Exertional Rhabdomyolysis in Athletes: Systematic Review and Current Perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: Exertional rhabdomyolysis results from a breakdown of skeletal muscle cells after intense exercise in otherwise healthy patients, causing increased levels of creatine kinase (CK) or myoglobin, as well as urine dipstick positive for blood, and may result in kidney insufficiency. The aim of this study was to outline the current perspectives of exertional rhabdomyolysis in athletes and subsequent treatment based on the current literature. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed and Google databases for ([exercise] OR [exertional]) AND rhabdomyolysis following the PRISMA guidelines. All abstracts were reviewed by 2 independent examiners. Inclusion criteria consisted of original articles presenting studies on exertional rhabdomyolysis or exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis with 7 or more cases. All case reports, case series, or editorials were excluded. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1541-abstracts were screened, leaving 25 studies for final inclusion and analysing 772patients. Especially, young male patients were affected at a mean age of 28.7 years (range 15.8-46.6 years). Most of the athletes performed running, including marathons in 54.3% of cases (n = 419/772), followed by weightlifting in 14.8% (n = 114/772). At the time of presentation, the mean creatine kinase was 31 481 IU/L (range 164-106,488 IU/L). Seventeen studies reported the highest level of CK, which was 38 552 IU/L (range 450-88,496 IU/L). For treatment, hydration was the most common method of choice reported by 8 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Exertional rhabdomyolysis seems to be underestimated, and it is essential to screen patients who present with muscle soreness/cramps and/or dark urine after heavy endurance events to avoid any further complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II; systematic review.

Increased Synovial Inflammatory Markers in Aseptic Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: In cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation, a synovial fluid aspiration is often performed to evaluate for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is currently unclear how aseptic dislocation of a THA influences synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%). The primary aim of this study is to investigate the influence of THA dislocation on synovial WBC count and PMN%. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who underwent a synovial aspiration of a THA between 2014 and 2019 were identified and enrolled in our case-control study. Patients with an aseptic THA dislocation and synovial hip aspiration were matched against patients without dislocation, patients undergoing hip aspiration before aseptic THA revision surgery, and patients undergoing hip aspiration before septic THA revision surgery. RESULTS: Synovial WBC count was significantly increased in the dislocation vs aseptic THA revision group (P = .015), as well as between the septic revision group vs dislocation and aseptic THA revision group (both P < .001). The PMN% did not differ significantly between the dislocation and aseptic revision groups (P = .294). Mean C-reactive protein values were 12.4 ± 14.9 mg/dL in THA dislocation, 24.1 ± 37.7 mg/dL in THA without infection compared to 85.7 ± 84.9 mg/dL in THA infection group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that THA dislocation has a significant impact on synovial WBC count in joint aspiration. Our data suggest that in the setting of THA dislocation, synovial WBC and PMN% may not be the best method to evaluate for PJI. Further research should be performed to establish new thresholds for these synovial inflammatory markers in the setting of THA dislocation and PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective trial.

Rapid Return to Braking After Anterior and Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of surgical approach on return to braking after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and few studies have investigated braking after THA with modern surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols. METHODS: In a prospective comparative design, we enrolled 65 patients who received right-sided primary THA at our institution from April 2018 through March 2020, 34 with a direct anterior approach (DAA) and 31 with a posterior approach (PA). Braking tests measuring brake reaction time (BRT) and brake pedal depression (BPD) were administered to patients preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperatively using a realistic driving simulator. BRT and BPD were compared between groups and preoperatively versus postoperatively using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Preoperative BRT averaged 638 msec in the DAA group and 604 msec in the PA group (P = 0.31). At 1 week postoperatively, the DAA group had significantly prolonged BRT compared with preoperatively (694 msec, P = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in the PA group (633 msec, P = 0.31). Both groups had returned to baseline by 2 weeks, and both had significantly faster BRT at 4 weeks compared with preoperatively (583 msec for DAA, P = 0.01; 537 msec for PA, P < 0.001). BPD was similar between groups, and there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative BPD at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: With modern surgical techniques, BRT after right-sided THA returns to baseline levels approximately 2 weeks after surgery. There seems to be a quicker return to preoperative BRT observed in patients with a PA.

