Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sante Publique ; 33(6): 959-970, 2022.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35724200

RESUMO

Since early 2020, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, physicians have continued to report adverse events associated with care. Patients also continued to participate in the hospital satisfaction surveys. To date, no study in France has measured the impact of the pandemic on adverse events and patient satisfaction. We looked at the characteristics of these adverse events in relation to the pandemic and put patients' feelings into perspective. A qualitative and observational retrospective study of the REX and MCO48 databases was carried out. The quantitative study of the REX database was supplemented by a qualitative analysis of the declarations. The adverse events more often affects middle-aged men aged 60 years, while deaths occur in older patients with more complex pathologies and more urgent management. The nature of these events is different depending on the reporting period: Those reported in the first wave are more urgent, occur less frequently in the operating room than in the emergency room, and are considered less preventable than those reported in the second wave. The latter are more similar to the events that usually occur. The implementation of effective barriers, particularly within the teams, has made it possible to reduce the impact of the second wave on the occurrence of these events, the role of communication seems essential. The overall patient satisfaction score as well as those for medical and paramedical care has increased, which may reflect patient solidarity with caregivers. The attitude of active resilience on the part of all actors has been a major element in risk management during this crisis and it is essential to capitalize on these collaborative processes for the future.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Comunicação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 22(1): 101-110, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28780684

RESUMO

Objectives Timely access to health care is critical in obstetrics. Yet obtaining reliable estimates of travel times to hospital for childbirth poses methodological challenges. We compared two measures of travel time, self-reported and calculated, to assess concordance and to identify determinants of long travel time to hospital for childbirth. Methods Data came from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey, a national representative sample of births (N = 14 681). We compared both travel time measures by maternal, maternity unit and geographic characteristics in rural, peri-urban and urban areas. Logistic regression models were used to study factors associated with reported and calculated times ≥30 min. Cohen's kappa coefficients were also calculated to estimate the agreement between reported and calculated times according to women's characteristics. Results In urban areas, the proportion of women with travel times ≥30 min was higher when reported rather than calculated times were used (11.0 vs. 3.6%). Longer reported times were associated with non-French nationality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.3 (95% CI 1.0-1.7)] and inadequate prenatal care [aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.2-2.0)], but not for calculated times. Concordance between the two measures was higher in peri-urban and rural areas (52.4 vs. 52.3% for rural areas). Delivery in a specialised level 2 or 3 maternity unit was a principal determinant of long reported and measured times in peri-urban and rural areas. Conclusions for Practice The level of agreement between reported and calculated times varies according to geographic context. Poor measurement of travel time in urban areas may mask problems in accessibility.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstetrícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Feminino , França , Hospitais , Humanos , Cuidado Pré-Natal , População Rural , População Suburbana , População Urbana
3.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 95(7): 746-54, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26958827

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies are indicators of obstetrical quality of care, but their use for international comparisons is complicated by difficulties with accurate ascertainment of tears and uncertainties regarding the optimal rate of episiotomies. We compared rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in European countries and analysed the association between these two indicators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used aggregate data from national routine statistics available in the Euro-Peristat project. We compared rates of severe (third- and fourth-degree) tears and episiotomies in 2010 by mode of vaginal delivery (n = 20 countries), and investigated time trends between 2004 and 2010 (n = 9 countries). Statistical associations were assessed with Spearman's ranked correlations (rho). RESULTS: In 2010 in all vaginal deliveries, rates of severe tears ranged from 0.1% in Romania to 4.9% in Iceland, and rates of episiotomies from 3.7% in Denmark to 75.0% in Cyprus. A negative correlation between the rates of episiotomies and severe tears was observed in all deliveries (rho = -0.66; p = 0.001), instrumental deliveries (rho = -0.67; p = 0.002) and non-instrumental deliveries (rho = -0.72; p < 0.001). However there was no relation between time trends of these two indicators (rho = 0.43; p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: The large variations in severe tears and episiotomies and the negative association between these indicators in 2010 show the importance of improving the assessment and reporting of tears in each country, and evaluating the impact of low episiotomy rates on the perineum.


Assuntos
Episiotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Períneo/lesões , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 16: 15, 2016 Jan 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26809989

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that socioeconomic position is inversely associated with stillbirth risk, but the impact on national rates in Europe is not known. We aimed to assess the magnitude of social inequalities in stillbirth rates in European countries using indicators generated from routine monitoring systems. METHODS: Aggregated data on the number of stillbirths and live births for the year 2010 were collected for three socioeconomic indicators (mothers' educational level, mothers' and fathers' occupational group) from 29 European countries participating in the Euro-Peristat project. Educational categories were coded using the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) and analysed as: primary/lower secondary, upper secondary and postsecondary. Parents' occupations were grouped using International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08) major groups and then coded into 4 categories: No occupation or student, Skilled/ unskilled workers, Technicians/clerical/service occupations and Managers/professionals. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for stillbirth by each occupational group as well as the percentage population attributable risks using the most advantaged category as the reference (post-secondary education and professional/managerial occupations). RESULTS: Data on stillbirth rates by mothers' education were available in 19 countries and by mothers' and fathers' occupations in 13 countries. In countries with these data, the median RR of stillbirth for women with primary and lower secondary education compared to women with postsecondary education was 1.9 (interquartile range (IQR): 1.5 to 2.4) and 1.4 (IQR: 1.2 to 1.6), respectively. For mothers' occupations, the median RR comparing outcomes among manual workers with managers and professionals was 1.6 (IQR: 1.0-2.1) whereas for fathers' occupations, the median RR was 1.4 (IQR: 1.2-1.8). When applied to the entire set of countries with data about mothers' education, 1606 out of 6337 stillbirths (25 %) would not have occurred if stillbirth rates for all women were the same as for women with post-secondary education in their country. CONCLUSIONS: Data on stillbirths and socioeconomic status from routine systems showed widespread and consistent socioeconomic inequalities in stillbirth rates in Europe. Further research is needed to better understand differences between countries in the magnitude of the socioeconomic gradient.


