RESUMO
Annual mammography remains the gold standard of asymptomatic breast cancer screening for women starting at the age of 40. However, Indonesia has not designated mammography as its national screening program. To help policymakers decide whether mammography should be introduced into a national program, it is important to comprehensively understand the knowledge and acceptance of both consumers and providers. A total of 25 subjects including a range of women and health care professionals (HCPs) in Yogyakarta Province were recruited using purposive, maximum variation sampling and then interviewed in-depth. The interviews were recorded and all data were taken and transcribed from the audio recording, which were subsequently translated to English and analyzed thematically. Almost all of Yogyakarta women had heard about the term of mammography. However, only few of them have let themselves be screened, mainly because of their perceived lack of urgency to screen for asymptomatic breast cancer. Another important reason was the high cost of mammography. Meanwhile, several HCPs believed that breast cancer has not been a priority for the government and hence the government limited mammography screening's access and excluded it from the national insurance coverage. Most women in Yogyakarta have a good understanding about breast cancer screening, but their acceptance of mammography as a breast cancer screening tool is significantly influenced by high cost, limited access, and lack of urgency.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Indonésia , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
ABSTRACTAlthough mammography is the gold standard for breast cancer screening, the World Health Organization recommends clinical breast examination (CBE) as the preferred early detection method in countries with limited resources. However, its effectiveness as a 'stand-alone' screening modality compared with other techniques remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated a risk-based opportunistic breast cancer screening programme using three modalities. Between June and December 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, of women aged >40 years with at least one risk factor for breast cancer. Subjects underwent CBE, mammography, and ultrasonography. We calculated the proportion of breast lesions detected through each modality and compared their mass size. A total of 503 eligible subjects were screened. Five cases of potential malignant lesions were detected; pathological tests conducted for 4 of them confirmed breast cancer diagnoses. A combined assessment of mammography and ultrasonography examinations revealed 343 breast lesions (68.2%), whereas CBE screening detected only 76 breast lesions (15.1%). The mean lesion sizes detected by mammography or ultrasonography, but not through CBE, were significantly smaller (p-values of 0.037 and 0.007 for mammography and ultrasonography, respectively). In conclusion, mammography and ultrasonography produced higher detection rates for benign and malignant breast lesions compared with CBE.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Indonésia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , MamografiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The lack of early detection in breast cancer management has been identified as the primary factor contributing to the high mortality rate. The introduction of BPJS Kesehatan, Indonesia's national health insurance, was intended to ensure the provision of adequate health services for breast cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the current state of health services in Indonesia concerning the early detection of breast cancer, following the implementation of BPJS Kesehatan introduction. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2017 in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Subjects were recruited using a purposive sampling technique with maximum variation. The sample comprised breast cancer patients, health care professionals (HCPs), and healthy women from the general population with no history of breast cancer. The subjects' experiences and knowledge of health services regarding the early detection of breast cancer were investigated through in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the results from interviews with 25 participants. RESULT: This study identified several issues that hinder the timely detection of breast cancer. The lack of both screening and diagnostic procedures emerged as a prominent obstacle in breast cancer management. The study identified the following barriers: (1) limited community knowledge about early detection; (2). lack of urgency among patients to seek medical treatment; (3) limited access to health facilities; and (4) inconsistent adherence among health care professionals to guidelines for both screening and diagnostic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed multiple factors contributing to the delay in breast cancer detection in Indonesia, leading to suboptimal management of the disease. It is crucial for the government to prioritize the improvement of enabling factors across all levels of care for early detection. These factors include initiatives to increase public awareness, improve access to health services, strengthen the referral system, and enhance health facilities.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , Feminino , Indonésia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , GovernoRESUMO
We report three cases of focally thickened ductal lesions found on screening ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration (FNA)-proven benign cytology in order to demonstrate the different fates of this radiographic finding. All three patients, aged 74, 69 and 68 years old, had their first time mammography and concurrent ultrasonography. Their mammograms did not show abnormalities except a focal asymmetry in one case. The sonographic focally thick ducts were the lesions of concern and all the patients had long-term follow-up.One patient had a slightly decreased lesion size on follow-up, likely to be a non-proliferative alteration of the breast. One patient's FNA revealed a benign papillary lesion whose ductal diameter slightly increased in size with internal echo after two years with repeat FNA demonstrating epithelial papillae consistent with intraductal papilloma. The final patient had an alteration of the imaged ductal lesion in the third year of follow-up and the final specimen after surgical wide excision that was done in the fourth year confirmed cancer. We emphasize the importance of focally thickened ductal lesions found on screening sonography and underscore their need for scrutinized characterization and long term follow-up.