What is the Case Volume of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons in the Military Health System? An Assessment of Wartime Readiness and Skills Sustainment.

INTRODUCTION: Complex, high-energy extremity trauma secondary to explosive mechanisms has been increasingly common in modern warfare, accounting for a majority of combat wounds throughout the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons treated many of these complex injuries; however, as the number of casualties continue to decrease during a period of relative peace, a growing concern over maintaining military trauma readiness exists. METHODS: The Military Health System Data Repository was queried for all Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes associated with 18 fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons from 2013 to 2019. The codes were further analyzed and categorized based on common trauma subspecialty procedures such as fracture fixation of the pelvic ring, acetabulum, upper and lower extremity, peri-articular, and nonunion/malunion surgery. We used descriptive statistics to quantify both the average number of cases per surgeon per year in each of the subcategories and case volume among Military Treatment Facilities (MTFs) during the study period. RESULTS: We identified 7,769 CPT codes for surgical procedures throughout the study period. The most common surgical procedures performed were: removal of implant (n = 836, 11%), knee arthroscopy (n = 507, 7%), and debridement of devitalized tissue (n = 345, 4%). The total trauma subspecialty procedural codes and average cases per surgeon per year were as follows: pelvic ring (n = 54, <1 case/year), acetabulum (n = 90, 1 case/year), upper extremity (n = 1,314, 15 cases/year), lower extremity (n = 2,286, 25 cases/year), peri-articular (n = 675, 8 cases/year), and nonunion/malunion (n = 288, 3 cases/year). San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC) accounted for the most fracture-related CPT codes overall (35%), while all other MTFs contributed approximately 10% or less of all fracture-related codes. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the lack of orthopaedic trauma volume at other MTFs outside of SAMMC, raising concern for maintaining military readiness during an inter-war period of relative peace. The DoD continues to make concerted efforts to maintain readiness through civilian partnerships and subsequently increase surgical case volume for military trauma surgeons. Future efforts should include an in-depth analysis of caseloads of military trauma surgeons providing care at both MTFs and civilian institutions to optimize preparedness in future conflicts.

Fix or Replace? Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Geriatric Lower Extremity Fractures: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Introduction: When considering treatment options for geriatric patients with lower extremity fractures, little is known about which outcomes are prioritized by patients. This study aimed to determine the patient preferences for outcomes after a geriatric lower extremity fracture. Materials and Methods: We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to 150 patients who were at least 60 years of age and treated for a lower extremity fracture at a Level I trauma center. The discrete choice experiment presented study participants with 8 sets of hypothetical outcome comparisons, including joint preservation (yes or no), risk of reoperation at 6 months and 24 months, postoperative weightbearing status, disposition, and function as measured by return to baseline walking distance. We estimated the relative importance of these potential outcomes using multinomial logit modeling. Results: The strongest patient preference was for maintained function after treatment (59%, P < .001), followed by reoperation within 6 months (12%, P < .001). Although patients generally favored joint preservation, patients were willing to change their preference in favor of joint replacement if it increased function (walking distance) by 13% (SE, 66%). Reducing the short-term reoperation risk (12%, P < .001) was more important to patients than reducing long-term reoperation risk (4%, P = .33). Disposition and weightbearing status were lesser priorities to patients (9%, P < .001 and 7%, P < .001, respectively). Discussion: After a lower extremity fracture, geriatric patients prioritized maintained walking function. Avoiding short-term reoperation was more important than avoiding long-term reoperation. Joint preservation through fracture fixation was the preferred treatment of geriatric patients unless arthroplasty or arthrodesis provides a meaningful functional benefit. Hospital disposition and postoperative weightbearing status were less important to patients than the other included outcomes. Conclusions: Geriatric patients strongly prioritize function over other outcomes after a lower extremity fracture.

Transtibial Amputation With Fibulectomy and Fibular Collateral Ligament-Biceps Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To describe our clinical experience and surgical technique of transtibial amputation with fibulectomy and fibular collateral ligament-biceps reconstruction for management of, particularly short, transtibial amputations with proximal fibula prominence, overt instability, or inadequate soft-tissue coverage. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level II trauma center. PATIENTS: Twelve consecutive patients who underwent transtibial amputation with fibulectomy and fibular collateral ligament-biceps reconstruction between 2008 and 2021. INTERVENTION: We reviewed patient medical records, radiographs, and clinical photographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications, instability, and pain. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent acute transtibial amputation with fibulectomy and reconstruction, whereas 4 patients underwent amputation revision with fibulectomy and reconstruction for chronic pain. All 12 patients were men, with a median age of 39 years (interquartile range, 33-46). All injuries were due to high-energy mechanisms, including improvised explosive device (n = 8), rocket-propelled grenade (n = 2), gunshot wound (n = 1), and motor vehicle accident (n = 1). After a median follow-up of 8.5 years (interquartile range, 3.4-9.3), there was one complication, a postoperative suture abscess. No patients had subjective lateral knee instability after the procedure, and the average pain scores decreased from 4.75 to 1.54 ( P = 0.01). All patients returned to regular prosthesis wear and maintained independent functioning with activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with fibulectomy and fibular collateral ligament-biceps reconstruction demonstrated no subjective or clinical postoperative instability and may be a useful adjunct for managing transtibial amputations with fibular instability or prominence, pain, or skin breakdown at the fibular head. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Peripheral Nerve Management in Extremity Amputations.

The effective management of peripheral nerves in amputation surgery is critical to optimizing patient outcomes. Nerve-related pain after amputation is common, maybe a source of dissatisfaction and functional impairment, and should be considered in all amputees presenting with pain and dysfunction. While traction neurectomy or transposition has long been the standard of care, both regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) have emerged as promising techniques to improve neuroma-related and phantom pain. A multi-disciplinary and multi-modal approach is essential for the optimal management of amputees both acutely and in the delayed or chronic setting.

Pure Superior Wall Acetabular Fracture: A Rare Posterior Wall Variant.

CASE: We present a case of a pure superior wall acetabular fracture in an US soldier, caused by a collapsing wall. Although Letournel and Judet classified this pattern as a rare variant of a posterior-superior wall acetabular fracture, it shares features of several patterns and the treatment more closely follows that of the anterior-based elementary patterns. CONCLUSION: The mechanism, incidence, and long-term outcomes of this fracture remain unknown, but improved recognition and proper classification may help to guide treatment. This case highlights 1 patient with this unique pattern and outlines its management and short- to mid-term outcome.

Internal Fixation Versus Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of elderly patients with nondisplaced and minimally displaced femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation versus arthroplasty. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and central databases was conducted through June 25, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if the sample population was (1) 60 years of age or older, (2) had nondisplaced or minimally displaced (Garden I or II) femoral neck fractures, and (3) if the study compared internal fixation versus arthroplasty. Only full-text English manuscripts were included. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included mortality, patient-reported outcomes, length of hospital stay, infection, and blood transfusions. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. Each study was independently evaluated for quality using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of the 1597 identified articles, 4 manuscripts met the eligibility criteria with a total of 579 patients (236 treated with hemiarthroplasty and 343 treated with internal fixation). Patients treated with arthroplasty had a significantly lower risk of reoperation when compared with those treated with internal fixation [relative risk: 0.30 (95% CI, 0.16-0.55, P < 0.01)]. There was no significant difference detected in 1-year mortality risk between the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with nondisplaced and minimally displaced femoral neck fractures, treatment with hemiarthroplasty may reduce the relative risk of reoperation by 70% when compared with internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is PROMIS the new standard for patient-reported outcomes measures in orthopaedic trauma research?

