Phase I Trial of Inducible Caspase 9 T Cells in Adult Stem Cell Transplant Demonstrates Massive Clonotypic Proliferative Potential and Long-term Persistence of Transgenic T Cells.

PURPOSE: Inducible caspase 9 (iCasp9) is a cellular safety switch that can make T-cell therapy safer. The purpose of this phase I trial was to investigate the use of iCasp9-transduced T-cell addback in adult patients undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation for high-risk hematologic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing myeloablative, CD34-selected haploidentical stem cell transplantation were treated with 0.5-1.0 × 106/kg donor-derived iCasp9-transduced T cells on day +25 or 26 post-transplant, with additional doses allowed for disease relapse, infection, or mixed chimerism. RESULTS: Three patients were enrolled. iCasp9-transduced T cells were readily detectable by 4 weeks post-infusion in all patients and remained at high level (114 cells/µL, 11% of T cells) in 1 patient alive at 3.6 years. One patient developed donor-derived Epstein-Barr virus-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (EBV-PTLD), which was followed by a marked expansion of iCasp9 T cells and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). These iCasp9-transduced T cells infiltrated the affected lymph nodes and secreted IFNγ and IL-10. They peaked at 1,848 cells/µL and were found to be monoclonal by T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotype and oligoclonal by viral integrant analysis, representing a 6-log in vivo expansion of the dominant T-cell clone. These T cells were not autonomous and contracted with the resolution of EBV-PTLD, which did not recur. CONCLUSIONS: iCasp9-transduced T cells could persist long-term. They retained very high in vivo clonotypic proliferative capacity and function, and could cause CRS in response to de novo lymphoma development.

Use of individual fraction size data from 3756 patients to directly determine the alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of fraction size and total dose of radiation on recurrence of localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 3756 patients treated with radiation monotherapy at three institutions were analyzed, including 185 high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) boost patients. The 5th to 95th centiles of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) fraction sizes and doses were 1.8 to 2.86 Gy, and 57.4 to 77.4 Gy, respectively, and HDRB fractional doses were between 5.5 and 12 Gy, totaling 147 unique fractionation schedules. Failure was defined by one biochemical (nadir + 2 ng/ml) and two advanced disease endpoints. The alpha/beta ratios were estimated via a proportional hazards model stratified by risk severity and institution. RESULTS: The alpha/beta ratio using biochemical recurrence was 3.7 Gy (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.1, infinity Gy) for EBRT-only cases and 2.6 Gy (95% CI, 0.9, 4.8 Gy) after the addition of HDRB data. This estimate was highly dependent on an HDRB homogeneity correction factor (120% HDRB dose increase; alpha/beta ratio 4.5 Gy, 95% CI 1.6, 8.7 Gy). A 5-Gy increase in total dose reduced the hazard of failure by 16% (95% CI 11, 21%, p < 0.0001), and had more impact as follow-up matured (p < 0.0003). The clinically advanced endpoints concurred with the biochemical failure results, albeit with less precision. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the concept that the alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer is low, although considerable uncertainty remains in the estimated value. Outcome data from EBRT studies using substantially higher doses per fraction are needed to show increased precision in these estimates.

An international multicenter study evaluating the impact of an alternative biochemical failure definition on the judgment of prostate cancer risk.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of an alternative biochemical failure (bF) definition on the performance of existing plus de novo prognostic models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The outcomes data of 1,458 Australian and 703 Canadian men treated with external-beam radiation monotherapy between 1993 and 1997 were analyzed using a lowest prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to date plus 2 ng/mL (L + 2) bF definition. Two existing prognostic models were scrutinized using discrimination (Somers Dxy [SDxy]) and calibration indices. Alternative prognostic models were also created using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and multivariate nomogram methods for comparison. RESULTS: Discrimination of bF was improved using the L + 2 definition compared with the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition using both the three-level risk model (SDxy 0.30 and 0.22, respectively) or the nomogram (SDxy 0.35 and 0.27, respectively). Both existing prognostic models showed only modest calibration accuracy. Using RPA, five distinct risk groups were identified based primarily on Gleason score (GS) and all subsequent divisions based on PSA. All GS 7-10 tumors were intermediate or high risk. This model and the developed nomogram showed improved discrimination over the existing models as well as accurate calibration against the Canadian data, apart from the 30-50% failure region. CONCLUSIONS: The L + 2 definition of bF provides improved capacity for discrimination of failure risk. New prognostic models based on this endpoint have overall statistical performance superior to those based on the ASTRO consensus definition but continue to have unreliable discrimination in the intermediate-risk region.

Both pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level and posttreatment biochemical failure are independent predictors of overall survival after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of pretreatment prognostic factors plus subsequent biochemical failure on overall survival after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and survival records of 1571 men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy monotherapy at the former Queensland Radium Institute between 1990 and 1997. The pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, patient age, and the development of biochemical failure were assessed in relationship to overall survival and cause-specific survival, using fixed, as well as time-dependent, statistics. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 88.1 months (95 months for those still alive). The actuarial overall survival, cause-specific survival, and biochemical failure-free survival rate at 10 years was 61.1%, 80.9%, and 25.9% respectively. Cause-specific survival was independently influenced by the pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, clinical stage, and the development of biochemical failure (relative risk, 19.1). Using the overall survival endpoint, multivariate analysis showed age, pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, and biochemical failure (relative risk 1.27) to be statistically significant variables. CONCLUSION: In addition to previously identified factors, the pretreatment PSA level and occurrence of biochemical failure after radiotherapy for prostate cancer are associated with an increased overall mortality risk. Both pretreatment PSA level and posttreatment biochemical failure are independent predictors of overall survival after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.