Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Reduce Surgical Site Infections after CRS/HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a common cause of morbidity after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancy. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been proposed as a method to reduce the rates of SSIs; however, there is paucity in the literature on the efficacy in this population. The goal of this study was to determine whether routine use of NPWT in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC could reduce the risk of developing SSI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective before-after study to assess the rates of SSI with NPWT compared with a standard postoperative surgical dressing (SSD) in all patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC from November 2013 to December 2021 at a single tertiary care center. The primary outcome was rate of SSI. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate for risk factors for SSI. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were treated with CRS/HIPEC over the study period. Seventy patients had placement of SSD, and 108 patients had placement of NPWT. Rates of SSI were 11.4% (8/70) and 5.6% (6/108) in the two groups, respectively (p = 0.16). On multivariate analysis, patients treated with NPWT had a significantly lower risk of developing an SSI (OR 0.24 [0.06, 0.92], p = 0.037). Patients living >50 km from the hospital had significantly higher risk of developing SSI (OR 2.03 [1.09, 3.78], p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that routine use of NPWT can reduce the risk of developing an SSI in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy.

Impact of grade on workup of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective cohort study : Grade impact on workup of rectal NETs.

BACKGROUND: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNETs) are often discovered on screening colonoscopy. Indications for staging and definitive resection are inconsistent in current guidelines. We evaluated the role of grade in guiding staging and procedural decision-making. METHODS: Patients with biopsy confirmed RNETs between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics, staging investigations (biochemical and imaging), and endoscopic/surgical treatment were recorded. Associations between grade, preoperative staging, interventions, and survival were determined using Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact, log-rank, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Amongst 139 patients with RNETs, 9% were aged ≥ 75 years and 44% female. Tumor grade was: 73% grade 1 (G1), 18%, grade 2 (G2) and 9% grade 3 (G3). Staging investigations were performed in 52% of patients. All serum chromogranin A and 97% of 24-hour urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid tests were normal. The large majority of staging computed tomography (CT) scans were negative (76%) with subgroup analysis showing no G1 patients with CT identified distant disease compared with 38% of G2 and 50% of G3 patients (p < 0.001). G1 patients were more likely to achieve R0/R1 resections compared to G2 (95% vs. 50%, p < 0.001) and G1 patients had significantly better 5-year overall survival (G1: 98%, G2: 67%, G3: 10%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tumor grade is important in preoperative workup and surgical decision-making. Biochemical staging may be omitted but staging CT should be considered for patients with grade ≥ 2 lesions. Anatomic resections should be considered for patients with grade 2 disease.