RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) are essential in obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) management. However, the best timing for such procedures remains unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to compare, for the first time, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, detection of active bleeding and vascular lesions, recurrent bleeding, and mortality of "early" versus "nonearly" SBCE and DAE. METHODS: MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify studies comparing early versus nonearly SBCE and DAE. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed; reporting quality was assessed. RESULTS: From 1974 records, 39 were included (4825 patients). Time intervals for the early approach varied, within 14 days in SBCE and 72 hours in DAE. The pooled diagnostic and therapeutic yields of early DAE were superior to those of SBCE (7.97% and 20.89%, respectively; P < .05). The odds for active bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 5.09; I2 = 53%), positive diagnosis (OR, 3.99; I2 = 45%), and therapeutic intervention (OR, 3.86; I2 = 67%) were higher in the early group for SBCE and DAE (P < .01). Subgroup effects in diagnostic yield were only identified for the early group sample size. Our study failed to identify differences when studies were classified according to time intervals for early DAE (I2 < 5%), but the analysis was limited because of a lack of data availability. Lower recurrent bleeding in early SBCE and DAE was observed (OR, .40; P < .01; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The role of small-bowel studies in the early evaluation of OGIB is unquestionable, impacting diagnosis, therapeutic intervention, and prognosis. Comparative studies are still needed to identify optimal timing.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/patologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND AIM: in capsule endoscopy (CE), small bowel subepithelial lesions (SBSL) are difficult to distinguish from innocent mucosal protrusions. The SPICE score (smooth, protruding lesions index on CE) and a score that assesses the SBSL protrusion angle were developed. The aim of the study was to determine if a composite score is superior to the proposed models. METHODS: all CE between 01/2010 and 12/2020 were included in the study if a smooth, round protruding lesion was identified. Both scores and a composite score (SPICE > 2 and angle < 90°) were calculated after video review. Mucosal protrusions were defined as SBSL if they had a histological/imaging diagnosis and innocent protrusions if otherwise. All patients without at least one appointment and an additional diagnostic exam after CE were excluded. RESULTS: a total of 34 CE were included; 64.7 % were males, aged 65.4 ± 14.7 years. The most common indication for CE was anemia (52.9 %). SBSL was identified in 17 cases, with lipomas (14.7 %) being the most frequent diagnosis. Both the SPICE (AUROC 0.90, p < 0.001) and protrusion angle scores (AUROC 0.74, p = 0.019) accurately distinguished SBSL from innocent protrusions. Applying a 90° cut-off, the protrusion angle had a sensitivity of 52.9 % and specificity of 88.2 %. Applying a cut-off of > 2 points, the SPICE score has a sensitivity of 64.7 % and specificity of 94.2 %. The composite score had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 47.0 %, 100 %, 100 % and 65.4 %. CONCLUSION: we propose that additional follow-up investigation should always be undertaken in cases where both a SPICE > 2 and angle of < 90° are obtained, as the likelihood of SBSL is high.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
The authors describe a case of a rectal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma in a 78-year-old female patient, manifested as rectal bleeding. Despite being commonly diagnosed in the localized form, this patient had supradiaphragmatic involvement on disease staging. Immunochemotherapy was proposed due to the disseminated involvement and poorer prognosis.
Assuntos
Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B , Neoplasias Gástricas , Idoso , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/terapia , Linfoma não Hodgkin , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologiaRESUMO
The authors report an unusual case of gastrointestinal bleeding with a challenging diagnosis, associated with a Bochdalek hernia. This clinical case highlights the role of capsule endoscopy both as a first-line exam in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and as an alternative exam in cases of incomplete colonoscopy. .
