Genetic features of the poxtA linezolid resistance gene in human enterococci from France.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of poxtA among clinical linezolid-resistant enterococci (LRE) collected in France from 2016 to 2020 and to extensively characterize its genetic supports and environments. METHODS: All LRE clinical isolates received at the National Reference Centre for Enterococci from French hospitals between 2016 and 2020 were included. LRE isolates were screened for linezolid resistance genes (cfr-like, optrA and poxtA) by real-time PCR and phenotypically characterized. A collection of 11 representative poxtA-positive isolates (10 Enterococcus faecium and 1 Enterococcus faecalis) underwent WGS by hybrid assembly combining short-read (Illumina MiSeq) and long-read (MinION) approaches. Transferability of poxtA was attempted by filter-mating experiments. RESULTS: Out of 466 LRE received at the National Reference Centre for Enterococci over the period, 47 (10.1%) were poxtA-positive, including 42 E. faecium. The 11 isolates characterized by WGS were confirmed to be epidemiologically unrelated by core genome analysis and eight different STs were assigned to E. faecium isolates. The poxtA gene was found to be plasmid carried and flanked by IS1216E transposase genes in all isolates and frequently linked with fexB, tet(M) and tet(L). A total of seven distinct poxtA-harbouring plasmids were obtained after hybrid assembly and plasmid transfer of poxtA was successful in three cases. For the two poxtA/optrA-positive isolates, those genes were carried by different plasmids. CONCLUSIONS: The poxtA gene has been circulating among clinical enterococci in France since at least 2016, mostly in E. faecium and independently from optrA. The poxtA-carrying plasmids often co-carried resistance genes to phenicols and tetracyclines, and could have been co-selected through their veterinary use.

Molecular and functional analysis of the novel cfr(D) linezolid resistance gene identified in Enterococcus faecium.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the novel cfr(D) gene identified in an Enterococcus faecium clinical isolate (15-307.1) collected from France. METHODS: The genome of 15-307.1 was entirely sequenced using a hybrid approach combining short-read (MiSeq, Illumina) and long-read (GridION, Oxford Nanopore Technologies) technologies in order to analyse in detail the genetic support and environment of cfr(D). Transfer of linezolid resistance from 15-307.1 to E. faecium BM4107 was attempted by filter-mating experiments. The recombinant plasmid pAT29Ωcfr(D), containing cfr(D) and its own promoter, was transferred to E. faecium HM1070, Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2 and Escherichia coli AG100A. RESULTS: As previously reported, 15-307.1 belonged to ST17 and was phenotypically resistant to linezolid (MIC, 16 mg/L), vancomycin and teicoplanin. A hybrid sequencing approach confirmed the presence of several resistance genes including vanA, optrA and cfr(D). Located on a 103 kb plasmid, cfr(D) encoded a 357 amino acid protein, which shared 64%, 64%, 48% and 51% amino acid identity with Cfr, Cfr(B), Cfr(C) and Cfr(E), respectively. Both optrA and cfr(D) were successfully co-transferred to E. faecium BM4107. When expressed in E. faecium HM1070 and E. faecalis JH2-2, pAT29Ωcfr(D) did not confer any resistance, whereas it was responsible for an expected PhLOPSA resistance phenotype in E. coli AG100A. Analysis of the genetic environment of cfr(D) showed multiple IS1216 elements, putatively involved in its mobilization. CONCLUSIONS: Cfr(D) is a novel member of the family of 23S rRNA methyltransferases. While only conferring a PhLOPSA resistance phenotype when expressed in E. coli, enterococci could constitute an unknown reservoir of cfr(D).

