An Investigation of the Validity of the Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT) in Acquired Brain Injury (ABI).

OBJECTIVES: Social cognition is frequently impaired following an acquired brain injury (ABI) but often overlooked in clinical assessments. There are few validated and appropriate measures of social cognitive abilities for ABI patients. The current study examined the validity of the Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT, Baksh et al., ) in measuring social cognition following an ABI. METHODS: Forty-one patients with ABI were recruited from a rehabilitation service and completed measures of general ability, executive functions and social cognition (Faux Pas; FP, Reading the Mind in the Eyes; RME, Social Norms Questionnaire; SNQ and the ESCoT). Forty-one controls matched on age, sex and years of education also performed the RME, SNQ and ESCoT. RESULTS: A diagnosis of ABI was significantly associated with poorer performance on all ESCoT measures and RME while adjusting for age, sex and years of education. In ABI patients, the ESCoT showed good internal consistency with its subcomponents and performance correlated with the other measures of social cognition demonstrating convergent validity. Better Trail Making Test performance predicted better ESCoT total, RME and SNQ scores. Higher TOPF IQ was associated with higher RME scores, while higher WAIS-IV working memory predicted better FP performance. CONCLUSIONS: The ESCoT is a brief, valid and internally consistent assessment tool able to detect social cognition deficits in neurological patients. Given the prevalence of social cognition deficits in ABI and the marked impact these can have on an individual's recovery, this assessment can be a helpful addition to a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment.

Pilot project of psychological services integrated into a pediatric epilepsy clinic: Psychology Adding Value - Epilepsy Screening (PAVES).

RATIONALE: Children and young people with epilepsy (CYPwE) are particularly vulnerable to developing social, emotional, behavioral, and learning difficulties, which, if not identified or addressed at an early stage, can impact adversely on quality of life and long-term psychosocial outcomes. This paper describes the development of a screening protocol and a pathway of early, 'stepped' intervention, which aims to address this issue, together with initial outcomes. METHODS: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was completed by CYPwE and their parents prior to routine epilepsy clinic appointments. A traffic light system was devised to indicate the reported level of concern and a potential route through the early intervention pathway. RESULTS: Of those CYPwE screened, 53% were found to be experiencing elevated levels of mental health difficulties, which had not previously been identified, and had the opportunity to access an appropriate early intervention. Initial feedback on the PAVES pathway has been positive, with high levels of feasibility and acceptability indicated by young people, parents, and clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: The PAVES approach enables mental health difficulties to be identified and appropriate intervention accessed at an early stage, potentially improving long-term psychosocial outcomes for CYPwE. In addition, if found to be effective in larger trials, PAVES has potential to be adapted and generalized to other populations.