Carcinoma of unknown primary with gastrointestinal profile: immunohistochemistry and survival data for this favorable subset.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of unknown primary with a "gastrointestinal profile" is an emerging, favorable entity. Distinguishing this entity is of increasing significance given the progress in the treatment of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 74 carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) patients with CDX2+ tumors were chosen from the databases at M.D. Anderson and Sarah Cannon Cancer Centers between 2004 and 2010. Data on clinical and pathological characteristics including therapy and survival were recorded. RESULTS: 20 patients had ascites on presentation; the predominant sites of metastases included liver (30 %), carcinomatosis (50 %), and nodes (51 %). Based on immunohistochemistry, 2 cohorts were created: Cohort 1-"consistent with lower GI profile" included 34 patients [CDX-2+, CK20+, CK7-] and Cohort 2-"probable lower GI profile" included 40 patients [CDX2+, irrespective of CK7/CK20 status]. Excluding 6 outliers, Cohorts 1 and 2 had 32 and 36 patients, respectively; their median survivals were 37 and 21 months, respectively. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, only liver metastases were found to negatively influence survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study provides encouraging indications that CUP patients with gastrointestinal profiles benefit from site-specific therapy. We recommend all CUP patients, especially those with abdominal nodes, isolated carcinomatosis or liver metastases, to undergo optimal immunohistochemistry (IHC) to check for a gastrointestinal profile of CUP.

Phase II trial of taxol, an active drug in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Taxol, an antimicrotubule agent, has shown promise for efficacy in treatment of breast cancer, but severe hypersensitivity reactions led to cessation of many phase I clinical trials. Consequently, investigators and the National Cancer Institute recommended that phase I and II studies of this agent use 24-hour infusions and antiallergic medications. Using a premedication regimen effective in preventing hypersensitivity reactions, we have performed a phase II trial of taxol in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Taxol was administered to 25 patients at a dose of 250 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion every 21 days. These patients had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen, either adjuvant to surgery or for metastatic disease; all but two had received doxorubicin. In 60% of the patients, the dominant site of disease was the viscera. All patients were assessable. In April 1991, at a median time on study of 9 months (range, 5-13+ months), the objective response rate was 56% (12% complete and 44% partial; 95% confidence interval, 35%-76%). Disease progressed in only 8% of the patients. The median number of courses of therapy was 11. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect, but neutropenia with fever occurred in only 5% of 232 courses. A chronic glove-and-stocking neuropathy developed in most patients, but no allergic reactions occurred. We conclude that taxol is an active agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and that it warrants continued study. Currently, we are conducting a phase I trial of taxol plus doxorubicin. Future trials should address the optimal effective dose, the optimal sequencing of combinations, mechanisms of drug resistance in tumors, and dose-limiting toxic effects (particularly cardiac toxic effects of taxol given as a single agent or in drug combinations).

Phase II study of taxol in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Taxol, a complex plant product (a diterpene) extracted from the bark of Taxus brevifolia, has demonstrated substantial anticancer activity in ovarian and breast cancers, malignant melanoma, and acute myelogenous leukemia. Due to allergic reactions in phase I and early phase II studies, use of a 24-hour infusion of taxol with prophylactic dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine has been recommended. PURPOSE: In this phase II study, we attempted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of taxol in patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer who had never received chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were not excluded because of prior surgery or because of radiotherapy administered more than 4 weeks before study entry. Taxol was administered in the hospital at a dose of 200 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 24 hours and repeated every 3 weeks, provided that patients had recovered from any toxic effects. Dexamethasone, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine were given before chemotherapy to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Therapy was continued for at least two courses unless there was rapid disease progression and for at least three courses if no change was observed and no grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred. Treatment was continued for six more courses after maximum response or for two more courses after complete remission but was discontinued if disease progressed. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients entered in the study, 25 were assessable for toxic effects and response. One patient had an allergic reaction that was not life threatening. The overall response rate was 24% (one complete response and five partial responses). An additional seven patients (28%) had minor response. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect, and neutropenic fever occurred in eight of 118 courses. One additional patient developed neutropenic sepsis with hypotension but recovered with intensive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Taxol appears to have activity against non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. IMPLICATIONS: A phase II study combining taxol, etoposide, and cisplatin and using hematopoietic stimulating factors is now proposed. The optimal dose for combination chemotherapy has yet to be determined. An important consideration is potential cardiac effects of taxol with other drugs.

