RESUMO
Emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in dramatic changes in global healthcare provision. Resources were redirected across all healthcare sectors to support the treatment of viral pneumonia with resultant effects on other essential services. We describe the impact of this on the provision of major trauma care in a major capital city.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Reestruturação Hospitalar/métodos , Controle de Infecções , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Gestão de Mudança , Defesa Civil/tendências , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Procedimentos Clínicos/tendências , Eficiência Organizacional , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Londres/epidemiologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Meio Social , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapiaRESUMO
The incidence of open tibia/fibula fractures in the elderly is increasing, but current national guidelines focus on the aggressive treatment of high-energy injuries in younger patients. There is conflicting evidence regarding whether older age affects treatment provision and outcomes in open fractures. The aim of this study was to determine if elderly patients are sustaining a different injury to younger patients and how their treatment and outcomes differ. This may have implications for future guidelines and verify their application in the elderly. In this retrospective single centre cohort study (December 2015-July 2018), we compared the injury characteristics, operative management and outcomes of elderly (≥65 years) and younger (18-65 years) patients with open tibia/fibula fractures. An extended cohort examined free flap reconstruction. In total, 157 patients were included. High-energy injuries were commoner in younger patients (88% vs 37%; p<0.001). Most were Gustilo-Anderson IIIb in both age groups. Elderly patients waited longer until debridement (21:19 vs 19:00 h) and had longer inpatient stays (23 vs 15 days). There was no difference in time to antibiotics, operative approach or post-operative complications. Despite the low-energy nature of elderly patients' injuries, the severity of soft tissue insult was equivalent to younger patients with high-energy injuries. Our data suggest that age and co-morbidities should not prohibit lower limb reconstruction. The current application of generic guidelines appears suitable in the elderly, particularly in the acute management. We suggest current management pathways and targets be reviewed to reflect the greater need for peri-operative optimisation and rehabilitation in elderly patients.
RESUMO
Treatment of neglected fracture dislocations of the ankle poses a surgical challenge. Extensive open reduction can frequently be contraindicated because of local skin conditions and contractures. The Taylor Spatial Frame™ (TSF) has been used to reduce and maintain reduction of complex fractures. Its use in fracture dislocation of the ankle joint has not been described. We describe a case where a TSF was used to reduce and treat a 6-week-old fracture dislocation of the ankle. The TSF is a versatile device, which has a role in the management of both acute and neglected fractures.
Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fixadores Internos , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Doenças Negligenciadas/cirurgia , Ossos do Tarso/lesões , Adulto , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Luxações Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Negligenciadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Medição de Risco , Ossos do Tarso/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: As the world continues to fight successive waves of COVID-19 variants, we have seen worldwide infections surpass 100 million. London, UK, has been severely affected throughout the pandemic, and the resulting impact on the NHS has been profound. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on theatre productivity across London's four major trauma centres (MTCs), and to assess how the changes to normal protocols and working patterns impacted trauma theatre efficiency. METHODS: This was a collaborative study across London's MTCs. A two-month period was selected from 5 March to 5 May 2020. The same two-month period in 2019 was used to provide baseline data for comparison. Demographic information was collected, as well as surgical speciality, procedure, time to surgery, type of anaesthesia, and various time points throughout the patient journey to theatre. RESULTS: In total, 1,243 theatre visits were analyzed as part of the study. Of these, 834 patients presented in 2019 and 409 in 2020. Fewer open reduction and internal fixations were performed in 2020 (33.5% vs 38.2%), and there was an increase in the number of orthoplastic cases in 2020 (8.3% vs 2.2%), both statistically significant results (p < 0.000). There was a statistically significant increase in median time from 2019 to 2020, between sending for a patient and their arrival to the anaesthetic room (29 vs 35 minutes; p = 0.000). Median time between arrival in the anaesthetic room and commencement of anaesthetic increased (7 to 9 minutes; p = 0.104). CONCLUSION: Changes in working practices necessitated by COVID-19 led to modest delays to all aspects of theatre use, and consequently theatre efficiency. However, the reality is that the major concerns of impact of service did not occur to the levels that were expected. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):886-892.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Segmental tibial fractures are fractures in two or more areas of the tibial diaphysis resulting in a separate intercalary segment of the bone. Surgical fixation is recommended for patients with segmental tibial fractures as non-operative treatment outcomes are poor. The most common surgical interventions are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and circular frame external fixation (CFEF), but evidence about which is better is of poor quality. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine optimum treatment is required. STIFF-F aimed to assess the feasibility of a multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF for segmental tibial fracture. METHODS: STIFF-F was a mixed-methods feasibility study comprising a pilot RCT conducted at six UK Major Trauma Centres, qualitative interviews drawing on Phenomenology and an online survey of rehabilitation. The primary outcome was recruitment rate. Patients, 16 years and over, with a segmental tibial fracture (open or closed) deemed suitable for IMN or CFEF were eligible to participate. Randomisation was stratified by site using random permuted blocks of varying sizes. Participant or assessor blinding was not possible. Interviews were undertaken with patients about their experience of injury, treatment, recovery and participation. Staff were interviewed to identify contextual factors affecting trial processes, their experience of recruitment and the treatment pathway. An online survey was developed to understand the rehabilitation context of the treatments. RESULTS: Eleven patients were screened and three recruited to the pilot RCT. Nineteen staff and four patients participated in interviews, and 11 physiotherapists responded to the survey. This study found the following: (i) segmental tibial fractures were rarer than anticipated, (ii) the complexity of the injury, study setup times and surgeon treatment preferences impeded recruitment, (iii) recovery from a segmental tibial fracture is challenging, and rehabilitation protocols are inconsistent and (iv) despite the difficulty recruiting, staff valued this research question and strived to find a way forward. CONCLUSION: The proposed multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF is not feasible. This study highlighted the difficulty of recruiting patients to an RCT of a complex rare injury over a short time period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry: ISRCTN11229660.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Peptide YY (PYY), a gut peptide, has recently been shown to inhibit appetite. The role of this peptide in elderly nutritionally-compromised patients with femoral neck fracture (FNF) has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated the longitudinal pattern of PYY levels during hospital stay and investigated the postprandial PYY response to a standard meal in patients with FNF and matched controls. METHODS: Fasting plasma concentrations of the PYY were measured on days 1, 4, 7, 14, 21 and 28 or on discharge from the hospital in 17 white patients with FNF. On the second week of stay, 13 patients with FNF consumed a standard breakfast following an overnight fasting. One fasting sample and one 45-minute postmeal sample were collected. A control group was made up of 17 matched healthy elderly patients. RESULTS: PYY concentrations were increased significantly over the length of hospital stay. Results of the test breakfast suggested a significant and exaggerated post-prandial PYY response, despite a smaller energy intake being consumed. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows PYY concentrations are increased during hospitalization and their post-prandial release exaggerated in this group of vulnerable patients, and suggests a role in the etiology of reduced appetite in this patient group.
Assuntos
Apetite/fisiologia , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/sangue , Peptídeo YY/sangue , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Ingestão de Energia , Jejum/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Período Pós-Prandial , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de TempoAssuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica/educação , Amputação Cirúrgica/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Traumatismos da Perna/cirurgia , Deformidades Congênitas dos Membros/cirurgia , Salvamento de Membro/educação , Salvamento de Membro/métodos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/educação , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Cotos de Amputação/cirurgia , Comportamento Cooperativo , Humanos , Técnica de Ilizarov , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Especialização , Infecção dos Ferimentos/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Residual limb infection following amputation is a devastating complication, resulting in delayed rehabilitation, repeat surgery, prolonged hospitalisation and poor functional outcome. The aim of this study was to identify variables predicting residual limb infection following non-salvageable lower limb trauma. METHODS: All cases of non-salvageable lower limb trauma presenting to a specialist centre over 5 years were evaluated from a prospective database and clinical and management variables correlated with the development of deep infection. RESULTS: Forty patients requiring 42 amputations were identified with a mean age of 49 years (±19.9, 1SD). Amputations were performed for 21 Gustilo IIIB injuries, 12 multi-planar degloving injuries, seven IIIC injuries and one open Schatzker 6 fracture. One limb was traumatically amputated at the scene and surgically revised. Amputation level was transtibial in 32, through-knee in one and transfemoral in nine. Median time from injury to amputation was 4 days (range 0-30 days). Amputation following only one debridement and within 5 days resulted in significantly fewer stump infections (p = 0.026 and p = 0.03, respectively, Fisher's exact test). The cumulative probability of infection-free residual limb closure declined steadily from day 5. Multivariate analyses revealed that neither the nature of the injury nor pre-injury patient morbidity independently influenced residual limb infection. CONCLUSION: Avoiding residual limb infection is critically dependent on prompt amputation of non-salvageable limbs.
