Real-life pilot study on the impact of the telemedicine platform EasyMICI-MaMICI® on quality of life and quality of care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has shown promising results in the follow up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. This study compared quality of life and disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease monitored using a telemedicine platform versus standard care. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, patients with active inflammatory bowel disease were randomized to EasyMICI-MaMICI® telemedicine platform or standard care. The main objective was to assess the efficacy of the software platform, as measured by quality of life and quality of care. Secondary outcomes were changes in the use of healthcare resources, and patient satisfaction in the MaMICI group. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled (November 2017-June 2018); 59.3% had Crohn's disease and 40.7% ulcerative colitis. Forty-two patients received biologics at inclusion. After 12 months, a significant improvement in quality of life was observed with MaMICI versus standard care, with mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline of 14.8 (11.8) vs 6.3 (9.7) in the SIBDQ scores and 18.5 (18.7) vs 2.4 (8.3) in the EuroQol 5 D-3L questionnaire scores (both p ≤ .02). Disease activity was similar in both treatment groups. Use of MaMICI slightly reduced healthcare utilization versus controls (mean gastroenterologist consultations 2.2 vs 4.1; p = .1308). Overall satisfaction with MaMICI was high (mean score 7/10), and 46.2% of remaining patients in the MaMICI group continued to use the platform until 12 months. CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in quality of life and overall satisfaction with this telemedicine platform, indicates that further evaluation of EasyMICI-MaMICI in larger numbers of patients with inflammatory bowel disease is warranted.

Long-term impact of renal transplantation on liver fibrosis during hepatitis C virus infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: During hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, liver fibrosis progression after renal transplantation remains controversial. The aim of this cohort study with controls was to compare liver histopathologic features during HCV infection between renal transplant recipients and matched groups of hemodialyzed patients or controls without renal disease and untreated for HCV. METHODS: Each renal transplant recipient (group 1, n = 30) was matched at first liver biopsy (LB) using the main factors known to influence progression of fibrosis with one HCV hemodialyzed patient (group 2, n = 30) and one HCV-infected patient (nonhemodialyzed, nontransplanted; group 3, n = 30). Patients from group 1 were also matched with those of group 3 on the time between 2 consecutive LBs performed 37 months apart. LBs were evaluated according to the Knodell index, METAVIR score, and rate of fibrosis progression per year (fibrosis unit). RESULTS: The rate of fibrosis progression per year between the first and second LBs was significantly lower (P = 0.03) in group 1 (0.067; 95% confidence interval: -0.05, 0.18) than group 3 (0.20; 95% confidence interval: 0.13, 0.26). At the second LB, the Knodell index and activity or fibrosis in METAVIR were lower in group 1 than group 3 (4.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 7.5 +/- 0.6, 0.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.2, and 1.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.2 respectively, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that liver fibrosis progression is low in most HCV-infected renal transplant recipients with moderate liver disease at baseline.