateral approach.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical exposure to the posterior ankle for trauma and reconstruction is a source of debate. We hypothesized that the Achilles tendon-splitting approach would provide greater exposure to the posterior ankle than the posterolateral approach. METHODS: Forty surgical approaches were performed from twenty fresh-frozen cadavers. Achilles tendon-splitting and posterolateral approaches were performed using a randomized crossover design for surgical sequence. Six landmarks (medial malleolus, ankle joint, subtalar joint, incisura fibularis, lateral malleolus and medial gutter) were identified by direct visualization or palpation. A calibrated digital photograph was taken and Image J (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) was used to calculate the surface area of the distal tibia and talus exposed in neutral and dorsiflexion. RESULTS: Using a posterolateral approach, the average distal tibia exposed was 11.3cm(2) in neutral and 10.2 cm(2) in dorsiflexion. The average talus exposed was 2.0 cm(2) in neutral and 2.4 cm(2) in dorsiflexion. Using an Achilles tendon-splitting approach, the average exposed distal tibia was 33% more (15.0 cm(2)) in neutral and 43% more (14.6 cm(2)) in dorsiflexion. The average talus exposed was 47% more (3.0 cm(2)) in neutral and 76% more (4.2 cm(2)) in dorsiflexion. All increases in exposure were statistically significant. The medial malleolus was visualized in 19 tendon-splitting and six posterolateral approaches. The medial gutter was visualized in 20 tendon-splitting and 13 posterolateral approaches. These differences were statistically significant. All other landmarks could be visualized through both approaches. CONCLUSION: The Achilles tendon-splitting approach provided significantly greater exposure of the posterior distal tibia and talus compared to the posterolateral approach. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prospective studies will help determine if the tendon-splitting approach is a safe and clinically useful approach for surgeries in which direct access to the entire posterior ankle and subtalar joint are required.

AAOS/METRC Clinical Practice Guideline Summary: Pharmacologic, Physical, and Cognitive Pain Alleviation for Musculoskeletal Extremity/Pelvis Surgery.

Pharmacologic, Physical, and Cognitive Pain Alleviation for Musculoskeletal Extremity/Pelvis Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of current scientific and clinical research. The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to evaluate therapeutic interventions to alleviate pain, improve function, and reduce opioid use after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery by providing 29 evidence-based treatment recommendations to be used by orthopaedic surgeons and other clinicians. In addition, the work group highlighted the need for better research to help patients recovering from injury or surgery experience safe and effective pain alleviation.

A Case Illustrating the Practical Application of the AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacologic, Physical, and Cognitive Pain Alleviation for Musculoskeletal Extremity/Pelvis Surgery.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline "Pharmacologic, Physical, and Cognitive Pain Alleviation for Musculoskeletal Extremity/Pelvis Surgery" is a summary of the available literature designed to help guide surgeons provide a safe and effective means of pain alleviation for orthopaedic surgery patients. The following case study demonstrates these guidelines at work in a patient undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty. The recommendations listed in the following sentences are from the Clinical Practice Guideline. Preoperative patient education regarding the effects of opioids and benefits of early termination may help patients discontinue opioids earlier in their postoperative course. Perioperative use of intravenous ketamine and regional anesthesia continuous peripheral nerve catheters help reduce pain scores and decrease opioid use. Postoperative cryotherapy may provide a modest benefit in reducing pain scores. Postoperative cyclooxygenase-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) and oral acetaminophen improve pain and decrease opioid use. Combination opioid/NSAIDs may provide a modest improvement in pain scores at the expense of NSAID dose optimization in the postoperative period. Gabapentin has not been shown to improve patient outcomes; however, pregabalin may decrease pain and opioid use after total joint arthroplasty.

