Rif2 interaction with Rad50 counteracts Tel1 functions in checkpoint signalling and DNA tethering by releasing Tel1 from MRX binding.

The yeast Rif2 protein is known to inhibit Mre11 nuclease and the activation of Tel1 kinase through a short motif termed MIN, which binds the Rad50 subunit and simulates its ATPase activity in vitro. The mechanism by which Rif2 restrains Tel1 activation and the consequences of this inhibition at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are poorly understood. In this study, we employed AlphaFold-Multimer modelling to pinpoint and validate the interaction surface between Rif2 MIN and Rad50. We also engineered the rif2-S6E mutation that enhances the inhibitory effect of Rif2 by increasing Rif2-Rad50 interaction. Unlike rif2Δ, the rif2-S6E mutation impairs hairpin cleavage. Furthermore, it diminishes Tel1 activation by inhibiting Tel1 binding to DSBs while leaving MRX association unchanged, indicating that Rif2 can directly inhibit Tel1 recruitment to DSBs. Additionally, Rif2S6E reduces Tel1-MRX interaction and increases stimulation of ATPase by Rad50, indicating that Rif2 binding to Rad50 induces an ADP-bound MRX conformation that is not suitable for Tel1 binding. The decreased Tel1 recruitment to DSBs in rif2-S6E cells impairs DSB end-tethering and this bridging defect is suppressed by expressing a Tel1 mutant variant that increases Tel1 persistence at DSBs, suggesting a direct role for Tel1 in the bridging of DSB ends.

The Ku complex promotes DNA end-bridging and this function is antagonized by Tel1/ATM kinase.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by either homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). NHEJ is induced by the binding to DSBs of the Ku70-Ku80 heterodimer, which acts as a hub for the recruitment of downstream NHEJ components. An important issue in DSB repair is the maintenance of the DSB ends in close proximity, a function that in yeast involves the MRX complex and Sae2. Here, we provide evidence that Ku contributes to keep the DNA ends tethered to each other. The ku70-C85Y mutation, which increases Ku affinity for DNA and its persistence very close to the DSB ends, enhances DSB end-tethering and suppresses the end-tethering defect of sae2Δ cells. Impairing histone removal around DSBs either by eliminating Tel1 kinase activity or nucleosome remodelers enhances Ku persistence at DSBs and DSB bridging, suggesting that Tel1 antagonizes the Ku function in supporting end-tethering by promoting nucleosome removal and possibly Ku sliding inwards. As Ku provides a block to DSB resection, this Tel1 function can be important to regulate the mode by which DSBs are repaired.

DNA binding modes influence Rap1 activity in the regulation of telomere length and MRX functions at DNA ends.

The cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is initiated by the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex that has structural and catalytic functions. MRX association at DSBs is counteracted by Rif2, which is known to interact with Rap1 that binds telomeric DNA through two tandem Myb-like domains. Whether and how Rap1 acts at DSBs is unknown. Here we show that Rif2 inhibits MRX association to DSBs in a manner dependent on Rap1, which binds to DSBs and promotes Rif2 association to them. Rap1 in turn can negatively regulate MRX function at DNA ends also independently of Rif2. In fact, a characterization of Rap1 mutant variants shows that Rap1 binding to DNA through both Myb-like domains results in formation of Rap1-DNA complexes that control MRX functions at both DSBs and telomeres primarily through Rif2. By contrast, Rap1 binding to DNA through a single Myb-like domain results in formation of high stoichiometry complexes that act at DNA ends mostly in a Rif2-independent manner. Altogether these findings indicate that the DNA binding modes of Rap1 influence its functional properties, thus highlighting the structural plasticity of this protein.

Proteasome-mediated degradation of long-range nucleases negatively regulates resection of DNA double-strand breaks.

Homologous recombination is initiated by the nucleolytic degradation (resection) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSB resection is a two-step process. In the short-range step, the MRX (Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2) complex, together with Sae2, incises the 5'-terminated strand at the DSB end and resects back toward the DNA end. Then, the long-range resection nucleases Exo1 and Dna2 further elongate the resected DNA tracts. We found that mutations lowering proteasome functionality bypass the need for Sae2 in DSB resection. In particular, the dysfunction of the proteasome subunit Rpn11 leads to hyper-resection and increases the levels of both Exo1 and Dna2 to such an extent that it allows the bypass of the requirement for either Exo1 or Dna2, but not for both. These observations, along with the finding that Exo1 and Dna2 are ubiquitylated, indicate a role of the proteasome in restraining DSB resection by negatively controlling the abundance of the long-range resection nucleases.