Performance of commercial methods for linezolid susceptibility testing of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid-resistant enterococci (LRE) causing infections that are challenging to treat are rising, highlighting the need for reliable screening of LRE clinical isolates. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of the broth microdilution (BMD) method for LRE detection and to assess the performance of seven commercially available techniques for linezolid susceptibility testing. METHODS: A collection of 100 clinical isolates (80 Enterococcus faecium and 20 Enterococcus faecalis), including 20 optrA-positive isolates, 17 poxtA-positive isolates and 1 optrA/poxtA-positive E. faecium isolate, were studied. MICs were determined after 18 h [Day 1 (D1)] and 42 h [Day 2 (D2)] of incubation and interpreted following EUCAST and CLSI guidelines, which currently provide different interpretative breakpoints. Performance of commercial techniques was compared with BMD results. RESULTS: MIC50/D1 and MIC50/D2 were both 8 mg/L, while MIC90/D1 and MIC90/D2 were 16 and 32 mg/L, respectively. MICD1 values for poxtA-positive isolates were lower than those for optrA-positive isolates. Proportions of susceptible isolates at D1 and D2 were 48% and 41%, respectively, according to EUCAST breakpoints and 35% and 13%, respectively, according to CLSI criteria (the proportions of isolates categorized as intermediate following CLSI recommendations were 13% and 28% at D1 and D2, respectively). Percentage susceptibility assessed by the commercially available techniques was always higher. The four commercial methods allowing MIC determination provided an overall essential agreement of ≥90% at D1. Categorical agreement and error rates were generally improved at D2. CONCLUSIONS: Non-automated methods (Sensititre and UMIC) and, to a lesser extent, gradient strip Etest appear to show an acceptable correlation with the BMD reference method for the detection of isolates with low MICs of linezolid after prolonged incubation.

Emergence of optrA-mediated linezolid resistance in enterococci from France, 2006-16.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiological trend of linezolid-resistant enterococci (LRE) collected in France from 2006 to 2016 and to extensively characterize LRE isolates. METHODS: The National Reference Center for Enterococci (NRC-Enc) received enterococcal isolates suspected to be VRE and/or LRE from all French hospitals between 2006 and 2016. LRE isolates were phenotypically characterized and their genomes were entirely sequenced by Miseq (Illumina). Transfer of linezolid resistance was attempted by filter mating experiments. RESULTS: Out of 3974 clinical isolates of enterococci received at the NRC-Enc over the period, 9 (0.2%) were LRE (MICs 8 to >32 mg/L), including 6 Enterococcus faecium and 3 Enterococcus faecalis. This overall prevalence significantly increased over the study period, reaching 0.8% in 2016. The five LRE isolated before 2016 were vanA-positive E. faecium whereas strains isolated in 2016 (one E. faecium and three E. faecalis) were susceptible to vancomycin. None of these isolates was part of an outbreak, while E. faecium strains were assigned to four different STs [17 (1), 80 (3), 412 (1) and 650 (1)] and all three E. faecalis belonged to ST480. Except for the strain isolated in 2010, all LRE were positive for optrA, which was located on plasmids (5/8) or in the chromosome (3/8). Plasmid transfer of optrA was successful in three cases. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a significant increase in the prevalence of LRE in France over time; this is due to the spread of optrA among E. faecium and E. faecalis human clinical isolates (VRE or not).

In vitro activity of eravacycline and mechanisms of resistance in enterococci.

Eravacycline (ERC), the first fluorocycline, is a new tetracycline with superior activity to tigecycline (TGC) against many bacterial species. This work aimed to determine the in vitro activity of ERC compared with other tetracyclines against enterococcal clinical isolates and to analyse corresponding resistance mechanisms. A collection of 60 enterococcal strains was studied: 54 epidemiologically unrelated clinical isolates (46 Enterococcus faecium and 8 Enterococcus faecalis) including 42 vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) (33 vanA and 9 vanB), 3 in vitro TGC-resistant mutants (E. faecium AusTig, HMtig1 and HMtig2) and 3 reference wild-type strains (E. faecium Aus0004 and HM1070, E. faecalis ATCC 29212). In vitro susceptibility was determined using Etest strips (for ERC) or by broth microdilution (for TGC, doxycycline, minocycline and tetracycline). Resistance genes [tet(M), tet(L), tet(O) and tet(S)] were screened by PCR for TGC- and/or ERC-resistant strains as well as sequencing of the rpsJ gene (encoding ribosomal protein S10). MIC50/90 values were 0.016/0.08, ≤0.03/0.5, 4/32, 8/16 and 32/>32 mg/L for ERC, TGC, doxycycline, minocycline and tetracycline, respectively. According to EUCAST guidelines, nine strains were categorised as resistant to TGC (MIC, 0.5-8 mg/L), including four E. faecium vanA(+) strains also resistant to ERC (MIC, 0.19-1.5 mg/L). These four strains all possessed at least one mutation in rpsJ and two tet determinants: tet(M) + tet(L) (n = 2); and tet(M) + tet(S) (n = 2). Although ERC has excellent in vitro activity against enterococci (including VRE), emergence of resistance is possible due to combined mechanisms (rpsJ mutations + tet genes).