Nutritional management of patients with oesophageal cancer throughout the treatment trajectory: benchmarking against best practice.

PURPOSE: Oesophageal cancer (OC) impacts nutritional status and outcomes. This study aims to benchmark the current nutrition management of patients with OC against best practice recommendations, identify critical points in the treatment trajectory where nutritional status is compromised, service gaps and opportunities for improvement. METHODS: A retrospective audit collected demographic, medical and nutritional data from medical records of patients who received curative treatment for OC at a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patient records were audited over the time period. Twenty-nine patients underwent nutrition screening on admission to the service. Eighteen out of 25 patients receiving neoadjuvant radiation therapy, all patients during surgical admission, and only 19 patients at postsurgical discharge were seen by a dietitian. All patients received tube feeding post-operatively; however, initiation within 24 h only occurred for 14 patients. Weight significantly declined over the course of treatment (p < 0.001), whilst malnutrition during surgical admission (p = 0.004) and postsurgical discharge (p = 0.038) were both associated with significantly higher unplanned readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Best practice recommendations were met for aspects of the immediate post-operative period; however, service gaps remain during pre-operative and post-discharge care. Findings from this study indicate that nutritional care is inconsistent across different treatment stages, and malnutrition impacts negatively on unplanned readmission. Research is needed to address evidence-practice gaps, assess appropriateness of recommendations and provide evidence for models of care during multimodality treatments and across different services.

Physical activity estimated by the bone-specific physical activity questionnaire is also associated with cardiovascular risk.

The nature of physical activity that benefits bone is traditionally thought to differ from that benefiting cardiovascular health. Accordingly, exercise recommendations for improving bone health and cardiovascular health are largely incongruent. Our aim was to determine the associations between high-impact physical activity participation and both cardiovascular disease risk factors and bone mass. We recruited 94 men and women (age 34.0 ± 13.3 years) to undergo measures of cardiovascular disease risk (BMI, total cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, waist-to-hip ratio, and mean arterial pressure) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA XR-800, Norland) measures of bone mass (femoral neck, lumbar spine, and whole body BMD) and body composition (whole body lean mass and fat mass). Physical activity participation was estimated using the bone-specific physical activity questionnaire (BPAQ). Those in the upper tertile for current BPAQ score exhibited lower total cholesterol, waist-to-hip ratio, and mean arterial pressure than those in the lower tertiles (P < 0.05) with the relationship being mild-to-moderate (r = -0.49 to 0.29, P < 0.01). Those in the upper tertile for BPAQ score also had greater lumbar spine BMD than those in the lower tertile (P = 0.008), with BPAQ score predicting 6% of the variance in BMD (P = 0.02). We conclude that high-impact physical activity as captured by the BPAQ may be beneficial for both bone health and for attenuating cardiovascular disease risk.