Burden of migraine in Brazil: A cross-sectional real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the burden and consequences of migraine in Brazil in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity and daily activities, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). BACKGROUND: Despite existing data on how migraine affects populations worldwide, there are limited data on the burden of migraine in Latin America. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used patient-reported data from the 2018 Brazil National Health and Wellness Survey. HRQoL scores (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level [EQ-5D-5L]; 36-item Short Form Health Survey, version 2 [SF-36v2]; and Short Form 6-dimension [SF-6D]), impairments to work productivity and daily activities (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire), and all-cause HRU were compared between migraine respondents and matched non-migraine controls. RESULTS: Of the 12,000 total respondents in the survey database, 1643 self-reported a physician diagnosis of migraine and were propensity score matched 1:1 with controls without migraine. HRQoL was lower in patients with migraine versus non-migraine controls, with significantly lower SF-36v2 physical (mean [± SD] 50.3 [7.5] vs. 52.0 [7.6]) and mental component (mean [± SD] 42.9 [10.2] vs. 46.0 [9.9]) summary scores and SF-6D (mean [± SD] 0.7 [0.1] vs. 0.7 [0.1]) and EQ-5D-5L (mean [± SD] 0.7 [0.2] vs. 0.8 [0.2]) utility scores (all p < 0.001). Patients with migraine reported higher levels of work productivity loss (mean [± SD], 40.6% [31.4%] vs. 28.6% [30.9%], including absenteeism 12.8% [19.1%] vs. 8.4% [17.1%] and presenteeism 35.0% [28.7%] vs. 24.8% [28.0%]; all p < 0.001); activity impairment (mean [± SD] 36.0% [28.8%] vs. 25.5% [28.1%]; p < 0.001); and significantly higher HRU in the past 6 months (healthcare provider and emergency department visits [mean [± SD] 7.2 [9.5] vs. 4.5 [6.3] and 1.7 [3.8] vs. 0.9 [2.2]; both p < 0.001] and hospitalizations [mean [± SD] 0.4 [2.7] vs. 0.2 [1.1]; p = 0.002]) than controls. CONCLUSION: Migraine is associated with poorer HRQoL, higher all-cause HRU, and greater activity impairment and work productivity loss versus non-migraine controls in Brazil.

EGFR Mutation Testing: Changing Patterns of Molecular Testing in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, cancer is the second most common cause of death. Most patients in resource-limited countries are diagnosed in advanced stages. Current guidelines advocate for EGFR mutation testing in all patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are recommended in patients with advanced or metastatic disease harboring sensitizing mutations. In Brazil, there are limited data regarding the frequency of EGFR testing and the changes in patterns of testing overtime. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective study. We obtained deidentified data from a commercial database, which included 11,684 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated between 2011 and 2016 in both public and private settings. We analyzed the frequency of EGFR mutation testing over time. We also directly studied 3,664 tumor samples, which were analyzed between 2011 and 2013. These samples were tested for EGFR mutations through an access program to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Brazil. RESULTS: Overall, 38% of patients were tested for EGFR mutations; 76% of them were seen in the private sector, and 24% were seen in the public center. The frequency of testing for EGFR mutations increased significantly over time: 13% (287/2,228 patients) in 2011, 34% (738/2,142) in 2012, 39% (822/2,092) in 2013, 44% (866/1,972) in 2014, 53% (1,165/2,184) in 2015, and 42% (1,359/3,226) in 2016. EGFR mutations were detected in 25.5% of analyzed samples (857/3,364). Deletions in Exon 19 were the most frequent mutations, detected in 54% of patients (463/857). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the frequency of EGFR mutation in this cohort was lower than that found in Asia but higher than in North American and Western European populations. The most commonly found mutations were in Exon 19 and Exon 21. Our study shows that fewer than half of patients are being tested and that the disparity is greater in the public sector. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These data not only indicate the shortage of testing but also show that the rates of positivity in those tested seem to be higher than in other cohorts for which data have been published. This study further supports the idea that awareness and access to testing should be improved in order to improve survival rates in lung cancer in Brazil.