Assuntos
Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica , Cotos de Amputação/microbiologia , Desbridamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The challenges of managing Gustilo IIIB tibial fractures in children are unique. A multi-disciplinary, evidence based approach is needed. We aimed to evaluate the evidence for the ortho-plastic management of Gustilo grade IIIB open tibial shaft fractures in children based on a review of all published data in order to rationalise the orthopaedic and plastic surgical approach to these complex injuries. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Gustilo grade IIIB tibial shaft fractures in pre-adolescent and adolescent children were identified and evaluated with regard to both the skeletal and soft tissue management, and the outcome. RESULTS: Of 54 children with grade IIIB tibial fractures, a mean union time of 31 weeks included 33 weeks for 42 adolescents and 23 weeks for 12 pre-adolescents. Faster union time in pre-adolescents tended towards significance. Delayed union occurred in 22%, nonunion in 13%, mostly in adolescents. Two of 45 covered by vascularised flaps and 3 of 9 treated without flaps developed deep infection (p=0.028). There was no correlation between method of skeletal fixation and union time. CONCLUSION: Gustilo IIIB tibial shaft fractures in pre-adolescents tended towards faster healing with fewer complications, irrespective of the method of skeletal fixation. In adolescents, healing times were similar to adults. Soft tissue closure without flaps was associated with deep infection in one-third of patients, requiring debridement and flap cover. Adequate debridement and flap cover is suggested in all cases, irrespective of age.
Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Masculino , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Fraturas da Tíbia/reabilitação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early coverage with vascularized soft-tissue flaps has dramatically improved the outcome in open tibial fractures. However, the ideal tissue for covering open fractures remains controversial. Several clinical studies suggest that muscle is superior to fasciocutaneous tissue; this is attributed to the presumed higher vascularity of muscle, although experimental evidence is inconclusive. The authors' previously described novel murine fracture model, which allows exclusive comparison of both tissues, demonstrated enhanced healing beneath muscle. The present study was undertaken to compare the vascularity of muscle and fasciocutaneous tissues over the course of fracture healing. METHODS: Two experimental groups comprised mice with tibial fractures in contact with either muscle or fasciocutaneous tissues exclusively. Controls included a nontrauma group and those where soft tissues and periosteum were dissected but the tibia was not fractured. Animals were harvested between 3 and 28 days after fracture (n = 170 in total). The vascular density of the soft tissues was assessed using immunohistochemical techniques. RESULTS: Fasciocutaneous tissue was found to have a higher vascular density compared with muscle in contact with the fracture site at all time points (p < 0.0001, two-way analysis of variance), despite accelerated healing of fractures covered by muscle. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' data show that the more advanced healing of fractures covered by muscle compared with fasciocutaneous tissue is not related to the vascularity of the tissues, as the latter had a higher vascular density at all time points. Therefore, provided that a flap has sufficient vascularity to effectively reconstitute the soft-tissue envelope, other factors may be important in specifically promoting fracture healing.
Assuntos
Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Animais , Feminino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BLRESUMO
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of soft tissue coverage by either muscle or fasciocutaneous tissue on the healing of open tibial fractures in a murine model. An open tibial fracture, stripped of periosteum with intramedullary fixation, was created in mice. Experimental groups were devised to allow exclusive comparison of either muscle alone or skin plus fascia in direct contact with healing bone. To exclusively assess the relative efficacy of muscle and fasciocutaneous tissue to promote healing of a fracture stripped of periosteum, a piece of sterile inert material (polytetrafluoroethylene) was positioned anteriorly, excluding skin and fascia (muscle group) or posteriorly, excluding muscle (fasciocutaneous group). Skeletal repair was assessed histologically and quantified by histomorphometry; quantitative peripheral computed tomography (pQCT) and mechanical testing using a four-point bending technique. This standardized, reproducible model allowed characterization of the morphology of open fracture healing. At 28 days postfracture, there was faster healing in the experimental muscle coverage group compared to skin and fascia alone. Furthermore, there was almost 50% more cortical bone content and a threefold stronger union beneath muscle compared to fasciocutaneous tissue (p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA). Exclusive comparison of muscle and fasciocutaneous tissue in our novel murine model demonstrates that muscle is superior for the coverage of open tibial fractures for both the rate and quality of fracture healing.