Pain Catastrophizing Predicts Opioid and Health-Care Utilization After Orthopaedic Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of Trial Participants with Spine and Lower-Extremity Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Most individuals undergoing elective surgery expect to discontinue opioid use after surgery, but many do not. Modifiable risk factors including psychosocial factors are associated with poor postsurgical outcomes. We wanted to know whether pain catastrophizing is specifically associated with postsurgical opioid and health-care use. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study of trial participants undergoing elective spine (lumbar or cervical) or lower-extremity (hip or knee osteoarthritis) surgery between 2015 and 2018. Primary and secondary outcomes were 12-month postsurgical days' supply of opioids and surgery-related health-care utilization, respectively. Self-reported and medical record data included presurgical Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) scores, surgical success expectations, opioid use, and pain interference duration. RESULTS: Complete outcomes were analyzed for 240 participants with a median age of 42 years (34% were female, and 56% were active-duty military service members). In the multivariable generalized additive model, greater presurgical days' supply of opioids (F = 17.23, p < 0.001), higher pain catastrophizing (F = 1.89, p = 0.004), spine versus lower-extremity surgery (coefficient estimate = 1.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.50 to 2.82]; p = 0.005), and female relative to male sex (coefficient estimate = -1.25 [95% CI, -2.38 to -0.12]; p = 0.03) were associated with greater 12-month postsurgical days' supply of opioids. Presurgical opioid days' supply (chi-square = 111.95; p < 0.001), pain catastrophizing (chi-square = 96.06; p < 0.001), and lower extremity surgery (coefficient estimate = -0.17 [95% CI, -0.24 to -0.11]; p < 0.001), in addition to age (chi-square = 344.60; p < 0.001), expected recovery after surgery (chi-square = 54.44; p < 0.001), active-duty status (coefficient estimate = 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.67]; p < 0.001), and pain interference duration (chi-square = 43.47; p < 0.001) were associated with greater health-care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Greater presurgical days' supply of opioids and pain catastrophizing accounted for greater postsurgical days' supply of opioids and health-care utilization. Consideration of several modifiable factors provides an opportunity to improve postsurgical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Femoral Nerve Blockade Does Not Lead to Subjective Functional Deficits After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) ranks among the most common surgeries performed in civilian as well as military orthopedic settings. Regional anesthesia, and the femoral nerve block (FNB) in particular, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing postoperative pain and opioid use after ACLR, however concerns linger about possible impaired functional outcomes. The purpose of the current investigation was to assess International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores at 6 to 12 months after ACLR in patients who did (FNB) and did not (NoFNB) receive a perioperative FNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing unilateral ACLR in the study period were reviewed in this institutional process improvement analysis. The primary outcome was prospectively collected IKDC-SKF scores obtained at 6-12 months post-surgery. Demographic and surgical information collected as potential covariates included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative IKDC-SKF score, use of an FNB, use of another (not femoral nerve) block, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, graft type (auto vs. allograft), concomitant meniscus or cartilage procedures, tobacco use, tourniquet time, and primary vs. revision surgery. Assuming a 1:2 ratio of patients who did not vs. did receive FNBs and a clinically meaningful difference of 7 points on the IKDC-SKF, 112 patients were required for 80% power. A regression model averaging approach examined the relationships between covariates and postoperative IKDC-SKF scores. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients met inclusion criteria (FNB 79 and NoFNB 40). The cohorts were significantly different in several factors including BMI, ASA level, graft type, and other peripheral nerve blocks, which were controlled for through regression modeling. Regressions with model averaging examined the relationship between treatment groups and postoperative IKDC-SKF scores, along with other potential predictor variables. Estimated adjusted marginal differences in postoperative IKDC-SKF scores from the best-fitting model revealed a very small 0.66-point mean (P = .86) difference between NoFNB and FNB groups that was not statistically significant. Those who reported tobacco use had a 10.51 point (P = .008) lower mean postoperative IKDC-SKF score than those who did not report tobacco use. Every 1-point increase in the preoperative IKDC-SKF score was associated with a 0.28-point (P = .02) increase in the postsurgical IKDC-SKF score. CONCLUSIONS: Active tobacco use may negatively impact short-term subjective patient-reported outcomes after ACLR, as reported by the IKDC-SKF. Lower preoperative scores are also associated with significantly lower postoperative IKDC-SKF scores while the use of a FNB was not associated with lower postoperative scores. The negative association between tobacco use and patient-reported functional outcomes after ACLR lends further support to tobacco cessation programs within the military.

High Incidence of Combined and Posterior Labral Tears in Military Patients With Operative Shoulder Instability.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder instability is the pattern most commonly reported in the civilian population, but military servicemembers may represent a unique population. At 1.7 per 1000 person-years, servicemembers not only have a higher incidence of instability events compared with civilians (reported rate of 0.2-0.8), but the distribution of labral tears in the military may differ significantly as well. HYPOTHESIS: The incidence of combined and posterior labral tears in the military population will be greater than numbers previously reported. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The Wounded, Ill, and Injured Registry, a Department of Defense patient reported outcomes data collection platform that includes all military branches, was queried retrospectively for all patients who had undergone a primary arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilization procedure (Current Procedural Terminology codes 29806, 23455, 23462) between October 2016 and January 2019. Demographic information was obtained through intake forms completed by patients at the time of enrollment into the Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network. Tear location was determined arthroscopically and labeled as anterior, inferior, posterior, superior, or any combination thereof. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the percentage of patients with isolated anterior, isolated posterior, isolated inferior, or combined labral tears in the current study cohort with those in a previously reported cohort of patients with operative shoulder instability at a single military treatment facility. RESULTS: A total of 311 patients were included who had undergone primary shoulder stabilization during the study period. Of these patients, 94 (30.2%) had isolated anterior tears, 76 (24.4%) had isolated posterior tears, and 136 (43.7%) had combined tears. We observed a higher percentage of combined tears in our data set than in a data set from a single military treatment facility (χ2(2) = 48.2; P < .00001). Chi-square analysis demonstrated that significantly more female patients had an isolated anterior labral tear (51.2%) compared with male patients (27.1%; χ2(2) = 9.4; P = .009). CONCLUSION: The incidence of combined and posterior labral tears in the military population is greater than numbers previously reported in both military and civilian populations.

Return to running and sports participation after limb salvage.

BACKGROUND: The ability to return to running and sports participation after lower extremity limb salvage has not been well documented previously. Although the ability to ambulate without pain or assistive devices is generally a criteria for a good limb salvage outcome, many patients at our institution have expressed a desire to return to a more athletic lifestyle to include running and sports participation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the types of athletic endeavors our high-energy lower extremity trauma patients were able to pursue after limb salvage. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed lower extremity limb salvage patients who were at least 12 weeks status after external fixation removal and participated in our limb salvage return-to-running clinical pathway. Patients were rehabilitated to their highest functional level through a sports medicine-based approach. A custom energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis was implemented to help augment plantarflexion strength in conjunction with running gait retraining. RESULTS: The first 10 patients to complete the clinical pathway were identified. All patients were treated at the same institution by the same orthopedic surgeon and physical therapist. Eight patients have returned to running, and 10 patients have returned to weight-lifting. Seven patients have returned to cycling, three have returned to golf, three to basketball, and two to softball. Two patients have completed a mini-triathlon. CONCLUSION: Aggressive rehabilitation, an energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis, and running gait retraining can restore an active recreational lifestyle to patients who have undergone lower extremity limb salvage.