Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
ESMO Open ; 9(6): 103593, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848660

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is frequent in patients with cancer and/or liver cirrhosis and is associated with impaired quality of life. Here, we investigated the impact of anaemia on overall survival (OS) and clinical characteristics in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: HCC patients treated between 1992 and 2018 at the Medical University of Vienna were retrospectively analysed. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin level <13 g/dl in men and <12 g/dl in women. RESULTS: Of 1262 assessable patients, 555 (44.0%) had anaemia. The main aetiologies of HCC were alcohol-related liver disease (n = 502; 39.8%) and chronic hepatitis C (n = 375; 29.7%). Anaemia was significantly associated with impaired liver function, portal hypertension, more advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). In univariable analysis, anaemia was significantly associated with shorter median OS [9.5 months, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 7.3-11.6 months] versus patients without anaemia (21.5 months, 95% CI 18.3-24.7 months) (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, Model for End-stage Liver Disease, number of tumour nodules, size of the largest nodule, macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, first treatment line, alpha-fetoprotein and CRP, anaemia remained an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.43, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Anaemia was significantly associated with mortality in HCC patients, independent of established liver- and tumour-related prognostic factors. Whether adequate management of anaemia can improve outcome of HCC patients needs further evaluation.


Assuntos
Anemia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicações , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anemia/complicações , Anemia/mortalidade , Idoso , Prognóstico
2.
ESMO Open ; 8(1): 100783, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36753993

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus on the optimal systemic treatment regimen in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) patients. We describe clinical characteristics and outcome of cHCC-CCA patients, with a special focus on patients receiving palliative systemic therapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: In this European retrospective, multicenter study, patients with histologically proven cHCC-CCA treated at four institutions between April 2003 and June 2022 were included. In patients receiving palliative systemic therapy, outcome was compared between cytotoxic chemotherapy (CHT)- and non-cytotoxic CHT (nCHT)-treated patients. RESULTS: Of 101 patients, the majority were male (n = 70, 69%) with a mean age of 64.6 ± 10.6 years. Only type of first-line treatment was independently associated with overall survival (OS). Palliative systemic therapy was administered to 44 (44%) patients. Of those, 25 (57%) patients received CHT and 19 (43%) had nCHT (n = 16 of them sorafenib) in systemic first line. Although there was no significant difference in overall response rate (ORR; CHT versus nCHT: 8% versus 5%), disease control rate (24% versus 21%), and median progression-free survival {3.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-4.6 months] versus 3.2 months (95% CI 2.8-3.6 months), P = 0.725}, there was a trend towards longer median OS in the CHT group [15.5 months (95% CI 8.0-23.0 months) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 0-12.5 months), P = 0.052]. However, in multivariable analysis, type of first-line regimen (CHT versus sorafenib) was not associated with OS. ORR in patients receiving ICIs (n = 7) was 29%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cHCC-CCA, OS, progression-free survival, ORR, and disease control rate were not significantly different between individuals receiving CHT and patients receiving nCHT. Immunotherapy may be effective in a subset of patients. Prospective studies are needed to identify optimal systemic treatment regimens in cHCC-CCA.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Colangiocarcinoma , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Sorafenibe , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/complicações , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos/patologia
3.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 47(7): 980-988, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29377193

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF) has been shown to indicate the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension, and thus, predicts the development of clinical events in patients with cirrhosis. AIM: To investigate the impact of bacterial translocation and inflammation on vWF, as well as the association between vWF and procoagulant imbalance. Moreover, we assessed whether vWF predicts complications of cirrhosis, independent of the severity of portal hypertension. METHODS: Our study population comprised 225 patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥ 10 mm Hg without active bacterial infections or hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS: vWF correlated with markers of bacterial translocation (lipopolysaccharide-binding protein [LBP; ρ = 0.201; P = 0.021]), inflammation (interleukin 6 [IL-6; ρ = 0.426; P < 0.001] and C-reactive protein [CRP; ρ = 0.249; P < 0.001]), and procoagulant imbalance (factor VIII/protein C ratio; ρ = 0.507; P < 0.001). Importantly, the associations between vWF and these parameters were independent of HVPG. Moreover, vWF (per 10%) independently predicted variceal bleeding (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.01-1.16]; P = 0.023), requirement of paracentesis (HR: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.01-1.1]; P = 0.023) and bacterial infections (HR: 1.04 [95% CI: 1-1.09]; P = 0.04) including spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (HR: 1.09 [95% CI: 0.999-1.18]; P = 0.053) on a trend-wise level. After backward elimination, vWF (HR: 1.05 [95% CI: 1.02-1.08]; P = 0.003) and CRP (per 10 mg/L; HR: 1.53 [95% CI: 1.14-2.05]; P = 0.005) remained in the final model for transplant-free mortality. Finally, the independent prognostic value of vWF/CRP groups for mortality was confirmed by competing risk analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that vWF is not only a marker of portal hypertension but also independently linked to bacterial translocation, inflammation and procoagulant imbalance, which might explain its HVPG-independent association with most clinical events. Prognostic groups based on vWF/CRP efficiently discriminate between patients with a poor 5-year survival and patients with a favourable prognosis.


Assuntos
Translocação Bacteriana , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Portal/diagnóstico , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Fator de von Willebrand/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/sangue , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/sangue , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/complicações , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/metabolismo , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/sangue , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/complicações , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/sangue , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/complicações , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hipertensão Portal/complicações , Hipertensão Portal/microbiologia , Hipertensão Portal/patologia , Inflamação/sangue , Inflamação/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/sangue , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pressão na Veia Porta , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA