Differential impact of COVID-19 on urological surgeries in public and private institutions between 2019 and 2021 in France.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted all routine health care services in 2020. To date, data regarding adjustment and coverage of surgical backlog in the post-COVID era actually remains scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the number of urological procedures coded between 2019 and 2021 in public and private institutions to (i) quantify the variation in surgical activity linked to the shutdown in 2020 and (ii) study the adjustment of procedures over the year 2021. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a comprehensive retrospective analysis of all urological surgeries coded between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021 in France. Data were extracted from the open access dataset of the national Technical Agency for Information on Hospital Care (ATIH) website. In total, 453 urological procedures were retained and allocated in 8 categories. Primary outcome was the impact of COVID-19 analyzed by the 2020/2019 variation. The secondary outcome was the post-COVID catch-up analyzed by the 2021/2019 variation. RESULTS: Surgical activity in public hospitals dropped by 13.2% in 2020 compared to 7.6% in the private sector. The most impacted areas were functional urology, stones and BPH. Incontinence surgery did not recover at all in 2021. BPH and stone surgeries were far less impacted in the private sector, with even explosive activity in 2021, post-COVID period. Onco-urology procedures were roughly maintained with a compensation in 2021 in both sectors. CONCLUSION: The recovery of surgical backlog was much more efficient in the private sector in 2021. The pressure on the health system associated to the multiple COVID-19 waves may generate a gap between public and private surgical activity in the future.

Preoperative risk factors for complications after flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for stone disease: A French multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: With an increasing prevalence in industrialized countries, lithiasis represents a public health problem with significant economic cost. Ureteroscopy is nowadays the main treatment for kidney and ureteral stones with increasingly broad indications. While this treatment is relatively safe and effective, the complications can be severe. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the preoperative risk factors of complication in the 30 days following a rigid or flexible ureteroscopy in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 5 French centers between January 1st 2017 and 31st December 2018. All flexible and rigid ureteroscopies performed were included. All preoperative and per operative data were collected in an electronic database. Outcomes and complications within 30 days of the procedure were also collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses evaluated for potential predictors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: 1124 procedures were included. According to the occurrence of a postoperative complication, patients were divided into two groups, 109 in the group with complications. The majority of complications were minor, with only 13.7% classified as Clavien 3-4. In univariate analysis, ASA score>2 (odd ratio, OR=1.68, P=0.04), WHO performance status≥1 (OR=1.50, P=0.04) and neurologic disease (OR=2.78, P=0.005) were predictors of postoperative complications. In multivariable analysis, Charlson's score (OR=0.79, P=0.01) and ASA score>2 (OR=1.48, P=0.03) were independents risk factors of postoperative complication. Concerning major complications, in univariate analysis, cardiovascular disease (OR=3.71, P=0.032) and BMI (OR=0.87, P=0.02) were the only predictors of major complications after ureteroscopy. Only BMI was found In multivariable analysis (OR=0.86, P=0.01) CONCLUSION: Baseline characteristics and comorbidities of the patients, especially neurological diseases, were the main risk factors for short-term complications after ureteroscopy. Ureteroscopy remains a relatively safe and effective procedure. However, we advise surgeons to take precautions with fragile patients with multiple comorbidities or neurological disease.

Is YouTube™ a reliable source for patient information about Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate?

OBJECTIVES: Prior to benign prostate surgery, the patient's informed consent is mandatory. Among the multiple source of information for patients, social networks are very popular, but the quality of information delivered is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the information freely available for patients on YouTube™ regarding HoLEP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The term "HOLEP" was searched on YouTube™ on December 24, 2020. Videos that were not in English, French or Arabic, specifically destined to the medical community, with no written or oral comment, patient testimonials, pure surgical technique or had content unrelated to HoLEP were excluded from the study. The patient information sheet by the French Urology Association (AFU) was used to create a list of 31 items classified into 4 categories as follows: anatomy and pathophysiology (6 items), technique and perioperative preparation (10 items), usual outcomes (10 items) and complications (5 items). For each item on the predefined list, correct, missing and incorrect information were rated respectively 1, 0 and -1. RESULTS: Thirty-five videos met the inclusion criteria. Their average length was 6'06"±7'03" [00'20"; 31'30"], with an average number of views of 5279±17,821 [8; 87,354]. The information provided on the videos was written and oral, oral-only and written-only in 51%, 34% and 14% of cases, respectively. 23% of the videos showed surgery sequences, 40% animations and 62% a doctor speaking. Only one video had a quality score greater than 80% and 7 videos got a score below 20%. CONCLUSION: The information about HoLEP on YouTube™ seemed not of sufficiently high quality to allow patients to make informed decisions, and was occasionally misleading. Surgeons still have the duty to give the best quality information, and may point patients towards adequate sources of information, especially those delivered by national and international professional societies.

[BCG strain shortage from 2012 to 2014: Evaluation of its impact on the management of patients with high-risk NMIBC]. / Pénurie en souche de BCG entre 2012 et 2014 : évaluation de son impact sur la prise en charge des patients présentant une TVNIM de haut risque.

INTRODUCTION: BCG instillations are the gold-standard treatment for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with a decreased risk of tumor recurrence and muscle infiltration. From 2012 to 2014, a stock shortage of the Connaught strain has led to the cessation of supply for immucyst in France. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of BCG shortage on the management of patients with NMIBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including patients followed from May 2005 to May 2015 with a high-risk NMIBC (primo-diagnosis). Patients were separated into two groups: not impacted by the shortage (NISG: 56 patients) and impacted by the shortage (ISG: 53 patients). Data on tumour recurrence (RFS), muscle progression (PFS) and overall and specific survival (OS and SS) were also analysed. RESULTS: The BCG induction schedule could not be carried out in 20.8% of cases in the ISG compared to only 5.3% of cases in NISG (P=0.02). Similarly, the maintenance treatment was incomplete for 56.6% of cases versus 37.5% in NISG (P=0.047). Nevertheless, it should be underlined that very high-risk NMIBC received a complete induction BCG schedule. The ISG seems to have benefited with the evolution of the guidelines with the use of diagnosis bladder fluorescence but without significant difference on the rate of second look bladder trans-uretral resection. The cystectomy rate was higher in ISG. No significant difference in RFS, PFS, OS, and SS between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In our experience, RFS, PFS, OS or SS were not impacted by the BCG shortage. These data may be explained by a better selection of very high-risk patients including the recommended BCG schedule and more frequently the use of diagnosis bladder fluorescence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Onco-TESE and testicular cancer]. / Onco-TESE et cancer du testicule.

INTRODUCTION: Fertility preservation is essential before cancer treatment. When ejaculated sperm preservation is not possible, testicular tissue can be surgically collected by Onco-TESE technic (Oncological Testicular Sperm Extraction) to isolate sperm. We report on our experience with Onco-TESE in testicular cancer patients at the Rouen University Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study including all pubescent men, treated for testicular cancer, uni- or bilateral, before any carcinological therapy, who have undergone Onco-TESE at the Rouen University Hospital. Fragment weight, detection of sperm or its precursors were analysed. A histological interpretation of the testicular tumor was carried out. For each positive sample, straws were kept at the French Sperm Bank. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had an Onco-TESE: 58.34% severe sperm alteration (SSA) and 41.36% sperm collection failure (SCF), between 1996 and 2019. The mean age was 26.6 (±5.29) years. The mean procedure and length of stay were 71minutes (±30.7) and 3.75 days (±2.83), respectively. The rate of positive testicular biopsies (TB) was 58.33% overall and 66,67% in the case of TB on tumour testis. One patient had a Clavian-Dindo III complication. The mean number of straws preserved per patient was 14.28 (±15.34) for 7.14% use. CONCLUSION: Our results seem to confirm that Onco-TESE is an effective solution for preserving fertility in men with testicular cancer in cases of SSA or SCF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Is intraoperative heparin during renal transplantation useful to reduce graft vascular thrombosis?

