Transcending Dimensions: a Comparative Analysis of Cloaca Imaging in Advancing the Surgeon's Understanding of Complex Anatomy.

Surgeons have a steep learning capacity to understand 2-D images provided by conventional cloacagrams. Imaging advances now allow for 3-D reconstruction and 3-D models; but no evaluation of the value of these techniques exists in the literature. Therefore, we sought to determine if advances in 3-D imaging would benefit surgeons, lead to accelerated learning, and improve understanding for operative planning of a cloaca reconstruction. Questionnaires were used to assess the understanding of 2-D and 3-D images by pediatric surgical faculty and trainees. For the same case of a cloacal malformation, a 2D contrast study cloacagram, a 3D model rotatable CT scan reconstruction, a software enhanced 3D video animation (which allowed the observer to manipulate the structure in any orientation), and a printed physical 3D cloaca model that could be held in the observer's hand were employed. Logistic mixed effect models assessed whether the proportion of questions about the case that were answered correctly differed by imaging modality, and whether the proportion answered correctly differed between trainee and attending surgeons for any particular modality. Twenty-nine pediatric surgery trainees (27 pediatric general surgery and 2 pediatric urology surgery trainees) and 30 pediatric surgery and urology faculty participated. For trainees, the percentage of questions answered correctly was: 2-D 10.5%, 3-D PACS 46.7%, 3-D Enhanced 67.1%, and 3-D Printed 73.8%. For faculty, the total percentage of questions answered correctly was: 2-D 22.2%, 3-D PACS 54.8%, 3D Enhanced 66.2%, and 3-D printed 74.0%. The differences in rates of correctness across all four modalities were significant in both fellows and attendings (p < 0.001), with performance being lowest for the 2-D modality, and with increasing percentage of correct answers with each subsequent modality. The difference between trainees and attendings in correctness rate was significant only for the 2-D modality, with attendings answering correctly more often. The 2-D cloacagram, as the least complex model, was the most difficult to interpret. The more complex the modality, the more correct were the responses obtained from both groups. Trainees and attendings had similar levels of correct answers and understanding of the cloacagram for the more advanced modalities. Mental visualization skills of anatomy and complex 3-D spatial arrangements traditionally have taken years of experience to master. Now with novel surgical education resources of a 3-D cloacagram, a more quickly advancing skill is possible.

Reconstructing the anal sphincters to reverse iatrogenic overstretching following a pull-through for Hirschsprung disease. One-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In patients with Hirschsprung disease (HSCR), soiling may be related to anal sphincter damage following the initial pull-through. No optimal treatment has been developed for such patients, although enemas (rectal or antegrade) have been applied with some success. We present the one-year outcomes of a new technique for anal sphincter reconstruction. METHODS: All patients with HSCR referred from other institutions for post pull-through soiling were studied. Seven patients with patulous sphincters underwent sphincter reconstruction. Six had a full preoperative evaluation and were included in the study. Their 12-month outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: All six patients had soiling without voluntary bowel movements (VBMs). One patient was clean on Malone flushes when referred. Three underwent pre- and post-reconstruction non-sedated three-dimensional anorectal manometry, and objectively were able to close their sphincters following the reconstruction. All patients without Down syndrome (4 of 6) showed improvement in the abbreviated Baylor Continence Scale (4.5 vs. 0.75). One patient has achieved total bowel control without antegrade flushes, three now have VBMs which they did not have before but have occasional accidents and use antegrade flushes intermittently. They reported higher productivity, the ability to participate in sports and be away from home with confidence in their regimen. Two of 6 patients have Down syndrome and required a redo pull-through for other indications and underwent empiric sphincter reconstruction. For these two patients we do not have an outcomes assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A new technique for sphincter reconstruction shows promising results in improvement of bowel control at one year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Cysto-Vaginoscopy of a 3D-Printed Cloaca Model: A Step toward Personalized Noninvasive Preoperative Assessment in Patients with Complex Anorectal Malformations.

INTRODUCTION: For the classification of the complexity of cloacal malformations and the decision on the operative approach, an exact anatomical assessment is mandatory. To benefit from using three-dimensional (3D)-printed models in preoperative planning and training, the practicability of these models should be guaranteed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and feasibility of a real-size 3D-printed cloaca model for the purpose of cysto-vaginoscopic evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 3D reconstruction and printed a real-size, rubber-like 3D model of an infant pelvis with a cloacal malformation and asked invited pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists to perform a cysto-vaginoscopy on the model and to complete a brief questionnaire to rate the quality and feasibility of the model and to indicate whether they would recommend the model for preoperative planning and training. RESULTS: Overall, 41 participants rated the model quality as good to very good (M = 3.28, standard deviation [SD] = 0.50, on a scale from 1 to 4). The model was rated as feasible for preoperative training (M = 4.10, SD = 0.75, on a scale from 1 to 5) and most participants (85.4%) would recommend the model for preoperative training. The cysto-vaginoscopy of the model was considered as a valid training tool for real-life cases and improved the confidence on the anatomy of a cloaca. CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that patient-specific 3D-printed models might be a useful tool in the preoperative evaluation of complex anorectal malformations by simulation of cysto-vaginoscopy with an excellent view on anatomical structures to assess the whole spectrum of the individual cloacal malformation. Our model might be a valuable add-on tool for specialty training in pediatric colorectal surgery.

The Use of an Inanimate Simulation Model for the Correction of an Anorectal Malformation in the Training of Colorectal Pediatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: An anorectal malformation (ARM) is a congenital malformation that requires surgical correction. To acquire the skills needed to perform this complex procedure, an affordable simulation model has previously been developed and validated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the suitability of this ARM model (with perineal fistula) for training in hands-on workshops. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ARM model consists of a wooden casing with disposable perineal body. Participants in several international pediatric colorectal hands-on workshops in 2019 and 2020 were asked to participate. They were divided in a target group and an experienced group based on experience. All practiced the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty procedure on the model with multimodality guidance. Subsequently, statements on the suitability of the model for use during hands-on workshops were scored on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 80 participants were included (43 surgical specialists, 13 pediatric surgery fellows, and 25 residents). Nearly, all statements scored at least a mean of >4.0, all scored significantly better than a neutral opinion. The target group (n = 58) scored higher compared with the experienced group (n = 22) on "transferability of the skills to the clinical setting" (means 4.4 vs. 4.0, p = 0.038); however, the "suitability as a replacement for an animal model" scored significantly lower (means 3.6 vs. 3.9, p = 0.049). No other differences were found. CONCLUSION: This affordable ARM model was regarded a suitable model for training during preclinical hands-on workshops and could be used for the specified steps of the procedure.

Validation of a Newly Developed Competency Assessment Tool for the Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The correction of an anorectal malformation (ARM) is complex and relatively infrequent. Simulation training and subsequent assessment may result in better clinical outcomes. Assessment can be done using a competency assessment tool (CAT). This study aims to develop and validate a CAT for the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) on a simulation model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CAT-PSARP was developed after consultation with experts in the field. The PSARP was divided into five steps, while tissue and instrument handling were scored separately. Participants of pediatric colorectal hands-on courses in 2019 and 2020 were asked to participate. They performed one PSARP procedure on an ARM simulation model, while being assessed by two objective observers using the CAT-PSARP. RESULTS: A total of 82 participants were enrolled. A fair interobserver agreement was found for general skills (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.524, p < 0.001), a good agreement for specific skills (ICC = 0.646, p < 0.001), and overall performance (ICC = 0.669, p < 0.001). The experienced group scored higher on all steps (p < 0.001), except for "anoplasty (p = 0.540)," compared with an inexperienced group. CONCLUSION: The CAT-PSARP is a suitable objective assessment tool for the overall performance of the included steps of the PSARP for repair of an ARM on a simulation model.

A technique to reconstruct the anal sphincters following iatrogenic stretching related to a pull-through for Hirschsprung disease.

Soiling and fecal incontinence are troubling complications which can occur after a pull-through for Hirschsprung disease. They can usually be improved with proper medical management, but in some cases are the result of an anatomic defect related to overstretching of the sphincters and/or damage of the anal canal. For such patients the treatment of this true fecal incontinence is limited to a structured bowel management program with ante- or retrograde enemas to achieve social continence. Herein we report two such patients with overstretched sphincters and loss of the dentate line after an initial pull-through and describe a sphincter tightening technique to improve bowel control.

Factors predicting the need for vaginal replacement at the time of primary reconstruction of a cloacal malformation.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with cloacal malformations requires vaginal replacement during their primary reconstruction, increasing the surgical complexity. Identifying factors which predict the need for vaginal replacement would facilitate operative planning. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent primary cloacal reconstruction at our Center (2014-2018) and assessed the length of the common channel, urethra, and vagina. The presence of hydrocolpos at birth, Müllerian anomalies, sacral ratio, and tethered cord were also assessed between patients who did and did not require vaginal replacement. RESULTS: 50 patients were identified. 17/50 patients (34%) underwent a total urogenital mobilization (TUM), and none required vaginal replacement. 33/50 (66%) patients underwent a urogenital separation. 19/33 (58%) required vaginal replacement. This group had a shorter vagina (4.2 cm vs 6.6 cm, p < 0.01). There was no difference in urethral or common channel length, number of cervices, sacral ratio, presence of a vaginal septum, hydrocolpos, or tethered cord between those who did and those who did not require vaginal replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Urethral and common channel lengths were used to successfully determine the operative plan (TUM or urogenital separation) to reconstruct cloacal malformations. The need for urogenital separation and a shorter vaginal length were predictive of the need for vaginal replacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series with no comparison groups.

Presacral masses and sacrococcygeal teratomas in patients with and without anorectal malformations: A single institution comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Despite variability at presentation, presacral masses in patients with and without anorectal malformations (ARM) appear histologically similar. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in oncologic outcomes between these two groups. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed utilizing our institutional cancer and colorectal and pelvic reconstruction databases for patients with presacral masses and sacrococcygeal teratomas between 1990 and 2017. Data captured included age at surgical resection, type of ARM, tumor location within the pelvis, tumor histopathology, tumor size, adjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence, and follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-six patients comprised our cohort, of whom 12 had an ARM. The median age was older at resection for those with an ARM (1.4 years; range 1 day to 29.4 years) compared to those without an ARM (9 days; range 0 days to 6.9 years) (p = 0.01). The mean tumor size was 2.5 cm in patients with an ARM compared to 6.0 cm in patients without an ARM (p = 0.036). All patients with ARM had exclusively intrapelvic tumors, and histopathology included mature teratoma (8), yolk sac tumor (1), lipoma (1), and unknown (2). Tumor location for patients with sacral and presacral masses without ARM included exclusively extrapelvic (10), primarily extrapelvic with large intrapelvic component (7), primarily intrapelvic with extrapelvic component (1), exclusively intrapelvic (8), and unknown (8). Histopathology for patients with presacral masses without ARM included mature teratoma (20), immature teratoma (7), yolk sac tumor (3), ganglioneuroma (1), neuroblastoma (1), benign epithelial cyst (1), and unknown (1). Tumor recurrence rate was similar between patients with ARM (n = 3, 25%) and those without an ARM (n = 5, 15%) (p = 0.41). The 5-year event free survival was 65% (95% CI: 25%-87%) in the group with ARM and 81% (95% CI: 60%-92%) in the group without ARM (p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Sacral and presacral masses in patients with ARM are resected at a later age and are more likely to be intrapelvic. They appear histologically similar and have similar rates of recurrence and malignancy when compared to patients without ARM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.