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Hérnias Diafragmáticas Congênitas , Colonoscopia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: the impact of early enteroscopy on the outcome of overt-obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) is still unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of early enteroscopy on overt-OGIB. METHODS: the PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically reviewed. Observational retrospective studies comparing early versus non-early enteroscopy in overt-OGIB were identified. Data on diagnosis, treatment, and rebleeding were extracted from each study, and a meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: fifteen studies (comprising 1,907 patients) were included. Early enteroscopy was performed in 470 patients and non-early enteroscopy in 1,437 patients. Early enteroscopy was associated with a significantly higher diagnostic yield (odds ratio [OR] = 3.2, 95 % CI: 1.9-5.3; p = 0.002) and therapeutic yield (OR = 4.9, 95 % CI: 1.2-20.5; p = 0.03). However, moderate and high heterogeneity was observed in both analyses (DY I2 = 60.4 %; p = 0.002; TY I2 = 83.1 %; p < 0.001). When considering only studies where enteroscopy was performed during ongoing bleeding or within ≤ 24 h, ≤ 48 h, and ≤ 72 h of bleeding, heterogeneity was removed while the positive effect on diagnostic yield was maintained (OR = 4.7, 95 % CI: 3.4-6.6, p < 0.001, I2 = 0 %). Early enteroscopy did not significantly influence rebleeding rate (OR = 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.40-1.89, p = 0.72) in our analysis. CONCLUSIONS: in conclusion, early enteroscopy, especially when performed during ongoing bleeding or within 24 h, 48 h or 72 h of the bleeding episode, may increase diagnostic yield. Although an effect on therapeutic yield was observed, the value of early intervention has to be cautiously evaluated due to the high heterogeneity found among results. In our meta-analysis, early enteroscopy did not significantly influence rebleeding rate.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Laparoscopia , Enteroscopia de Duplo Balão , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The diagnostic yield (DY) and therapeutic yield (TY) of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) is higher in the first 72 h. This study aimed to evaluate if this higher DY and TY after urgent BAE impacted the rebleeding rate, time to rebleed and short-term mortality. METHODS: Retrospective cohort-study, which consecutively included all patients submitted to BAE for overt OGIB, between 2010 and 2019. Patients were distributed in 2 groups: (1) Urgent BAE; (2) Non-urgent BAE. Rebleeding was defined as an Hb drop >2 g/dL, need for transfusional support or presence of melena/hematochezia. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included, of which 17 (31.5%) were submitted to BAE in the first 72 h. DY and TY of urgent BAE (DY 88.2%; n = 15; TY 94.1%; n = 16) was higher compared to non-urgent BAE (DY 59.5%; n = 22; TY 45.9%; n = 17) (DY p = .03) (TY p = .001). The rebleeding rate at 1, 2, and 5 years was 32.0%, 34.0%and 37.0%, respectively. Rebleeding was lower after urgent BAE (17.6%; n = 3) compared to non-urgent BAE (45.9%; n = 17) (p = .04). Rebleeding tended to occurr earlier in non-urgent BAE, being at 6-months (32.5%) and 36 months (41.3%) (p = .05). OGIB related 30-day mortality was 5.4% (n = 2) for non-urgent BAE and 0% for urgent BAE (p = .5). CONCLUSION: Urgent BAE might be associated with higher DY and TY with lower rebleeding and trend toward higher rebleeding-free time.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Intestino Delgado , Enteroscopia de Duplo Balão , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background and aims: Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) allows resection of larger non-invasive colorectal lesions. Adenoma recurrence is an important limitation and occurs in ≤20%. The present study aimed to validate the Sydney EMR recurrence tool (SERT) score as a predictor of both endoscopic and histologic recurrence and evaluate interobserver agreement in adenoma recurrence based on endoscopic scar assessment, among nonexperts in EMR.Methods: Retrospective cohort and cross-sectional study, in which all patients submitted to pEMR in a tertiary care center in Portugal, between 2012 and 2018 were included. SERT-score was calculated for all lesions and compared with the SMSA (size, morphology, site, access) score already validated as a predictor of adenoma recurrence. Image based offline analysis was performed to evaluate adenoma recurrence prediction and assess the interobserver agreement within a heterogeneous group of participants, mostly composed by nonexperts in EMR.Results: There was a moderate positive correlation between the SERT and SMSA scores (p <.001; r = 0.61). SERT-score was significantly associated with endoscopic recurrence (p =.005) and histologic recurrence (p = .015). Endoscopic prediction of recurrence had high coefficient of agreement (k-0.806; p < .001).Conclusion: Histologic recurrence after pEMR can be predicted by SERT score and optical diagnosis of recurrent adenoma has high interobserver agreement between nonexperts in EMR.
