Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis remains a widely used treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction; however, it carries a higher risk of reinfarction than primary PCI (PPCI). There are few data comparing PPCI with thrombolysis followed by routine angiography and PCI. The purpose of the present study was to assess contemporary outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients, with specific emphasis on comparing a pharmacoinvasive strategy (thrombolysis followed by routine angiography) with PPCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This nationwide registry in France included 223 centers and 1714 patients over a 1-month period at the end of 2005, with 1-year follow-up. Sixty percent of the patients underwent reperfusion therapy, 33% with PPCI and 29% with intravenous thrombolysis (18% prehospital). At baseline, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score was similar in thrombolysis and PPCI patients. Time to initiation of reperfusion therapy was significantly shorter in thrombolysis than in PPCI (median 130 versus 300 minutes). After thrombolysis, 96% of patients had coronary angiography, and 84% had subsequent PCI (58% within 24 hours). In-hospital mortality was 4.3% for thrombolysis and 5.0% for PPCI. In patients with thrombolysis, 30-day mortality was 9.2% when PCI was not used and 3.9% when PCI was subsequently performed (4.0% if PCI was performed in the same hospital and 3.3% if performed after transfer to another facility). One-year survival was 94% for thrombolysis and 92% for PPCI (P=0.31). After propensity score matching, 1-year survival was 94% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When used early after the onset of symptoms, a pharmacoinvasive strategy that combines thrombolysis with a liberal use of PCI yields early and 1-year survival rates that are comparable to those of PPCI.

Editor's Choice-Medically managed patients with non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction have heterogeneous outcomes, based on performance of angiography and extent of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Medically managed individuals represent a high-risk group among patients with non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTE-AMI). We hypothesized that prognosis in this group is heterogeneous, depending on whether medical management was decided with or without coronary angiography (CAG). METHODS: Using data from the French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI), we analysed data from 798 patients with NSTE-AMI who were medically managed (i.e. without revascularization during the index hospitalization). Patients were categorized according to the performance of CAG and, if performed, to the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS: There were marked differences in baseline demographics, according to whether CAG was performed and to the extent of CAD. While the overall mortality rate at five years was high (56.2%), it differed greatly between groups, with patients who did not undergo CAG having a higher mortality rate (77.4%) than patients who underwent CAG (36.7%, p<0.001), and a higher mortality rate even than patients with multivessel CAD (54.2%, p<0.001). By multivariable analysis, non-performance of CAG was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality among medically managed NSTE-AMI patients (adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) 3.19 (1.79-5.67) at 30 days, 2.28 (1.60-3.26) at one year, and 1.63 (1.28-2.07) at five years; all p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Medically managed patients with NSTE-AMI are a heterogeneous group in terms of baseline characteristics and outcomes. The highest risk patients are those who do not undergo CAG. Non-performance of CAG is a strong predictor of death. (FAST-MI, NCT00673036).

Impact of age-adjusted insulin-like growth factor 1 on major cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction: results from the fast-MI registry.

BACKGROUND: The GH/IGF-1 axis is being targeted for therapeutic development in diseases such as short stature, cancer, and metabolic disorders. The impact of IGF-1 in cardiovascular disease remains controversial. We therefore studied whether IGF-1 at admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) predicted death, recurrent AMI, and stroke over a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Using data from the French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction registry, we measured IGF-1 among all the 1005 patients with AMI who participated in the serum data bank. Because IGF-1 decreases with age, a standardized IGF-1 score was calculated as previously described [IGF-1 score = (log [IGF-1 (micrograms per liter)] + 0.00625 × age - 2.555)/0.104]. Impact of IGF-1 score (continuous and quartiles) on outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: During follow-up, 190 patients died or had a recurrent AMI or stroke. Patients in the lowest quartile of IGF-1 were older and more frequently female and diabetic compared with patients in the other quartiles. After adjustment for known cardiovascular factors, an increase of five units of IGF-1 score was associated with a 30% decrease of the risk of events during follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.92; P = .0093). Similarly, the lowest quartile of IGF-1 was associated with an increased risk of events (adjusted hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.08; compared with others quartiles, P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: Low IGF-1 score is associated with an increased risk of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and stroke in AMI patients. Whether patients treated by IGF-1 axis inhibitors have a specific clinical course after AMI would be worth studying.