Assessment of the Heineke-Mikulicz anoplasty for skin level postoperative anal strictures and congenital anal stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: Acquired skin-level strictures following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) and some rare cases of congenital anal stenosis can be managed using a Heineke-Mikulicz like anoplasty (HMA). We hypothesized that this procedure was an effective, safe, and durable outpatient procedure in select patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent HMA for skin level strictures following PSARP or for certain congenital anal stenoses from 2014 to 2017. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (19 males, 9 females) with a mean age of 5.8 years (range 0.5-24.4) underwent HMA. Twenty-six had a prior PSARP, of which 18 were redo, and 8 were primary procedures. Two patients had congenital skin level anal stenosis. The mean follow up was 1.0 years (range 0.4-2.9). The average preprocedure anal size was Hegar 8, which after HMA increased 8 Hegar sizes to 16 (95% CI 7-9, p < 0.001). There were no operative complications. One patient restenosed and required a secondary procedure. CONCLUSION: HMA is a safe procedure for skin-level anal strictures following PSARP (primary and redo) and can also be used in some rare cases of congenital anal stenosis. Long-term follow up to determine the restricture rate is ongoing. A plan to do an HMA if a stricture develops may offer an alternative to routine anal dilations, particularly after a redo PSARP in an older child. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Diagnosis and management of a remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) in males following surgery for anorectal malformations.

