RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Shifts in public health infrastructure to respond to one emerging health threat may have unanticipated consequences for preexisting diseases. Previous research evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been conducted nationally, with little exploration of the impact on a granular geospatial level. This ecological study seeks to quantify the association between COVID-19 cases or deaths and chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis cases for all US counties in 2020. METHODS: Separate, adjusted multivariable quasi-Poisson models with robust standard errors modeled the county-level association between 2020 COVID-19 cases and deaths per 100,000 and 2020 chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis cases per 100,000. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Every 1000 additional COVID-19 cases per 100,000 was associated with a 1.80% increase in the average number of chlamydia cases ( P < 0.001) and a 5.00% increase in the average number of gonorrhea cases ( P < 0.001). Every 1000 additional COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 was associated with a 57.9% increase in the average number gonorrhea cases ( P < 0.001) and a 74.2% decrease in the average number of syphilis cases ( P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths were associated with increased rates of some STIs at the US county level. The underlying reasons for these associations could not be established by this study. The emergency response to an emerging threat may have unanticipated influence on preexisting diseases that varies by level of governance.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Sífilis , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Digital media has become an integral part of adolescents' lives. Mirroring this trend, food and non-alcoholic beverage (hereafter: food) brands increasingly promote products in digital media to maximise reach with young consumers. Videogame livestreaming platforms, where individuals can broadcast or watch streamed videogame footage, are a growing form of digital media. The top three platforms (market share by hours watched) are Twitch (72%), YouTube Gaming (13%), and Facebook Gaming Live (9%), with a combined 34.6 billion hours watched in 2021. These platforms represent a hybridisation of two popular digital trends amongst teenagers: viewing online video content and playing videogames. On these platforms, gaming influencers promote food brands and products, with energy drinks and fast-food restaurants representing the most frequently promoted categories. Evidence suggests that food marketing via Twitch is associated with food craving, purchasing and consumption in adults. Yet, despite the evident teenage appeal and prevalence of food marketing on these platforms, research is yet to explore its associations with adolescent eating behaviour. Adolescents (n = 490, Mage = 16.81, 30.2% female) completed an online cross-sectional questionnaire exploring their recall of food marketing on the top three videogame livestreaming platforms, and relevant behavioural (purchase, consumption) and health (Body Mass Index) outcomes. Structural equation modelling was used to explore hierarchical relationships between the key variables. Results showed that recall of unhealthy food marketing on these platforms was significantly associated with purchase and consumption of marketed food categories. Attitudes towards unhealthy foods mediated this relationship. Findings are the first to demonstrate the relationships between unhealthy food marketing via videogame livestreaming platforms and adolescent eating behaviours, which has implications for the design of policies to restrict digital food marketing to young people.
Assuntos
Bebidas Energéticas , Mídias Sociais , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Internet , Alimentos , Marketing/métodos , DietaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention policies on face mask use fluctuated. Understanding how public health communications evolve around key policy decisions may inform future decisions on preventative measures by aiding the design of communication strategies (eg, wording, timing, and channel) that ensure rapid dissemination and maximize both widespread adoption and sustained adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess how sentiment on masks evolved surrounding 2 changes to mask guidelines: (1) the recommendation for mask use on April 3, 2020, and (2) the relaxation of mask use on May 13, 2021. METHODS: We applied an interrupted time series method to US Twitter data surrounding each guideline change. Outcomes were changes in the (1) proportion of positive, negative, and neutral tweets and (2) number of words within a tweet tagged with a given emotion (eg, trust). Results were compared to COVID-19 Twitter data without mask keywords for the same period. RESULTS: There were fewer neutral mask-related tweets in 2020 (ß=-3.94 percentage points, 95% CI -4.68 to -3.21; P<.001) and 2021 (ß=-8.74, 95% CI -9.31 to -8.17; P<.001). Following the April 3 recommendation (ß=.51, 95% CI .43-.59; P<.001) and May 13 relaxation (ß=3.43, 95% CI 1.61-5.26; P<.001), the percent of negative mask-related tweets increased. The quantity of trust-related terms decreased following the policy change on April 3 (ß=-.004, 95% CI -.004 to -.003; P<.001) and May 13 (ß=-.001, 95% CI -.002 to 0; P=.008). CONCLUSIONS: The US Twitter population responded negatively and with less trust following guideline shifts related to masking, regardless of whether the guidelines recommended or relaxed mask usage. Federal agencies should ensure that changes in public health recommendations are communicated concisely and rapidly.