OBJECTIVES: The standard treatment for end-stage renal disease is renal transplantation. As vascular anastomoses are performed during the surgery, it may expose to a risk of vascular thrombosis. This raises the question of using intravenous heparin during the procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of renal transplant vascular thrombosis in the perioperative period based on whether the patients received or not intraoperative heparin. METHODS: A single center retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2011 and 2015. Patients were divided into two groups: patients not receiving heparin vs. receiving heparin at the dose of 0.5mg/kg. A Doppler ultrasound was performed at day one postoperatively to assess the occurrence of vascular thrombosis. Hemorrhagic complications and the need for postoperative transfusion were also assessed. RESULTS: In total, 261 patients were included. Fifty-one patients received heparin (19.5%). Patient's baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. No significant difference was found regarding the incidence of vascular thrombosis (6% for both groups, P=1). In addition, no difference was found regarding hemorrhagic complications requiring surgical revision (P=1) as well as early postoperative transfusion rate (P=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that intraoperative IV heparin doesn't improve the risk of vascular thrombosis following renal transplantation. However, intraoperative IV heparin was not significantly associated with a higher rate of hemorrhagic complications suggesting that heparin can be safely used if required in some selected patients at higher risk of thrombosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Single, immediate postoperative intra-vesical instillation (SI) compared to a single preoperative intra-vesical instillation of mitomycin C in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Phase II randomized trial]. / Instillation préopératoire immédiate (IPOI) de mitomycine C comparée à l'instillation postopératoire précoce (IPOP) dans les tumeurs de la vessie. Étude de phase II randomisée.

OBJECTIVE: A single immediate instillation of mitomycin C is recommended after a complete transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) in low- and intermediate-risk patients with NMIBC. Actually, post-TURB instillation is seldom used due to logistical difficulties and surgical contraindications. Our aim was to compare patients with single pre-TURB intra-vesical instillation and patients with a single, immediate post-TURB intra-vesical instillation of mitomycin C. METHODS: We performed a multicenter randomized trial between February 17, 2014 and November 24, 2016 (registration number 2012-004341-32). Sixty patients with two or less, primary or recurrent papillary bladder tumors and a negative urinary cytology were planned. Cystoscopy was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after TURB. Our primary endpoint was disease-free interval. Secondary endpoints were recurrence rate at 3 and 12 months, rate of patients in whom instillation could not be performed and tolerance 1 month after TURB using BCI-Fr score. RESULTS: Among 35 eligible participants, 20 were randomly assigned in the pre-TURB instillation group and 15 in the post-TURB instillation group. Follow-up was comparable: 12,3±1,6 months in the SI group and 10,2±4,5 months in the pre-TURB instillation group. In the post-TURB instillation group, 2 patients didn't have any instillation. We did not identify significant differences in disease-free interval. Tolerance at 1 month after TURB was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Tolerance and efficacy were not significantly different. As expected, logisitics were easier for the health providers in the pre-TURB group where all patients had their instillation conversely to the post-TURB group. These results suggest that the advantages of a single immediate pre-TURB instillation warrant further evaluation of this strategy in a phase III randomized trial.

Long-term follow-up reveals a low persistence rate of abobotulinumtoxinA injections for idiopathic overactive bladder.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about long-term efficacy and tolerance of intra-detrusor injections of abobotulinumtoxinA for management of idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB). We report long-term efficacy and compliance of abobotulinumtoxinA in patients treated for OAB. METHODS: All patients treated with abotulinumtoxinA for OAB in a tertiary reference centre between 2005 and 2012 were included in a retrospective analysis. Patients received 150, 250 or 500 U of abotulinumtoxinA as first injection. The primary endpoint was the discontinuation rate at 5 years. Other outcomes of interest were: rate of failure, reasons for discontinuation and subsequent treatment elected in those who did not persist with abobotulinumtoxinA. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (50 women and 9 men) were included. Forty-one patients (69.4%) received 250 U of abobotulinumtoxinA as first injection. Thirteen patients (22%) received 500 U and 5 (8.4%) received 150 U of BoNT-A. Median follow-up was 83.6 months [0.3-183.6]. Median number of injections per patient was 2 [1-15] and median reinjection interval was 10.7 [3-86.4] months. The estimated 5-year discontinuation-free survival rate was 23.4%. Fourteen patients (23.7%) experienced persistent improvement of symptoms and 12 patients (20.3%) stopped the injections because of tolerability issues. Main cause of discontinuation was primary failure, which occurred in 21 patients (35.5%). CONCLUSION: Overall, 59.3% of patients were successfully treated with first abobotulinumtoxinA injection. Although the estimated 5-year discontinuation-free survival rate is low, abobotulinumtoxinA could be considered as an alternative off-labelled in patients not responders to onabotulinumtoxinA after failure of other conservative measures. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

