Association between undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea and severe course of COVID-19: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with many long-term health consequences. We hypothesized that previously unrecognized and untreated OSA may be associated with more severe respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in the Pulmonology Department with confirmed COVID-19, University Hospital in Kraków, Poland, between September 2020 and April 2021 were enrolled. OSA screening questionnaires including Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP-BANG, Berlin questionaire (BQ), OSA-50, and No-SAS were completed. Polygraphy was performed after > 24 h without requirement for supplemental oxygen. RESULTS: Of 125 patients with median age of 61.0 years, 71% of whom were male. OSA was diagnosed in 103 patients (82%) and was categorized as mild, moderate, and severe in 41 (33%), 30 (24%), and 32 (26%), respectively. Advanced respiratory support was introduced in 85 patients (68%), and 8 (7%) patients eventually required intubation. Multivariable analysis revealed that increased risk of requirement for advanced respiratory support was associated with higher respiratory event index (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.07), oxygen desaturation index (OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.10), and hypoxic burden (1.02 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03) and lower minimal SpO2 (OR 0.89, 95%CI 0.81 to 0.98), but not with results of OSA screening tools like BQ score (OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.38 to 1.16), STOP-BANG score (OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.51 to 1.01), NoSAS score (OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.18), or OSA50 score (OR 0.84, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.01). CONCLUSION: Previously undiagnosed OSA was common among hospitalized patients who survived the acute phase of COVID-19. The degree of OSA was associated with the severity of respiratory failure.

Bronchial epithelial cell transcriptome shows endotype heterogeneity of asthma in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is currently classified as a type-2 (T2) immune-mediated disease characterized by asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, and hypersensitivity to cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize immunological endotypes of N-ERD based on the gene expression profile in the bronchial epithelium. METHODS: mRNA transcriptome (mRNA-sequencing) was analyzed in bronchial brushings from patients with N-ERD (n = 22), those with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-tolerant asthma (NTA, n = 21), and control subjects (n = 11). Additionally, lipid and protein mediators were measured in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). RESULTS: Initial analysis of the entire asthma group revealed 2 distinct gene expression signatures: "T2-high" with increased expression of T2-related genes (eg, CLCA1, CST1), and "proinflammatory" characterized by the expression of innate immunity (eg, FOSB, EGR3) and IL-17A response genes. These endotypes showed similar prevalence in N-ERD and NTA (eg, T2-high: 33% and 32%, respectively). T2-high asthma was characterized by increased expression of mast cell and eosinophil markers, goblet cell hyperplasia, and elevated LTE4 and PGD2 in BALF. Patients with a proinflammatory endotype showed mainly neutrophilic inflammation and increased innate immunity mediators in BALF. Furthermore, the proinflammatory signature was associated with a more severe course of asthma and marked airway obstruction. These signatures could be recreated in vitro by exposure of bronchial epithelial cells to IL-13 (T2-high) and IL-17A (proinflammatory). CONCLUSIONS: T2-high signature was found only in one-third of patients with N-ERD, which was similar to what was found in patients with NTA. The proinflammatory endotype, which also occurred in N-ERD, suggests a novel mechanism of severe disease developing on a non-T2 background.

The impact of clinical and psychological factors on asthma control: the experience of a single asthma center in Poland.