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Comunicação em Saúde , Mídias Sociais , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Pandemias , Máscaras , Opinião Pública , Infodemiologia , Emoções , AtitudeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is utilized in austere environments because it is lightweight, durable, battery powered, and portable. In austere settings, weight and space constraints are limitations to carrying dedicated ultrasound gel. Few studies have assessed commonly carried liquids as gel alternatives. The study objective was to assess the suitability of common food and personal care products as ultrasound coupling agents compared with that of commercial gel. METHODS: A noninferiority study compared 9 products to commercial gel. Each substance was independently tested on 2 subjects by 2 sonographers covering 8 standardized ultrasound windows. Clips were recorded, blinded, and independently graded by 2 ultrasound fellowship-trained physicians on the ability to make clinical decisions and technical details, including contrast, resolution, and artifact. A 20% noninferiority margin was set, which correlates to levels considered to be of reliably sufficient quality by American College of Emergency Physicians' guidelines. The substances included water, soap, shampoo, olive oil, energy gel, maple syrup, hand sanitizer, sunscreen, and lotion. RESULTS: A total of 300 of 318 (94%) clips met the primary endpoint of adequacy to make a clinical decision. All media, except sunscreen, were noninferior to commercial gel in the ability to make a clinical decision (α=0.05). In terms of secondary outcomes, resolution, artifact, and contrast, all substances were noninferior to commercial gel (α=0.05). The sonographers concluded that all gel alternatives' usability performed similarly to commercial gel, with the exception of energy gel. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 9 substances tested, 8 were noninferior to commercial gels for clinical decisions. Our study indicates that several POCUS gel substitutes are serviceable to produce clinically adequate images.
Assuntos
Médicos , Protetores Solares , Humanos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Géis , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao LeitoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Obesity is a pressing health concern within the United States (US). Obesity medicine "diplomates" receive specialized training, yet it is unclear if their accessibility and availability adequately serves the need. The purpose of this research was to understand how accessibility has evolved over time and assess the practicality of serving an estimated patient population with the current distribution and quantity of diplomates. METHODS: Population-weighted Census tracts in US counties were mapped to the nearest facility on a road network with at least one diplomate who specialized in adult (including geriatric) care between 2011 and 2019. The median travel time for all Census tracts within a county represented the primary geographic access measure. Availability was assessed by estimating the number of diplomates per 100 000 patients with obesity and the number of facilities able to serve assigned patients under three clinical guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 3371 diplomates certified since 2019, 3036 were included. The median travel time (weighted for county population) fell from 28.5 min [IQR: 13.7, 68.1] in 2011 to 9.95 min [IQR: 7.49, 18.1] in 2019. There were distinct intra- and inter-year travel time variations by race, ethnicity, education, median household income, rurality, and Census region (all P < 0.001). The median number of diplomates per 100 000 with obesity grew from 1 [IQR: 0.39, 1.59] in 2011 to 5 [IQR: 2.74, 11.4] in 2019. In 2019, an estimated 1.7% of facilities could meet the recommended number of visits for all mapped patients with obesity, up from 0% in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Diplomate geographic access and availability have improved over time, yet there is still not a high enough supply to serve the potential patient demand. Future studies should quantify patient-level associations between travel time and health outcomes, including whether the number of available diplomates impacts utilization.