[Nurse's role in functional urology]. / Rôle de l'IDE en urologie fonctionnelle.

INTRODUCTION: The management of patients in functional urology is complex and requires the expertise of the medical team but also of the nurse team. The aim of this article is to detail the roles of the nurses in functional urology. METHODS: Exchanges with the nurses of our unit, analysis of the literature using the terms "nurse", "urology", "urodynamics" in the PubMed search engine, and a search for regulatory texts relating to the practice of nurses in urology units were conducted. RESULTS: Since the creation of the Inter-University Diploma of Nurse Expert in Urology in 2002 and the inter-professional cooperation protocols in 2009, the urologist can rely on the specific skills of nurses to optimise the patient's management: from endoscopic or urodynamic explorations, to stomatherapy or sexology, from therapeutic education to specialised treatments such as posterior tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation or botulinum toxin injections. Their expertise is an undeniable asset in the patient support and for the quality of care. The cooperation protocols respond to the current problems of the healthcare system: attractiveness for paramedical professionals, medical demographics and ambulatory care. The increasingly frequent practice of multidisciplinary consultation meetings also gives them a coordinating role. CONCLUSION: Nurses in functional urology plays a major role in diagnostic and therapeutic management as the patient's privileged contact and collaborator with the referring urologist.

Overall survival and oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cT2a renal tumors: A collaborative international study from the French kidney cancer research network UroCCR.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended as first-line treatment for cT1 stage kidney tumors because of a better renal function and probably a better overall survival than radical nephrectomy (RN). For larger tumors, PN has a controversial position due to lack of evidence showing good cancer control. The aim of this study was to compare the results of PN and RN in cT2a stage on overall survival and oncological results. METHOD: A retrospective international multicenter study was conducted in the frame of the French kidney cancer research network (UroCCR). We considered all patients aged≥18 years who underwent surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stage cT2a (7.1-10cm) between 2000 and 2014. Cox and Fine-Gray models were performed to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and cancer-free survival (CFS). Comparison between PN and RN was realized after an adjustment by propensity score considering predefined confounding factors: age, sex, tumor size, pT stage of the TNM classification, histological type, ISUP grade, ASA score. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were included. OS at 3 and 5 years was 93.6% and 78.7% after PN and 88.0% and 76.2% after RN, respectively. CSS at 3 and 5 years was 95.4% and 80.2% after PN and 91.0% and 85.0% after RN. No significant difference between groups was found after propensity score adjustment for OS (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.05, P=0.75), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18-1.54, P=0.24) and CFS (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.50-2.09, P=0.96). CONCLUSION: PN seems equivalent to RN for OS, CSS and CFS in cT2a stage kidney tumors. The risk of recurrence is probably more related to prognostic factors than the surgical technique. The decision to perform a PN should depend on technical feasibility rather than tumor size, both to imperative and elective situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