Phase I trial and clinical pharmacology of elsamitrucin.

Elsamitrucin (BMY-28090) is an antitumor antibiotic first described in 1985 that has significant oncolytic activity against a number of murine tumors including P388, L1210, B16 and M5076, as well as against MX1 and HCT116 xenografts. Preclinical toxicology studies of elsamitrucin revealed edema of multiple organs associated with hypoproteinemia and, at lethal doses, severe multiorgan toxicity. We conducted a phase I clinical trial (31 patients) of elsamitrucin administered as a 10-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. The starting dose (0.6 mg/m2) was 1/3 of the dog low toxic dose. The maximum tolerated dose was 30 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity was reversible hepatic dysfunction manifested by elevated transaminase levels not associated with bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, or lactate dehydrogenase elevations. Other toxicities included nausea, vomiting, malaise, and phlebitis. Because the hepatic toxicity was brief and reversible, a subsequent study (18 patients) was conducted with elsamitrucin administered every 2 weeks. Reversible grade 3 hepatotoxicity was again observed at 30 mg/m2. Plasma and urine samples from patients receiving doses of 0.6-36 mg/m2 were analyzed for drug content. The maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve values increased linearly with doses up to 25 mg/m2 but not at higher doses. The terminal half-lives, total body clearances, and volume of distribution were 36-60 h, 10-19 liters/h/m2, and 400-1100 liters/m2, respectively. Less than 5% was excreted in the urine in 24 h as parent compound. Bile was collected from one patient with an indwelling biliary catheter. Approximately 22% of the dose was excreted in 48 h, suggesting that biliary excretion of elsamitrucin may be an important route of drug elimination. Based on reversible hepatic toxicity, the phase II recommended dose of elsamitrucin is 25 mg/m2 every 2 weeks.

Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of liposome-entrapped cis-bis-neodecanoato-trans-R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum(II).

cis-Bis-neodecanoato-trans-R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexaneplatinum++ +(II) (NDDP) is a liposome dependent cisplatin analogue since the liposome carrier is required for its i.v. administration and for its biological activity. A Phase I study of liposome entrapped NDDP (L-NDDP) was performed using a single i.v. injection every 4 weeks. L-NDDP was prepared and characterized at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The maximum tolerated dose of L-NDDP was 312.5 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, affecting all three blood cell lineages. The granulocyte nadir occurred on days 14-18, and the platelet nadir consistently earlier (days 11-12). The median day of recovery of blood cell counts was day 21 (range, 18-32). Other toxicities included grade 2 nausea and vomiting, fever consisting of a single temperature spike in most patients, grade 1 diarrhea after 60% of courses, and grade 1-2 malaise lasting for 5-10 days after the infusion in 73% of courses. Transient alanine aminotransferase elevations without clinical relevance were common. No signs of renal dysfunction or ototoxicity were observed. One patient with a preexisting peripheral neuropathy showed some progression of the neuropathy after a cumulative dose of 1605 mg/m2. Except for fever and transient liver dysfunction, no liposome related side effects were observed in spite of the high doses of lipid administered. The blood clearance of L-NDDP fits a two-compartment model at lower doses and a single-compartment model at the maximum tolerated dose, suggesting that saturation of the reticuloendothelial organs occurs at the maximum tolerated dose. Two minimal responses were observed. L-NDDP has a toxicity profile similar to that of carboplatin. Phase II studies to address the issue of how the therapeutic index of platinum compounds is affected by liposome entrapment are being planned.