Assuntos
População Rural , Viagem , Adulto , Idoso , Escolaridade , Etnicidade , Humanos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of three validated food responsiveness scales in measuring recall of, and responsiveness to, food marketing exposure on social media. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey among adolescents and adults who used the social media platform Twitch.tv (Twitch). Responsiveness to food marketing was self-reported as craving or purchasing any brands participants observed on Twitch. Participants completed three validated scales of food responsiveness: the revised 18-question Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), the external eating subscale of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) and the External Food Cue Responsiveness (EFCR) scale. Adjusted linear regression models assessed the predictive ability of each scale on recall and responsiveness outcomes. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and sixty-eight Twitch users (90·1 % male, 60·6 % White, 43·7 % aged 18-24, 25·9 % under 18). RESULTS: In separate adjusted linear regression models, scores on the TFEQ were not related to any outcome, while DEBQ scores related to product cravings (OR: 1·10, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·19, P = 0·02). In contrast, scores on the EFCR scale were significantly associated with higher brand recall (incident rate ratio: 1·42, 95 % CI 1·20, 1·68, P < 0·001), product craving (OR: 3·93, 95 % CI 2·22, 7·17, P < 0·001) and purchasing behaviour (OR: 3·97, 95 % CI 1·99, 8·26, P < 0·001). A subset of three EFCR scale items related to influencer marketing were similarly associated with each outcome with greater precision in the point estimates than the overall EFCR. CONCLUSIONS: The EFCR scale predicted recall of and responsiveness to food marketing via Twitch, suggesting its utility in monitoring the effects of food marketing on social media.
Assuntos
Fissura , Sinais (Psicologia) , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Alimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Marketing , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the prevalence of food and beverage marketing on the livestreaming platforms Twitch, Facebook Gaming and YouTube Gaming, as well as examine growth of food and beverage marketing on these platforms over a 17-month period of data collection. DESIGN: Cross-sectional data were analysed across three livestreaming platforms and six food and beverage categories: alcohol, candy, energy drinks, snacks, sodas and restaurants. SETTING: Stream titles of livestreamed events as well as corresponding hours watched on Twitch, Facebook Gaming and YouTube Gaming. PARTICIPANTS: None. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the use of food and beverage brand mentions in stream titles across all three studied platforms (P < 0·05), as well as hours watched across platforms (P < 0·05). Energy drinks dominated food and beverage brand mentions across platforms, followed by restaurants, soda and snacks. All platforms demonstrated growth over the 17-month data collection period. Post-hoc analyses revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic impacted both immediate and sustained growth across all platforms, with the greatest impact observed on the Twitch platform. CONCLUSIONS: Food and beverage marketing as measured through stream titles is widely prevalent across the three most popular livestreaming platforms, particularly for energy drinks. Food marketing on these platforms experienced growth over the past 17 months which was accelerated substantially by the COVID-19 pandemic. Future work should assess the sustained impact this growth may have on marketing practices and eating behaviour.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Bebidas Energéticas , Mídias Sociais , Jogos de Vídeo , Bebidas , Doces , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Marketing , Pandemias , Prevalência , Restaurantes , SARS-CoV-2 , LanchesRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the improvement in stress urinary incontinence symptoms using autologous fascia lata sling placed at the midurethra. The secondary objective was to determine the presence of leg pain after harvest of fascia lata graft. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Rural academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All women who underwent an autologous fascia midurethral sling over a 1-year period between June 2019 and September 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Autologous fascia lata midurethral sling. MEASUREMENTS: Incontinence severity index, urodynamic distress inventory-6, and Likert pain scale. MAIN RESULTS: Nineteen women received an autologous fascial sling at the midurethra using the described technique-16 fascia lata and 3 rectus fasciae. Mean improvement in incontinence severity index score was 6 points. Mean improvement in urodynamic distress inventory-6 and SUI subscale scores was 14 and 53, respectively, surpassing the minimally important difference for each. Median follow-up time was 9 months (range 2-16). Leg pain at the harvest site was bothersome in 1 patient beyond 6 weeks. Median time to passing voiding trial was 4 days (range 1-13 days). Four patients (21%) had postoperative voiding dysfunction, 3 of which resolved after sling loosening at a mean of 60 days after sling placement. CONCLUSION: Midurethral autologous fascial sling placement significantly improves symptoms of SUI but carries a risk of voiding dysfunction. Harvesting fascia lata using a fascial stripper is associated with minimal postoperative morbidity.