Assuntos
Adenoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Adenoma/patologia , Idoso , Colonoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Portugal , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: DUBLIN score allows evaluation of disease activity and extent in ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to evaluate DUBLIN score as a predictor of therapeutic failure as well as to associate endoscopic and histological activity scores to assess their joint performance. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study, with consecutive inclusion of patients undergoing total colonoscopy with serial biopsies between 2016 and 2019. DUBLIN score (0-9) was calculated as the product of Mayo endoscopic score (MSe 0-3) by disease extent (E1-E3). Histological activity was evaluated through Nancy score (0-4). Activity scores were correlated with biomarkers, treatment failure (therapeutic escalation, hospitalization and/or colectomy) and clinical remission at 6 months (Mayo partial score ≤ 1). RESULTS: One-hundred and seven patients were included. In 38.3% (n = 41) there was evidence of endoscopic activity (MSe ≥ 2) and in 50.5% (n = 54) histological activity (Nancy ≥ 2). MSe and DUBLIN scores showed good correlation (r = 0.943; p < .001) and both were significantly higher in patients with histological activity (p < .001). Therapeutic failure occurred in 25.2% (n = 27). MSe, DUBLIN, and Nancy scores were significantly associated with therapeutic failure (p < .001). The areas under the (AUC) ROC curve were 0.74 (MSe; p < .001), 0.78 (DUBLIN; p < .001) and 0.84 (Nancy; p < .001). Joint evaluation of endoscopic and histological activity by combining DUBLIN and Nancy scores was associated with therapeutic failure with a significantly higher AUC of 0.84 (p < .001) compared to the Dublin score alone (p = .003). CONCLUSION: Mayo and DUBLIN endoscopic scores correlated with each other and with histological activity. The joint evaluation of endoscopic and histological activity allowed to predict with greater accuracy treatment failure.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Colonoscopia , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prediction of rebleeding after small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) is challenging. The recently described RHEMITT score includes 7 variables: chronic kidney disease (CKD); heart failure (HF); P1/P2 lesions (Saurin's classification); major bleeding; incomplete examination; smoking and endoscopic treatment. This tool has been shown to accurately predict the risk of recurrence after a SBCE study. The primary aim of this study was to perform an external validation of the RHEMITT score. METHODS: Retrospective cohort-study, which consecutively included all patients submitted to SBCE (Mirocam®) for OGIB between January 2017 and December 2018. Rebleeding was defined as: (1) a drop in hemoglobin>2g/dL or (2) Melena or hematochezia. The RHEMITT score was calculated and subsequently the accuracy of the score for the prediction of rebleeding was assessed. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixty patients were enrolled. Mean age was 65.8±13.6years and 58.1% (n=93) were female. The mean follow-up time was 20 (SD 9) months. Rebleeding occurred in 14.4% (n=23). Rebleeding at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months was 6.3%, 12.0%, 14.2% and 15.5% respectively. There was a significant association between the RHEMITT score and rebleeding (p <0.001). The area under the (AUC) ROC curve was 0.756 (p<0.001). Rebleeding occurred earlier in intermediate and high-risk patients (RHEMITT score >3) being at 6-months 13.6% and 24 months 28.4% (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The present study carried out in an external validation cohort confirms the usefulness and accuracy of the RHEMITT score in predicting rebleeding after SBCE.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Intestinal decolonization of carbapenamase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE) can prevent transmission and infection by these agents. The aim of this study was to assess CPE decolonization after FMT. METHODS: this was a case-series study that consecutively included all CPE-carriers that underwent FMT between 2014 and 2019. The indications included refractory/recurrent CDI and CPE-decolonization. RESULTS: out of 21 CPE-carriers, eight were excluded due to incomplete post-FMT testing. CPE decolonization was confirmed in 76.9 % (n = 10). The median decolonization time was 16-weeks (IQR-23) and ranged from two to 53 weeks. CONCLUSION: FMT may be used in the clinical practice for CPE-decolonization as an alternative to combined antibiotic regimens.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Enterobacteriaceae , Fezes , Humanos , Intestinos , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: data on the long-term outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) with positive small bowel findings in capsule endoscopy but negative small bowel findings in device-assisted enteroscopy are scarce. OBJECTIVE: this study aimed to evaluate the rebleeding rate and time to rebleed in patients with no small bowel findings in enteroscopy, after a positive capsule endoscopy in the setting of OGIB. Baseline predictors for rebleeding were assessed. METHODS: a retrospective double-center study was performed, including patients with OGIB with positive findings by capsule endoscopy and negative small bowel findings by enteroscopy. RESULTS: thirty-five patients were included. Rebleeding occurred in 40 % of patients during a median follow-up of 27 months. Further evaluation in patients with a rebleed was performed in 85.7 %, leading to a final diagnosis in 78.6 %. The rebleeding rate increased progressively over time, from 17.2 % at one month to 54.4 % at four years. Overt bleeding at the time of the first episode was a predictor of rebleeding (p = 0.03) according to the multivariate analysis. This was 50 % at one year compared with 21.8 % in patients with occult bleeding on admission. CONCLUSIONS: in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, long-term follow-up and further evaluation may be considered after a positive capsule endoscopy. Even if there are no small bowel findings by device-assisted enteroscopy. The rebleeding rate in our study was 40 %, mainly in the presence of an overt bleeding on admission.