Acute Coronary Syndrome Treatment Costs from the Perspective of the Supplementary Health System.

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is defined as a "group of clinical symptoms compatible with acute myocardial ischemia", representing the leading cause of death worldwide, with a high clinical and financial impact. In this sense, the development of economic studies assessing the costs related to the treatment of ACS should be considered. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate costs and length of hospital stay between groups of patients treated for ACS undergoing angioplasty with or without stent implantation (stent+ / stent-), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and treated only clinically (Clinical) from the perspective of the Brazilian Supplementary Health System (SHS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical claims of beneficiaries of health plans was performed considering hospitalization costs and length of hospital stay for management of patients undergoing different types of treatment for ACS, between Jan/2010 and Jun/2012. RESULTS: The average costs per patient were R$ 18,261.77, R$ 30,611.07, R$ 37,454.94 and R$ 40,883.37 in the following groups: Clinical, stent-, stent+ and CABG, respectively. The average costs per day of hospitalization were R$ 1,987.03, R$ 4,024.72, R$ 6,033.40 and R$ 2,663.82, respectively. The average results for length of stay were 9.19 days, 7.61 days, 6.19 days and 15.20 days in these same groups. The differences were significant between all groups except Clinical and stent- and between stent + and CABG groups for cost analysis. CONCLUSION: Hospitalization costs of SCA are high in the Brazilian SHS, being significantly higher when interventional procedures are required.

Revisão sistemática e análise de custo- minimização de lipegfilgrastim na profilaxia da neutropenia e da neutropenia febril relacionadas à quimioterapia citotóxica / Systematic review and cost-minimization analysis of lipegfilgrastim in the prophylaxis of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia related to cytotoxic chemotherapy

Objetivo: Realizar avaliação econômica de lipegfilgrastim, fator de crescimento de longa duração (G-CSF), com os demais medicamentos da classe terapêutica disponíveis para a diminuição da duração da neutropenia grave (NG) e da incidência de neutropenia febril (NF), em pacientes adultos tratados com quimioterapia citotóxica para neoplasias malignas. Métodos: Revisão sistemática da literatura de evidências científicas sobre a eficácia e a segurança de lipegfilgrastim e análise de custo-minimização em comparação com pegfilgrastim ou filgrastim sob a perspectiva do Sistema Suplementar no Brasil. A análise incluiu tempo de tratamento de estudos clínicos, custo de infusão/ honorários médicos e custo com aquisição de medicamentos, distribuídos em três perspectivas: cenário 1 (conservador), cenário 2 (moderado) e cenário 3 (mundo real). Resultados: Seis estudos foram incluídos na análise, sendo três estudos randomizados e três revisões sistemáticas. O lipegfilgrastim resultou numa duração média de NG significativamente menor ao placebo e não inferior ao pegfilgrastim. Um estudo que comparou indiretamente lipegfilgrastim com filgrastim não encontrou diferenças estatisticamente significativas em redução de duração de NG e incidência de NF. O lipegfilgrastim apresentou redução de custos diretos de -R$ 3.673,50/paciente comparado com pegfilgrastim em todos os cenários avaliados e, na comparação com filgrastim, observou-se redução de -R$ 57.403,40; -R$ 19.183,67 e de -R$ 42,50/paciente nos cenários 1, 2 e 3, respectivamente. Conclusões: Lipegfilgrastim apresentou perfil de custo-minimização favorável em comparação com pegfilgrastim ou filgrastim, e surge como uma importante alternativa para o tratamento da redução da duração da neutropenia e da incidência da neutropenia febril durante a realização de tratamento quimioterápico, que pode representar economia de recursos para o Sistema de Saúde Suplementar.