Design and results of phase I cancer clinical trials: three-year experience at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: Alternatives to the standard design for conducting phase I trials are proposed with increasing frequency. This study was undertaken to determine how phase I trials are currently conducted and to provide a basis for evaluation of evolving methodology. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All published phase I trials from a single institution over a 3-year period were reviewed to determine the method of selection of the recommended dose for a phase II trial of a new agent, type and extent of toxicity, number of patients treated at the recommended dose, and clinical response. RESULTS: All 23 published trials used the standard method of entering cohorts of patients at increasing dose levels and observing toxic effects to determine the dose recommended for phase II study. Among 610 patients, 26% were treated at or within 10% of the recommended dose and 35% were treated with less than 50% of the recommended dose or on a trial that yielded no recommended dose. Among 18 trials using agents previously tested in humans, fewer patients were treated at much less than the recommended dose. For trials in which myelosuppression was dose-limiting, the estimated probability of serious myelosuppression associated with the recommended dose ranged from 23% to 66%. Nineteen patients (3%) responded to therapy. CONCLUSION: This summary of phase I trials recently conducted at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center confirms the need for alternative methods, provides baseline information against which alternatively conducted trials can be compared, and demonstrates some practical clinical trial issues not generally considered when alternative methods are proposed.

Analysis of a diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected tumors of unknown origin.

PURPOSE: Diagnostic strategies designed to identify the underlying primary malignancies in patients with unknown primary tumors (UPTs) have relied on retrospective analyses. We analyzed 879 consecutive patients referred with suspected UPTs to determine the yield and cost of a limited diagnostic evaluation, assess the contribution of specific studies to diagnosis, and analyze the survival patterns of patients in whom the primary tumor was diagnosed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients with a suspected UPT were entered into a computerized data base, and the patients underwent a predefined limited diagnostic evaluation. Primary malignancies were diagnosed by pathologic review alone or by pathologic criteria plus a physical or radiographic finding. Survival was measured from diagnosis, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared using the Cox-Mantel log-rank test. RESULTS: A primary tumor was found in 179 of 879 patients (20%). The survival duration of patients in whom the primary tumor was diagnosed was superior to that of patients in whom the primary tumor remained unknown. Specific patient subsets contributed most to the improved survival duration of the group in which the primary tumor was found, including lymphoma patients diagnosed solely by pathologic criteria and female patients with primary breast or ovarian cancer. The cost of diagnosis was mostly due to the extensive use of computed tomography. Except for ovarian cancer, computed tomography rarely identified treatable primary tumors. CONCLUSION: The limited diagnostic evaluation used in this study identified patients with treatable malignancies and increased the survival duration of a population of suspected UPT patients. Primary malignancies with the best survival can be diagnosed through careful pathologic review and focused evaluations for breast and ovarian cancer in women.

Unknown primary carcinoma: natural history and prognostic factors in 657 consecutive patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the natural history, validate previous observations, and identify prognostic factors in patients with unknown primary carcinoma (UPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients referred to the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center with a preliminary diagnosis of UPC were prospectively identified. A standardized evaluation narrowed the study population to 657 patients with UPC. All data were recorded and computerized for storage, retrieval, and analysis. The primary end point for the study was survival, which was calculated from the first day of patient registration. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Cox-Mantel log-rank test. To identify important prognostic factors, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The demographics of the UPC patient population mirrored those of the general population of patients referred to our cancer center except for an excess of men among the UPC patients. Most patients had histologic or cytologic evidence of adenocarcinoma and had more than one organ site metastatically involved. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified numerous important prognostic factors with a significant influence on survival, including sex, number of organ sites involved, specific organ sites involved, and pathologic subtypes. CONCLUSION: This study validated previously identified important prognostic factors for survival in UPC. Additional variables that had an impact on survival were identified and the complex interaction of the factors was explored. As patient numbers increase, this database will be able to provide further analyses of patient subsets and potentially relate specific clinical features to the evolving molecular and biochemical understanding of these malignancies.

Poorly differentiated carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown origin: favorable subsets of patients with unknown-primary carcinoma?