The multistep path to replicative senescence onset: zooming on triggering and inhibitory events at telomeric DNA.

Replicative senescence is an essential cellular process playing important physiological functions, but it is better known for its implications in aging, cancer, and other pathologies. One of the main triggers of replicative senescence is telomere shortening and/or its dysfunction and, therefore, a deep understanding of the molecular determinants is crucial. However, replicative senescence is a heterogeneous and hard to study process, especially in mammalian cells, and some important questions still need an answer. These questions concern i) the exact molecular causes triggering replicative senescence, ii) the role of DNA repair mechanisms and iii) the importance of R-loops at telomeres in regulating senescence onset, and iv) the mechanisms underlying the bypass of replicative senescence. In this review, we will report and discuss recent findings about these mechanisms both in mammalian cells and in the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The PP2A phosphatase counteracts the function of the 9-1-1 axis in checkpoint activation.

DNA damage elicits a checkpoint response depending on the Mec1/ATR kinase, which detects the presence of single-stranded DNA and activates the effector kinase Rad53/CHK2. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, one of the signaling circuits leading to Rad53 activation involves the evolutionarily conserved 9-1-1 complex, which acts as a platform for the binding of Dpb11 and Rad9 (referred to as the 9-1-1 axis) to generate a protein complex that allows Mec1 activation. By examining the effects of both loss-of-function and hypermorphic mutations, here, we show that the Cdc55 and Tpd3 subunits of the PP2A phosphatase counteract activation of the 9-1-1 axis. The lack of this inhibitory function results in DNA-damage sensitivity, sustained checkpoint-mediated cell-cycle arrest, and impaired resection of DNA double-strand breaks. This PP2A anti-checkpoint role depends on the capacity of Cdc55 to interact with Ddc1 and to counteract Ddc1-Dpb11 complex formation by preventing Dpb11 recognition of Ddc1 phosphorylated on Thr602.

The DNA damage checkpoint: A tale from budding yeast.

Studies performed in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe have led the way in defining the DNA damage checkpoint and in identifying most of the proteins involved in this regulatory network, which turned out to have structural and functional equivalents in humans. Subsequent experiments revealed that the checkpoint is an elaborate signal transduction pathway that has the ability to sense and signal the presence of damaged DNA and transduce this information to influence a multifaceted cellular response that is essential for cancer avoidance. This review focuses on the work that was done in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to articulate the checkpoint concept, to identify its players and the mechanisms of activation and deactivation.

To Fix or Not to Fix: Maintenance of Chromosome Ends Versus Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Early work by Muller and McClintock discovered that the physical ends of linear chromosomes, named telomeres, possess an inherent ability to escape unwarranted fusions. Since then, extensive research has shown that this special feature relies on specialized proteins and structural properties that confer identity to the chromosome ends, thus allowing cells to distinguish them from intrachromosomal DNA double-strand breaks. Due to the inability of conventional DNA replication to fully replicate the chromosome ends and the downregulation of telomerase in most somatic human tissues, telomeres shorten as cells divide and lose this protective capacity. Telomere attrition causes the activation of the DNA damage checkpoint that leads to a cell-cycle arrest and the entering of cells into a nondividing state, called replicative senescence, that acts as a barrier against tumorigenesis. However, downregulation of the checkpoint overcomes this barrier and leads to further genomic instability that, if coupled with re-stabilization of telomeres, can drive tumorigenesis. This review focuses on the key experiments that have been performed in the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae to uncover the mechanisms that protect the chromosome ends from eliciting a DNA damage response, the conservation of these pathways in mammals, as well as the consequences of their loss in human cancer.

Sensing R-Loop-Associated DNA Damage to Safeguard Genome Stability.

DNA transcription and replication are two essential physiological processes that can turn into a threat for genome integrity when they compete for the same DNA substrate. During transcription, the nascent RNA strongly binds the template DNA strand, leading to the formation of a peculiar RNA-DNA hybrid structure that displaces the non-template single-stranded DNA. This three-stranded nucleic acid transition is called R-loop. Although a programed formation of R-loops plays important physiological functions, these structures can turn into sources of DNA damage and genome instability when their homeostasis is altered. Indeed, both R-loop level and distribution in the genome are tightly controlled, and the list of factors involved in these regulatory mechanisms is continuously growing. Over the last years, our knowledge of R-loop homeostasis regulation (formation, stabilization, and resolution) has definitely increased. However, how R-loops affect genome stability and how the cellular response to their unscheduled formation is orchestrated are still not fully understood. In this review, we will report and discuss recent findings about these questions and we will focus on the role of ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) and Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinases in the activation of an R-loop-dependent DNA damage response.