A Randomized Trial of Broad Area ALA-PDT for Field Cancerization Mitigation in High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between actinic keratoses (AKs) and nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) is well established. Patients with field cancerization are at high risk of developing new lesions. A treatment to interrupt new lesion formation or progression is required. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate occurrence of AKs in high-risk patients after field aminolevulinic acid–photodynamic therapy (ALA–PDT). METHODS: In this randomized, parallel-group, evaluator-blinded, 52-week study, patients with 4–15 facial AKs (N = 166) were random-ized (ALA 2x vs ALA 3x vs vehicle [VEH]-pooled [VEH 2x+VEH 3x], 1:1:1) to receive 2 or 3 PDT treatments (1-hour incubation) following cryotherapy at screening. RESULTS: More ALA-treated patients than VEH-treated patients had no AKs at week 52 (ALA 2x, 36.0%, P=0.0102; ALA 3x, 37.5%, P=0.0089; VEH, 18.9%). Week 52 lesion recurrence rates were 7.7% (P=0.0004) and 6.1% (P<0.0001) for ALA 2x and ALA 3x, respec-tively, versus 15.5% for VEH. Therapy was well tolerated; no patient requested early termination of light treatment. ALA 3x reduced NMSC development versus VEH (5 vs 12 lesions, P=0.0014). CONCLUSION: 2 or 3 ALA–PDT treatments with 1-hour incubation can significantly reduce occurrence of AKs after 1 year in patients at high risk of NMSC versus VEH–PDT (NCT02239679). J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(5):452-458. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.4930.

A Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses on the Upper Extremities.

BACKGROUND: Blue-light aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) after broad-area application and 3-hour incubation is efficacious for actinic keratosis (AK) lesion clearance on upper extremities, with use of occlusive dressing significantly increasing efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To prove the safety and efficacy of ALA-PDT versus vehicle (VEH-PDT) in the spot treatment of multiple AKs on upper extremities. METHODS: Aminolevulinic acid or VEH was spot applied only to lesions on one upper extremity 3 hours before blue-light exposure. Treated extremity was covered with occlusive dressing during incubation. Identical treatment was repeated at Week 8 if AK lesions were present in the treated area. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent (42/135) of subjects treated with ALA-PDT had complete clearance at Week 12, compared with 13% (17/134) of the subjects treated with VEH-PDT (p = .0001). The mean AK lesion clearance rate for ALA-treated subjects at Weeks 8 and 12 was 53% and 69%, respectively, compared with 26% and 30% for the VEH-treated group (p < .0001, linear mixed model). Safety profile observed in this study is consistent with previous studies/reports in the literature, and the therapy was well tolerated overall. CONCLUSION: Aminolevulinic acid-PDT spot treatment using a 3-hour occluded incubation was superior to VEH-PDT for AK lesion clearance of the upper extremity.

Halobetasol Propionate Lotion, 0.05% Provides Superior Hydration Compared to Halobetasol Propionate Cream, 0.05% in a Double-Blinded Study of Occlusivity and Hydration.

BACKGROUND: This study measured skin hydration and occlusivity of two test products [halobetasol propionate lotion, 0.05% (HBP Lotion) and Ultravate® (halobetasol propionate) cream, 0.05% (HBP Cream)] at 2, 4, and 6 hours after application to skin test sites previously challenged by dry shaving, which was performed to compromise the integrity of the stratum corneum barrier. METHODS: Trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), an indicator of skin barrier function, was measured using cyberDERM, inc. RG-1 evaporimeter. Skin hydration was evaluated using IBS SkiCon-200 conductance meter. Test products were applied bilaterally on dry-shaved sites on the volar forearm sites, according to a randomization scheme, with two test sites untreated to serve as "dry-shaved" controls. TEWL and conductance were measured at 2, 4, and 6 hours post-treatment. RESULTS: HBP Lotion displayed a significant increase in skin hydration at 2, 4, and 6 hours post-treatment compared to the baseline values and dry-shaved controls (each, P less than 0.001). However, HBP Cream produced statistically significant increased skin hydration only after 6 hours (P less than 0.05). HBP Lotion was significantly more effective than HBP Cream in increasing skin hydration at 2 and 4 hours post-treatment (each, P less than 0.001), and had a directional advantage (not statistically significant) at 6 hours. Neither test product had a significant occlusive effect as measured by TEWL at 2, 4, and 6 hours post-application. CONCLUSION: Both formulations of HBP (Lotion and Cream) contributed to skin moisturization, as measured by skin conductance. HBP Lotion produced a significantly more rapid onset and higher level of moisturization at 2 and 4 hours post-application compared to HBP Cream. The TEWL results indicate that neither HBP Lotion nor HBP Cream provided any significant occlusivity to the skin.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(2):140-144.