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to assess clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in unselected, consecutive patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 1,400 patients analyzed were referred to our unknown-primary tumor (UPT) clinic from January 1, 1987 through July 31, 1994. Clinical data from these patients were entered into a computerized data base for storage, retrieval, and analysis. Survival was measured from the time of diagnosis; survival distribution was estimated using the product-limit method. Multivariate survival analyses were performed using proportional hazards regression and by recursive partitioning. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy-seven patients were diagnosed with unknown-primary carcinoma (UPC) and 337 of these patients had PDC or PDA. No clinical differences were identified among patients with PDC, PDA, or UPC patients with other carcinoma or adenocarcinoma subtypes. PDC patients enjoyed better survival than PDA patients. Poor cellular differentiation was not an important prognostic variable. Variables predictive of survival included lymph node metastases, sex, number of metastatic sites, histology (PDC v PDA), and age. Although chemotherapy did not appear to influence survival for the entire group of PDC or PDA patients, a subset of patients with good prognostic features experienced median survival durations of up to 40 months. CONCLUSION: The long median survival and chemotherapy responsiveness of UPC patients with PDC and PDA could not be confirmed. However, subpopulations with prolonged median survival durations could be defined, and the value of chemotherapy in this group remains to be determined. Identification and exclusion of treatable or slow-growing malignancies may account for the poor survival of the PDC and PDA patients reported in this study.

Unknown primary tumors metastatic to liver.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to identify prognostic factors for unknown primary tumor (UPT) patients with hepatic metastases, determine the common primary tumors identified, assess the yield of specific diagnostic studies, and evaluate the impact of therapy on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 1,522 patients analyzed were referred from January 1, 1987 through June 30, 1995. Clinical data from these patients were entered into a computerized database for storage, retrieval, and analysis. Survival was measured from the time of diagnosis; survival distribution was estimated by the product limit method. Multivariate survival analyses were performed by proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Five hundred UPT patients had liver metastases. Primary tumors, usually lung, colorectal, or pancreatic neoplasms, were identified in 135 patients (27%). The remaining 365 unknown primary carcinoma (UPC) patients with liver involvement had a higher death rate than those without liver involvement (hazards ratio, 1.63; P < .0001). Neuroendocrine carcinoma patients had a lower death rate than patients without this histology (hazards ratio, 0.29; (P < .0001). Two hundred sixteen of 365 patients with UPC and liver metastases received chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-treated patients had a lower death rate than those who were not treated with chemotherapy (hazards ratio, 0.52; P < .0001). The effect of chemotherapy was most pronounced in patients with adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Hepatic metastases in UPC patients portend a generally poor prognosis. However, subsets of patients with more favorable outcomes can be identified by available clinical and pathologic data. Chemotherapy may be beneficial for the large subset of UPC patients with adenocarcinoma that involves the liver.

Phase I evaluation of all-trans retinoic acid with and without ketoconazole in adults with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: All-trans retinoic acid (RA) induces accelerated plasma all-trans RA clearance, presumably via cytochrome P450 enzymes. This accelerated metabolism has been shown to be inhibited in the short term by the cytochrome P450 inhibitor ketoconazole. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ketoconazole in maintaining plasma all-trans RA levels over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a randomized crossover study design, we randomly assigned six patients to receive all-trans RA (45 mg/m2 orally twice per day for 14 days of a 21-day cycle) for cycle 1 and the same dose of all-trans RA plus ketoconazole (400 mg orally for one dose, then 200 mg orally three times per day for 14 days) for cycle 2, and seven patients to receive the same treatment in the reverse order. Plasma all-trans RA levels were measured during the initial 8-hour period after all-trans RA ingestion on days 1 and 15 of cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: There was a marked decrease in plasma all-trans RA levels after 14 days of treatment, as measured by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), regardless of whether ketoconazole was given (from a baseline value of 857 to 44 ng/mL/h; P = .025) or not (from 1,355 to 308 ng/mL/h; P = .123). This lack of effect on plasma all-trans RA levels was not due to inadequate plasma ketoconazole levels. Ketoconazole administration was associated with more toxicity. No objective tumor responses were observed. CONCLUSION: Ketoconazole does not appear to maintain adequate plasma all-trans RA levels over time.

A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine.

A novel deoxycytidine analog, gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine [dFdC]), has been studied in a phase I clinical and pharmacology trial. Doses ranging from 10 to 1,000 mg/m2 were administered over 30 minutes weekly times 3 weeks every 4 weeks. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 790 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, with thrombocytopenia and anemia quantitatively more important than granulocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal. Two responses in patients with adenocarcinomas of the colon and lung were documented. The maximum dFdC plasma concentration, reached after 15 minutes of infusion, was proportional to the total dose administered. Elimination, due mainly to deamination, was rapid (terminal half-life [t1/2], 8.0 minutes) and dose independent. The deamination product 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) was eliminated with biphasic kinetics characterized by a long terminal phase (t1/2, 14 hours); it was the sole metabolite detected in urine. The concentration of dFdC 5'-triphosphate in circulating mononuclear cells increased in proportion to the dFdC dose at infusions between 35 and 250 mg/m2. No further increment in dFdC 5'-triphosphate (dFdCTP) was observed at higher doses, which resulted in plasma dFdC concentrations greater than 20 mumol/L (350 to 1,000 mg/m2), suggesting saturation of dFdC 5'-phosphate accumulation. The recommended dose for phase II clinical trials in solid tumors is 790 mg/m2/wk.

Phase I evaluation of all-trans-retinoic acid in adults with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Prompted by recent demonstrations that all-trans-retinoic acid (all-trans-RA) had efficacy in acute promyelocytic leukemia, a phase I trial of all-trans-RA was conducted to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) before phase II testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with a histologic or cytologic diagnosis of malignancy other than leukemia were treated with single daily oral doses of all-trans-RA ranging from 45 mg/m2 to 200 mg/m2. Doses of all-trans-RA were escalated in the next cohort of patients until the MTD was determined if the preceding dose level was not associated with significant toxicity. RESULTS: Lung cancer was the most common type of tumor included in the study (26 cases) followed by head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (three cases), and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (two cases); other miscellaneous solid tumors were also represented. Toxicities included cheilitis, skin reactions, headache, and nausea and vomiting, as well as transient elevations of liver enzymes and triglyceride levels. Skin toxicities, consisting of erythema with desquamation and paronychia, were considered to be the dose-limiting toxicity, and were observed in two of six patients who received 175 mg/m2/d, and in two of five patients who received 200 mg/m2/d. Of the 30 patients with assessable lesions, response was evaluated in 26 patients and no major objective tumor response was observed. Two patients were able to receive the drug for longer than 1 year without significant toxicities. There was considerable variation in individual patients' peak plasma all-trans-RA levels, and a decrease in the area under the curve of all-trans-RA plasma concentration was observed in all four patients evaluated. CONCLUSION: For phase II study of adult patients, we recommend 150 mg/m2 of all-trans-RA administered orally once a day. However, for better optimization of drug administration schedules, further studies are needed.

Phase II study of topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with measurable disease in nonradiated fields were eligible. Other eligibility criteria were Zubrod performance status (PS) < or = 2 and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. Of 48 registered patients, 40 were fully assessable. Nineteen patients had adenocarcinoma (AD), 14 squamous carcinoma (SCC), and seven poorly differentiated carcinoma. RESULTS: Six patients (15%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations: 8, 14, 18, 28, 56, and 61 weeks) and four patients a minor response; 10 patients had stable disease and 20 patients progressive disease. The PR rate was 36% (five of 14 patients) in patients with SCC versus 4% (one of 26 patients) in those with other histologies (P = .014). The overall median survival time was 38 weeks and 30% of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 76% and 10% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea (46% and 5%), vomiting (31% and 7%), and fatigue (53% and 16%). CONCLUSION: TPT at the dose and schedule used has moderate antitumor activity in NSCLC; its activity is mostly limited to patients with SCC. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.

Classification and regression tree analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with unknown primary carcinoma.

The clinical features and survival times of patients with unknown primary carcinoma (UPC) are heterogeneous. Therefore, the goals of this study were to apply a novel analytical method to UPC patients to: (a) identify novel prognostic factors; (b) explore the interactions between clinical variables and their impact on survival; and (c) illustrate explicitly how the covariates interact. The 1000 patients analyzed were referred to the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 1987 through November 30, 1994. Clinical data from these patients were entered into a computerized database for storage, retrieval, and analysis. Multivariate analyses of survival were performed using recursive partitioning referred to as classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. The median survival for all 1000 consecutive UPC patients was 11 months. CART was performed with an initial split on liver involvement, and 10 terminal subgroups were formed. Median survival of the 10 subgroups ranged from 40 months (95% confidence interval, 22-66 months) for UPC patients with one or two metastatic organ sites, with nonadenocarcinoma histology, and without liver, bone, adrenal, or pleural metastases to 5 months (95% confidence interval, 4-7 months) in UPC patients with liver metastases, tumor histologies other than neuroendocrine carcinoma, age >61.5 years, and a small subgroup of patients with adrenal metastases. Two additional trees were also explored. These analyses demonstrated that important prognostic variables were consistently applied by the CART program and effectively segregated patients into groups with similar clinical features and survival. CART also identified previously unappreciated patient subsets and is a useful method for dissecting complex clinical situations and identifying homogeneous patient populations for future clinical trials.

Phase I clinical and plasma and cellular pharmacological study of topotecan without and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Topotecan, a semisynthetic water-soluble analogue of camptothecin, inhibits human topoisomerase I (topo I). We performed a Phase I clinical and plasma pharmacological study of topotecan administered by 24-h continuous infusion without and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We also measured topo I-DNA complexes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in an attempt to correlate formation of topo I-DNA complexes in patients treated with topotecan with toxicity and/or response. One hundred four courses of topotecan at doses of 2.5-15.0 mg/m2 were administered to 44 patients with solid tumors. The maximum tolerated dose without G-CSF was 10.0 mg/m2; granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect. The maximum tolerated dose could not be increased with G-CSF because of severe thrombocytopenia. Plasma pharmacology was obtained in 11 patients treated at 12.5 mg/m2 and 15.0 mg/m2. The topotecan lactone end-infusion plasma levels correlated strongly with the area under the curve. Lactone elimination was biexponential with a mean t1/2alpha of 28 min and a t1/2beta of 3.8 h at 12.5 mg/m2. Topo I-DNA complexes were measured before and after treatment in PBMCs from seven patients. Pretopotecan topo I-DNA complexes were available on two additional patients treated at 15 mg/m2. The mean increase in topo I-DNA complexes at the end of the topotecan infusion was 1.25 times the pretreatment value. There was a statistically significant relationship (P = 0.02) between lack of disease progression and the level of topo I-DNA complexes measured in PBMCs before therapy. For Phase II studies of minimally treated adults with solid tumors, the recommended topotecan starting dose administered by 24-h continuous infusion is 10 mg/m2 without G-CSF.

The taxoids: paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere).

The taxoids, paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere), represent a novel class of antineoplastic drugs. Paclitaxel and docetaxel share a similar mechanism of action: the promotion of microtubule assembly and inhibition of microtubule disassembly. The clinical development of paclitaxel was initially hampered by hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). The use of premedications and prolongation of the infusion time to 24h has reduced these reactions and allowed this drug's clinical development. Although paclitaxel's clinical activity has not been fully investigated, clinical trials have demonstrated its activity against ovarian, breast, and bronchial carcinomas. Because phase I studies of docetaxel noted occasional HSRs and these observations increased with further clinical experiences, those premedications employed with paclitaxel have now been instituted in many phase II studies of docetaxel. Docetaxel is currently being investigated in ovarian, breast, and bronchial carcinomas and has shown impressive clinical activity. The dose-limiting toxicity of both these agents is neutropenia; myalgias, mucositis, neuropathies, and alopecia have also been observed with both drugs. Additionally, a fluid retention syndrome and cutaneous toxicities have been noted in patients treated with docetaxel. Future studies of the taxoids will allow further comparisons of the toxicity and efficacy of these agents.

Prognostic implications of ploidy and proliferative activity in human solid tumors.

Ploidy and cell cycle compartment distribution were measured by DNA flow cytometry in 261 patients with a variety of different tumors. Eighty-one percent of all tumors were aneuploid, and 72% were hyperdiploid. Ploidy levels spanned a wide range from hypodiploid (maximum 30% less than diploid controls) to hyperoctaploid (440% in excess of diploid controls) with a mean and median values coinciding at a near-triploid DNA content. The proportion of cells with G1 DNA content decreased with increasing hyperdiploid abnormality. While unrelated to biopsy site and to a number of host factors such as age, sex and race, both ploidy and cytokinetic parameters were markedly affected by histopathologic diagnosis. Patients with metastatic lung, breast and GI cancer had higher ploidy levels than individuals with the corresponding primary tumors. Ploidy (except for one patient) remained constant, and G1/100 proportions showed only minor variation by disease site and over a median observation time of 6 months. Prognostic factor analysis was performed in the subgroup of patients studied within 6 months from diagnosis. The adverse impact of low tumor G1/100 proportion on survival was lost as the proportional hazard analysis was extended to include diagnostic subgroups. Accounting for histopathologic diagnosis, stage of disease, ploidy, and the proportion of tumor G1/100 cells, the following sequence of adverse prognostic factors in order of their relative ranks was established: (1) absence of breast cancer (p=0.0001), (2) hypertriploid DNA index (p=0.049), and (3) presence of metastatic disease (p=0.079). Our study demonstrates that DNA content-derived information on instrinsic tumor cell features pertaining to cytogenetics and cytokinetics may provide an objective means of biologically relevant cancer classification.

Phase I clinical trial of cisplatin given i.v. with 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid.

We report the results of a phase I study of intravenously administered cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid. This trial was designed to exploit potential biochemical interactions between these three agents. The maximum tolerated doses were cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, day 1; 5-fluorouracil, 375 mg/m2, days 1-5 and leucovorin 500 mg/m2, days 1-5. The dose-limiting toxic effect of this regimen was myelosuppression. Mild non-hematologic toxic effects were also observed and included nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and diarrhea. Phase II trial of this regimen are underway, however randomized studies will eventually be necessary to establish whether cisplatin contributes clinically significant activity to this regimen.

Phase I clinical evaluation of [SP-4-3(R)]-[1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato(2-)](2-methyl-1,4- butanediamine-N,N1) platinum in patients with metastatic solid tumors.

The development of clinically useful drugs is a priority of clinical cancer research. CI-973, [SP-4-3(R)]-[1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato(2-)](2-methyl-1,4- butanediamine-N,N1) platinum, has been shown in preclinical murine and human tumor models to have activity equivalent or superior to that of cisplatin and carboplatin and to exert activity against cisplatin-resistant cell lines. In addition, preclinical testing suggests a reduced toxicity profile for CI-973 as compared with currently available drugs, especially decreased nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and gastrointestinal toxicity. A total of 29 (28 evaluable) patients with solid tumors were treated with intravenous CI-973 given over 30 min every 4 weeks. No routine pre- or post-treatment hydration or antiemetic program was used. The CI-973 doses given were 75, 150, 170, 188, 230, and 290 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia. Nausea and vomiting occurred in the majority of patients but was mild to moderate in severity. No renal or auditory toxicity was seen. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for patients who had a good performance status, had not received prior radiation therapy to bone marrow, and had not previously been exposed to platinum or stem-cell toxin was 290 mg/m2. For those who had received prior radiation therapy, had a performance status of 2 or worse, or had previously been exposed to platinum or stem-cell toxin, the MTD was 230 mg/m2. The recommended phase II starting doses for these groups of patients are 230 and 190 mg/m2, respectively. No clinical tumor response was seen in this phase I study.