OBJECTIVE: The asthma control test (ACT) is commonly used to identify patients with uncontrolled asthma. The goal of this study was to determine whether clinical parameters such as asthma history and medications, exacerbation rate, comorbidities, lung function, and socioeconomic status are risk factors for uncontrolled asthma assessed with the ACT, and to evaluate the psychological status of controlled and uncontrolled asthmatics. METHODS: Adult asthmatics (n = 104) were recruited from a single asthma center, Poland. Asthma control was assessed with the ACT, using <20 as the cutoff point for uncontrolled asthma. Data on clinical factors were collected and spirometry was performed. Patients completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, General Health Questionnaire, Acceptance of Illness Scale, Life Orientation Test-Revised, and Eysenck's Personality Inventory. RESULTS: Asthma was uncontrolled in 42.3% of patients. Asthma exacerbations in the preceding 12 months and high inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) doses were identified as independent risk factors for uncontrolled asthma. Uncontrolled asthmatics had a significantly worse psychological status than controlled asthmatics. The groups did not differ in terms of personality traits, but in the controlled asthma group numerous significant correlations between psychological factors and personality traits were observed. In the uncontrolled asthma group, however, the occurrence of correlations between personality traits and other psychological variables was rarer. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified independent risk factors for uncontrolled asthma, namely, exacerbations in the recent 12 months and treatment with high-dose ICS. Uncontrolled asthmatics have a significantly worse psychological status than controlled asthmatics, irrespective of personality traits.

Effect of omalizumab on bronchoalveolar lavage matrix metalloproteinases in severe allergic asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Airway inflammation in asthma is accompanied by reconstruction of the bronchial wall extracellular matrix that most likely occurs with a contribution of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Recently we have reported that omalizumab may decrease reticular basement membrane (RBM) thickness together with fibronectin deposits in asthmatic airways, although mechanisms involved are unknown. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we have investigated the impact of omalizumab on MMPs concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) of asthmatic subjects in relation to airway remodeling changes in histology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 13 severe allergic asthmatics treated with omalizumab for at least 12 months. In each subject, clinical and laboratory parameters, bronchoscopy with BAL, and endobronchial biopsy were evaluated before and after the biologic therapy. RBM thickness, fibronectin, and collagen deposits in bronchial mucosa specimens were analyzed in histology. The investigations also included BAL cytology and BAL concentrations of MMP-2, -3, and -9. RESULTS: Omalizumab was related to a decrease in all measured MMPs in BAL (p < 0.001, each), although such declines were not observed in each patient. The depletions were associated with a lower asthma exacerbation rate and better asthma control. Interestingly, patients who showed a decline in at least one MMP (n = 10, 77%) were characterized by a higher decrease in the RBM thickness (-1.61 [-2.02 to -0.6] vs. -0.06 [-0.09 to +3.3], p = 0.03). Likewise, individuals with lower concentrations of MMP-9 after omalizumab (n = 7, 58%) had a greater reduction in the RBM layer as compared to those with steady MMP-9 levels (-1.8 [-2.4 to -1.14] vs. -0.13 [-0.6 to -0.06] µm, p = 0.03). Moreover, the latter group also had unfavorable higher collagen I accumulation after biologic (42 [20 to 55] vs. 0 [-10 to 20]%, respectively, p = 0.03). Higher concentrations of MMPs in BAL at baseline were related to the lower systemic steroid dose and better omalizumab response concerning the decline in RBM thickness. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that omalizumab therapy is associated with decreased BAL MMPs concentration in the subgroup of asthma patients. The decline was linked with a reduction in the RBM thickness what might play a beneficial role in airway remodeling.

Heterogeneity of lower airway inflammation in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) asthma is characterized by chronic rhinosinusitis and intolerance of aspirin and other COX1 inhibitors. Clinical data point to a heterogeneity within the N-ERD phenotype. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate immune mediator profiles in the lower airways of patients with N-ERD. METHODS: Levels of cytokines (determined by using Luminex assay) and eicosanoids (determined by using mass spectrometry) were measured in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from patients with N-ERD (n = 22), patients with NSAID-tolerant asthma (n = 21), and control subjects (n = 11). mRNA expression in BALF cells was quantified by using TaqMan low-density arrays. RESULTS: Lower airway eosinophilia was more frequent in N-ERD (54.5%) than in NSAID-tolerant asthma (9.5% [P = .009]). The type-2 (T2) immune signature of BALF cells was more pronounced in the eosinophilic subphenotype of N-ERD. Similarly, BALF concentrations of periostin and CCL26 were significantly increased in eosinophilic N-ERD and correlated with T2 signature in BALF cells. Multiparameter analysis of BALF mediators of all patients with asthma revealed the presence of 2 immune endotypes: T2-like (with an elevated level of periostin in BALF) and non-T2/proinflammatory (with higher levels of matrix metalloproteinases and inflammatory cytokines). Patients with N-ERD were classified mostly as having the T2 endotype (68%). Changes in eicosanoid profile (eg, increased leukotriene E4 level) were limited to patients with N-ERD with airway eosinophilia. Blood eosinophilia appeared to be a useful predictor of airway T2 signature (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83); however, surrogate biomarkers had moderate performance in distinguishing eosinophilic N-ERD (for blood eosinophils, AUC = 0.72; for periostin, AUC = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Lower airway immune profiles show considerable heterogeneity of N-ERD, with skewing toward T2 response and eosinophilic inflammation. Increased production of leukotriene E4 was restricted to a subgroup of patients with eosinophilia in the lower airway.

