RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection can be easily prevented by hygienic measures. Up to date the majority of the studies in literature highlighted a reduction in cCMV antenatal counseling and its prevention. Our purpose was to evaluate obstetrics providers' knowledge about cCMV infection, management and the behavioral practices to avoid it. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey carried out in Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome between November 2019 and January 2020. We recruited 148 specialists and residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology through online anonymous multiple-choice 13-questions, 10 min-survey comparing responses between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 94.6% of all participants said they always prescribe cytomegalovirus (CMV) serum screening: 73.6% of them regularly counsel about preventive practices, with specialists recording higher percentages (85.4 vs. 65.1%, p<0.005). We identified a good knowledge about the diagnostic pathway, but only 58.1% of our population knows the correct time of late amniocentesis. 12.2% of providers do not consider magnetic resonance (MRI) as a complementary exam. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of maternal seroconversion is crucial: even if our data show an acceptable knowledge about antenatal counseling, we encourage clinicians to firmly inform and educate women about behavioral measures.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/congênito , Obstetrícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Preterm birth is an obstetric condition associated with a high risk of infant mortality and morbidities in both the neonatal period and later in life, which has also a significant public health impact because it carries an important societal economic burden. As in many cases the etiology is unknown, it is important to identify environmental factors that may be involved in the occurrence of this condition. In this review, we report all the studies published in PubMed and Scopus databases from January 1992 to January 2019, accessible as full-text articles, written in English, including clinical studies, original studies, and reviews. We excluded articles not written in English, duplicates, considering inappropriate populations and/or exposures or irrelevant outcomes and patients with known risk factors for preterm birth (PTB). The aim of this article is to identify and summarize the studies that examine environmental toxicants exposure associated with preterm birth. This knowledge will strengthen the possibility to develop strategies to reduce the exposure to these toxicants and apply clinical measures for preterm birth prevention.
RESUMO
Recently, Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are one of the most intensively studied group of antiblastic agents for the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Among this family, Olaparib was the first to be approved by European Medicines Agency as maintenance therapy post-response to platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer in women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation. Following that, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Olaparib monotherapy as fourth or later line of treatment in advanced ovarian cancer with deleterious germ-line BRCA1/2 mutation. On March 2017, Niraparib, was approved as maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy, independently of BRCA mutation. Rucaparib inhibits PARP-1, 2 and 3, PARP-4, -12, -15 and -16, as well as tankyrase 1 and 2. On December 2016, it was granted accelerated approval by the FDA, based on data from two multicenter, single arm, phase II trials that evaluated the efficacy of Rucaparib in patients with deleterious, germline and/or somatic BRCA mutation-associated, advanced OC, who have been treated with two or more lines of chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated dose reported was 600â¯mg twice a day administered orally. Phase III studies are currently ongoing to further validate the efficacy of Rucaparib in the treatment setting and explore its usefulness in a maintenance setting as well. The focus of our review is to report the most recent investigations and clinical progress regarding Rucaparib for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.
Assuntos
Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/farmacologia , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/farmacologiaRESUMO
The choice of treatment in case of ovarian endometriomas is one of the most discussed topics in Reproductive Medicine. Management options include expectancy, medical treatment, surgery, in vitro fertilization (IVF), or a combination of the above. The main presenting symptom, i.e. pain or infertility, usually guide the choice of treatment. Medical treatment is usually preferred as the first line option when pain is the associated symptom, whereas surgery or IVF are preferred in case of associated infertility. In most cases, however, the symptoms may overlap, and often a patient with infertility complains also of chronic pelvic pain, and vice versa. In addition, in many cases the patient may be asymptomatic, usually presenting with the incidental diagnosis of an ovarian endometrioma. Therefore, a strict categorization in two separate pathways of either associated pain or associated infertility, as the one outlined in current guidelines, may not represent the real clinical scenario. In this context, a personalized approach, taking into account several additional variables that are not considered in guidelines, is mandatory. In the present review, a symptom-driven approach to the management of ovarian endometriomas, that goes beyond the pain/infertility categorization, is described, considering additional parameters that guide the choice of treatment, with a patient-centered, personalized approach.