jective: To develop an economic evaluation of lipegfilgrastin, long acting G-CSF, compared to other available G-CSF to reduce the duration of severe neutropenia (SN) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in adult patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy for cancer in the Brazilian private Health System. Methods: Systematic literature review of scientific evidence evaluating the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastin and cost-minimization analysis comparing to pegfilgrastin or filgrastin in the Brazilian private Health System. The analysis includes time of treatment with filgrastin from clinical trials (scenario 1) or real world data (scenario 2 and 3) and considers direct medical costs. Results: Six studies were included in the analysis: three randomized controlled trials and three systematic reviews. Lipegfilgrastin resulted in a statistically significant reduction of median SN duration compared to placebo and non-inferior compared to pegfilgrastin. A study that performed an indirect comparison of lipegfilgrastin and filgrastin did not find any difference statistically significant reduction of SN duration and FN incidence. Lipefilgrastin resulted in a cost-difference of -R$ 3.673,50/patient compared to pegfilgrastin in all scenarios and -R$ 57.403,40; -R$ 19.183,67 and -R$ 42,50/patient compared to filgrastin in scenario 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Conclusions: Lipegfilgrastim showed a favorable cost-minimization profile compared to pegfilgrastin or filgrastin and is an important alternative treatment in reducing the duration of neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia during the course of chemotherapy, and may result in resource savings for the Brazilian Private Health System.

Diabetes mellitus no Brasil: características clínicas, padrão de tratamento e custos associados ao cuidado da doença / Diabetes Mellitus in Brazil: clinical characteristics, standard treatment choice and cost

Objetivo: Descrever a utilização de recursos de saúde associados ao tratamento do Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) no sistema público de saúde brasileiro, assim como o padrão de tratamento e seus eventos adversos, a ocorrência de complicações vasculares e o controle metabólico nos pacientes. Métodos: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo, conduzido em 4 centros do Sistema Único de Saúde envolvendo pacientes com DM2. Os dados foram coletados dos prontuários médicos de setembro a dezembro de 2013. Foi conduzida análise descritiva considerando três faixas de duração da doença desde o seu diagnóstico e a estratificação dos pacientes de acordo com o período recordatório e presença de complicações vasculares. Resultados: 161 pacientes foram analisados. Os principais esquemas terapêuticos utilizados foram a combinação de metformina, insulina NPH e insulina regular; de glibenclamida e metformina; e metformina isolada. A associação metformina e insulina apresentou maior frequência de eventos adversos (28,9%) e a glibenclamida, metformina e insulina, menor frequência (5,7%). A maioria dos pacientes mostrou complicações microvasculares, sendo nefropatia e neuropatia frequentes em todos os estratos analisados. Em pacientes com DM2 avançado (≥ 15 anos de duração), a retinopatia mostrou-se prevalente. A frequência de eventos macrovasculares variou de 21,3% a 37,9% entre os grupos, sendo a doença coronariana a mais frequente. Um custo total médio de R$ 931,88±1.400,75 por paciente foi observado para os pacientes sem complicações vasculares e de R$ 1.212,37±1.012,38 para aqueles com complicações. Conclusão: Informações relevantes sobre o manejo de pacientes brasileiros com DM2 foram descritas, sugerindo alta frequência de complicações vasculares e maiores custos associados a elas.

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the use of public health resources to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and its costs in Brazil. Furthermore, we describe the standard treatment choice and its related adverse events as well as patients' metabolic control and vascular complications. Methods: This observational and retrospective study was conducted in four public health centers from Brazilian Public Health System (SUS); a secondary assistance level for long-term treatment for outpatients with T2DM. Data were collected from medical records from September to December 2013. A descriptive analysis is available for three groups according to time of disease since diagnosis. The recall and vascular complications were also considered. Results: 161 patients were studied. The most frequent treatments were metformin in monotherapy, metformin + NPH insulin + regular insulin and metformin + glibenclamide. Metformin + insulin therapy had the highest rate of adverse events (28.9%), while glibenclamide + metformin + insulin therapy, the lowest rate (5.7%). The majority of patients developed microvascular complications, specially nephropathy and neuropathy. Retinopathy was the most frequent complication for the group of patients with end stage T2DM (≥ 15 years). The frequency of macrovascular events ranged from 21.3% to 37.9% between groups. Coronary disease was the most frequent macrovascular complications. The mean cost per patient was R$ 1.212,37±1.012,38 for patient group presenting vascular complications and R$ 931,88±1.400,75 for the group not presenting complications. Conclusion: We describe current use of public health resources regarding T2DM treatment in Brazil, as well as T2DM treatment´s characteristics.