The influence of self-assessment of asthma control on the Asthma Control Test outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The Asthma Control Test (ACT) consists of five items, one of which is self-assessment of asthma control. The goal of this study was to compare the responses to the first four ACT items with the response to the fifth item and determine whether this response affects the final ACT score. METHODS: Adult asthmatics (n = 417) were recruited from a specialty asthma center in Poland. Clinical data were collected by questionnaire. Spirometry and skin prick tests were performed for clinical evaluation. Asthma control was assessed through the ACT. The cutoff point for uncontrolled asthma was <20 points. RESULTS: Asthma was uncontrolled in 42.5% of patients. Based upon scores of the first four ACT items, three clusters of patients were identified. Cluster 1 comprised very well-controlled asthmatics [mean (sd) ACT total score 24.7 (0.7)]. Cluster 2 included both controlled and uncontrolled asthmatics [ACT total score 20.1 (2.5)]. Cluster 3 comprised poorly controlled asthmatics [ACT total score 12.1 (2.9)]. Misjudgment of asthma control in the fifth ACT item had no impact on the ACT total score in clusters 1 and 3. In cluster 2, the response to this item caused misclassification in 10.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with either very well or very poorly controlled asthma, the response to the fifth ACT item did not alter the assignment into the appropriate asthma control group. Only in a small group of patients with a total ACT score of approximately 20 points did the asthma group classification result in either controlled or uncontrolled.

Omalizumab may decrease the thickness of the reticular basement membrane and fibronectin deposit in the bronchial mucosa of severe allergic asthmatics.

Introduction: Immunoglobulin E is an important modulator of the inflammatory reaction in allergic asthma. It also contributes to airway remodeling in the course of the disease. The authors evaluated airway structural changes in severe allergic asthma during the omalizumab therapy. Patients and methods: The study included 13 patients with severe allergic asthma treated with omalizumab for at least one year. In each patient clinical, laboratory, and spirometry parameters were evaluated before and after the treatment. In addition, bronchoscopy with bronchial mucosa biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage was performed. The basal lamina thickness, inflammatory cell infiltration, fibronectin, as well as type I and III collagen accumulation were assessed in bronchial mucosa specimens, together with the assessment of bronchoalveolar lavage cellularity. Results: The omalizumab therapy led to a decrease in the basal lamina thickness (p = 0.002), and to a reduction in fibronectin (p = 0.02), but not collagen deposits in the bronchial mucosa. The decrease in fibronectin accumulation was associated with an improvement in asthma control and quality of life (p = 0.01, both), and a diminished dose of systemic corticosteroids (p = 0.001). It was also associated with a tendency towards reduction of the eosinophil count in the peripheral blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and bronchial mucosa specimens. Conclusion: Our study has shown that omalizumab, effective in the treatment of severe allergic asthma, may also decrease unfavorable structural airway changes in allergic asthmatics, at least with respect to the fibronectin deposit and an increased thickness of the basal lamina. However, more extensive observational studies are needed to verify the above hypothesis.