Treatment Satisfaction and Acceptability of 20% Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses of the Face, Scalp, and Upper Extremities.

Background: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are precancerous, dysplastic, epidermal lesions caused by chronic sun exposure that may progress to squamous cell carcinoma. Aminolevulinic acid 20% solution with blue light photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) has previously been shown to be superior to vehicle plus PDT (VEH-PDT) for treatment of AKs of the face, scalp, and upper extremities. Objective: We report detailed patient satisfaction data for ALA-PDT. Methods: Patient satisfaction for ALA-PDT versus VEH-PDT and patient-reported acceptability of ALA-PDT versus previous treatments for AKs were assessed in three randomized, vehicle-controlled studies (two Phase II and one Phase III) in adults. Patients in the Phase II studies were treated on the scalp and/or face, and those in the Phase III study were treated on the upper extremities. Results: A total of 234, 166, and 269 patients were enrolled in the two Phase II studies and one Phase III study, respectively; overall, 79.8 percent of patients were male. Overall treatment satisfaction ranged from 79 to 88 percent for ALA-PDT, compared to 35 to 56 percent for VEH-PDT. Patients generally considered ALA-PDT to be equivalent to or more acceptable than prior treatments, including cryotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, previous PDT, and surgery. Similar proportions of patients receiving ALA-PDT or VEH-PDT on the upper extremities considered in-office time, side effects/adverse events (AEs), and duration of side effects/AEs to be acceptable. Limitations: The majority of patients were male, and no statistical comparisons were conducted. Conclusion: Patients were generally satisfied with ALA-PDT for the treatment of AKs of the face, scalp, and upper extremities and considered ALA-PDT to be equal to or more acceptable than previous treatments. Trial Registry Information: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01475955; NCT02239679; NCT02137785.

Efficacy of aminolevulinic acid 20 % solution photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratoses on the upper extremities: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, randomized, vehicle-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid is indicated for targeted treatment of actinic keratoses on the face, scalp, and upper extremities. This was a post hoc analysis of a phase 3 randomized trial assessing the efficacy of aminolevulinic acid/photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratoses on the upper extremities. METHODS: Adults with 4-15 grade 1-2 actinic keratosis lesions on ≥1 upper extremity were randomized (1:1) to receive aminolevulinic acid/photodynamic therapy or vehicle/photodynamic therapy applied to individual lesions followed by occlusion and blue light treatment. Assessments included the clearance rate of treated lesions vs baseline, cumulative disease area clearance, and complete clearance by lesion size. RESULTS: There were 135 and 134 patients randomized to aminolevulinic acid/photodynamic therapy and vehicle/photodynamic therapy groups, respectively. At 12 weeks, clearance of treated lesions (80.6 % vs 45.5 %; P <0.0001) and the mean decrease in cumulative disease area (82.4 % vs 42.6 %; P <0.0001) was significantly higher for aminolevulinic acid/photodynamic therapy vs vehicle/photodynamic therapy, respectively. Rates of complete clearance and clearance by cutpoint (≥90 %, ≥85 %, ≥80 %, or ≥75 % clearance) were numerically higher for aminolevulinic acid/photodynamic therapy. Clearance of lesions was higher for aminolevulinic acid/photodynamic therapy vs vehicle/photodynamic therapy regardless of baseline lesion size. Aminolevulinic acid/photodynamic therapy was well tolerated with adverse events consistent with those expected with photodynamic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of actinic keratosis lesions of the extremities.

A comparison of commercially available polymethylmethacrylate-based soft tissue fillers.