Assuntos
Slings Suburetrais , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Incontinência Urinária , Fascia Lata/transplante , Feminino , Humanos , Dor , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgiaRESUMO
The objective of this study was to assess the level of interest in preconception carrier screening among reproductive-aged persons presenting for gynecologic care and to identify demographic factors predictive of pursuing screening. Patients aged 18-40 who were presenting for gynecologic care at a single U.S. academic medical center were provided with information about current options for preconception carrier screening and were offered genetic counseling referral with the possibility to undergo screening. Outcomes of interest were desire for genetic counseling referral and attendance at genetic counseling visit. Statistical analyses were performed as appropriate using R version 3.6.1 with variables significant at 0.1 included in a multivariable logistic regression. Of 193 participants, 79 (41%) desired genetic counseling referral. Participants aged 25-34 (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.47-8.10) and nulliparas (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.23-6.03) were more likely to desire referral. Thirty-five participants (44.3% of those who desired referral) attended a visit with genetic counseling. Having an advanced degree (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.06-10.4) was associated with visit attendance. Thirteen participants underwent screening, and five were found to be a carrier of at least one X-linked or autosomal recessive condition. Surprisingly, presenting for a gynecologic visit directly related to planning a pregnancy was not associated with increased interest in preconception carrier screening. Nulliparas and those aged 25-34 likely expressed greater interest in referral due to high potential for future childbearing in these groups. The increased level of visit attendance in participants with advanced degrees is likely confounded by the high level of health literacy and financial resources in this group.
Assuntos
Aconselhamento Genético , Reprodução , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Triagem de Portadores Genéticos , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Cuidado Pré-Concepcional , Gravidez , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reddit is a popular social media platform that has faced scrutiny for inflammatory language against those with obesity, yet there has been no comprehensive analysis of its obesity-related content. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the presence of 4 types of obesity-related content on Reddit (misinformation, facts, stigma, and positivity) and identify psycholinguistic features that may be enriched within each one. METHODS: All sentences (N=764,179) containing "obese" or "obesity" from top-level comments (n=689,447) made on non-age-restricted subreddits (ie, smaller communities within Reddit) between 2011 and 2019 that contained one of a series of keywords were evaluated. Four types of common natural language processing features were extracted: bigram term frequency-inverse document frequency, word embeddings derived from Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, sentiment from the Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning, and psycholinguistic features from the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Program. These features were used to train an Extreme Gradient Boosting machine learning classifier to label each sentence as 1 of the 4 content categories or other. Two-part hurdle models for semicontinuous data (which use logistic regression to assess the odds of a 0 result and linear regression for continuous data) were used to evaluate whether select psycholinguistic features presented differently in misinformation (compared with facts) or stigma (compared with positivity). RESULTS: After removing ambiguous sentences, 0.47% (3610/764,179) of the sentences were labeled as misinformation, 1.88% (14,366/764,179) were labeled as stigma, 1.94% (14,799/764,179) were labeled as positivity, and 8.93% (68,276/764,179) were labeled as facts. Each category had markers that distinguished it from other categories within the data as well as an external corpus. For example, misinformation had a higher average percent of negations (ß=3.71, 95% CI 3.53-3.90; P<.001) but a lower average number of words >6 letters (ß=-1.47, 95% CI -1.85 to -1.10; P<.001) relative to facts. Stigma had a higher proportion of swear words (ß=1.83, 95% CI 1.62-2.04; P<.001) but a lower proportion of first-person singular pronouns (ß=-5.30, 95% CI -5.44 to -5.16; P<.001) relative to positivity. CONCLUSIONS: There are distinct psycholinguistic properties between types of obesity-related content on Reddit that can be leveraged to rapidly identify deleterious content with minimal human intervention and provide insights into how the Reddit population perceives patients with obesity. Future work should assess whether these properties are shared across languages and other social media platforms.
