Association of decision-making in spinal surgery with specialty and emotional involvement-the Indications in Spinal Surgery (INDIANA) survey.

BACKGROUND: Although recent trials provided level I evidence for the most common degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, treatment still varies widely. Thus, the Indications in Spinal Surgery (INDIANA) survey explores whether decision-making is influenced by specialty or personal emotional involvement of the treating specialist. METHOD: Nationwide, neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons specialized in spine surgery were asked to answer an Internet-based questionnaire with typical clinical patient cases of lumbar disc herniation (DH), lumbar spinal stenosis (SS), and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (SL). The surgeons were assigned to counsel a patient or a close relative, thus creating emotional involvement. This was achieved by randomly allocating the surgeons to a patient group (PG) and relative group (RG). We then compared neurosurgeons to orthopedic surgeons and the PG to the RG regarding treatment decision-making. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two spine surgeons completed the questionnaire (response rate 78.7%). Regarding DH and SS, more conservative treatment among orthopedic surgeons was shown (DH: odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-9.7, p = 0.001; SS: OR 3.9, CI 1.8-8.2, p < 0.001). However, emotional involvement (PG vs. RG) did not affect these results for any of the three cases (DH: p = 0.213; SS: p = 0.097; SL: p = 0.924). CONCLUSIONS: The high response rate indicates how important the issues raised by this study actually are for dedicated spine surgeons. Moreover, there are considerable variations in decision-making for the most common degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, although there is high-quality data from large multicenter trials available. Emotional involvement, though, did not influence treatment recommendations.

Shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the role of intrathecal interleukin-6.

OBJECT: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has been reported to induce an intrathecal inflammatory reaction reflected by cytokine release, particularly interleukin-6 (IL-6), which correlates with early brain damage and poor outcome. The present study examines intrathecal IL-6 production together with clinical parameters, as a predictor of posthemorrhagic shunt dependency. METHODS: Among 186 SAH patients admitted between July 2010 and December 2012, 82 received external ventricular drainage due to acute hydrocephalus. In these patients, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of IL-6 were measured within the first 14 days after SAH. Patients whose IL-6 values were not determined regularly and those who did not survive until discharge were excluded. The peak value of IL-6, ventricular infection during the hospital stay, microbial CSF culture, patient's age and sex, Hunt and Hess grade, and aneurysm location were assumed as predictive for shunt dependency. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included, 24 of whom underwent shunt surgery. Peak IL-6 values of ≥10,000 pg/ml were significantly associated with a higher incidence of shunt dependency (p = 0.009). Additional risk factors were aneurysm location on the anterior cerebral artery and its branches or in the posterior circulation (p = 0.025), and age ≥60 years (p = 0.014). In a multivariate analysis, IL-6 ≥10,000 pg/ml appeared to be the only independent predictor for shunt dependency (p = 0.029) CONCLUSION: CSF IL-6 values of ≥10,000 pg/ml in the early post-SAH period may be a useful diagnostic tool for predicting shunt dependency in patients with acute posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. The development of shunt-dependent posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus remains a multifactorial process.

The Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI) in assessing prognosis of patients with spinal metastases.

Introduction: The Oswestry Spinal Risk Index (OSRI) was designed to predict life expectancy of patients presenting with spinal metastases. It integrates the most predictive items of existing scores and is calculated using not more than two items: General condition and primary tumor. Research question: The purpose of this study was to externally validate the OSRI in a large cohort and to compare it with the established scores. Material and methods: We retrospectively identified 211 consecutive surgical patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. We collected clinical and radiographic data, such as Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), Frankel Status, primary tumor pathology and metastatic spread to calculate the Tokuhashi score, Tomita score, modified Bauer score and the OSRI. Logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meyer-curves, discriminant power and variance analyses were applied using Harrell's C-index and Cox and Snell's Pseudo R². Results: Predicted and actual survival of our cohort's patients correlated significantly in each investigated scoring systems (p < 0.001). In test quality measurements Tokuhashi score performed best (C = 0.7204; R² = 0.3619), followed by OSRI (C = 0.7023; R² = 0.2612), Tomita (C = 0.6748; R² = 0.2818) and modified Bauer score (C = 0.6653; R² = 0.2486). Accuracy of predicted life expectancy was highest in modified Bauer score and OSRI. Discussion and conclusion: Compared to the original scores, the OSRI provided equal or even superior results in assessing our study population's life expectancy. Its particular advantage lies in the simplicity of its application, which well meets the demands of surgical decision-making in daily practice.

