Outcomes after surgery for infective endocarditis.

The role of surgery in infective endocarditis is becoming established the world over. In spite of all recent advances, endocarditis remains a lethal disease following surgery. With the emergence of more difficult-to-treat microorganisms, sicker and older patients with multiple co-morbidities, and an increase in healthcare-associated infections, the need for surgery in the management of infective endocarditis is only bound to increase. Data on the use of surgery in endocarditis till date is largely from observational data due to the relative rarity of the disease and variable practice patterns around the world. Hopefully, with increasing awareness and more inter-institutional and international collaborations, more robust data will emerge to further establish the role of surgery. For the time being, individual patient management will require the active multi-disciplinary approach of an endocarditis team to provide the best possible outcomes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01647-9.

Selecting the appropriate patients for coronary artery bypass grafting in ischemic cardiomyopathy-importance of myocardial viability.

Patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in ischemic cardiomyopathy have a survival advantage over medical therapy at 10 years. The survival advantage of CABG over medical therapy is due to its ability to reduce future myocardial infarction, and by conferring electrical stability. The presence of myocardial viability does not provide a differential survival advantage for CABG over medical therapy. Presence of angina and inducible ischemia are also less predictive of outcome. Moreover, CABG is associated with significant early mortality. Hence, careful patient selection is more important for reducing the early mortality and improving the long-term outcome than relying on results of myocardial viability. Younger patients with good exercise tolerance benefit the most, while patients who are frail and patients with renal dysfunction and dysfunctional right ventricle seem to have very high operative mortality. Elderly patients, because of poor life expectancy, do not benefit from CABG, but the age cutoff is not clear. Patients also need to have revascularizable targets, but this decision is often based on experience of the surgical team and heart team discussion. These recommendations are irrespective of the myocardial viability tests. Optimal medical treatment remains the cornerstone for management of ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Early and long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement with mechanical valve in rheumatic heart disease.

Background: Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease is endemic in India. Mitral valve replacement with mechanical valve is the commonest surgical procedure performed in rheumatic heart disease (RHD). However, there are no studies reporting the long-term outcomes of mechanical mitral valve replacement in rheumatic heart disease from India. Objective: The primary objective of the study was to look at the long-term survival following mechanical mitral valve replacement in RHD. The secondary objectives included follow up complications and event-free survival. Methods: For this study, 238 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with TTK Chitra™ valve from 1st January 2006 to 31st December 2018 for RHD were included for analysis and reporting. The median follow-up period was 3371.50 days (9.3 years). Total follow-up was 2044 patient-years. Results: The mean age of the study population was 39.72 ± 10.48 years (range: 18-68 years). Out of 238 patients operated, 155 patients (65.12%) were alive and 69 patients (28.99%) were dead, and 14 patients (5.88%) were lost to follow-up. The operative mortality was 6 (2.52%) and the follow-up mortality was 63 (26.47%). The reasons for follow-up mortality were cardiac complications in 22 (34.9%) patients, valve-related complications in 18 (28.5%) patients, sudden unexplained death in 13 (20.6%) patients, and non-valve/ non-cardiac death in 10patients (15.8%). The one-year survival was 94.0%, five-year survival was 83.6%, ten-year survival was 70.6% and 15-year survival was 62.9%. During follow-up, valve-related events occurred in 123(52%) patients. The 15-year event-free survival was 33.0%. Conclusions: The long term outcome of mechanical valve replacement of the mitral valve in RHD patients was less than favorable. Both cardiac complications and mechanical valve related complications reduced their survival.