PURPOSE: A complication of the surgical management of anorectal malformations (ARMs) is a retained remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) formerly called a posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD). A ROOF may have multiple presentations or may be incidentally discovered during the work-up of ARM after previous surgery. We sought to define the entity and the surgical indications for excision of a ROOF when found. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all male patients who presented to our center following previous repair for ARM at another institution, who came for evaluation of problems with urinary and/or fecal continence, from 2014 to 2017. Charts were reviewed for symptoms, original type of malformation, preoperative imaging, treatment, and postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: Of 180 referred male patients, 16 had a ROOF. 14 underwent surgical repair to address this and for other redo indications, and 2 did not require intervention. 13 patients had an additional reason for a redo such as anal mislocation or rectal prolapse. Indications for ROOF excision were urinary symptoms (e.g. UTI, dribbling, passage of mucous via urethra, stone formation), to make a smoother posterior urethra for intermittent catheterization, or for prophylactic reasons. Patients were repaired at an average age of 4.2 years, using a PSARP only approach with excision of the ROOF for all except one patient who needed a laparotomy due to abdominal extension of the ROOF. No patient needed a colostomy. The original ARM repairs of the patients were PSARP (9), laparoscopic assisted (4) and abdominoperineal pullthrough (3). Preoperative evaluation included pelvic MRI, VCUG, and cystoscopy. The ROOF was visualized on 14 of 16 MRIs, 10 of 14 VCUGs, and 14 of 15 cystoscopies. Urinary symptoms associated with a ROOF and ease of catheterization were improved in all repaired cases. CONCLUSION: Patients not doing well from a urinary or bowel standpoint post ARM pull-through need a complete evaluation which should include a check for a ROOF. Both modalities MRI and cystoscopy are needed as a ROOF can be missed on either alone. A VCUG was not reliable in identifying a ROOF. Excision is needed in patients to improve urinary symptoms associated with these lesions and to minimize the small but theoretical oncologic risk present in a ROOF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Gynecologic anatomic abnormalities following anorectal malformations repair.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients may present with gynecologic concerns after previous posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for repair of an anorectal malformation (ARM). Common findings include an inadequate or shortened perineal body, as well as introital stenosis, retained vaginal septum, and remnant rectovestibular fistula. An inadequate or shortened perineal body may impact fecal continence, sexual function and recommendations regarding obstetrical mode of delivery. We describe our experience with female patients referred to our center for evaluation of their previously repaired ARM, with a specific focus on perineal body anatomy and concomitant gynecologic abnormalities. We outline our collaborative evaluation process and findings as well as subsequent repair and outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: A single site retrospective chart review from May 2014 to May 2016 was performed. Female patients with a history of prior ARM repair who required subsequent reoperative surgical repair with perineoplasty were included. The decision for reoperation was made collaboratively after a multidisciplinary evaluation by colorectal surgery, urology, and gynecology which included examination under anesthesia (EUA) with cystoscopy, vaginoscopy, rectal examination, and electrical stimulation of anal sphincters. The type of original malformation, indication for reoperative perineoplasty, findings leading to additional procedures performed at time of perineoplasty, postoperative complications, and the length of follow up were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period 28 patients were referred for evaluation after primary ARM repair elsewhere and 15 patients (60%) met inclusion criteria. Thirteen patients (86.6%) originally had a rectovestibular fistula with prior PSARP and 2 patients (13.4%) originally had a cloacal malformation with prior posterior sagittal anorectovaginourethroplasty. The mean age at the time of the subsequent perineoplasty was 4.6years (0.5-12). Patients had an inadequate perineal body requiring reoperative perineoplasty due to: anterior mislocation of the anus (n=11, 73.3%), prior perineal wound dehiscence with perineal body breakdown (n=2, 13.4%), acquired rectovaginal fistula (n=1, 6.6%), and posterior mislocated introitus with invasion of the perineal body (n=1, 6.6%). During the preoperative evaluation, additional gynecologic abnormalities were identified that required concomitant surgical intervention including: introital stenosis (n=4, 26.6%), retained vaginal septum (n=3, 20%) and remnant recto vestibular fistula (n=2, 13.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a previously repaired ARM may present with gynecologic concerns that require subsequent surgical intervention. The most common finding was an inadequate perineal body, but other findings included introital stenosis, retained vaginal septum and remnant recto vestibular fistula. Multidisciplinary evaluation to assess and identify abnormalities and coordinate timing and surgical approach is crucial to assure optimal patient outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series with no comparison group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The Mullerian Black Box: Predicting and defining Mullerian anatomy in patients with cloacal abnormalities and the need for longitudinal assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with a cloacal malformation have a Mullerian anomaly. We sought to examine our patients with a cloacal malformation to determine the proportion of them we felt we knew their Mullerian anatomy and which proportion we felt would most benefit from longitudinal assessment to define their anatomy, reproductive potential, and risk of outflow tract obstruction after puberty. We also compared the preoperative assessment of reproductive anatomy (pelvic ultrasound, MRI, cloacagram, and vaginoscopy) and intra-operative abdominal findings (at the time of primary cloacal reconstruction or subsequent abdominal procedures) to see how these correlated with and which preoperative assessment tool was most predictive of intraoperative anatomy. We also sought to confirm what we expected to be a lack of ovarian pathology. METHODS: A single site retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with a cloacal anomaly seen between May 2014 and September 2017. Preoperative assessment (pelvic ultrasound, MRI, cloaca gram, and vaginoscopy) and operative reports (both primary reconstruction and later abdominal procedures) were reviewed to ascertain Mullerian and ovarian anatomy. RESULTS: 30 of 36 (83%) of patients had defined Mullerian anatomy after preoperative assessment (pelvic ultrasound, MRI, cloacagram, and vaginoscopy) with or without the addition intraoperative assessment of Mullerian structures obtained during laparoscopy or laparotomy. 19/30 (63%) had duplication of their Mullerian structures. 25/36 (69%) had intraoperative assessment of Mullerian anatomy during laparoscopy or laparotomy. In this group, preoperative assessment with pelvic ultrasound correlated in 4/8 patients (50%), MRI correlated in 3/4 patients (75%), cloacagram in 10/15 patients (67%), and vaginoscopy in 23/25 patients (92%). 14/36 (39%) patients were found to require longitudinal assessment to define anatomy, reproductive potential or risk of outflow tract obstruction after puberty. Patients with ovarian findings described at the time of laparoscopy or laparotomy had no evidence of ovarian pathology. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with cloaca in our series (83%) had their Mullerian anatomy defined by either preoperative assessment and/or findings at the time of laparoscopy or laparotomy. Duplication of the vagina and uterus was the most commonly described Mullerian anatomy (63%) in our series. Vaginoscopy appears to be superior to pelvic ultrasound, MRI, and cloacagram in predicting Mullerian anatomy. Fourteen of our 36 (39%) patients will require longitudinal assessment follow for reproductive potential and/or risk of outflow tract obstruction after puberty as their Mullerian anatomy is not known. There was no evidence of ovarian pathology in any cloaca patient. While we felt as though we could define Mullerian anatomy in most of our patients, any opportunity for intraoperative assessment of Mullerian anatomy should be utilized and therefore teams who are involved in the management of these patients must have a systematic and collaborative method established to ensure that Mullerian structures are thoroughly evaluated intra-operatively and documented in a standardized fashion. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Chart review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Surgical management of functional constipation: An intermediate report of a new approach using a laparoscopic sigmoid resection combined with malone appendicostomy.