Assuntos
Mídias Sociais , Humanos , Prevalência , Infodemiologia , Psicolinguística , ComunicaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated a rapid shift in how individuals interact with and receive fundamental services, including health care. Although telemedicine is not a novel technology, previous studies have offered mixed opinions surrounding its utilization. However, there exists a dearth of research on how these opinions have evolved over the course of the current pandemic. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate how the language and sentiment surrounding telemedicine has evolved throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Tweets published between January 1, 2020, and April 24, 2021, containing at least one telemedicine-related and one COVID-19-related search term ("telemedicine-COVID") were collected from the Twitter full archive search (N=351,718). A comparator sample containing only COVID-19 terms ("general-COVID") was collected and sampled based on the daily distribution of telemedicine-COVID tweets. In addition to analyses of retweets and favorites, sentiment analysis was performed on both data sets in aggregate and within a subset of tweets receiving the top 100 most and least retweets. RESULTS: Telemedicine gained prominence during the early stages of the pandemic (ie, March through May 2020) before leveling off and reaching a steady state from June 2020 onward. Telemedicine-COVID tweets had a 21% lower average number of retweets than general-COVID tweets (incidence rate ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99; P=.04), but there was no difference in favorites. A majority of telemedicine-COVID tweets (180,295/351,718, 51.3%) were characterized as "positive," compared to only 38.5% (135,434/351,401) of general-COVID tweets (P<.001). This trend was also true on a monthly level from March 2020 through April 2021. The most retweeted posts in both telemedicine-COVID and general-COVID data sets were authored by journalists and politicians. Whereas the majority of the most retweeted posts within the telemedicine-COVID data set were positive (55/101, 54.5%), a plurality of the most retweeted posts within the general-COVID data set were negative (44/89, 49.4%; P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, opinions surrounding telemedicine evolved to become more positive, especially when compared to the larger pool of COVID-19-related tweets. Decision makers should capitalize on these shifting public opinions to invest in telemedicine infrastructure and ensure its accessibility and success in a postpandemic world.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idioma , Opinião Pública , Mídias Sociais , Telemedicina , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of food and beverage marketing on Twitch.tv (Twitch), a social media platform where individuals broadcast live audiovisual material to millions of daily users. DESIGN: Observational analysis of the prevalence of 238 food and beverage brands in five distinct categories (processed snacks; food delivery services and restaurants; candies, energy drinks/coffees/teas; and sodas and other sugar-sweetened beverages) over the course of 18 months. SETTING: Twitch streamer profiles and stream titles between January 2018 and July 2019. Twitch chat room messages during July 2019. PARTICIPANTS: None. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in brand exposure on Twitch both in stream titles (sodas and candies, P < 0·05) and on streamer profiles (sodas, restaurants/food delivery services, candies, and energy drinks/coffees/teas, P < 0·05) over the 18-month study period. Energy drinks, coffees and teas had the most exposure with 1·08 billion exposure hours from profiles and 83 million exposure hours from titles. Restaurants/food delivery services and sugar-sweetened beverages were the most frequently mentioned products in chat rooms with 1·24 million messages and 1·10 million messages, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate the extent by which food and beverage brands garner millions of hours of exposure on Twitch. Future studies should evaluate the impact that this level of exposure to nutrient-poor, energy-dense products may have on behavioural and health outcomes.
Assuntos
Doces , Bebidas Gaseificadas , Bebidas Energéticas , Marketing , Lanches , Mídias Sociais , Humanos , Prevalência , RestaurantesAssuntos
Indústria Alimentícia , Marketing/ética , Controle Social Formal/métodos , Mídias Sociais/ética , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Uso da Internet , Masculino , Marketing/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 severity is amplified among individuals with obesity, which may have influenced mainstream media coverage of the disease by both improving understanding of the condition and increasing weight-related stigma. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to measure obesity-related conversations on Facebook and Instagram around key dates during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Public Facebook and Instagram posts were extracted for 29-day windows in 2020 around January 28 (the first US COVID-19 case), March 11 (when COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic), May 19 (when obesity and COVID-19 were linked in mainstream media), and October 2 (when former US president Trump contracted COVID-19 and obesity was mentioned most frequently in the mainstream media). Trends in daily posts and corresponding interactions were evaluated using interrupted time series. The 10 most frequent obesity-related topics on each platform were also examined. RESULTS: On Facebook, there was a temporary increase in 2020 in obesity-related posts and interactions on May 19 (posts +405, 95% CI 166 to 645; interactions +294,930, 95% CI 125,986 to 463,874) and October 2 (posts +639, 95% CI 359 to 883; interactions +182,814, 95% CI 160,524 to 205,105). On Instagram, there were temporary increases in 2020 only in interactions on May 19 (+226,017, 95% CI 107,323 to 344,708) and October 2 (+156,974, 95% CI 89,757 to 224,192). Similar trends were not observed in controls. Five of the most frequent topics overlapped (COVID-19, bariatric surgery, weight loss stories, pediatric obesity, and sleep); additional topics specific to each platform included diet fads, food groups, and clickbait. CONCLUSIONS: Social media conversations surged in response to obesity-related public health news. Conversations contained both clinical and commercial content of possibly dubious accuracy. Our findings support the idea that major public health announcements may coincide with the spread of health-related content (truthful or otherwise) on social media.