A phase II study of temsirolimus added to low-dose weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Background: Activating events along the PI3K/mTOR pathway are common in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), and preclinical studies suggest additive or synergistic effects when combining mTORC1 inhibitors with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Patients and methods: In this single-institution phase II study, the combination of temsirolimus 25 mg, carboplatin AUC 1.5, and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle was evaluated in 36 patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. The primary end point was objective response rate after two cycles of treatment. Secondary end points include the safety and tolerability profile and overall survival. Correlative studies with exome mutational analysis were performed in pre-treatment biopsy samples from 21 patients. Results: Fifteen (41.7%) patients had an objective response, which were all partial responses, and 19 (52.3%) patients had stable disease as best response. The two patients who were designated as 'non-responders' were removed from study prior to two cycles of treatment, but are included in the efficacy and safety analyses. The median duration on study was 5.3 months and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.9 months (95% confidence interval, 4.8-7.1) and 12.8 months (95% confidence interval, 9.8-15.8), respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hematologic toxicities. Three (3.8%) patients developed neutropenic fever on study. Three of four patients with PIK3CA mutations experienced tumor regressions, and responses were also seen in patients with other genetic alterations in the PI3K/mTOR pathway. Conclusion: The combination of temsirolimus with low-dose weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel appears to have meaningful clinical efficacy in the treatment of R/M HNSCC. This regimen has a relatively high response rate compared to other treatments evaluated in R/M HNSCC, and potential associations with genetic alterations in the PI3K/mTOR pathway should be further explored.

Sequential treatment with ProACT™ device implantation after male sling failure for male urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVES: There is no strong evidence for second line therapy after male sling failure for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI). We report the outcomes after periurethral balloons implantation for persistence or recurrence of mild PPI symptoms after male sling implantation. METHODS: All patients implanted of a ProACT™ device (Uromedica, Inc., MN, USA) following I-STOP transobturator male sling (TOMS) failure, in a tertiary reference center between 2009 and 2016, were included. Patients were evaluated by 24-hour pad-test before and after implantation, and after each balloon repressurizing procedure. PGI-I and Likert scale patient satisfaction were estimated during a telephone interview conducted in 2016. Objective and subjective cure of urinary incontinence were defined by a 24-hour pad-test<8g and the use of zero or one pad per day, respectively. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included. Median follow-up was 34months [4-89]. Objective and subjective cure were 29% (n=4) and 57% (n=8), respectively. Median pad-test decreased from 95g [IQR: 130] to 34g [IQR: 83] (P=0.022). ProACT™ significantly decreased median pad-test by a factor 2.73 [1.19-6.29]. Eighty-eight percent patients were feeling a little better, much better or very much better and 77% were satisfied or very satisfied at the end of follow-up. Reoperation rate was 28% (n=4): 3 balloons were changed for caudally migration (n=2) or deflation (n=1) and 1 had a urinary sphincter implanted for severe UI. CONCLUSIONS: ProACT™ is a safe and efficient treatment that can be used in second line therapy after TOMS failure for PPUI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Interest of surgical companionship during the training period of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy]. / Intérêt du compagnonnage chirurgical durant la période d'apprentissage de la prostatectomie radicale robot-assistée.

OBJECTIVE: Study of the learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, evaluating intraoperative difficulties and postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of our first 157 consecutive patients treated with robot-assisted prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer between September 2011 and December 2014. Comparison of learning for each group of 50 procedures and then comparison between patients operated on by a pair of two seniors specially trained for robotic surgery and patients operated on by one mixed pair including a surgeon junior coached by one senior of the first group. RESULTS: Only postoperative complications decreased significantly from the 51st patient (P=0.04). The curves showing the evolution of the operative time decreased with a parallel trend between the two pairs, but with more variability in the mixed pair. There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative difficulties (P=0.59), nor postoperative complications (P=0.56) mainly of grade 2. The blood loss, transfusion rate, duration of hospitalization and readmission rates did not differ. Lymph node dissection did not affect outcomes. For oncological results, the overall rate of positive surgical margins (R+) was 30.6 % in the initial pair against 24.2 % in the mixed group with no significant difference. Nevertheless, the subpopulation study objectified a R+ rate of 12.86 % for pT2 against 42.85 % for pT3. CONCLUSION: The early involvement of a junior surgeon who did not receive specific training, but benefiting from the guidance of a senior surgeon, did not compromise the results while allowing a faster learning curve with a rate of operative complications close to the one observed by the senior pair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Long-term outcomes of I-Stop TOMS™ male sling implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence management.