INTRODUCTION: We previously reported our surgical technique for functional constipation for patients who have failed medical management using a novel collaborative approach with gastroenterology input, pre-operative contrast enema, colonic manometry, and laxative protocol combined with a laparoscopic colonic resection with Malone appendicostomy. Now we report our intermediate outcomes. METHODS: Patients who failed bowel management program for functional constipation were reviewed from 3/2014-2/2017. Patients with Hirschsprung disease, anorectal malformation, tethered cord, spina bifida, Trisomy 21, cerebral palsy, mitochondrial disease, or prior colon resection were excluded. RESULTS: Of 31 patients (14 females; median age 12years, follow-up 10.3months) with functional constipation and failed medical management, 26 (84%) had preoperative colonic manometry which, in addition to the contrast enema, guided laparoscopic colon resection. Ten patients (32.3%) are clean with no flushes (1 takes no laxatives, 8 are on low dose laxatives only, and 1 patient was clean on laxatives but chose to switch back to flushes). Of the 21 patients that remain on antegrade flushes, 20 (95.2%) are clean, and one patient (4.8%) continues to soil. We define clean as no soiling and no abnormal stool burden on x-ray. Laxative trials are planned for all patients on an antegrade flush regimen. CONCLUSION: Our intermediate results show that laparoscopic colon resection with Malone appendicostomy allows the majority of patients to be clean on antegrade flushes, and some to be on no or minimal laxatives. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Are Senna based laxatives safe when used as long term treatment for constipation in children?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Senna is a stimulant laxative commonly used by pediatricians, pediatric gastroenterologists, and pediatric surgeons. Many clinicians avoid Senna for reasons such as tolerance or side effects but this has little scientific justification. We recently found several patients we were caring for developed perineal blistering during the course of Senna treatment. Because of this we chose to review the literature to identify side effects in children taking this medication as well as to analyze our Center's experience with Senna's secondary effects. METHODS: We performed a literature review (MEDLINE, PUBMED) using the keywords of Senna, sen, sennosides and children, and pediatric and functional (idiopathic) constipation. We looked for articles with information regarding perineal blisters related to Senna as well as other secondary effects of Senna laxatives in children when used on a long-term basis. We also reviewed the charts of our patients who had previously taken Senna or are currently taking Senna, looking for adverse reactions. RESULTS: Eight articles in the literature reported perineal blisters after administration of Senna laxatives in 28 patients. Of those occurrences, 18 patients (64%) had accidental administration of Senna and 10 (36%) had Senna prescribed as a long term treatment. All of the blistering episodes were related to high dose, night-time accidents, or intense diarrhea with a long period of stool to skin contact. At our institution, from 2014 to 2017, we prescribed Senna and have recorded data to 640 patients. During the study period, 17 patients (2.2%) developed blisters during their treatment. Patients who developed blisters had higher doses 60mg/day; 60 [12-100] vs. 17.5 [1.7-150] (p<0.001). All of the blistering episodes were related to night-time accidents, with a long period of stool to skin contact. 83 (13%) patients presented minor side effects such as abdominal cramping, vomiting or diarrhea which resolved once the type of laxatives were changed or enemas were started. The doses of Senna was not significantly different in these patients 15mg/day [4.4-150] vs. 17.5mg/day [1.5-150]. There were no other long-term side effects from Senna found in the pediatric literature for long-term treatment besides abdominal cramping or diarrhea during the first weeks of administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to Senna in our review. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of information in the literature regarding side effects of sennosides as a long-term therapy, and to our knowledge, this is the first review of Senna side effects in children. Senna induced dermatitis is rare, but may occur when patients need a higher dose. All of the cases described had a long period of exposure of the skin to stool. Besides the perineal rash with blisters, we could find no other described major side effect with Senna administration in the pediatric population or evidence of the frequently mentioned concern of the development of tolerance to Senna. Pediatric caregivers should advise families of the rare side effect of skin blistering and educate them to change the diaper frequently in children who are not toilet- trained to reduce stool to skin exposure. We can conclude from this review that Senna is a safe treatment option for constipation in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Impact on Patient Care of a Multidisciplinary Center Specializing in Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction.