The role of questionnaires in the assessment of asthma control.

The achievement and the maintenance of asthma control is currently considered the main goal of asthma treatment. Recent guidelines recommend regular assessment of asthma control and indicate questionnaires as important tools that can facilitate its evaluation. Questionnaires relate to GINA or NAEPP guidelines. Questionnaires constitute complex numerical or categorical scales and consist of several to over a dozen questions relating to the patient's symptoms of asthma, limitations in daily activities and usage of rescue medications within a period of time. Each questionnaire is characterized by the features that affect its reliability and usefulness. In the following paper we discuss most of the questionnaires which assess asthma control. We focus on the items they include and present the results of studies that prove the effectiveness of individual questionnaires in assessment of asthma control. Attention was drawn to the patient groups to which the questionnaires are addressed. We list the features of the questionnaire which should be considered before choosing a test, so that it satisfies both the doctor's and the patient's needs. The role of questionnaires as the easy-to-use tools is growing steadily. Unfortunately, not all are available in Polish language. Conducting appropriate validation studies may allow to use many of them in Polish conditions.

A clinical profile and factors associated with severity of the disease among Polish patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 - an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the greatest clinical challenges of the last decades. Clinical factors associated with severity of the disease remain unclear. The aim of the study was to characterize Polish patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 and to evaluate potential prognostic factors of severe course of the disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational study was conducted from March to July 2020 in the Pulmonology and Allergology Department of the University Hospital in Kraków, Poland. Consecutive patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) infection were enrolled, and data about past medical history, signs and symptoms, laboratory results, imaging studies results, in-hospital management and outcomes was prospectively gathered. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 100 patients at the mean age of 59.2 (SD 16.1) years among whom 63 (63.0%) were male. Among them 10 (10.0%) died, 47 (47%) presented respiratory failure, 15 (15.0%) were transferred to the intensive care unit, 17 (17.0%) developed acute kidney injury, 7 (7.0%) had sepsis and 10 (10.0%) were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism. Multivariable analysis revealed age (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.01-1.15), body mass index (BMI; OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.01-1.53), modified early warning score (MEWS; OR 3.95; 95% CI 1.48-12), the highest d-dimer value (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.03-2.9) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03-1.3) to be associated with severe course of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This observational study showed that almost half of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 developed respiratory failure in the course of the disease. Increasing age, BMI, MEWS, d-dimer value and LDH concentration were associated with the severity of COVID-19.

Influence of omalizumab therapy on airway remodeling assessed with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in severe allergic asthma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Airway remodeling is an important factor in persistent obstruction in severe asthma. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is an effective method of detecting changes in airway structure. Our aim was to use HRCT to assess changes in airway remodeling in patients with severe allergic asthma who are treated with omalizumab. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 12 patients with severe allergic asthma, HRCT was performed before and after treatment with omalizumab. In selected bronchi airways, parameters were calculated: bronchial wall area (BA), also corrected for body surface area (BSA); percentage of wall area (WA%); and the ratio of luminal area to total bronchial area (Ai/Ao). Clinical response to treatment was assessed using an asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ), and number of exacerbations per year. Assessment included spirometry and blood eosinophilia. RESULTS: Treatment resulted in significant improvement in ACQ (p = 0.035) and AQLQ (p = 0.001). We observed significant reduction in exacerbations per year (p = 0.002) and reduction of daily systemic steroid dose (p = 0.032). FEV1 and peripheral blood eospinophilia did not change (p = 0.846 and p = 0.221). Airway dimensions (Ai/Ao) of particular bronchi were consistent with the mean of the parameters calculated for all bronchi measured. Although we observed a significant decrease in WA (p = 0.002) and WA/BSA (p = 0.002), WA% and Ai/Ao did not improve (p = 0.39 and p = 0.49). We found no correlations between changes in airways and changes in spirometry or clinical parameters. CONCLUSION: Despite clinical effectiveness of omalizumab, its effect on airway remodeling may be limited.