OBJECTIVES: To report long-term outcomes after I-Stop TOMS™ implantation for PPI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted in three tertiary reference centers. All consecutive patients implanted with an I-Stop TOMS™ sling between 2007 and 2012 for mild to moderate PPI (24-hour Pad test<400g) without history of pelvic radiation therapy were included. Evaluation had been conducted preoperatively, at one and six months postoperative and yearly thereafter. The main outcome criterion was the number of pads per day. Secondary criteria were International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), SF-36 questionnaire, and complications. RESULTS: A hundred patients were evaluated with a median follow-up of 58months [19-78]. Pad use was significantly reduced and quality of life improved at last follow-up (P<0.0001). The percentage of patients dry and socially continent (0 or 1 pad) were 40% and 77% at 1 year, then dropped to 15% and 22%, respectively after 5years. Twelve patients were treated by artificial urinary sphincter implantation, five by ProACT™ balloons and one by a re-do I-Stop TOMS™. No severe complications were recorded at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: I-Stop TOMS™ implantation is a safe and effective option in the short-term for mild to moderate PPI management. However, a significant trend to recurrence of leakage has been established after long-term follow-up. If confirmed by further studies, these results may substantially impact patient information before male sling implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Prostate cancer before renal transplantation: A multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical issues of renal transplantation (RT) after localized prostate cancer (PC) treatment and oncological outcomes after transplantation in patients on the waiting list with a history of PC were unknown. We conducted a retrospective multicentre study including all patients with PC diagnosed before the kidney transplantation. METHODS: Fifty-two patients were included from December 1993 to December 2015. The median age at diagnosis of PC was 59.8years old. RESULTS: The median PSA rate at diagnosis was 7ng/mL. Twenty-seven, Twenty-four, and one PC were respectively low, intermediate and high risk according to d'Amico classification. Forty-three patients were treated by radical prostatectomy (RP): 28 retropubic, 15 laparoscopic and 3 by a perineal approach. Eighteen patients had a lymph node dissection. Four patients were treated with external radiotherapy and 2 by brachytherapy. Eight patients underwent radiotherapy after surgery. The median time between PC treatment and RT was 35.7 months. The median operating time for the renal transplantation was 180min (IQR 150-190; min 90-max 310) with a median intraoperative bleeding of 200mL (IQR 100-290; min 50-max 2000). A history of lymphadenectomy did not significantly lengthen operative time (P=0.34). No recurrence of PC was observed after a median follow of 36months. CONCLUSION: PC discovered before RT should be treated with RP to assess the risk of recurrence and decrease waiting for a RT. If the PC is at low risk of recurrence, it seems possible to shorten the waiting time before the RT after a multidisciplinary discussion meeting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Partial nephrectomy vs. radical nephrectomy for tumor>7cm]. / Résultats de la néphrectomie partielle pour les tumeurs de plus de 7cm : comparaison avec la néphrectomie élargie.

INTRODUCTION: The usefulness of partial nephrectomy (PN) has been demonstrated for the treatment of renal tumor<7cm and it is now the standard treatment for such lesions. However, few studies are available regarding tumors≥T2. The objective of this study was to assess PN results for the treatment of renal tumors>7cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective two-center study was performed, including 170 patients treated. Thirty-two patients underwent PN and 138 radical nephrectomy (RN) for renal cT2 tumors between 2004 and 2014. The biological and clinical characteristics including perioperative morbidity as well as the survival rate were compared between these 2 groups. RESULTS: The median age was 59.5 years and the median follow-up was 47 months. More cT2b tumors were treated through RN (34.1% vs. 12.5%, P=0.01). The postoperative decrease in creatinine clearance was higher for the RN group (-24.3mL/min vs. -16.8; P=0.04). This difference was no longer significant at last follow-up. Perioperative complications were more frequent in the PN group (50.0% vs. 18.1%; P=0.008), and more severe (Clavien≥3 18.7% vs. 5.1%, P=0.01). No difference was found regarding the overall survival. Surgical margins were more frequent in the PN group (9.1% vs. 0.85%; P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested the feasibility of PN for renal tumors>7cm, involving however a higher perioperative complication risk. Cautious patient selection appeared to be required for the indication of PN for large tumors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[HoLEP learning curve: Toward a standardised formation and a team strategy]. / Apprentissage de l'HoLEP : vers une formation standardisée et une stratégie d'équipe.