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Humanos , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The present evidence-based guidelines are focused on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in the management of small-bowel diseases. A panel of experts selected by the Spanish and Portuguese small-bowel study groups reviewed the available evidence focusing on the main indications of this technique, its role in the management algorithm of each indication, and its diagnostic and therapeutic yield. A set of recommendations was issued accordingly.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Enteropatias , Humanos , Enteropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Enteropatias/terapia , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , PortugalRESUMO
AIM: the aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for an incomplete capsule endoscopy and an inadequate small-bowel preparation in capsule endoscopy. METHODS: predictive factors for an incomplete capsule endoscopy were evaluated. Therefore, all patients with incomplete examinations performed between June 2009 and February 2016 were retrospectively included and compared with all patients with complete procedures performed between January 2014 and February 2016. Predictive factors of an inadequate small-bowel cleanliness were assessed. Therefore, the subset of patients that underwent capsule endoscopy between January 2014 and February 2016, including incomplete examinations, were evaluated. Small-bowel cleanliness was evaluated according to a quantitative index and a qualitative evaluation scale. Data with regard to patient and capsule endoscopy was analyzed. RESULTS: 31 incomplete and 122 complete capsule endoscopies were included in the analysis of predictive factors for an incomplete capsule endoscopy. The degree of dependency (OR = 4.67; p = 0.028), performance of a capsule endoscopy in hospitalized patients (OR = 4.04; p = 0.006) and prior abdominal surgery (OR = 3.45; p = 0.012) were independent predictive factors of an incomplete procedure. 130 patients were included in the analysis of predictive factors for an inadequate small-bowel cleanliness. The mean quantitative index value was 7.3 (s.d. ± 2.3); 41.6% and 58.5% of capsule endoscopies were classified as poor-fair and good/excellent respectively, according to the qualitative evaluation. Independent predictive factors for an inadequate preparation according to the quantitative index included male gender (Beta = -0.79; p = 0.028), small-bowel transit time (Beta = -0.007; p < 0.0001) and cardiac disease (Beta = -1.29; p = 0.001). Associated factors according to the qualitative evaluation included male gender (OR = 0.406; p = 0.027) and small-bowel transit time (SBTT) (OR = 0.993; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: inpatient status, higher degrees of dependency and abdominal surgery are predictive factors for an incomplete capsule endoscopy; male gender and higher small-bowel transit time are predictive factors for an inadequate cleanliness.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula/normas , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Intestino Delgado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
AIM: this study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). METHODS: this was an observational study of patients with refractory or recurrent CDI treated with FMT between June 2014 and January 2017. Primary and secondary outcomes were the resolution of diarrhea without CDI recurrence within two months after one or more FMT. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: thirty-four FMT were performed in 28 patients, 88.2% (n = 30) using an upper route with a gastroscopy and 11.8% (n = 4) with colonoscopy; 50% (n = 17) of FMT were due to recurrent CDI and 50% (n = 17) were due to refractory CDI. The overall cure rate of upper FMT was 87.5% (21/24) and 100% (4/4) when colonoscopy was performed. A cure was achieved after one FMT in 88% (22/25) of cases and after two or more FMT in 8% (2/25) of cases, resulting in an overall cure rate of 96% (24/25). No severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: FMT constitutes an effective and safe approach for the management of refractory and recurrent CDI, with an overall cure rate of 96% and no reported severe adverse events.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Angioectasias represents the most frequently found lesion in the small bowel by device-assisted enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in Western countries. Recurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding after angioectasias therapy remains unclear and data regarding the efficacy of additional endoscopic therapeutic sessions to reduce the rebleeding rate is limited. AIM: To evaluate the rebleeding rate in small bowel angioectasias after a second endoscopic treatment with balloon-assisted enteroscopy after an initial bleed during the first endoscopic treatment. METHODS: A retrospective double-center study of patients with small-bowel angioectasias undergoing a second enteroscopy treatment due to a first rebleeding episode. The endpoint was rebleeding, defined as the need for a blood transfusion, the presence of overt bleeding or a decrease in hemoglobin ≥ 2 g/dL. RESULTS: Fifteen of 37 (40.5%) patients with small-bowel angioectasias that underwent a second endoscopic therapy after a first rebleeding episode (n = 15) experienced a second rebleeding episode. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that most rebleeding episodes occurred within the first 12 months of follow-up, resulting in a rebleeding rate of 33.1% at 6 months, 39.1% at 12 months and 52.6% at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high absolute short-term rebleeding rate, further endoscopic treatments may be beneficial due to the effective reduction of rebleeding in a subset of patients.