BACKGROUND The rapid market expansion of filler treatment options requires physicians and health care providers to fully understand differences among comparable products. OBJECTIVE The objective was to compare commercially available polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based soft tissue fillers to determine if there are meaningful variations in these products that could result in significantly different therapeutic profiles, especially with respect to safety. METHODS AND MATERIALS PMMA particles were evaluated for size and morphology using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. PMMA microsphere soft tissue filler products from the United States, Europe, Brazil, and Canada were compared with respect to size, homogeneity/irregularity, surface smoothness/roughness, and the presence or absence of sediment and particulate debris. RESULTS Marked differences with respect to PMMA particle morphology and related particle characteristics from a variety of products were found. Of note, some products demonstrated potentially concerning significant variability in particle size and irregular morphology. CONCLUSION It is anticipated that the variability detected in these products, based on the literature, could result in different therapeutic profiles, especially with respect to safety. Physicians and health care providers should be aware that "comparable" products that at a glance appear similar may not be equal.

Bilateral comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of 3% diclofenac sodium gel and 5% 5-fluorouracil cream in the treatment of actinic keratoses of the face and scalp.

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are a common precancerous condition and are said to account for 14% of visits to dermatologists in the US each year. Along with cryotherapy, topical treatments are a mainstay of therapy for these lesions. One of the potential benefits of topical therapy is less pain and irritation as compared to cryotherapy. Additionally, topical therapies have a perceived benefit of treating subclinical lesions along with clinically evident keratoses. We conducted a bilateral comparison study of the efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac 3% gel used for 90 days and 5% fluorouracil cream used for 28 days in thirty patients with AK of the face and scalp. The diclofenac gel and 5-fluorouracil cream each demonstrated substantial efficacy in the number of lesions cleared and the proportion of patients with significant lesion clearing. In most patients, diclofenac induced only mild signs of inflammation compared to 5-fluoruracil, despite a longer treatment period. A greater number of patients expressed significant satisfaction with diclofenac gel compared to the 5-fluorouracil cream.

Photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid topical solution and visible blue light in the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp: investigator-blinded, phase 3, multicenter trials.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 20% wt/vol aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (hereinafter "ALA") and visible blue light for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, uneven parallel-group study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients (N = 243) were randomized to receive vehicle or ALA followed within 14 to 18 hours by PDT. Follow-up visits occurred 24 hours and 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks following PDT. Target lesions remaining at week 8 were re-treated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical response based on lesion clearing by week 8. RESULTS: Most patients in both groups had 4 to 7 lesions. Complete response rates for patients with 75% or more of the treated lesions clearing at weeks 8 and 12 were 77% (128/166) and 89% (133/149), respectively, for the drug group and 18% (10/55) and 13% (7/52), respectively, for the vehicle group (P<.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel general association test). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rates at week 8 was 46.9% to 71.0% and at week 12, 65.3% to 86.3%. The week 12 response rate includes 30% of patients who received a second treatment. Most patients experienced erythema and edema at the treated sites, which resolved or improved within 1 to 4 weeks after therapy, and stinging or burning during light treatment, which decreased or resolved by 24 hours after light treatment. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that topical ALA PDT is an effective and safe treatment for multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp.

Evaluation of adrenal suppression of a lipid enhanced, topical emollient cream formulation of hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% in treating children with atopic dermatitis.

Corticosteroids are currently the first line of treatment for patients with atopic dermatitis. In the pediatric population however, the potential impact of adrenal suppression is always an important safety concern. Twenty boys and girls, 5-12 years of age, with normal adrenal function and a history of atopic dermatitis were maximally treated three times daily with a lipid-rich, moisturizing formulation of hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% for up to 4 weeks. At the conclusion of the 4-week treatment period, cosyntropin injection stimulation testing showed no evidence of adrenal suppression. In addition, the therapy was noted to be highly efficacious, with a clinical success rate of 80% (Physician Global Score of (0) clear or (1) almost clear). No local side effects associated with prolonged use of topical corticosteroids were reported. In summary, this study supports the contention that this lipid-rich, moisturizing formulation of hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% was a well-tolerated and beneficial treatment for atopic dermatitis, demonstrating no adrenal suppression in the pediatric population aged 5-12 years. The relevance of these findings for children below 5 years of age, because of difference in body mass/surface area ratios, remains to be determined.

