Diuretics for heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Diuretics are regarded as the first-line treatment for patients with congestive heart failure since they provide symptomatic relief. The effects of diuretics on disease progression and survival remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the harms and benefits of diuretics for chronic heart failure SEARCH METHODS: Updated searches were run in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL Issue 1 of 4, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to 22 February 2011), EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 07) and HERDIN database (1990 to February 2011). We hand searched pertinent journals and reference lists of papers were inspected. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Double-blinded randomised controlled trials of diuretic therapy comparing one diuretic with placebo, or one diuretic with another active agent (e.g. ACE inhibitors, digoxin) in patients with chronic heart failure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently abstracted the data and assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of each trial. Extracted data were analysed by determining the odds ratio for dichotomous data, and difference in means for continuous data, of the treated group compared with controls. The likelihood of heterogeneity of the study population was assessed by the Chi-square test. If there was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity and pooling of results was clinically appropriate, a combined estimate was obtained using the fixed-effects model. MAIN RESULTS: This update has not identified any new studies for inclusion. The review includes 14 trials (525 participants), 7 were placebo-controlled, and 7 compared diuretics against other agents such as ACE inhibitors or digoxin. We analysed the data for mortality and for worsening heart failure. Mortality data were available in 3 of the placebo-controlled trials (202 participants). Mortality was lower for participants treated with diuretics than for placebo, odds ratio (OR) for death 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.83; P = 0.02. Admission for worsening heart failure was reduced in those taking diuretics in two trials (169 participants), OR 0.07 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.52; P = 0.01). In four trials comparing diuretics to active control (91 participants), diuretics improved exercise capacity in participants with CHF, difference in means WMD 0.72 , 95% CI 0.40 to 1.04; P < 0.0001. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available data from several small trials show that in patients with chronic heart failure, conventional diuretics appear to reduce the risk of death and worsening heart failure compared to placebo. Compared to active control, diuretics appear to improve exercise capacity.

A survey of breast cancer awareness and knowledge in a Western population: lots of light but little illumination.

There are conflicting data on breast cancer awareness and knowledge in specific population groups. We assessed awareness and knowledge of breast cancer in the general Irish population to identify sources of information on breast cancer and determine factors associated with knowledge and awareness of the disease. Participants (n=2355, 53% female) completed a multi-part questionnaire. Most (81%) had seen or heard something about breast cancer in the recent past and knowledge of symptoms and treatment was good overall. However, 66% of females overestimated their risk of developing disease, 88% underestimated the age at which it was most likely to develop and 56% underestimated 5-year survival. Knowledge of incidence and survival was higher in males (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.3, 95% Confidence Interval (CI); 1.1-1.5), participants with higher education (1.5; 1.2-1.7) and those who received information from television (1.3; 1.1-1.5). Ignorance regarding incidence, outcome and risk makes it unlikely that the general public or at risk females could currently make informed decisions on a range of breast cancer issues.

Review of the If selective channel inhibitor ivabradine in the treatment of chronic stable angina.

Coronary heart disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries, and its prevalence is predicted to grow as the population ages. Current drugs for chronic stable angina (such as beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, long- and short-acting nitrates, and potassium-channel activators) are often effective, either as monotherapy or in combination, but side effects and contraindications may limit their use. The "I(f)" (for "funny") channel, discovered in 1979, is expressed mainly in the membrane of pacemaker cells present in the sinus node, the atrioventricular node, the ventricular conduction pathways, and ventricular myocytes. By determining the slope of diastolic depolarization, which in turn controls action potential frequency, it is a key determinant of heart rate and so provides a new therapeutic target for controlling angina symptoms. A new antiangina drug, ivabradine, has been developed and licensed for clinical use. It exclusively reduces the heart rate by selectively blocking the I(f) channel of the sino-atrial node. As clinical trials have shown it to be remarkably well-tolerated, ivabradine offers an alternative for patients who cannot take, or are intolerant of, beta blockade. This review provides an insight into this new agent, its historical background, mechanism of action, and pathophysiologic basis, and provides up-to-date evidence-based information on its optimum use in stable angina.