Return to Sports After Cervical Total Disc Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Total disc replacement (TDR) is typically indicated in young patients with a cervical soft disc herniation. There are few data on the activity level of patients after cervical TDR, in particular from young patients who are expected to have a high activity level with frequent exercising. The expectation is that returning to active sports after cervical TDR is not restricted. METHODS: Fifty patients were treated with a monosegmental cervical TDR at our department between May 2006 and March 2012. Clinical status and radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively and during follow-up. In addition, information was gathered regarding neck disability index, pain, a questionnaire concerning athletic aspects, and a modified Tegner activity score. The study design was a prospective case series. RESULTS: All patients were treated with the Prestige artificial cervical disc for a single-level soft disc herniation with radiculopathy. The average age was 40 years, and the mean follow-up period was 53 months (range, 26-96). The median neck disability index during follow-up was 5, and median visual analog scale for pain was 2. Two professional athletes, 20 semiprofessionals, 24 hobby athletes, and 5 patients with a very low activity level were treated. The median time to resumption of sporting activity was 4 weeks after surgery. All professionals and semiprofessionals recovered to their previous activity level. All of the 20 hobby athletes recovered to resume their sport participation. The modified Tegner preoperative score was 4 and the postoperative score was 3.5 (P = 0.806). CONCLUSIONS: We found that cervical TDR did not prohibit sporting activities. All patients recovered and were able to take part in their previous activities at an appropriate intensity level.

Outcome after Surgical Treatment for Late Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniations in Standard Open Microsurgery.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of studies highlighting the outcome by different scores or parameters after surgery for recurrent disc herniations of the lumbar spine at the initial herniation site. This study assessed the quality of life after surgical treatment of recurrent herniations with different standardized validated outcome instruments. METHODS: During a 24-month period, 64 patients underwent (microscope assisted) surgery for recurrent disc herniations of the lumbar spine. The postoperative quality of life was tested with Short Form-36, the Oswestry Disability Index, the EuroQol health status 5D, and Prolo questionnaires. Leg and back pain before and after surgery was assessed. RESULTS: The patients showed a good overall outcome, but still not satisfying enough compared with the very good surgical results reported in the literature, for the surgical treatment of primary disc herniations. CONCLUSIONS: Patients have to be informed carefully before surgery of recurrent lumbar disc herniations because of the less-promising outcome than after first time surgery for a lumbar disc herniation.

Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized study. OBJECTIVE: To compare occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon, as well as the patient, during posterior lumbar spine instrumentation in 10 navigated cases (navigated) versus 11 cases using the freehand technique (non-navigated). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of navigation increases the accuracy of posterior lumbar instrumentation.A further speculated benefit of navigation is the reduction of radiation exposure of the surgeon. However, this has so far not been evaluated in such comparative manner. METHODS: Radiation exposure to the surgeon was measured by digital dosimeters placed at the level of the eye, chest, and dominant forearm. Radiation exposure was measured from the time of positioning of the patient to the end of the procedure both for navigated (intraoperative 3-dimensional [3D] fluoroscopy-based) and non-navigated (2-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided) freehand posterior lumbar spine instrumentations. A 3D fluoroscopic scan was routinely performed at the end of the procedure for all patients. RESULTS: Patients were distributed evenly in the 2 groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, and the number of operated levels. The accumulated radiation dose for the surgeon was significantly higher in the non-navigated group; up to 9.96 times. The radiation dose for the patient was higher with the freehand technique, 1884.8 cGy·cm (non-navigated) versus 887 cGy·cm (navigated), without reaching a statistically significant level. CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure to the surgeon during pedicle screw placement with the freehand technique is up to 9.96 times greater than with the use of navigation. In the latter group, the only radiation exposure comes from the preoperative-level control and positioning of the 3D C-arm before 3D fluoroscopic acquisition. Furthermore, neuronavigation also reduces the cumulative dose for the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Accuracy of robot-assisted placement of lumbar and sacral pedicle screws: a prospective randomized comparison to conventional freehand screw implantation.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective randomized controlled study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of robot-assisted (RO) implantation of lumbar/sacral pedicle screws in comparison with the freehand (FH) conventional technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SpineAssist is a miniature robot for the implantation of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral pedicle screws. The system, studied in cadaver and cohort studies, revealed a high accuracy, so far. A direct comparison of the robot assistance with the FH technique is missing. METHODS: Patients requiring mono- or bisegmental lumbar or lumbosacral stabilization were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to FH or RO pedicle screw implantation. Instrumentation was performed using fluoroscopic guidance (FH) or robot assistance. The primary end point screw position was assessed by a postoperative computed tomography, and screw position was classified (A: no cortical violation; B: cortical breach <2 mm; C: ≥2 mm to <4 mm; D: ≥4 mm to <6 mm; E: ≥6 mm). Secondary end points as radiation exposure, duration of surgery/planning, and hospital stay were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 298 pedicle screws were implanted in 60 patients (FH, 152; RO, 146). Ninety-three percent had good positions (A or B) in FH, and 85% in RO. Preparation time in the operating room (OR), overall OR time, and intraoperative radiation time were not different for both groups. Surgical time for screw placement was significantly shorter for FH (84 minutes) than for RO (95 minutes). Ten RO screws required an intraoperative conversion to the FH. One FH screw needed a secondary revision. CONCLUSION: In this study, the accuracy of the conventional FH technique was superior to the RO technique. Most malpositioned screws of the RO group showed a lateral deviation. Attachment of the robot to the spine seems a vulnerable aspect potentially leading to screw malposition as well as slipping of the implantation cannula at the screw entrance point.

Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of detailed information concerning patients' sports and recreational activities after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. HYPOTHESIS: Patients treated by unicompartmental knee arthroplasty will be able to return to sports and activity. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The authors surveyed 83 patients by postal questionnaires to determine their sporting and recreational activities at a mean follow-up of 18 +/- 4.6 months (range, 12-28) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. For data analysis, patients were divided into groups of women and men, and older and younger patients (those above and below the median age of the group). The authors also assessed the state of general health (SF-36) of the patients at the time of the survey and compared the results with those of a matched (for age and side-diagnoses) reference population. RESULTS: Before surgery, 77 of 83 patients were engaged in an average of 5.0 sports and recreational disciplines; postoperatively, 73 (88%) participated in an average of 3.1 different sports disciplines, resulting in a return to activity rate of 95%. The frequency of activities (sessions per week) was 2.9 preoperatively and remained constant at the time of survey (2.8). The group of older patients (mean age 73.0 y) revealed a significantly higher frequency than the group of younger patients (mean age 57.8 y). The minimum session length decreased from 66 minutes before surgery to 55 minutes after surgery. The most common activities after surgery were hiking, cycling, and swimming. Several high-impact activities, as well as the winter disciplines of downhill- and cross-country skiing had a significant decrease in participating patients. The majority of the patients (90.3%) stated that surgery had maintained or improved their ability to participate in sports or recreational activities. The patients generally scored very high on the SF-36 compared with the matched reference population. Higher SF-36 values in the physical-related domains correlated with an increased level of activity (r = 0.425). The preoperative body mass index showed a weak, negative correlation with the postoperative extent of activities (r = -0.282). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients returned to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. However, the numbers of different disciplines patients were engaged in decreased as well as the extent of activities. The activities in which most patients participated were primarily low- or midimpact. The patients scored higher on the SF-36 than age-related norms, which might be due to the patient-selection process for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and geographical differences.