The Clinical Frailty Scale can indicate prognosis and care requirements on discharge in oncology and haemato-oncology inpatients: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Routinely used performance status scales, assessing patients' suitability for cancer treatment, have limited ability to account for multimorbidity, frailty and cognition. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a suggested alternative, but research detailing its use in oncology is limited. This study aims to evaluate if CFS is associated with prognosis and care needs on discharge in oncology inpatients. METHODS: We evaluated a large, single-centre cohort study in this research. CFS was recorded for adult inpatients at a Regional Cancer Centre. The associations between CFS, age, tumour type, discharge destination and care requirements and survival were evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A total of 676 patients were included in the study. Levels of frailty were high (Median CFS 6, 81.8% scored ≥5) and CFS correlated with performance status (R = 0.13: P = 0.047). Patients who were frail (CFS ≥ 5) were less likely to be discharged home (62.9%) compared with those who were not classed as frail (86.1%) (OR 3.6 [95%CI 2.1 to 6.3]: P < 0.001). Higher CFS was significantly associated with poorer prognosis in all ages. Solid organ malignancy (hazard ratio [HR] 2.60 [95%CI 2.05-3.32]) and CFS (HR 1.43 [95%CI 1.29-1.59]; P < 0.001) were independently associated with poorer survival. This study demonstrated that CFS may help predict prognosis in adult oncology inpatients of any age. This may aid informed shared decision-making in this setting. Future work should establish if routine CFS measurement can aid the appropriate prescription of systemic therapy and enable early conversations about discharge planning.

Personalised Assessment and Rapid Intervention in Frail Patients With Lung Cancer: The Impact of an Outpatient Occupational Therapy Service.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer and its treatments cause or accelerate frailty, detrimentally affecting function and quality of life. Occupational therapists (OTs) provide global assessments and interventions, but services are often available for inpatients. The impact of holistic assessment and early intervention in the outpatient setting is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A tertiary cancer center in North East England piloted a Lung Cancer Outpatient OT Service for patients with thoracic malignancy and a Clinical Frailty Scale Score (CFS) ≥ 5. Service effectiveness was evaluated through calculation of admission avoidance, hospital length-of-stay reduction, completion/impact of advance care planning and patient/family feedback. Demographics, frailty level, required interventions, and onward referrals were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients (median age of 71 (range 46-90) received OT assessment and intervention. 48% were in the lowest socioeconomic quintile. Median CFS score was 5 (mildly frail (range: 4-7)) at initial assessment. Total of 918 interventions were delivered (median: 5, IQR: 3-7, Range 0-22). 48% of patients engaged in future planning (national average: 10%-15% P < .0001) and 78.5% achieved preferred place of death (national average 30%). An estimated 37 hospital admissions were avoided. In admitted patients, average inpatient stay when known to the service was 6.5 days less than other frail lung cancer patients in our unit (95% CI 4-9.1 days P < .0001). Higher CFS was associated with poor survival (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Outpatient OT services can avoid and shorten hospital admissions through advance care planning, management of functional disruption, onward referral to other allied health professionals and palliative care. A comprehensive multidisciplinary outpatient service may benefit patients further and should be the focus of future research.