Eflornithine cream combined with laser therapy in the management of unwanted facial hair growth in women: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Eflornithine cream is approved for the reduction of unwanted facial hair in women. The mechanism of action for eflornithine is reduction in follicular cell growth rate, while laser photoepilation heats hair and adjacent tissues to suspend growth. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of eflornithine or vehicle with laser therapy in the treatment of unwanted facial hair in women. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to treatment with eflornithine on one side of the face and vehicle on the contralateral side for 34 weeks. Subjects received Nd:YAG or alexandrite laser therapy to both sides of the face at Weeks 2 and 10. Blinded evaluations included left to right comparisons and appearance relative to baseline. RESULTS: Fifty-four women completed the trial. From Weeks 6 through 22, eflornithine-treated sides showed significant reduction in hair growth. By Week 34, no significant differences were seen. Subject grading showed significant and persistent hair reduction through Week 34 for eflornithine-treated sides. The safety profile for combination therapy is similar to eflornithine alone. CONCLUSION: Eflornithine is safely used in conjunction with laser hair removal treatments and promotes more rapid hair removal when combined with laser treatment. Patients demonstrate a clear preference for treatment with laser and eflornithine.

Actinic keratoses and the incidence of occult squamous cell carcinoma: a clinical-histopathologic correlation.

BACKGROUND: The ability to clinically diagnose actinic keratoses (AKs) lesions has been taken for granted for some time. The importance of the malignant potential of these lesions is well known. However, a recent Phase IV, multicenter study assessing the long-term benefit of aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy provided a unique opportunity to prospectively examine the clinical histopathologic correlation of AKs. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to characterize the histopathology of clinically diagnosed AK lesions in the study population. METHODS: Punch biopsies of 220 clinically diagnosed untreated AKs were performed at baseline plus 51 lesions unresponsive to treatment (total, 271). RESULTS: Clinical diagnosis and histopathologic findings agreed in 91% (246/271) of the lesions biopsied. The balance of the biopsied lesions were: (1) benign changes 4% (11/271) and (2) occult cutaneous malignancy in 5% (14/271) of the cases, 12 squamous cell carcinomas and 2 basal cell carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, about 1 in 25 clinically diagnosed AK lesions identified by board-certified dermatologist investigator(s) were occult early-stage squamous cell carcinomas on histologic assessment, a fact surmised by the medical community that until now had not been well quantified. These findings should be considered when clinicians decide how to treat and manage AK patients.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 5% and 2% topical minoxidil solutions in the treatment of female pattern hair loss.

BACKGROUND: To pical minoxidil solution 2% stimulates new hair growth and helps stop the loss of hair in men with androgenetic alopecia and women with female pattern hair loss. Results can be variable, and historic experience suggests that higher concentrations of topical minoxidil may enhance efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this 48-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of 5% topical minoxidil with 2% topical minoxidil and placebo in the treatment of female pattern hair loss. METHODS: A total of 381 women (18-49 years old) with female pattern hair loss applied 5% topical minoxidil solution (n = 153), 2% topical minoxidil solution (n = 154), or placebo (vehicle for 5% solution; n = 74) twice daily. Primary efficacy variables were change in nonvellus hair count at week 48, and patient and investigator assessments of change in hair growth/scalp coverage at week 48. RESULTS: After 48 weeks of therapy, 5% topical minoxidil was superior to placebo for each of the 3 primary efficacy measures. The 2% topical minoxidil group demonstrated superiority over placebo for hair count and investigator assessment of hair growth/scalp coverage at week 48; differences in patient assessment of hair growth at week 48 were not significantly different from placebo. The 5% topical minoxidil group demonstrated statistical superiority over the 2% topical minoxidil group in the patient assessment of treatment benefit at week 48. Both 5% and 2% topical minoxidil helped improve psychosocial perceptions of hair loss in women with female pattern hair loss. An increased occurrence of pruritus, local irritation, and hypertrichosis was observed with 5% topical minoxidil versus 2% topical minoxidil and placebo. CONCLUSION: In this 48-week study of 381 women with female pattern hair loss, 5% topical minoxidil was superior to placebo on each of the 3 primary efficacy end points: promoting hair growth as measured by change in nonvellus hair count and patient/investigator assessments of hair growth and scalp coverage. Application of 2% topical minoxidil was superior to placebo for assessments of nonvellus hair counts and investigator assessment of hair growth/scalp coverage at week 48; differences in patient assessment of hair growth at week 48 were not significantly different from placebo. At week 48, the 5% topical minoxidil group demonstrated statistical superiority over the 2% topical minoxidil group in the patient assessment of treatment benefit. Both concentrations of topical minoxidil were well tolerated by the women in this trial without evidence of systemic adverse effects. With the introduction of numerous herbal remedies for hair loss, of which most have not been tested in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, it is important to describe well-controlled trials that demonstrate the efficacy and safety of topical drugs.