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) and delivery method in a U.S. obstetric cohort. METHODS: The study population included U.S. women with a history of recent live birth, drawn from the 2009-2018 PRAMS (Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System) cohort. The primary exposure was self-reported IPV. The primary outcome of interest was method of delivery (vaginal or cesarean). Secondary outcomes included preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Bivariate associations between the primary exposure (ie, self-report of IPV vs no self-report of IPV) and each covariate of interest were assessed with weighted quasibinomial logistic regression. Weighted multivariable logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the association between IPV and delivery method controlling for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 130,000 women were included in this secondary analysis of a cross-sectional sample, representing 7,500,000 women nationwide based on PRAMS sampling design. Of these, 0.8% reported abuse in the 12 months before their current pregnancy and 1.3% reported abuse during pregnancy; 1.6% of the study population reported abuse both before and during pregnancy. After adjusting for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, IPV exposure at any time was not significantly associated with cesarean delivery, compared with no IPV exposure (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.11). Of secondary outcomes, 9.4% of women experienced preterm birth and 15.1% had neonates admitted to the NICU. Exposure to IPV was associated with a 21.0% increased risk of preterm birth, compared with women without exposure (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40), and a 33.3% increased risk of NICU admission (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52) after controlling for confounders. There was no difference in the risk of delivering a neonate who was SGA. CONCLUSION: Intimate partner violence was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. Intimate partner violence before or during pregnancy was associated with increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes, such as preterm birth and NICU admission, corroborating previous research findings.
Assuntos
Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional , Modelos Logísticos , Retardo do Crescimento FetalRESUMO
PURPOSE: Geographic access to cancer care is known to significantly impact utilization and outcomes. Longer travel times have negative impacts for patients requiring highly specialized care, such as for rare cancers, and for those in rural areas. Scant population-based research informs geographic access to care for rare cancers and whether rurality impacts that access. METHODS: Using Medicare data (2014-2015), we identified prevalent cancers and cancer-directed surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiation. We classified cancers as rare (incidence <6/100,000/year) or common (incidence ≥6/100,000/year) using previously published thresholds and categorized rurality from ZIP code of beneficiary residence. We estimated travel time between beneficiaries and providers for each service based on ZIP code. Descriptive statistics summarized travel time by rare versus common cancers, service type, and rurality. FINDINGS: We included 1,169,761 Medicare beneficiaries (21.9% in nonmetropolitan areas), 87,399; 7.5% had rare cancers, with 9,133,003 cancer-directed services. Travel times for cancer services ranged from approximately 29 minutes (25th percentile) to 68 minutes (75th percentile). Travel times were similar for rare and common cancers overall (median: 45 vs 43 minutes) but differed by service type; 13.4% of surgeries were >2 hours away for rare cancers, compared to 8.3% for common cancers. Increasing rurality disproportionately increased travel time to surgical care for rare compared to common cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Travel times to cancer services are longest for surgery, especially among rural residents, yet not markedly longer overall between rare versus common cancers. Understanding geographic access to cancer care for patients with rare cancers is important to delivering specialized care.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Medicare , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Viagem , População RuralRESUMO
This study assesses the association between underlying health conditions and delaying medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. An online cross-sectional survey administered by OutbreaksNearMe.org on Momentive.ai collected self-reported data from April 27 to June 2, 2020 and May 10 to June 13, 2021. We used weighted multivariable logistic regressions to assess the association between delaying care and self-reported health status, adjusting for demographics. Of 312,661 total responses (99.6% completion rate), 17.1% reported delayed medical care. Compared to good health, those with poor health were more likely to delay care (AOR = 2.62, 95% CI [2.47, 2.78]). Individuals with any underlying condition (AOR = 1.62, 95% CI [1.58, 1.65]) and each of the conditions were more likely to delay care. Differences in delaying care were observed across region, year, and demographics. Our finding is that those at higher risk of severe COVID-19 were more likely to delay medical care in 2020 and 2021, which could exacerbate existing health conditions and existing disparities.