AIM: Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) is renowned for the difficulty of its learning curve. Our aim was to evaluate the interest of a three-step tutorial in the HoLEP learning curve, in a university center. METHODS: It is a retrospective, monocentric study of the 82 first procedures done consecutively by the same operator with a proctoring in early experience and after 40 procedures. For all patients were noted: enucleation efficiency (g/min), morcellation efficiency (g/min), percentage of enucleated tissue (enucleated tissue/adenome weigth evaluated by ultrasonography. g/g), perioperative morbidity (Clavien), length of hospital stay, length of urinary drainage, functional outcomes at short and middle term (Qmax, post-void residual volume [PVR], QOL scores and IPSS at 3 and 6months). RESULTS: Enucleation and morcellation efficiency were significantly higher after the second proctoring (0.87 vs 0.44g/min; P<0.0001 and 4.2 vs 3.37g/min, P=0.038, respectively) so as the prostatic volume (43.5 vs 68.1mL, P=0.0001). Percentage of enucleated tissue was higher in the second group, however, the difference was not significant (69.5% vs 80.4%, P=0.03). Per- and postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, urinary drainage length and functional results at 3 and 6months were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The learning curve did not interfere with functional results. The second proctoring was essential to us in order to grasp the technique. These data underlined the necessity of a pedagogic reflexion in order to built a standardized formation technique to the HoLEP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Prognostic factors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with second-line targeted therapies]. / Étude des facteurs pronostiques pour le carcinome rénal métastatique traité par une deuxième ligne de thérapies ciblées.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of clinical and biological features in patients treated with second-line targeted therapies (TT) for a metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including 60 patients treated with second-line TT from 2006 to 2013. Clinical and biological features were collected, including TT-induced toxicities, Heng and MSKCC prognostic scores, and renal function. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The median age was 61 years [39-81]. MSKCC and Heng scores were significantly prognostic for OS and PFS (P<0.05). Hypo-albuminemia, anemia and brain metastasis were associated with poorer OS and PFS (P<0.05). Severe induced toxicities had a prognostic impact with higher OS (26 months vs 10 months, P=0.003) and PFS (5 months vs 4 months, P=0.047). Renal function impairment at the initiation of the second line was also associated with higher survival (OS=24 months vs 9 months, P=0.035 and PFS=7 months vs 4 months, P=0.043). On multivariate analysis, induced toxicity was found as an independent factor of good prognosis for OS (HR=0.36; P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that renal function impairment and TT-induced toxicities in the second line of treatment for mRCC have a potential prognostic interest as it had previously been reported for the first line of TT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Castration modalities in prostate cancer: Are they all equal?]. / Modalités de castration dans la prise en charge du cancer de la prostate: sont-elles toutes équivalentes ?

AIM: The aim of this literature review was to focus on the new highlights regarding oncologic and safety outcomes depending on the type of castration used. MATERIAL: Literature search using various algorithms "prostate cancer", "castration", "agonist", "antagonist", "orchiectomy", "GnRH", "FSH", "androgen deprivation therapy" has been performed in April 2015, through the PubMed and Embase databases. RESULTS: GnRH agonists and antagonists are both currently used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, differences regarding their pharmacologic properties have been highlighted in recent studies, specifically regarding the rapidity, sustainability and depth of the castration, but also the decrease in FSH level. Such differences may have oncological impact on the patient, regarding the disease biological control and the time to progression, and a tolerability impact, especially on the cardiovascular risks. The role of the depth and the sustainability of the castration in one hand, the FSH impact in the other hand, as well as a direct inhibition on extra-pituitary GnRH receptors by antagonist might explain these differences. CONCLUSIONS: Recent studies suggest differences between GnRH agonists and antagonist that could impact the patient clinical outcomes. However, further high level of evidence comparative studies remains warranted.