Assuntos
Fatores Socioeconômicos , Natimorto/epidemiologia , Adulto , Escolaridade , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Pai/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Nascido Vivo/epidemiologia , Masculino , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco
5.
Anesth Analg ; 121(3): 759-766, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26086620

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rate of neuraxial analgesia during labor in France is one of the highest among high-income countries: 77% of vaginal deliveries in 2010. In this context, the question of how women's preferences for delivering without neuraxial analgesia relate to actual use is of interest. Our objective was to study the factors associated with women's initial preference for labor without neuraxial analgesia and those associated with its use in women who initially preferred not to have it. METHODS: We used data from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey, a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of all births in France. Data were collected from interviews with mothers in the postpartum ward and from medical records. Our sample included 7123 women who had vaginal deliveries and were at low risk for cesarean delivery. The factors analyzed were maternal sociodemographic characteristics, prenatal care, childbirth class attendance, labor management, and organization of maternity units. Multilevel Poisson regression models were used to study factors associated with women's initial preference in the overall population and to study factors associated with actual use of neuraxial analgesia in the group of women who initially preferred not to have it. RESULTS: Initially, 26% of our population (n = 1835) preferred to deliver without neuraxial analgesia; this preference was associated with high parity, unfavorable social conditions, and delivery in a public maternity unit. Among these women, 52% (n = 961) delivered with neuraxial analgesia. This discrepancy between initial preference and actual use was significantly associated with nulliparity (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.6), oxytocin augmentation of labor (aRR = 2.4; 95% CI, 2.1-2.7), presence of an anesthesiologist in the unit 24/7 (aRR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6; compared with delivery in hospitals without an anesthesiologist on site 24/7), and high midwife workload (aRR = 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2). There was no clear association with maternal educational level. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that parity, the management of labor, and availability of anesthesiologists play a major role in the intrapartum decision to use neuraxial analgesia for women who initially preferred not to have it. Further research is necessary in the clinical circumstances leading to this decision and the role of women's demands and medical staff attitudes throughout labor.


Assuntos
Analgesia Obstétrica/psicologia , Analgesia Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Coleta de Dados , Dor do Parto/psicologia , Trabalho de Parto/psicologia , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Dor do Parto/epidemiologia , Dor do Parto/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/psicologia , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
6.
Br J Nutr ; 112(12): 1914-22, 2014 Dec 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25345440

RESUMO

The effects of ruminant (R) trans-fatty acids (TFA) on the risk of CVD are still under debate. It could be argued that the lack of the effect of R-TFA may be the result of the small amount of their intake. Taking into consideration the growing available data from intervention studies, we carried out a systematic review and meta-regression to assess the impact of R-TFA intake levels on changes in the total cholesterol: HDL-cholesterol (TC:HDL-C) ratio. A systematic review of the literature was conducted and thirteen randomised clinical trials were included, yielding a total of twenty-three independent experimental groups of subjects. A univariate random-effects meta-regression approach was used to quantify the relationship between the dose of R-TFA and changes in the TC:HDL-C ratio. To consider several potential modifiers such as subject and dietary characteristics, a multivariate regression analysis was performed. We found no relationship between R-TFA intake levels of up to 4.19% of daily energy intake (EI) and changes in cardiovascular risk factors such as TC:HDL-C and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C):HDL-C ratios. In addition, a multivariate regression analysis that included other dietary variables, as well as subject baseline characteristics, confirmed that doses of R-TFA did not significantly influence the changes in the lipid ratio. Our findings showed that doses of R-TFA did not influence the changes in the ratios of plasma TC:HDL-C and LDL-C:HDL-C. These data suggest that TFA from natural sources, at least at the current levels of intake and up to 4.19% EI, have no adverse effects on these key CVD risk markers in healthy people.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Colesterol/sangue , Dieta , Gorduras na Dieta/efeitos adversos , Ruminantes , Ácidos Graxos trans/administração & dosagem , Animais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Humanos , Ácidos Graxos trans/efeitos adversos
8.
BMJ Open ; 8(1): e018745, 2018 01 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29371276