RESUMO
Populations of the U.S. threatened orchid, Platanthera leucophaea, are restricted to fragmented grassland and wetland habitats. We address the long-term (1998-2020) interactive effects of habitat (upland prairie vs. wetland), fire management (burned vs. unburned) and climatic variation, as well as pollination crossing effects, on population demography in 42 populations. Our analysis revealed the consistent interactive effects of habitat, dormant season burning, and climatic variation on flowering, reproduction, and survival. Burning increased flowering and population size under normal or greater than normal precipitation but may have a negative effect during drought years apparently if soil moisture stress reduces flowering and increases mortality. Trends in the number of flowering plants in populations also correspond to precipitation cycles. As with flowering and fecundity, survival is significantly affected by the interactive effects of habitat, fire, and climate. This study supports previous studies finding that P. leucophaea relies on a facultative outcrossing breeding system. Demographic modeling indicated that fire, normal precipitation, and outcrossing yielded greater population growth, and that greater fire frequency increased population persistence. It also revealed an ecologically driven demographic switch, with wetlands more dependent upon survivorship than fecundity, and uplands more dependent on fecundity than survivorship. Our results facilitate an understanding of environmental and management effects on the population demography of P. leucophaea in the prairie region of its distribution. Parallel studies are needed in the other habitats such as wetlands, especially in the eastern part of the range of the species, to provide a more complete picture.
RESUMO
Influencer marketing may be amplified on livestreaming platforms (e.g., Twitch) compared with asynchronous social media (e.g., YouTube). However, food and beverage marketing on Twitch has not been evaluated at a user level. The present study aimed to compare users' self-reported exposure to food marketing and associated attitudes, consumption and purchasing behaviours on Twitch compared with YouTube. A survey administered via social media was completed by 621 Twitch users (90 % male, 64 % white, 69 % under 25 years old). Of respondents, 72 % recalled observing at least one food or beverage advertisement on Twitch. There were significant differences in the recall of specific brands advertised on Twitch (P < 0â 01). After observing advertised products, 14 % reported craving the product and 8 % reported purchasing one. In chat rooms, 56 % observed conversations related to food and 25 % participated in such conversations. There were significant differences in the number of users who consumed various products while watching Twitch (P < 0â 01). Of users who frequented YouTube (n 273), 65 % reported negative emotions when encountering advertising on YouTube compared with 40 % on Twitch (P < 0â 01). A higher proportion felt Twitch's advertising primarily supported content creators (79 v. 54 %, P < 0â 01), while a higher proportion felt that YouTube's advertising primarily supported the platform (49 v. 66 %, P < 0â 01). The findings support that food marketing exposures on Twitch are noticeable, less bothersome to users and influence consumption and purchasing behaviours. Future studies are needed to examine how the livestreaming environment may enhance advertising effectiveness relative to asynchronous platforms.
Assuntos
Bebidas , Comportamento do Consumidor , Alimentos , Marketing , Mídias Sociais , Adulto , Atitude , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is evidence that sleep deprivation or diseases such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) that lead to sleep disruption may adversely impact immune system functioning. We hypothesized that individuals who have OSA who did not use continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) would have higher rates of hospitalization and complications from influenza infection than patients with OSA who were adherent to treatment. METHODS: Medical records of patients at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, New Hampshire who had both OSA and a new, laboratory-confirmed influenza infection between 2016 and 2018 were reviewed for results of polysomnography, CPAP usage, influenza vaccination records, confirmation of influenza infection, and influenza-related hospitalizations and complications. RESULTS: Compared to the patients who were adherent to CPAP, patients who were either conservatively treated without CPAP or who were nonadherent to CPAP therapy had higher odds of hospitalization from influenza infections (odds ratio = 4.7, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 19.5, P = .01) but no higher odds of complications from influenza. The patients who had untreated sleep apnea had a higher percentage of influenza vaccination for their season of illness (75% of patients) compared to patients who were adherent to CPAP (56% of patients), although the difference in vaccination was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OSA who did not use CPAP appear to have greater rates of hospitalization from acute influenza infection, despite having a higher trend of influenza vaccination compared to patients who were adherent to CPAP.