Aim of the study: Many patients with an anorectal malformation (ARM) or pelvic anomaly have associated urologic or gynecologic problems. We hypothesized that our multidisciplinary center, which integrates pediatric colorectal, urologic, gynecologic and GI motility services, could impact a patient's anesthetic exposures and hospital visits. Methods: We tabulated during 2015 anesthetic/surgical events, endotracheal intubations, and clinic/hospital visits for all patients having a combined procedure. Main results: Eighty two patients underwent 132 combined procedures (Table 1). The median age at intervention was 3 years [0.2-17], and length of follow up was 25 months [7-31]. The number of procedures in patients who underwent combined surgery was lower as compared to if they had been done independently [1(1-5) vs. 3(2-7) (p < 0.001)]. Intubations were also lower [1[1-3] vs. 2[1-6]; p < 0.001]. Hospital length of stay was significantly lower for the combined procedures vs. the theoretical individual procedures [8 days [3-20] vs. 10 days [4-16]] p < 0.05. Post-operative clinic visits were fewer when combined visits were coordinated as compared to the theoretical individual clinic visits (urology, gynecology, and colorectal) [1[1-4] vs. 2[1-6]; p = < 0.001]. Conclusions: Patients with anorectal and pelvic malformations are likely to have many medical or surgical interventions during their lifetime. A multidisciplinary approach can reduce surgical interventions, anesthetic procedures, endotracheal intubations, and hospital/outpatient visits.

Can sacral development as a marker for caudal regression help identify associated urologic anomalies in patients with anorectal malformation?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The sacral ratio (SR) is a well-established tool to quantify sacral development in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) and can be used as a predictor of fecal continence. We hypothesized that a lower SR correlated with the presence of urologic and renal malformations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with ARM treated at our center from 2014 to 2016. We measured the lateral SR as a marker for sacral development and assessed the spine for the presence of tethered cord (TC). Urological and renal anomalies, including single kidney, hydronephrosis, hypospadias, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), ectopic ureter, and penoscrotal transposition were assessed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-tests, and multivariable linear regression were used to test for differences in SR with consideration of associated urologic malformations and tethered cord. RESULTS: 283 patients with ARM were included for analysis (156 females). The median age was 39months (10-90). Among these, 178 (55.6%) had 1 or more urologic malformations, and 81 (25.3%) had a TC. Hydronephrosis, high-grade VUR (3-5), solitary kidney, and tethered cord were significantly associated with lower SR (p<0.01). In multivariable regression models, the presence of urologic abnormalities remained significantly associated with lower a SR despite the presence or absence of TC (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: SR is a potentially useful indicator of certain urologic anomalies including hydronephrosis, high grade VUR, and solitary kidney in patients with ARM. This association is independent of the presence of TC. A sacral ratio as a part of the VACTERL screening can help the surgeon identify which patients need closer urologic follow up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Surgical Management of Functional Constipation: Preliminary Report of a New Approach Using a Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection Combined with a Malone Appendicostomy.