This review describes some of the benefits of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) architecture, determined how frequently PROMIS measures were used in the current orthopaedic trauma literature, and compared the features of PROMIS instruments with other frequently used patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). PROMIS instruments have several unique elements to their architecture, such as item response theory, computerized adaptive testing options, and scaling using T-scores, that differentiate the instruments from many other PROMs. Over the past five years, 108 different PROMs were reported in 319 studies published in high-impact orthopaedic journals. PROMIS measures, including PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Upper Extremity Function, were only used in seven studies (2%). PROMIS measures were found to be comparable to other more common PROMs with respect to respondent burden, administration options, and psychometric assessments specific to fracture patients. Likely, the limited familiarity and interpretability of PROMIS measures in the fracture population remain the most substantial barriers to broader adoption in orthopaedic trauma research.

Orthopaedic osseointegration: Implantology and future directions.

Osseointegration (OI) is the direct anchorage of a metal implant into bone, allowing for the connection of an external prosthesis to the skeleton. Osseointegration was first discovered in the 1960s based on the microscopic analysis of titanium implant placed into host bone. New bone was observed to attach directly to the metal surface. Following clinical investigations into dentistry applications, OI was adapted to treat extremity amputations. These bone anchored implants, which penetrate the skin and soft tissues, eliminate many of the challenges of conventional prosthetic sockets, such as poor fit and suspension, skin breakdown, and pain. Osseointegrated implants show promise to improve prosthesis use, pain, and function for amputees. The successful process of transcutaneous metal integration into host bone requires three synergistic systems: the host bone, the metal implant, and the skin-implant interface. All three systems must be optimized for successful incorporation and longevity of the implant. Osseointegration begins during surgical implantation of the metal components through a complex interplay of cellular mechanisms. While implants can vary in design-including the original screw, press fit implants, and compressive osseointegration-they face common challenges to successful integration and maintenance of fixation within the host bone. Overcoming these challenges requires the understanding of the complex interactions between each element of OI. This review outlines (a) the basic components of OI, (b) the science behind both the bone-implant and the skin-implant interfaces, (c) the current challenges of OI, and (d) future opportunities within the field.

Multiligamentous Knee Injuries in the Military Tactical Athlete.

Multiligament knee injuries pose a significant challenge to military service members looking to return to active duty service. They represent a diverse injury pattern and recovery is often complicated by other ipsilateral extremity trauma and systemic injuries. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence guiding the treatment of these injuries. Despite this, orthopedic surgeons are tasked with a young, active, high demand population looking to maximize their recovery after these complex injuries. We present a synthesis of the available civilian and military literature and provide an evidence-based review with considerations specific to a military population.

Low Revision Rates at 10 years for Metal on Metal Hip Implants in a Military Population.

INTRODUCTION: Prior to being largely abandoned due to unacceptably high failure rates and the adverse physiologic reactions to metal ions, metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing (HR) were in widespread use throughout the USA, and the potential benefit of decreased volumetric wear rates made it of particular interest to those who serve a young active population, such as military surgeons. The aim of our study was to determine the revision rate of metal on metal hip implants performed at our military institution and obtain current patient reported outcomes from this cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent MoM total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hip resurfacing (HR) at our institution from 2006 to 2012. Revision status and component type were determined, and patients were contacted to obtain current HOOS JR scores. RESULTS: We identified 103 THAs in 88 patients and 38 HRs in 33 patients, with mean follow up of 10.2 years. Average age at time of surgery was 48 years, and 85% of the patients were male. The mean HOOS JR score in the THA and HR groups were 84.9 ± 17.6 and 75.8 ± 24.9, respectively (p = 0.38), and were not significantly lower in those who were revised. Two THA revisions occurred for metallosis and one for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. One HR revision occurred for breach of the anterior femoral neck, and one occurred for heterotopicossification. CONCLUSIONS: Revision rates of MoM THA and HR in this young, predominantly male population were 2.9% and 5.3%, respectively, and patients maintained generally good hip-specific outcomes.