RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Haitian Annual Assembly for Orthopaedic Trauma (HAAOT) is a CME conference designed to help Haitian orthopaedic surgeons improve their knowledge and skills. The effectiveness of international CME conferences has not been studied. We hypothesized that HAAOT improves participants' short-term performance on knowledge-based assessments. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 57 Haitian and 21 foreign orthopaedic surgeons and residents who attended HAAOT using pre- and post-presentation questions. An audience response system was used to capture responses to 40 questions. Five additional demographic questions were used to train participants and to record unique audience member responses. Questions were projected in English and in French. Two-sided paired t tests were used to compare pre- and post-test scores. ANOVA with post-hoc unpaired t tests was used to compare among demographic groups. RESULTS: Response rate Median response rate was 77.4 % per day (Range: 76.5-85.9 % per day). Pre-test scores Pre-test scores averaged 21 % for Haitians and 39 % for foreigners (p < 0.0001), and were similar among Haitian attendings and residents. Pre-post differences Scores improved by 8 % for Haitians (p < 0.0001) and 10 % for foreigners (p < 0.01) after didactic presentations. Among sub-groups, Haitian attendings improved on average by 18 % compared to 6 % for residents (p < 0.0001). Haitian attending improvement trended toward significance when compared to foreign attendings (p < 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to show improved short-term knowledge performance using an audience response system during a CME conference in a low-income country. CME conferences in low-income countries can be an effective tool to increase surgeon knowledge, and audience response systems can help engage participants and track outcomes.
Assuntos
Educação Médica Continuada/normas , Ortopedia/educação , Competência Clínica , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Feminino , Haiti , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pobreza , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Haiti's surgical capacity was significantly strained by the 2010 earthquake. As the government and its partners rebuild the health system, emergency and essential surgical care must be a priority. METHODS: A validated, facility-based assessment tool developed by WHO was completed by 45 hospitals nationwide. The hospitals were assessed for (1) infrastructure, (2) human resources, (3) surgical interventions and emergency care, and (4) material resources for resuscitation. Fisher's exact test was used to compare hospitals by sectors: public compared to private and mixed (public-private partnerships). RESULTS: The 45 hospitals included first-referral level to the national referral hospital: 20 were public sector and 25 were private or mixed sector. Blood banks (33% availability) and oxygen concentrators (58%) were notable infrastructural deficits. For human resources, 69% and 33% of hospitals employed at least one full-time surgeon and anaesthesiologist, respectively. Ninety-eight percent of hospitals reported capacity to perform resuscitation. General and obstetrical surgical interventions were relatively more available, for example 93% provided hernia repairs and 98% provided cesarean sections. More specialized interventions were at a deficit: cataract surgery (27%), cleft repairs (31%), clubfoot (42%), and open treatment of fractures (51%). CONCLUSION: Deficiencies in infrastructure and material resources were widespread and should be urgently addressed. Physician providers were mal-distributed relative to non-physician providers. Formal task-sharing to midlevel and general physician providers should be considered. The parity between public and private or mixed sector hospitals in availability of Ob/Gyn surgical interventions is evidence of concerted efforts to reduce maternal mortality. This ought to provide a roadmap for strengthening of surgical care capacity.