A practical protocol to measure common carotid artery intima-media thickness.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and test a practical protocol to measure common carotid intima-media thickness that uses the combined values of two longitudinal examination angles to increase sensitivity. METHOD: Between February and September 2005, 206 patients underwent duplex scan examination of carotid vessels, and the intima-media thickness of 407 common carotids were measured in three angles: transversal, longitudinal posterolateral, and anterolateral, with three intima-media thickness measurements for each near and far wall. In addition to numbers obtained from the three angles of measurement, a fourth visual perspective was obtained by combining the intima-media thickness results of posterolateral and anterolateral longitudinal views and considering the thickest wall measurement. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy (66.3%) carotid arteries had an intima-media thickness thicker than 1mm. The mean intima-media thickness values achieved by the different incidences were 1.26+/-0.6 mm (transversal), 1.17+/-0.54 mm (longitudinal anterolateral), and 1.18+/-0.58 mm (longitudinal posterolateral). A significant difference in intima-media thickness measurement values was observed when the three angles of examination plus the combined positive results of both longitudinal angles were compared by ANOVA (P=0.005). The LSD Post-Hoc test determined that the combined longitudinal view results were similar to the transversal views (P=0.28) and had greater intima-media thickness means than isolated anterolateral or posterolateral longitudinal views (P=0.02 and 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The protocol presented is a practical method for obtaining common carotid artery intima-media thickness measurements. The combined longitudinal posterolateral and anterolateral longitudinal views provide a more sensitive evaluation of the inner layers of the carotid walls than isolated longitudinal views.

An experimental model for the treatment of lethal bleeding injury to the juxtahepatic vena cava with stent graft.

BACKGROUND: Juxtahepatic vein injuries present a high mortality rate. Our objectives were to develop an experimental model of endovascular lethal injury of the juxtahepatic inferior vena cava (JHIVC) and to evaluate its hemodynamic alterations; to treat the lesion with volume replacement, and a stent graft (SG); and to follow the animals after treatment. METHODS: Twenty dogs were anesthetized and monitored [heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), vesical and peritoneal pressures], and submitted to a JHIVC endovascular injury. After volume replacement the dogs were divided into two groups: control (GI) and experimental (GII). GI was observed until death. GII was treated with SG and followed by Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and cavography for 4 (GIIA), and 8 weeks (GIIB), and then sacrificed and IVC and SG were analyzed. RESULTS: GI presented increased abdominal pressures, arterial hypotension, and death after 80 minutes. GII had a 100% survival rate till sacrifice, without clinical repercussions. At DUS and cavography all SG were patent, with monophasic pulsatile flow. On US, SG diameters after 2, 4, and 8 weeks did not show differences. On cavography IVC diameters presented no difference between groups GIIA and GIIB throughout the experiment. These data analyzed for the GII as a whole, showed statistically significant differences. Average lumen diameter reduction of SG was 27.43+/-20,00%. Pressure values in the IVC cranially, caudally to the SG, and inside the SG, did not show differences. In the IVC with the SG we observed a thicker neointima layer, and the injury in the media layer was covered with fibroconnective tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an experimental dog model of endovascular lethal injury of the JHIVC with significant increase in abdominal pressures, and a mortality rate of 100%. The treatment of this lesion with SG resulted in a thickened neointima layer, and a 27% reduction in the JHIVC lumen diameter, without clinical repercussion, and with a 100% survival rate.

A practical protocol to measure common carotid artery intima-media thickness

OBJECTIVE: To describe and test a practical protocol to measure common carotid intima-media thickness that uses the combined values of two longitudinal examination angles to increase sensitivity. METHOD: Between February and September 2005, 206 patients underwent duplex scan examination of carotid vessels, and the intima-media thickness of 407 common carotids were measured in three angles: transversal, longitudinal posterolateral, and anterolateral, with three intima-media thickness measurements for each near and far wall. In addition to numbers obtained from the three angles of measurement, a fourth visual perspective was obtained by combining the intima-media thickness results of posterolateral and anterolateral longitudinal views and considering the thickest wall measurement. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy (66.3 percent) carotid arteries had an intima-media thickness thicker than 1mm. The mean intima-media thickness values achieved by the different incidences were 1.26±0.6mm (transversal), 1.17±0.54mm (longitudinal anterolateral), and 1.18±0.58mm (longitudinal posterolateral). A significant difference in intima-media thickness measurement values was observed when the three angles of examination plus the combined positive results of both longitudinal angles were compared by ANOVA (P=0.005). The LSD Post-Hoc test determined that the combined longitudinal view results were similar to the transversal views (P=0.28) and had greater intima-media thickness means than isolated anterolateral or posterolateral longitudinal views (P=0.02 and 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The protocol presented is a practical method for obtaining common carotid artery intima-media thickness measurements. The combined longitudinal posterolateral and anterolateral longitudinal views provide a more sensitive evaluation of the inner layers of the carotid walls than isolated longitudinal views.

Parâmetros dopplervelocimétricos na avaliação da perviedade da anastomose portossistêmica intra-hepática transjugular (TIPS) / Dopplerflowmetric patterns for evaluation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt patency

A anastomose portossistêmica intra-hepática transjugular (TIPS) é um procedimento intervencionista minimamente invasivo realizado pela introdução de prótese metálica auto-expansível no parênquima hepático, via transjugular. Tem por objetivo tratar as complicações da hipertensão portal, principalmente a hemorragia digestiva alta e a ascite refratária. A estenose é complicação freqüente, embora o procedimento seja eficaz e com baixo índice de insucesso. O diagnóstico precoce da estenose é de fundamental importância, pois interfere no tipo de tratamento a ser realizado e o reaparecimento dos sintomas pode ser grave. O ultra-som Doppler é então utilizado para o seguimento dos pacientes portadores do TIPS, e vários parâmetros são descritos na literatura para o diagnóstico de estenose, como: as velocidades mínima e máxima no interior da prótese, a velocidade na veia porta, o gradiente de velocidade entre dois pontos da prótese, e outros. Infelizmente não há consenso sobre qual parâmetro ou conjunto de parâmetros é mais eficaz no diagnóstico, porque os protocolos de avaliação variam de instituição para instituição. Os autores realizaram uma revisão dos parâmetros de estenose descritos na literatura e de outros aspectos de fundamental importância na compreensão do procedimento, como as indicações, as contra-indicações e a fisiopatologia da estenose.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a minimally invasive interventional procedure that consists of placement of an auto expandable metallic stent in the hepatic parenchyma via transjugular. It is used to treat the complications of portal hypertension, particularly digestive bleeding of gullet varices and refractory ascites. Although TIPS is an efficient procedure with low rate of failure some complications such as stenosis are frequent. Early diagnosis of stenosis is mandatory since it interferes with the type of treatment and the reappearing symptoms can be serious. Doppler sonography is used in the follow-up of this patients and many parameters indicating TIPS stenosis are described in the literature such as the minimum and maximum velocity flow inside the stent, the velocity flow in portal vein, the velocity gradient between different sites of the stent, among others. Unfortunately there is no consensus on which parameter or group of parameters is more efficient for diagnosis because the evaluation protocols varied among institutions. The authors reviewed the parameters of stenosis reported in literature and other important aspects for comprehension of this procedure including indications, contraindications and physiopathology of stenosis.