RESUMO
As an abundant H2-rich byproduct from coking production, coke oven gas (COG) is a favorable feedstock for ammonia production. Recently, three COG-based ammonia processes have been applied, including single process, coproduction of ammonia with methanol, and coproduction of ammonia with liquefied natural gas (LNG). To systematically evaluate the environmental impacts of three COG routes, a comparative life cycle assessment was conducted with industrial data. Besides, the effects of ammonia synthesis pressure and electricity sources to the total LCA result were discussed. The results indicate that the environmental impacts of COG-based single ammonia route are mainly generated from ammonia production stage, accounting for 69.63 % of the overall normalized results, in which electricity and COG are the dominated contributors. Therefore, employing electricity from renewables like wind, solar, hydro and nuclear could dramatically mitigate the environmental impacts with a reduction of 36.3 %-70.7 % in most environmental indicators. Scenario analysis proves that reducing synthesis pressure from 31.4 MPa to 15 MPa does not show remarkable environmental benefits as expected since higher pressure is more conducive to ammonia synthesis. In comparison with coal based and natural gas-based ammonia routes, COG routes have obvious energy-saving benefit. In three COG-based ammonia routes, the two coproduction routes accounted for 49.1 % and 78.6 % of the energy depletion as single production due to highly efficient utilization of resources and energy. Coproduction of ammonia with methanol route exhibits better environmental performance than these in coproduction of ammonia with LNG route. Therefore, coproduction of ammonia with methanol route is more favorable in COG to ammonia processes. This study intends to provide a valuable reference for COG utilization and ammonia production options through the life cycle aspect.