Assuntos
Dilatação Patológica/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Enteropatias/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado/anormalidades , Idoso , Enteroscopia de Duplo Balão , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Capsule endoscopy (CE) has the highest sensitivity in the evaluation of small-bowel mucosa in Crohn's disease (CD). Recent guidelines recommend the use of validated CE scores to assess small-bowel inflammatory activity in CD. Lewis score (LS) and Capsule Endoscopy Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CECDAI) are the currently available validated scores, but comparative studies are scarce. Moreover, correlation of these endoscopic scores with biomarkers and clinical activity is lacking. This study aims to compare LS with CECDAI, to determine cutoff values for CECDAI similar to those of LS (135-790), and to correlate LS and CECDAI with biomarkers and symptoms. STUDY: All patients with CD who underwent CE between March/2010 and February/2016 were included. LS and CECDAI were determined after analysis of each CE. In patients with small-bowel CD, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) were evaluated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis. SIGNIFICANCE: p<0.05. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included and the mean values obtained for LS were 1147±1453, CECDAI 11.3±6.9, CRP 0.92±1.5mg/dL and HBI 2.4±2.8. There was a very strong correlation between LS and CECDAI (rs=0.878; p<0.0001) and thresholds values of 135-790 in LS corresponded to 7.7-10.3 cutoff values in CECDAI, respectively. Neither CRP correlated with LS (rs=0.068; p=0.72) or CECDAI (rs=-0.004; p=0.98), nor HBI with LS (rs=-0.15; p=0.40) or CECDAI (rs=-0.10; p=0.23). CONCLUSION: Correlation between the two CE activity scores was very strong, with LS thresholds of 135-790 corresponding to CECDAI values of 7.7-10.3. HBI and CRP had no correlation with CECDAI and LS.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Doença de Crohn/patologia , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The authors present the case of a 66-year-old woman with four hospitalizations due to recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) non responsive to vancomycin and fidaxomicin. Furthermore, intestinal colonization with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) was identified after a positive stool culture in a screening routinely performed in our center in patients recently hospitalized.
Assuntos
Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Fezes/microbiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/terapia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/complicações , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Coinfecção/diagnóstico , Coinfecção/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções por Klebsiella/complicações , Infecções por Klebsiella/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small bowel submucosal lesions (SBSL) and innocent bulges may have an identical appearance and be difficult to distinguish on small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). Recently, Girelli et al. proposed a score, smooth, protruding lesion index on capsule endoscopy (SPICE), in order to differentiate between the two. We aimed to evaluate and validate SPICE as a differentiation method between innocent bulges and SBSLs. METHODS: We evaluated all SBCEs performed in our department between January 2005 and September 2015, and selected the ones with a smooth, round, protruding lesion in the small bowel. Lesions with suspicious characteristics were excluded. A video clip of the region of interest was created and SPICE was assigned blindly and independently by two endoscopists. We determined the discriminative ability of SPICE using the definitive diagnosis of each patient as the standard criteria. RESULTS: We included 30 SBCEs corresponding to 12 SBSLs (four gastrointestinal stromal tumors, two neuroendocrine tumors, four lipomas and two polypoid lymphangiectasias) and 18 innocent bulges. SPICE scores ranged from 0 to 4, allowing the distinction between SBSLs and innocent bulges (p < 0.001). SPICE > 2 had a 66.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, 100.0% positive predictive value and 78.3% negative predictive value, and the area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.73-1.00; p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of SBSL. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support SPICE, namely a score > 2, as a predictive method of SBSLs. Taking into account its simplicity, it may be very useful in the distinction between SBSLs and innocent bulges on SBCE.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Enteropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Mucosa Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinais/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: According to the Baveno VI consensus, patients with liver stiffness < 20 kPa and a platelet count > 150,000 ul have very low risk of clinically significant varices and do not need a screening endoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate non-invasive methods as predictors of esophageal varices according to the Baveno VI recommendations, in real life clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of patients with chronic liver disease who underwent transient elastography between January 2013 and December 2015. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients were included in the study, the median age was 56.8 years and 69.2% were male. The etiology of liver disease was hepatitis C in 80% of patients (including 20% with HIV co-infection), alcohol in 12%, hepatitis B in 4% and other causes in 5%. Varices were present in 25% of patients. A liver stiffness < 20 kPa had a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 84.6%. When considering high risk varices (small with red wales or large varices), a liver stiffness < 20 kPa had 100% sensitivity. A platelet count > 150,000/l had a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 64.1%. Four patients with a platelet count (PLT) > 150,000/l had esophageal varices. When both criteria were applied to the patient cohort, according to the Baveno VI consensus, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity, 61.5%. CONCLUSION: In this study, the Baveno VI criteria had 100% sensitivity but a relatively low specificity for the non-invasive diagnosis of esophageal varices. In clinical practice, all patients with varices are identified but many patients have a subsequent negative endoscopy.