Introduction Functional constipation is a common problem in children. It usually can be managed with laxatives but a small subset of patients develop intolerable cramps and need to be temporarily treated with enemas. The senior author has previously reported: 1) open sigmoid resection as a surgical option, but this did not sufficiently reduce the laxative need, then 2) a transanal approach (with resection of rectosigmoid), but this led to a high rate of soiling due to extensive stretching of the anal canal and loss of the rectal reservoir. The understanding of these procedures' results has led us to use a laparoscopic sigmoid ± left colonic resection with a Malone appendicostomy for these patients, to decrease the laxative requirements, temporarily treat with antegrade flushes, and to reduce postoperative soiling. Methods A single-institution retrospective review (3/2014-9/2015) included patients who failed our laxative protocol, and therefore were considered surgical candidates. Patients with anorectal malformation (ARM), Hirschsprung disease, spina bifida, tethered cord, trisomy 21, cerebral palsy, mitochondrial disease, prior colon resection at other facilities, or those that did not participate in our laxative program were excluded. Demographics, duration of symptoms, prior treatments, postoperative complications, and postoperative bowel regimens were evaluated. Results A total of 6 patients (3 males; median age of 12.5 years) presented with soiling related to constipation and intolerance to laxatives. Four patients failed preoperative cecostomy (done prior to referral to us). An average of 4.7 medication treatments were previously tried. In all, 4 patients had required in-patient disimpactions. Duration of symptoms was 7.5 years (median). The median senna dose was 30 mg (range, 15-150 mg), and all patients had intolerable symptoms or failed to empty their colon, which we considered a failed laxative trial. All had contrast enemas that demonstrated a dilated and/or redundant sigmoid colon, and colonic manometry was abnormal in 4. All patients underwent laparoscopic sigmoid and left colon resection, or only sigmoid resection (a low anterior resection). Two patients had postoperative colitis treated with oral antibiotics. The median follow-up was 52 days (range, 8-304 days). Five patients are on antegrade enemas with plans to convert to laxatives at 6 months, 1 is taking laxatives alone at a 33% lower dosage. Five of six are completely clean, 1 soils occasionally and their daily flush is being adjusted. Conclusion Only a minority of patients with functional constipation are medically unmanageable. This preliminary report shows that laparoscopic colon resection combined with antegrade flushes is an effective surgical technique to treat that group. A laparoscopic approach, guided by contrast enema and colonic manometry, allows for a defined resection of the abnormal segment of colon with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery including allowing for an extensive rectal resection (an improvement over open sigmoid resection) and avoidance of overstretching of the anal canal and removal of the rectal reservoir (an improvement over the transanal approach). Having antegrade access is useful to manage soiling and avoiding cramping from laxatives in the early postoperative period. Although our series is small, we believe that long-term most patients can avoid antegrade flushes and be on no, or a dramatically reduced, laxative dose.

Does clinic visit education within a multidisciplinary center improve health literacy scores in caregivers of children with complex colorectal conditions?

INTRODUCTION: Health literacy is low in an estimated one-third of the US population. Little is known about the health literacy of caregivers of children with colorectal conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate whether a timed health literacy intervention could improve health literacy in this population. METHODS: We used the BRIEF Health Literacy screening (BHLS) tool on caregivers of children who came to our colorectal clinic. Health literacy was categorized as inadequate, marginal, or adequate. The number of caregivers with adequate health literacy was compared to the number of clinic visits and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: We included 233 caregivers. The average number of clinic visits was 3.5 over 1.2years. At the first clinic visit, 70% (n=98) of caregivers had "adequate" health literacy. Scores improved to 88% (p=0.024) after the fourth visit. Socioeconomic factors were not associated with health literacy. Patients of caregivers with "adequate" health literacy visited our clinic 3.8 times, compared to 2.7 times for those with lower literacy (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Emphasis on providing an education-based approach at each visit increased health literacy significantly. As expected, health literacy was lowest during the first visit, which we believe is the optimal time to implement educational interventions. TYPE OF STUDY: Case Control/Retrospective Comparative Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Use of a Heineke-Mikulicz like stricturoplasty for intractable skin level anal strictures following anoplasty in children with anorectal malformations.

INTRODUCTION: We introduced a modification of the Heineke-Mikulicz technique to treat intractable skin level anal strictures post posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). The aim of this article is to describe the technique and outcome in a series of patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of patients who had Heineke-Mikulicz like stricturoplasty performed for a post PSARP skin level stricture over a one-year period. RESULTS: Five patients who were operated using the technique were reviewed. All had severe anal strictures that could admit Hegar dilator sizes 6 to 9 at 16months to 5years after PSARP. All underwent routine dilatations, which became increasingly painful. As an alternative to continued dilatations, an operative procedure was offered. The surgery was done as a day case and lasted 10 to 30min. The anus at the end of the procedure could comfortably accept a Hegar dilator size 14 to 17. None of the patients had a colostomy after the procedure and there were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Heineke-Mikulicz like stricturoplasty is a simple surgical procedure that can be done in an ambulatory setting to treat children with intractable skin level anal stricture if this develops following definitive surgery for anorectal malformations.