Acute Coronary Syndrome Treatment Costs from the Perspective of the Supplementary Health System / Custos de Tratamento da Síndrome Coronariana Aguda sob a Perspectiva do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar

AbstractBackground:Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is defined as a “group of clinical symptoms compatible with acute myocardial ischemia”, representing the leading cause of death worldwide, with a high clinical and financial impact. In this sense, the development of economic studies assessing the costs related to the treatment of ACS should be considered.Objective:To evaluate costs and length of hospital stay between groups of patients treated for ACS undergoing angioplasty with or without stent implantation (stent+ / stent-), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and treated only clinically (Clinical) from the perspective of the Brazilian Supplementary Health System (SHS).Methods:A retrospective analysis of medical claims of beneficiaries of health plans was performed considering hospitalization costs and length of hospital stay for management of patients undergoing different types of treatment for ACS, between Jan/2010 and Jun/2012.Results:The average costs per patient were R$ 18,261.77, R$ 30,611.07, R$ 37,454.94 and R$ 40,883.37 in the following groups: Clinical, stent-, stent+ and CABG, respectively. The average costs per day of hospitalization were R$ 1,987.03, R$ 4,024.72, R$ 6,033.40 and R$ 2,663.82, respectively. The average results for length of stay were 9.19 days, 7.61 days, 6.19 days and 15.20 days in these same groups. The differences were significant between all groups except Clinical and stent- and between stent + and CABG groups for cost analysis.Conclusion:Hospitalization costs of SCA are high in the Brazilian SHS, being significantly higher when interventional procedures are required.

Fundamento:Síndrome coronariana aguda (SCA) é definida como um “grupo de sintomas clínicos compatíveis com isquemia miocárdica aguda”, representando a principal causa de óbito no mundo, com elevado impacto clínico e financeiro. Nesse sentido, o desenvolvimento de estudos econômicos que avaliem os custos despendidos no tratamento da SCA deve ser considerado.Objetivo:Avaliar custos e tempo de internação hospitalar entre grupos de pacientes que trataram SCA, submetidos a procedimentos de angioplastia com ou sem implante de stent (stent+ / stent-), revascularização (Revasc) e tratados apenas clinicamente (Clínico), sob a perspectiva do sistema de saúde suplementar (SSS) brasileiro.Métodos:Realizou-se uma análise retrospectiva de contas médicas de beneficiários de planos de saúde considerando dados de custos de internação e tempo de permanência hospitalar para o manejo de pacientes submetidos a diferentes tipos de tratamento para SCA, no período entre 1/2010 e 6/2012.Resultados:Os custos médios por paciente foram de R$ 18.261,77, R$ 30.611,07, R$ 37.454,94 e R$ 40.883,37 nos grupos Clínico, stent-, stent+ e Revasc, respectivamente. Os custos médios por dia de internação foram de R$ 1.987,03, R$ 4.024,72, R$ 6.033,40 e R$ 2.663,82, respectivamente. Os tempos médios de internação foram de 9,19 dias, 7,61 dias, 6,19 dias e 15,20 dias nesses mesmos grupos. As diferenças foram estatisticamente significativas entre todos os grupos, exceto Clínico e stent- e entre os grupos stent + e Revasc, para a análise de custos.Conclusão:O custo hospitalar da SCA é elevado no SSS brasileiro e significativamente mais alto quando há a necessidade da realização de procedimentos intervencionistas.