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether risk factors for preterm (<37 weeks gestation) and early-term birth (37 and 38 weeks gestation) are similar. DESIGN: Nationally representative cross-sectional study of births. SETTING: France in 2010. PARTICIPANTS: Live singleton births (n=14 326). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm and early-term birth rates overall and by mode of delivery (spontaneous and indicated). Risk factors were maternal sociodemographic characteristics, previous preterm birth, height, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and smoking, assessed using multinomial regression models with full-term births 39 weeks and over as the reference group. RESULTS: There were 5.5% preterm and 22.5% early-term births. Common risk factors were: a previous preterm delivery (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) 8.2 (95% CI 6.2 to 10.7) and aRRR 2.4 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.0), respectively), short stature, underweight (overall and in spontaneous deliveries), obesity (in indicated deliveries only), a low educational level and Sub-Saharan African origin. In contrast, primiparity was a risk factor only for preterm birth, aRRR 1.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.2), while higher parity was associated with greater risk of early-term birth. CONCLUSIONS: Most population-level risk factors were common to both preterm and early-term birth with the exception of primiparity, and BMI which differed by mode of onset of delivery. Our results suggest that preterm and early-term birth share similar aetiologies and thus potentially common strategies for prevention.


Assuntos
Idade Gestacional , Nascido Vivo/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Escolaridade , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Obesidade/complicações , Razão de Chances , Paridade , Gravidez , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Magreza , Adulto Jovem
9.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 42(1): 109-116, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27831958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of labor epidural analgesia is difficult to explore, as it includes the maternal satisfaction with analgesia as well as the overall childbirth experience. In this population-based study, we sought to identify factors associated with the effectiveness of epidural analgesia for labor pain relief. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey, a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of births in France. All participants who gave birth with an epidural analgesia were included. Effectiveness of epidural analgesia was assessed 2 to 3 days after delivery and intended to include analgesic efficacy and maternal satisfaction together. The factors analyzed were anesthetic management and maternal, obstetrical, and organizational characteristics, using a logistic regression with random effects model. RESULTS: Among the 9337 women who gave birth with an epidural analgesia and were included, 8377 (89.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 88.7-89.9) considered their epidural to be very or fairly effective. In the multivariate analysis, effectiveness was significantly associated with the use of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.2 [1.0-1.5]; P = 0.02) and delivery in private maternity facilities (aOR = 1.3 [1.1-1.6]); it was significantly less effective in obese women (aOR = 0.6 [0.5-0.8]) and multiparous women not receiving oxytocin during labor (aOR = 0.4 [0.4-0.6]) as compared with nonobese and nulliparous women with oxytocin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At the population level, most women found epidural analgesia effective for labor pain relief, but specific attention should be paid to obese parturients and multiparous women not receiving oxytocin. High epidural effectiveness with patient-controlled analgesia should promote an increased use of this method.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Dor do Parto/diagnóstico , Dor do Parto/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Vigilância da População , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Dor do Parto/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(6): 986-995, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486364

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between the planned mode of delivery and neonatal mortality and morbidity in an unselected population of women with twin pregnancies. METHODS: The JUmeaux MODe d'Accouchement (JUMODA) study was a national prospective population-based cohort study. All women with twin pregnancies and their neonates born at or after 32 weeks of gestation with a cephalic first twin were recruited in 176 maternity units in France from February 2014 to March 2015. The primary outcome was a composite of intrapartum mortality and neonatal mortality and morbidity. Comparisons were performed according to the planned mode of delivery, planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery. The primary analysis to control for potential indication bias used propensity score matching. Subgroup analyses were conducted, one according to gestational age at delivery and one after exclusion of high-risk pregnancies. RESULTS: Among 5,915 women enrolled in the study, 1,454 (24.6%) had planned cesarean and 4,461 (75.4%) planned vaginal deliveries, of whom 3,583 (80.3%) delivered both twins vaginally. In the overall population, composite neonatal mortality and morbidity was increased in the planned cesarean compared with the planned vaginal delivery group (5.2% compared with 2.2%; odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.86-3.05). After matching, neonates born after planned cesarean compared with planned vaginal delivery had higher composite neonatal mortality and morbidity rates (5.3% compared with 3.0%; OR 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.29-2.67). Differences in composite mortality and morbidity rates applied to neonates born before but not after 37 weeks of gestation. Multivariate and subgroup analyses after exclusion of high-risk pregnancies found similar trends. CONCLUSION: Planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancies with a cephalic first twin at or after 32 weeks of gestation was associated with low composite neonatal mortality and morbidity. Moreover, planned cesarean compared with planned vaginal delivery before 37 weeks of gestation might be associated with increased composite neonatal mortality and morbidity.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Gêmeos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/mortalidade , Masculino , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/mortalidade , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos
11.
Fertil Steril ; 105(4): 978-987.e4, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26746132

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. DESIGN: Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. INTERVENTION(S): Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. RESULT(S): After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (-1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (-1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. CONCLUSION(S): Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women.


Assuntos
Endometriose/diagnóstico , Endometriose/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor/tendências , Qualidade de Vida , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/tendências , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Endometriose/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Infertilidade Feminina/psicologia , Medição da Dor/psicologia , Dor Pélvica/diagnóstico , Dor Pélvica/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA