A phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase inhibits Ras activation and regulates chemorepulsion in Dictyostelium discoideum.

During developmental and immune responses, cells move towards or away from some signals. Although much is known about chemoattraction, chemorepulsion (the movement of cells away from a stimulus) remains poorly understood. Proliferating Dictyostelium discoideum cells secrete a chemorepellent protein called AprA. Examining existing knockout strains, we previously identified proteins required for AprA-induced chemorepulsion, and a genetic screen suggested that the enzyme phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase A (PIPkinA, also known as Pik6) might also be needed for chemorepulsion. Here, we show that cells lacking PIPkinA are not repelled by AprA, and that this phenotype is rescued by expression of PIPkinA. To bias cell movement, AprA inhibits Ras activation at the side of the cell closest to the source of AprA, and we find that PIPkinA is required for AprA to inhibit Ras activation. PIPkinA decreases levels of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate [PI(4)P] and phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate [PI(3,4,5)P3], and possibly because of these effects, potentiates phagocytosis and inhibits cell proliferation. Cells lacking PIPkinA show normal AprA binding, suggesting that PIPkinA regulates chemorepulsion at a step between the AprA receptor and AprA inhibition of Ras activation.

Dictyostelium discoideum cells retain nutrients when the cells are about to outgrow their food source.

Dictyostelium discoideum is a unicellular eukaryote that eats bacteria, and eventually outgrows the bacteria. D. discoideum cells accumulate extracellular polyphosphate (polyP), and the polyP concentration increases as the local cell density increases. At high cell densities, the correspondingly high extracellular polyP concentrations allow cells to sense that they are about to outgrow their food supply and starve, causing the D. discoideum cells to inhibit their proliferation. In this report, we show that high extracellular polyP inhibits exocytosis of undigested or partially digested nutrients. PolyP decreases plasma membrane recycling and apparent cell membrane fluidity, and this requires the G protein-coupled polyP receptor GrlD, the polyphosphate kinase Ppk1 and the inositol hexakisphosphate kinase I6kA. PolyP alters protein contents in detergent-insoluble crude cytoskeletons, but does not significantly affect random cell motility, cell speed or F-actin levels. Together, these data suggest that D. discoideum cells use polyP as a signal to sense their local cell density and reduce cell membrane fluidity and membrane recycling, perhaps as a mechanism to retain ingested food when the cells are about to starve. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Polyphosphate uses mTOR, pyrophosphate, and Rho GTPase components to potentiate bacterial survival in Dictyostelium.

IMPORTANCE: Although most bacteria are quickly killed after phagocytosis by a eukaryotic cell, some pathogenic bacteria escape death after phagocytosis. Pathogenic Mycobacterium species secrete polyP, and the polyP is necessary for the bacteria to prevent their killing after phagocytosis. Conversely, exogenous polyP prevents the killing of ingested bacteria that are normally killed after phagocytosis by human macrophages and the eukaryotic microbe Dictyostelium discoideum. This suggests the possibility that in these cells, a signal transduction pathway is used to sense polyP and prevent killing of ingested bacteria. In this report, we identify key components of the polyP signal transduction pathway in D. discoideum. In cells lacking these components, polyP is unable to inhibit killing of ingested bacteria. The pathway components have orthologs in human cells, and an exciting possibility is that pharmacologically blocking this pathway in human macrophages would cause them to kill ingested pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Annotating Putative D. discoideum Proteins Using I-TASSER.

Using Gene Ontology annotation in any aspect or using any evidence code, we found that approximately 14% percent of predicted D. discoideum proteins have no GO annotations and no obvious similarity to any annotated protein across diverse organisms. We have been systematically examining these unannotated protein sequences using software that predicts a protein structure and then compares the predicted structure to known structures.